Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 23(9): e13716, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35856482

RESUMEN

Unscheduled interruptions to radiotherapy treatments lead to decreased tumor control probability (TCP). Rapid cell repopulation in the tumor increases due to the absence of radiation dose, resulting in the loss of TCP. Compensation for this loss is required to prevent or reduce an extension of the patient's overall treatment time and regain the original TCP. The cyberattack on the Irish public health service in May 2021 prevented radiotherapy treatment delivery resulting in treatment interruptions of up to 12 days. Current standards for treatment gap calculations are performed using the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) methodology, using a point-dose for planning target volume (PTV) and the organs at risk (OAR). An in-house tool, named EQD2 VH, was created in Python to perform treatment gap calculations using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) information in DICOM data extracted from commercial treatment planning system plans. The physical dose in each dose bin was converted into equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD2 ), accounting for tumor cell repopulation. This EQD2 -based DVH provides a 2D representation of the impact of treatment gap compensation strategies on both PTV and OAR dose distributions compared to the intended prescribed treatment plan. This additional information can aid clinicians' choice of compensation options. EQD2 VH was evaluated using five high-priority patients experiencing a treatment interruption when the cyberattack occurred. Compensation plans were created using the RCR methodology to evaluate EQD2 VH as a decision-making tool. The EQD2 VH method demonstrated that the comparison of compensated treatment plans alongside the original intended treatment plans using isoeffective DVH analysis can be achieved. It enabled a visual and quantitative comparison between treatment plan options and provided an individual analysis of each structure in a patient's plan. It demonstrated potential to be a useful decision-making tool for finding a balance between optimizing dose to PTV while protecting OARs.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Humanos , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Órganos en Riesgo , Probabilidad , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
2.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(10): 142-151, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31605464

RESUMEN

Current practice when delivering dose for superficial skin radiotherapy is to adjust the monitor units so that the prescribed dose is delivered to the central axis of the superficial unit applicator. Variations of source-to-surface distance due to patient's anatomy protruding into the applicator or extending away from the applicator require adjustments to the monitor units using the inverse square law. Off-axis dose distribution varies significantly from the central axis dose and is not currently being quantified. The dose falloff at the periphery of the field is not symmetrical in the anode-cathode axis due to the heel effect. This study was conducted to quantify the variation of dose across the surface being treated and model a simple geometric shape to estimate a patient's surface with stand-in and stand-off. Isodose plots and color-coded dose distribution maps were produced from scans of GAFChromic EBT-3 film irradiated by a Gulmay D3300 orthovoltage x-ray therapy system. It was clear that larger applicators show a greater dose falloff toward the periphery than smaller applicators. Larger applicators were found to have a lower percentage of points above 90% of central axis dose (SA90). Current clinical practice does not take this field variation into account. Stand-in can result in significant dose falloff off-axis depending on the depth and width of the protrusion, while stand-off can result in a flatter field due to the high-dose region near the central axis being further from the source than the peripheral regions. The central axis also received a 7% increased or decreased dose for stand-in or stand-off, respectively.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/instrumentación , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/normas , Neoplasias Cutáneas/radioterapia , Braquiterapia/normas , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos
3.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 15(3): 4681, 2014 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24892340

RESUMEN

IMRT QA requires, among other tests, a time-consuming process of measuring the absorbed dose, at least to a point, in a high-dose, low-dose-gradient region. Some clinics use a technique of measuring this dose with all beams delivered at a single gantry angle (collapsed delivery), as opposed to the beams delivered at the planned gantry angle (rotated delivery). We examined, established, and optimized Monte Carlo simulations of the dosimetry for IMRT verification of treatment plans for these two different delivery modes (collapsed versus rotated). The results of the simulations were compared to the treatment planning system dose calculations for the two delivery modes, as well as to measurements taken. This was done in order to investigate the validity of the use of a collapsed delivery technique for IMRT QA. The BEAMnrc, DOSXYZnrc, and egs_chamber codes were utilized for the Monte Carlo simulations along with the MMCTP system. A number of different plan complexity metrics were also used in the analysis of the dose distributions in a bid to qualify why verification in a collapsed delivery may or may not be optimal for IMRT QA. Following the Alfonso et al. formalism, the kfclin,frefQclin,Q correction factor was calculated to correct the deviation of small fields from the reference conditions used for beam calibration. We report on the results obtained for a cohort of 20 patients. The plan complexity was investigated for each plan using the complexity metrics of homogeneity index, conformity index, modulation complexity score, and the fraction of beams from a particular plan that intersect the chamber when performing the QA. Rotated QA gives more consistent results than the collapsed QA technique. The kfclin,frefQclin,Qfactor deviates less from 1 for rotated QA than for collapsed QA. If the homogeneity index is less than 0.05 then the kfclin,frefQclin,Q factor does not deviate from unity by more than 1%. A value this low for the homogeneity index can only be obtained with the rotated QA technique.


