Continuation of fluoropyrimidine treatment with S-1 after cardiotoxicity on capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil-based therapy in patients with solid tumours: a multicentre retrospective observational cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine- or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy is widely used in many solid tumours, but is associated with cardiotoxicity. S-1 is a fluoropyrimidine with low rates of cardiotoxicity, but evidence regarding the safety of switching to S-1 after 5-FU- or capecitabine-associated cardiotoxicity is scarce. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective study (NCT04260269) was conducted at 13 centres in 6 countries. The primary endpoint was recurrence of cardiotoxicity after switch to S-1-based treatment due to 5-FU- or capecitabine-related cardiotoxicity: clinically meaningful if the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval (CI; by competing risk) is not including 15%. Secondary endpoints included cardiac risk factors, diagnostic work-up, treatments, outcomes, and timelines of cardiotoxicity. RESULTS: Per protocol, 200 patients, treated between 2011 and 2020 [median age 66 years (range 19-86); 118 (59%) males], were included. Treatment intent was curative in 145 (73%). Initial cardiotoxicity was due to capecitabine (n = 170), continuous infusion 5-FU (n = 22), or bolus 5-FU (n = 8), which was administered in combination with other chemotherapy, targeted agents, or radiotherapy in 133 patients. Previous cardiovascular comorbidities were present in 99 (50%) patients. Cardiotoxic events (n = 228/200) included chest pain (n = 125), coronary syndrome/infarction (n = 69), arrhythmia (n = 22), heart failure/cardiomyopathy (n = 7), cardiac arrest (n = 4), and malignant hypertension (n = 1). Cardiotoxicity was severe or life-threatening in 112 (56%) patients and led to permanent capecitabine/5-FU discontinuation in 192 (96%). After switch to S-1, recurrent cardiotoxicity was observed in eight (4%) patients (95% CI 2.02-7.89, primary endpoint met). Events were limited to grade 1-2 and occurred at a median of 16 days (interquartile range 7-67) from therapy switch. Baseline ischemic heart disease was a risk factor for recurrent cardiotoxicity (odds ratio 6.18, 95% CI 1.36-28.11). CONCLUSION: Switching to S-1-based therapy is safe and feasible after development of cardiotoxicity on 5-FU- or capecitabine-based therapy and allows patients to continue their pivotal fluoropyrimidine-based treatment.

Cell kinetic changes in human squamous cell carcinomas during radiotherapy studied using the in vivo administration of two halogenated pyrimidines.

The aim of this study was to investigate cell cycle changes during radiation treatment and establish whether treatment intervention could be considered if these changes helped to predict outcome. 33 patients with head and neck cancer were administered iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) prior to treatment and a second administration of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) prior to the fifth fraction of 2 Gy. Biopsies were taken several hours after each injection and flow cytometry was used to calculate changes in the cellular kinetics and cell cycle delay in vivo. The kinetic response of the tumour cells was variable; some showed an increase in proliferation during the first week of treatment, whilst the majority showed an inhibition of proliferation. Reduction in the labelling index (LI) and the pretreatment DNA ploidy status and not delays in G2 were the only parameters to correlate with clinical outcome. A lack of reduction in the LI after 1 week of radiotherapy and DNA aneuploidy predicted a group of patients where radiotherapy failed. This information could be helpful in planning future treatment interventions.

Predictive value of potential doubling time in head and neck cancer patients treated by conventional radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to investigate the clinical utility of pretreatment measurements of tumor cell kinetics to predict the outcome of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck receiving conventional radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All patients received between 64 and 70 Gy as 2 Gy fractions, five fractions per week. Cell kinetics were assayed rapidly and quantitatively using flow cytometric evaluation of iododeoxyuridine (IdUrd) incorporation, in vivo, from a biopsy removed several hours after the administration of the DNA precursor to the patient prior to the start of treatment. RESULTS: The measured proliferation parameters were not related to the clinicopathological features of the tumors, emphasizing the independent nature of these parameters. In univariate analysis, nodal involvement was the most important clinical feature of the tumors related to local control followed by Tpot, DNA aneuploidy, and attainment of complete regression at 6 weeks. Of these only Tpot and nodal status maintained significance in multivariate analysis, with respect to loco-regional control. In subgroup analysis, Tpot was able to stratify patients into high or low rate of loco-regional control in node negative patients, in aneuploid tumors and in patients who did achieve complete regression at 6 weeks. For cause specific survival, N-stage was the only parameter that significantly discriminated the prognosis in these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The conclusion of this study is that Tpot provides clinically important information that can predict patients with a low probability of achieving long-term local control with conventional fractionation. Further improvements to the methodology to address the shortcomings of analyzing diploid tumors may increase the predictive power of the measurement.