Asunto(s)
Modelos Biológicos , Modelos Estadísticos , Método de Montecarlo , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Rotación , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
4.
Med Phys ; 51(2): 1421-1432, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38207016

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recent rediscovery of the FLASH effect, a normal tissue sparing phenomenon observed in ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiations, has instigated a surge of research endeavors aiming to close the gap between experimental observation and clinical treatment. However, the dependences of the FLASH effect and its underpinning mechanisms on beam parameters are not well known, and large-scale in vivo studies using murine models of human cancer are needed for these investigations. PURPOSE: To commission a high-throughput, variable dose rate platform providing uniform electron fields (≥15 cm diameter) at conventional (CONV) and UHDRs for in vivo investigations of the FLASH effect and its dependences on pulsed electron beam parameters. METHODS: A murine whole-thoracic lung irradiation (WTLI) platform was constructed using a 1.3 cm thick Cerrobend collimator forming a 15 × 1.6 cm2 slit. Control of dose and dose rate were realized by adjusting the number of monitor units and couch vertical position, respectively. Achievable doses and dose rates were investigated using Gafchromic EBT-XD film at 1 cm depth in solid water and lung-density phantoms. Percent depth dose (PDD) and dose profiles at CONV and various UHDRs were also measured at depths from 0 to 2 cm. A radiation survey was performed to assess radioactivation of the Cerrobend collimator by the UHDR electron beam in comparison to a precision-machined copper alternative. RESULTS: This platform allows for the simultaneous thoracic irradiation of at least three mice. A linear relationship between dose and number of monitor units at a given UHDR was established to guide the selection of dose, and an inverse-square relationship between dose rate and source distance was established to guide the selection of dose rate between 20 and 120 Gy·s-1 . At depths of 0.5 to 1.5 cm, the depth range relevant to murine lung irradiation, measured PDDs varied within ±1.5%. Similar lateral dose profiles were observed at CONV and UHDRs with the dose penumbrae widening from 0.3 mm at 0 cm depth to 5.1 mm at 2.0 cm. The presence of lung-density plastic slabs had minimal effect on dose distributions as compared to measurements made with only solid water slabs. Instantaneous dose rate measurements of the activated copper collimator were up to two orders of magnitude higher than that of the Cerrobend collimator. CONCLUSIONS: A high-throughput, variable dose rate platform has been developed and commissioned for murine WTLI electron FLASH radiotherapy. The wide field of our UHDR-enabled linac allows for the simultaneous WTLI of at least three mice, and for the average dose rate to be modified by changing the source distance, without affecting dose distribution. The platform exhibits uniform, and comparable dose distributions at CONV and UHDRs up to 120 Gy·s-1 , owing to matched and flattened 16 MeV CONV and UHDR electron beams. Considering radioactivation and exposure to staff, Cerrobend collimators are recommended above copper alternatives for electron FLASH research. This platform enables high-throughput animal irradiation, which is preferred for experiments using a large number of animals, which are required to effectively determine UHDR treatment efficacies.


Asunto(s)
Cobre , Electrones , Humanos , Animales , Ratones , Aceleradores de Partículas , Pulmón , Agua , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Radiometría
5.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 14(2): 3692, 2013 Mar 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23470925

RESUMEN

This paper presents an alternative method to tune Monte Carlo electron beam parameters to match measured data using a minimal set of variables in order to reduce the model setup time prior to clinical implementation of the model. Monte Carlo calculations provide the possibility of a powerful treatment planning verification technique. The nonstandardized and nonautomated process of tuning the required accelerator model is one of the reasons for delays in the clinical implementation of Monte Carlo techniques. This work aims to establish and verify an alternative tuning method that can be carried out in a minimal amount of time, allowing it to be easily implemented in a clinical setting by personnel with minimal experience with Monte Carlo methods. This tuned model can then be incorporated into the MMCTP system to allow the system to be used as a second dose calculation check for IMRT plans. The technique proposed was used to establish the primary electron beam parameters for accelerator models for the Varian Clinac 2100 6 MV photon beam using the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo system. The method is intended to provide a clear, direct, and efficient process for tuning an accelerator model using readily available clinical quality assurance data. The tuning provides a refined model, which agrees with measured dose profile curves within 1.5% outside the penumbra or 3 mm in the penumbra, for square fields with sides of 3 cm up to 30 cm. These models can then be employed as the basis for Monte Carlo recalculations of dose distributions, using the MMCTP system, for clinical treatment plans, providing an invaluable assessment tool. This was tested on six IMRT plans and compared to the measurements performed for the pretreatment QA process. These Monte Carlo values for the average dose to the chamber volume agreed with measurements to within 0.6%.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Aceleradores de Partículas , Radiometría/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Conformacional/instrumentación , Radioterapia Conformacional/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Método de Montecarlo , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
Stem Cells ; 29(7): 1149-57, 2011 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21608083

RESUMEN

Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs) migrate specifically to tumors in vivo, and coupled with their capacity to bypass immune surveillance, are attractive vehicles for tumor-targeted delivery of therapeutic agents. This study aimed to introduce MSC-mediated expression of the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) for imaging and therapy of breast cancer. Tumor bearing animals received an intravenous or intratumoral injection of NIS expressing MSCs (MSC-NIS), followed by (99m) Technetium pertechnetate imaging 3-14 days later using a BazookaSPECT γ-camera. Tissue was harvested for analysis of human NIS (hNIS) expression by relative quantitative-polymerase chain reaction. Therapy animals received an i.p. injection of (131) I or saline 14 days after injection of MSC-NIS, and tumor volume was monitored for 8 weeks. After injection of MSC-NIS, BazookaSPECT imaging revealed an image of animal intestines and chest area at day 3, along with a visible weak tumor image. By day 14, the tumor was visible with a significant reduction in radionuclide accumulation in nontarget tissue observed. hNIS gene expression was detected in the intestines, heart, lungs, and tumors at early time points but later depleted in nontarget tissues and persisted at the tumor site. Based on imaging/biodistribution data, animals received a therapeutic dose of (131) I 14 days after MSC-NIS injection. This resulted in a significant reduction in tumor growth (mean ± SEM, 236 ± 62 mm(3) vs. 665 ± 204 mm(3) in controls). The ability to track MSC migration and transgene expression noninvasively in real time before therapy is a major advantage to this strategy. This promising data supports the feasibility of this approach as a novel therapy for breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Terapia Genética/métodos , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/fisiología , Simportadores/biosíntesis , Animales , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/genética , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Proteínas Fluorescentes Verdes/biosíntesis , Proteínas Fluorescentes Verdes/genética , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/farmacocinética , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/metabolismo , Células Madre Mesenquimatosas/patología , Ratones , Ratones Desnudos , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Cintigrafía , Simportadores/genética , Distribución Tisular , Transfección
7.
Med Phys ; 38(6): 3260-9, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21815400

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Monte Carlo (MC) simulation can be used for accurate electron beam treatment planning and modeling. Measurement of large electron fields, with the applicator removed and secondary collimator wide open, has been shown to provide accurate simulation parameters, including asymmetry in the measured dose, for the full range of clinical field sizes and patient positions. Recently, disassembly of the treatment head of a linear accelerator has been used to refine the simulation of the electron beam, setting tightly measured constraints on source and geometry parameters used in simulation. The simulation did not explicitly include the known deflection of the electron beam by a fringe magnetic field from the bending magnet, which extended into the treatment head. Instead, the secondary scattering foil and monitor chamber were unrealistically laterally offset to account for the beam deflection. This work is focused on accounting for this fringe magnetic field in treatment head simulation. METHODS: The magnetic field below the exit window of a Siemens Oncor linear accelerator was measured with a Tesla-meter from 0 to 12 cm from the exit window and 1-3 cm off-axis. Treatment head simulation was performed with the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc code, modified to incorporate the effect of the magnetic field on charged particle transport. Simulations were used to analyze the sensitivity of dose profiles to various sources of asymmetry in the treatment head. This included the lateral spot offset and beam angle at the exit window, the fringe magnetic field and independent lateral offsets of the secondary scattering foil and electron monitor chamber. Simulation parameters were selected within the limits imposed by measurement uncertainties. Calculated dose distributions were then compared with those measured in water. RESULTS: The magnetic field was a maximum at the exit window, increasing from 0.006 T at 6 MeV to 0.020 T at 21 MeV and dropping to approximately 5% of the maximum at the secondary scattering foil. It was up to three times higher in the bending plane, away from the electron gun, and symmetric within measurement uncertainty in the transverse plane. Simulations showed the magnetic field resulted in an offset of the electron beam of 0.80 cm (mean) at the machine isocenter for the exit window only configuration. The fringe field resulted in a 3.5%-7.6% symmetry and 0.25-0.35 cm offset of the clinical beam R(max) profiles. With the magnetic field included in simulations, a single (realistic) position of the secondary scattering foil and monitor chamber was selected. Measured and simulated dose profiles showed agreement to an average of 2.5%/0.16 cm (maximum: 3%/0.2 cm), which is a better match than previously achieved without incorporating the magnetic field in the simulation. The undulations from the 3 stepped layers of the secondary scattering foil, evident in the measured profiles of the higher energy beams, are now aligned with those in the simulated beam. The simulated fringe magnetic field had negligible effect on the central axis depth dose curves and cross-plane dose profiles. CONCLUSIONS: The fringe magnetic field is a significant contributor to the electron beam in-plane asymmetry. With the magnetic field included explicitly in the simulation, realistic monitor chamber and secondary scattering foil positions have been achieved, and the calculated fluence and dose distributions are more accurate.


Asunto(s)
Aceleración , Cabeza , Magnetismo , Método de Montecarlo , Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/instrumentación , Humanos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica
8.
Brachytherapy ; 20(2): 410-419, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33234407

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans created using three retrospectively applied planning techniques with plans delivered to patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Treatment plans were created retrospectively on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) scans for 26 patients. The technique dubbed 4D Brachytherapy was applied, using TRUS and MRI to obtain prostatic measurements required for the associated webBXT online nomogram. Using a patient's MRI scan to create a treatment plan involving loose seeds was also explored. Plans delivered to patients were made using an intraoperative loose seed TRUS-based planning technique. Prostate V100 (%), prostate V150 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), urethra D30 (%), and prostate volumes were measured for each patient. Statistical analysis was used to assess and compare plans. RESULTS: Prostate volumes measured by TRUS and MRI were significantly different. Prostate volumes calculated by the webBXT online nomogram using TRUS- and MRI-based measurements were not significantly different. Compared with delivered plans, TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy) values, MRI-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed significantly higher prostate V100 (%) values and significantly lower rectum D0.1cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values, and loose seed MRI-based plans showed significantly lower prostate V100 (%), prostate D90 (Gy), rectum D0.1cc (Gy), rectum D2cc (Gy), urethra D10 (%), and urethra D30 (%) values. CONCLUSIONS: TRUS-based 4D Brachytherapy plans showed similar dosimetry to delivered plans; rectal dosimetry was superior. MRI can be integrated into the 4D Brachytherapy workflow. The webBXT online nomogram overestimates the required number of seeds.


Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Braquiterapia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Técnicas de Planificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Recto/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Uretra
9.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 9(4): 57-67, 2008 Oct 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19020487

RESUMEN

Electron-beam therapy is used to treat superficial tumors at a standard 100 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). However, certain clinical situations require the use of an extended SSD. In the present study, Monte Carlo methods were used to investigate clinical electron beams, at standard and non-standard SSDs, from a Siemens Oncor Avant Garde (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) linear accelerator (LINAC). The LINAC treatment head was modeled in BEAMnrc for electron fields 5 cm in diameter and 10 x 10 cm, 15 x 15 cm, and 20 x 20 cm; for 6 MeV, 9 MeV, and 12 MeV; and for 100 cm, 110 cm, and 120 cm SSD. The DOSXYZnrc code was used to calculate extended SSD factors and dose contributions from various parts of the treatment head. The main effects of extended SSD on water phantom dose distributions were verified by Monte Carlo methods. Monte Carlo-calculated and measured extended SSD factors showed an average difference of +/-1.8%. For the field 5 cm in diameter, the relative output at extended SSD declined more rapidly than it did for the larger fields. An investigation of output contributions showed this decline was mainly a result of a rapid loss of scatter dose reaching the d max point from the lower scrapers of the electron applicator. The field 5 cm in diameter showed a reduction in dose contributions; the larger fields generally showed an increased contribution from the scrapers with increase in SSD. Angular distributions of applicator-scattered electrons have shown a large number of acute-angle electron tracks contributing to the output for larger field sizes, explaining the shallow output reduction.


Asunto(s)
Electrones , Aceleradores de Partículas/instrumentación , Radioterapia/instrumentación , Algoritmos , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Método de Montecarlo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Fotones , Radioterapia/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia de Alta Energía , Dispersión de Radiación
10.
Med Phys ; 44(10): 5020-5033, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28688115

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate changes in surface dose due to the presence of the Clarity Autoscan™ ultrasound (US) probe during prostate radiotherapy using Monte Carlo (MC) methods. METHODS: MC models of the Autoscan US probe were developed using the BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc code based on kV and MV CT images. CT datasets were converted to voxelized mass density phantoms using a CT number-to-mass density calibration. The dosimetric effect of the probe, in the contact region (an 8 mm × 12 mm single layer of voxels), was investigated using a phantom set-up mimicking two scenarios (a) a transperineal imaging configuration (radiation beam perpendicular to the central US axial direction), and (b) a transabdominal imaging configuration (radiation beam parallel to the central US axial direction). For scenario (a), the dosimetric effect was evaluated as a function of the probe to inferior radiation field edge distance. Clinically applicable distances from 5 mm separation to 2 mm overlap were determined from the radiotherapy plans of 27 patients receiving Clarity imaging. Overlaps of 3 to 14 (1 to 3 SD) mm were also considered to include the effect of interfraction motion correction. The influence of voxel size on surface dose estimation was investigated. Approved clinical plans from two prostate patients were used to simulate worst-case dosimetric impact of the probe when large couch translations were applied to correct for interfraction prostate motion. RESULTS: The dosimetric impact of both the MV and kV probe models agreed within ±2% for both beam configurations. For scenario (a) and 1 mm voxel model, the probe gave mean dose increases of 1.2% to 4.6% (of the dose at isocenter) for 5 mm separation to 0 mm overlap in the probe-phantom contact region, respectively. This increased to 27.5% for the largest interfraction motion correction considered (14 mm overlap). For separations of ≥ 2 mm dose differences were < 2%. Simulated dose perturbations were found to be superficial; for the 14 mm overlap the dose increase reduced to < 3% at 5.0 mm within the phantom. For scenario (b), dose increases due to the probe were < 5% in all cases. The dose increase was underestimated by up to ~13% when the voxel size was increased from 1 mm to 3 mm. MC simulated dose to the PTV and OARs for the two clinical plans considered showed good agreement with commercial treatment planning system results (within 2%). Mean dose increases due to the presence of the probe, after the maximum interfraction motion correction, were ~16.3% and ~8.0%, in the contact region, for plan 1 and plan 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the probe results in superficial dose perturbations for patients with an overlap between the probe and the radiation field present in either the original treatment plan or due to translation of the radiation field to simulate correction of interfraction internal prostate motion.


Asunto(s)
Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Método de Montecarlo , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Transductores , Ultrasonografía/instrumentación , Humanos , Masculino , Movimiento , Fantasmas de Imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
11.
Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng ; 88532013 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26346410

RESUMEN

This work outlines the development of a multi-pinhole SPECT system designed to produce a synthetic-collimator image of a small field of view. The focused multi-pinhole collimator was constructed using rapid-prototyping and casting techniques. The collimator projects the field of view through forty-six pinholes when the detector is adjacent to the collimator. The detector is then moved further from the collimator to increase the magnification of the system. The amount of pinhole-projection overlap increases with the system magnification. There is no rotation in the system; a single tomographic angle is used in each system configuration. The maximum-likelihood expectation-maximization (MLEM) algorithm is implemented on graphics processing units to reconstruct the object in the field of view. Iterative reconstruction algorithms, such as MLEM, require an accurate model of the system response. For each system magnification, a sparsely-sampled system response is measured by translating a point source through a grid encompassing the field of view. The pinhole projections are individually identified and associated with their respective apertures. A 2D elliptical Gaussian model is applied to the pinhole projections on the detector. These coefficients are associated with the object-space location of the point source, and a finely-sampled system matrix is interpolated. Simulations with a hot-rod phantom demonstrate the efficacy of combining low-resolution non-multiplexed data with high-resolution multiplexed data to produce high-resolution reconstructions.

12.
Phys Med Biol ; 56(23): 7621-38, 2011 Dec 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22086242

RESUMEN

An extendable x-ray multi-leaf collimator (eMLC) is investigated for collimation of electron beams on a linear accelerator. The conventional method of collimation using an electron applicator is impractical for conformal, modulated and mixed beam therapy techniques. An eMLC would allow faster, more complex treatments with potential for reduction in dose to organs-at-risk and critical structures. The add-on eMLC was modelled using the EGSnrc Monte Carlo code and validated against dose measurements at 6-21 MeV with the eMLC mounted on a Siemens Oncor linear accelerator at 71.6 and 81.6 cm source-to-collimator distances. Measurements and simulations at 8.4-18.4 cm airgaps showed agreement of 2%/2 mm. The eMLC dose profiles and percentage depth dose curves were compared with standard electron applicator parameters. The primary differences were a wider penumbra and up to 4.2% reduction in the build-up dose at 0.5 cm depth, with dose normalized on the central axis. At 90 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD)--relevant to isocentric delivery--the applicator and eMLC penumbrae agreed to 0.3 cm. The eMLC leaves, which were 7 cm thick, contributed up to 6.3% scattered electron dose at the depth of maximum dose for a 10 × 10 cm2 field, with the thick leaves effectively eliminating bremsstrahlung leakage. A Monte Carlo calculated wedge shaped dose distribution generated with all six beam energies matched across the maximum available eMLC field width demonstrated a therapeutic (80% of maximum dose) depth range of 2.1-6.8 cm. Field matching was particularly challenging at lower beam energies (6-12 MeV) due to the wider penumbrae and angular distribution of electron scattering. An eMLC isocentric electron breast boost was planned and compared with the conventional applicator fixed SSD plan, showing similar target coverage and dose to critical structures. The mean dose to the target differed by less than 2%. The low bremsstrahlung dose from the 7 cm thick MLC leaves had the added advantage of reducing the mean dose to the whole heart. Isocentric delivery using an extendable eMLC means that treatment room re-entry and repositioning the patient for SSD set-up is unnecessary. Monte Carlo simulation can accurately calculate the fluence below the eMLC and subsequent patient dose distributions. The eMLC generates similar dose distributions to the standard electron applicator but provides a practical method for more complex electron beam delivery.


Asunto(s)
Electrones/uso terapéutico , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Aceleración , Humanos , Método de Montecarlo , Fantasmas de Imagen , Radiometría , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
13.
Phys Med Biol ; 55(14): 4083-105, 2010 Jul 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20601775

RESUMEN

Monte Carlo simulation can accurately calculate electron fluence at the patient surface and the resultant dose deposition if the initial source electron beam and linear accelerator treatment head geometry parameters are well characterized. A recent approach used large electron fields to extract these simulation parameters. This method took advantage of the absence of lower energy, widely scattered electrons from the applicator resulting in more accurate data. It is important to validate these simulation parameters for clinically relevant fields. In the current study, these simulation parameters are applied to fields collimated by applicators and inserts to perform a comprehensive validation. Measurements were performed on a Siemens Oncor linear accelerator for 6 MeV, 9 MeV, 12 MeV, 15 MeV, 18 MeV and 21 MeV electron beams and collimators ranging from an open 25 x 25 cm(2) applicator to a 10 x 10 cm(2) applicator with a 1 cm diameter cerrobend insert. Data were collected for inserts placed in four square applicators. Monte Carlo simulations were performed using EGSnrc/BEAMnrc. Source and geometry parameters were obtained from previous measurements and simulations with the maximum field size (40 x 40 cm(2)). The applicators were modelled using manufacturer specifications, confirmed by direct measurements. Cerrobend inserts were modelled based on calliper measurements. Monte Carlo-calculated percentage depth dose and off-axis profiles agreed with measurements to within the least restrictive of 2%/1 mm in most cases. For the largest applicator (25 x 25 cm(2)), and 18 MeV and 21 MeV beams, differences in dose profiles of 3% were observed. Calculated relative output factors were within 2% of those measured with an electron diode for fields 1.5 cm in diameter or larger. The disagreement for 1 cm diameter fields was up to 5%. For open applicators, simulations agreed with parallel plate chamber-measured relative output factors to 1%. This work has validated a recent methodology used to extract data on the electron source and treatment head from large electron fields, resulting in a reduction in the number of unknown parameters in treatment head simulation. Applicator and insert collimated electron fields were accurately simulated without adjusting these parameters. Results demonstrate that commissioning of electron beams based on large electron field measurements is a viable option.


Asunto(s)
Simulación por Computador , Electrones/uso terapéutico , Método de Montecarlo , Radioterapia/métodos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Aceleradores de Partículas/instrumentación , Radiometría , Radioterapia/instrumentación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Agua
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA