Role of FOLFIRINOX and chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: update of the AGEO cohort.

BACKGROUND: FOLFIRINOX has shown promising results in locally advanced (LAPA) or borderline resectable (BRPA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We report here a cohort of patients treated with this regimen from the AGEO group. METHODS: This is a retrospective multicentre study. We included all consecutive patients with non-pre-treated LAPA or BRPA treated with FOLFIRINOX. RESULTS: We included 330 patients (57.9% male, 65.4% <65 years, 96.4% PS <2). Disease was classified as BRPA in 31.1% or LAPA in 68.9%. Objective response rate with FOLFIRINOX was 29.5% and stable disease 51%. Subsequent CRT was performed in 46.4% of patients and 23.9% had curative intent surgery. Resection rates were 42.1% for BRPA and 15.5% for LAPA. Main G3/4 toxicities were fatigue (15%), neutropenia (12%) and neuropathy (G2/3 35%). After a median follow-up of 26.7 months, median OS (mOS) and PFS were 21.4 and 12.4 months, respectively. For patients treated by FOLFIRINOX alone, or FOLFIRINOX followed by CRT, or FOLFIRINOX + /- CRT + surgery, mOS was 16.8 months, 21.8 months and not reached, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRINOX for LAPA and BRPA seems to be effective with a manageable toxicity profile. These promising results in "real-life" patients now have to be confirmed in a Phase 3 randomised trial.

Unifocal versus Multiple Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumors Location: An Embryological Origin.

INTRODUCTION: Small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumors (SI-NET) are situated preferentially within the ileum. The aim was to describe a potential difference in location between unifocal and multiple ileal-NET. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between December 2010 and December 2019, all consecutive patients who underwent resection in our European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence, of at least 1 non-duodenal SI-NET, were retrospectively included. The main objective was to prove that multiple ileal-NET were mostly located on the left side of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) axis (defined as 40 cm from the ileocecal valve), and unifocal ones on the right side. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, 6 with unifocal jejunal-NET located 35 cm (range, 10-60) from the duodenojejunal angle (DJA), 44 (47%) with unifocal ileal-NET and 44 (47%) with multiple ileal-NET. The median number of tumors in multiple ileal-NET was 7 (range, 2-95), within a median small bowel segment of 105 cm (10-240). The median length between the proximal tumor and the DJA was 428 cm (300-635) and 540 cm (350-725) for the distal one; 40 (91%) of them were located on the left side of the SMA axis. In contrast, unifocal ileal-NET were located at a median distance of 577 cm (305-820) from the DJA (p < 0.001, compared to multiple ileal-NET); 30 (68%) of them were on the right side of the SMA axis (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Multiple ileal-NET are mostly located on the left side of the SMA axis. Further studies are warranted to explore the embryological origin of unifocal versus multiple ileal-NET.

Management and Prognosis of Localized Duodenal Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

INTRODUCTION: The characteristics, prognostic factors, and management of duodenal neuroendocrine neoplasms (dNEN) are ill-defined, given their rarity. Whether nonsurgical management might be appropriate for patients with nonmetastatic dNEN and a good prognosis, as is the case for pancreatic NEN (pNEN), is unknown. We aimed to describe the management and prognosis of nonmetastatic dNEN patients. METHODS: All consecutive patients with nonmetastatic dNEN managed between 1981 and 2018 in 2 expert centers were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and factors associated with recurrence were estimated. RESULTS: A total of 145 patients with dNEN were included. Twenty-eight patients with sporadic, nonfunctioning, small (median 7 mm) dNEN underwent endoscopic resection, with a 5-year RFS rate of 89.4%. Local recurrence occurred in 2 patients, who underwent surgery with no new events. The 5-year RFS rate was 87.9% in patients who underwent surgery. Upon univariate analysis, age, size, Ki67 index, and lymph node involvement (LN+) were significantly associated with worse RFS for all dNEN treated (endoscopy/surgery); multivariate analysis found that age, size, and LN+ were associated with worse RFS. CONCLUSION: Selected nonmetastatic dNEN had a favorable outcome, and a less invasive therapeutic strategy appeared more suitable than oncological surgery.

Elderly Patients with Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Are Undertreated and Have Shorter Survival: The LyREMeNET Study.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is rising, especially in elderly patients. The elderly cancer population presents considerable challenges, yet little is known about the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of metastatic NET (mNET) patients. METHODS: The Lyon Real-life Evidence in Metastatic NeuroEndocrine Tumors study (LyREMeNET, NCT03863106) included consecutive mNET patients, diagnosed between January 1990 and December 2017. The exclusion criteria were nonmetastatic NET, poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma, and mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasms. We aimed to compare patients ≥70 years old to patients <70 years old. RESULTS: A total of 866 patients were included, 198 (23%) were ≥70 years old. There was no significant difference in characteristics except that elderly patients had synchronous metastasis more frequently. Elderly patients received significantly fewer treatments (median of 2.0 vs. 3.0 lines, respectively, p < 0.0001), were significantly less frequently treated by chemotherapy (32 vs. 54%), targeted therapy (16 vs. 30%), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (5 vs. 16%), and they underwent significantly less frequently locoregional intervention. Median overall survival was significantly shorter in elderly patients (5.2 vs. 9.6 years). The most frequent cause of death was related to disease progression (71%). Multivariate analysis found that, after adjustment for tumor location, tumor grade, and number of metastatic sites, age remained significantly associated with overall survival (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.26-2.18), indicating a poorer survival in patients ≥70 years old in comparison with younger patients (p = 0.0003). CONCLUSION: Patients ≥70 years old have a worse survival, die frequently from their disease, and are undertreated compared to younger patients.

Lymphadenectomy during Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumor Surgery: The Concept of Skip Metastases.

BACKGROUND: More than half of small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs) are metastatic at diagnosis, but complete resection of the primary tumor and lymph node (LN) is recommended by most authors. Our aim was to describe the pattern of involved LN after an extensive LN resection. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 2013 and December 2015, all consecutive patients who underwent resection of at least one SB-NET in our European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society Center of Excellence were prospectively included, while patients with duodenal SB-NETs were excluded. The resection and pathological analysis of LNs were standardized using three groups (group 1, along the small intestine; group 2, along the mesenteric vessel; and group 3, retropancreatic and mesenteric vessel origin). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients with SB-NET resection were prospectively enrolled in the study, with seven patients being excluded from the analysis because it was impossible to divide the operative piece into nodal groups due to retractile mesenteritis. Among the remaining 21 patients, 20 (95 %) had LNs involved; 8 (38 %) in group 1, 13 (62 %) in group 2, and 12 (57 %) in group 3. Skip metastases were found in 14 patients (67 %): 4 (19 %) with an invasion pattern of group 3+ without group 2+, and 12 (57 %) with an invasion pattern of group 2+ or group 3+ without group 1+. CONCLUSION: As a result of skip metastases, systematic, extensive LN resection in retropancreatic portion may be required to prevent unresectable locoregional recurrence.

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin or alkylating agents for neuroendocrine tumors: Comparison of efficacy and search for predictive factors guiding treatment choice.

BACKGROUND: The alkylating agents (ALKYs) streptozotocin, dacarbazine, and temozolomide currently are the main drugs used in systemic chemotherapy for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). The promising activity shown by gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in previous studies prompted this study 1) to confirm the use of GEMOX in a larger population of NET patients, 2) to compare its efficacy with that of ALKYs, and 3) to explore whether the O(6) -methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status could help in selecting the chemotherapy regimen. METHODS: One hundred four patients with metastatic NETs (37 pancreatic NETs, 33 gastrointestinal NETs, 23 bronchial NETs, and 11 NETs of other/unknown origin) were treated with GEMOX between 2004 and 2014. Among these patients, 63 also received ALKYs. MGMT promoter gene methylation was assessed via pyrosequencing in 42 patients. RESULTS: Patients received a median of 6 courses of GEMOX. Twenty-four (23%) had an objective response (OR). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were 7.8 and 31.6 months, respectively. In the 63 patients treated with both ALKYs and GEMOX, the ORs (22% and 22%) and the PFSs (7.5 and 7.3 months) were similar. The response was concordant in 53% of the patients. Promoter gene methylation of MGMT was associated with better outcomes with ALKYs (P = .03 for OR and P = .04 for PFS) but not GEMOX. CONCLUSIONS: GEMOX is effective against NETs; its activity is comparable to that of ALKYs, and it is not influenced by the MGMT status. Our data suggest that GEMOX might be preferred for patients with unmethylated MGMT tumors. Cancer 2015;121:3435-43. © 2015 American Cancer Society.

Surgical Management of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors: Specific Requirements and Their Impact on Staging and Prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel neuroendocrine tumors (SB-NETs) are characterized by two main features: they usually are metastatic at diagnosis and multiple in 30 % of cases. As such, SB-NETs require specific surgical management. This retrospective study examined local recurrence, survival, and prognosis of SB-NETs after adapted surgery. METHODS: All consecutive patients with SB-NETs who underwent resection of at least one primary tumor between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2013 were analyzed. The preoperative morphologic workup, histologic classification, and metastatic lymph node (LN) ratio (LNs involved/removed) were recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 107 patients, 35 (33 %) of whom had multiple SB-NETs (range 1-44; mean 3.1). Preoperative imaging and perioperative surgical examination missed 61 and 33 % of SB-NETs, respectively, in contrast to pathologic examination. Of the 107 patients, 43 % had carcinoid syndrome, 70 % had metastatic disease, and 90 % had LN involvement. The median number of LNs retrieved was 12 (range 1-69). The LN ratio (LNs involved/removed) was 0.25. The highest tumoral grades were G1 (in 61 % of patients) and G2 (in 37 % of patients). Of the 107 patients, 13 (12 %) had local LN recurrence. The rate of LN recurrence-free survival at 5 years was 88 %. The median overall survival (OS) time was 128 months (range 91-165 months). In the multivariate analysis, high chromogranin A (CgA) levels and peritoneal carcinomatosis were significantly associated with shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS: Systematic palpation of the entire small bowel detects more multiple NETs than preoperative imaging. Systematic surgery with extensive LN resection is associated with low local recurrence. High CgA levels and carcinomatosis are linked with shorter survival.

Beyond MEN1, When to Think About MEN4? Retrospective Study on 5600 Patients in the French Population and Literature Review.

CONTEXT: Germline CDKN1B variants predispose patients to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), a rare MEN1-like syndrome, with <100 reported cases since its discovery in 2006. Although CDKN1B mutations are frequently suggested to explain cases of genetically negative MEN1, the prevalence and phenotype of MEN4 patients is poorly known, and genetic counseling is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of MEN4 in MEN1-suspected patients and characterize the phenotype of MEN4 patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational nationwide study. Narrative review of literature and variant class reassessment. PATIENTS: We included all adult patients with class 3/4/5 CDKN1B variants identified by the laboratories from the French Oncogenetic Network on Neuroendocrine Tumors network between 2015 and 2022 through germline genetic testing for MEN1 suspicion. After class reassessment, we compared the phenotype of symptomatic patients with class 4/5 CDKN1B variants (ie, with genetically confirmed MEN4 diagnosis) in our series and in literature with 66 matched MEN1 patients from the UMD-MEN1 database. RESULTS: From 5600 MEN1-suspected patients analyzed, 4 with class 4/5 CDKN1B variant were found (0.07%). They presented with multiple duodenal NET, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and adrenal nodule, isolated PHPT, PHPT, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. We listed 29 patients with CDKN1B class 4/5 variants from the literature. Compared with matched MEN1 patients, MEN4 patients presented lower NET incidence and older age at PHPT diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MEN4 is low. PHPT and pituitary adenoma represent the main associated lesions, NETs are rare. Our results suggest a milder and later phenotype than in MEN1. Our observations will help to improve genetic counseling and management of MEN4 families.

Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation in Carcinoid Heart Disease.

Carcinoid heart disease is a rare condition affecting mostly tricuspid and pulmonary valves causing right-sided heart failure. Surgical valve replacement is the mainstay of treatment when patients become symptomatic and/or in the presence of right heart remodeling. We present a case of severe pulmonary valve regurgitation secondary to carcinoid heart disease occurring 4 years after a surgical tricuspid replacement, successfully treated with direct transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation without pre-stenting.

Management of neuroendocrine neoplasms: conformity with guidelines in and outside a center of excellence.

Purpose: To improve neuroendocrine neoplasm (NEN) management, the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS) recognised 62 Centers of Excellence (CoE). This retrospective study compares conformity of patients' initial management within vs outside an ENETS CoE with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Methods: Patients diagnosed with a NEN between August 2018 and July 2020 and presented in the Lyon-CoE Multidisciplinary Tumour Board (MDT) were included. Factors potentially associated with the conformity of initial management (work-up and first treatment) to CPG underwent univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Among the 615 included patients, 170 (27.6%) were initially managed in the CoE and 445 (72.4%) were only presented at the CoE-MDT. Patients in the CoE group more often had intestinal or pancreatic primaries, metastatic disease (61.8% vs 33%), hereditary syndrome, and a functioning tumour. Work-up conformity was 37.1% in the CoE (vs 29.9%, P = 0.09); this was 95.8% for the first treatment (vs 88.7%, P = 0.01). After multivariate analysis, CPG conformity was significantly higher for patients managed in the CoE, for younger patients, for those having a grade 1-2 tumour, and a genetic syndrome. Pancreatic and small intestinal (SI) NET surgeries performed in the CoE had a higher splenic preservation rate during left pancreatectomy, better detection of multiple tumours in SI surgeries, and higher number of resected lymph nodes. Conclusions: Given the widespread observance of CPG, not all patients require management in the CoE. Referral should be considered for more complex cases such as metastatic diseases, G2 tumours, or carcinoid syndromes. Finally, we should encourage the centralization of NET surgery.

FFCD 1709-SIRTCI phase II trial: Selective internal radiation therapy plus Xelox, Bevacizumab and Atezolizumab in liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have high efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with microsatellite instability (MSI) but not in microsatellite stable (MSS) tumour due to the low tumour mutational burden. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) could enhance neoantigen production thus triggering systemic anti-tumoral immune response (abscopal effect). In addition, Oxalipatin can induce immunogenic cell death and Bevacizumab can decrease the exhaustion of tumour infiltrating lymphocyte. In combination, these treatments could act synergistically to sensitize MSS mCRCs to ICI SIRTCI is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, phase II, non-comparative single-arm study evaluating the efficacy and safety of SIRT plus Xelox, Bevacizumab and Atezolizumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1) in patients with liver-dominant MSS mCRC. The primary objective is progression-free survival at 9 months. The main inclusion criteria are patients with MSS mCRC with liver-dominant disease, initially unresectable disease and with no prior oncologic treatment for metastatic disease. The trial started in November 2020 and has included 10 out of the 52 planned patients.

Value of a patient-reported-outcome measure of carcinoid syndrome symptoms.

OBJECTIVE: Literature on patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of carcinoid syndrome symptoms (CSS) is scarce. We used a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) to evaluate CSS, the domains of daily life impacted by CSS, the main symptoms that affect daily life, its change according to clinical, biological and morphological evolution, and the risk factors for a poor PRO-CSS score. METHODS: Patients completed the PRO-CSS, EORTC-QLQ30, and GI-NET21 questionnaires at the time of their clinical, laboratory, and morphological assessments in a multicentre French cohort study from February 2019 to May 2020. RESULTS: In total, 147 patients with metastatic ileal (n =126), lung (n =20), or unknown primitive neuroendocrine tumour but high 5-hydroxyindole-3-acetic acid level (n =1) were included; 42 (32%) received an above-label dose of somatostatin analogues. Fifty-one (35%) patients had a poor PRO-CSS score. Travelling and food restriction were the two main domains affected. Diarrhoea (mean: 2.3/5 on Likert scale), imperiousness (mean of 2.5/5), fatigue (2.2/5), abdominal pain (1.7/5), and flushing episodes (1.5/5) were the main symptoms affecting daily life. The PRO-CSS score was not correlated to the clinical assessment performed by physicians at the baseline and during the follow-up. Patients with a poor PRO-CSS score had a higher tumour burden. CONCLUSIONS: PROM-CSS may help physicians make an objective assessment of CSS and its impact in daily practice; this tool could become a key evaluation criterion in clinical trials focusing on CSS.

Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel versus FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A European Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GN) and FOLFIRINOX (FFX) are two standard first-line therapies for metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) but have rarely been compared, especially in patients with locally advanced PC (LAPC). METHODS: This is a retrospective European multicenter study including patients with LAPC treated with either GN or FFX as the first-line therapy between 2010 and 2019. Coprimary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), both estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 147 patients (GN: n = 60; FFX: n = 87) were included. Tumor resection rates were similar between the two groups (16.7% vs. 16.1%; p = 1), with similar R0 resection rates (88.9%). Median PFS rates were not statistically different: 9 months (95% CI: 8-13.5) vs. 12.1 months (95% CI: 10.1-14.6; p = 0.8), respectively. Median OS rates were 15.7 months (95% CI: 12.6-20.2) and 16.7 months (95% CI: 14.8-20.4; p = 0.7), respectively. Abdominal pain at the baseline (HR = 2.03, p = 0.03), tumors located in the tail of the pancreas (HR = 4.35, p = 0.01), CA19-9 > 200 UI/L (HR = 2.03, p = 0.004) and tumor resection (HR = 0.37, p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for PFS, similarly to OS. CA19-9 ≤ 200 UI/L (OR = 2.6, p = 0.047) was predictive of the tumor response. Consolidation chemoradiotherapy, more often used in the FFX group (11.7% vs. 50.6%; p < 0.001), was not predictive. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study did not show any difference between GN and FFX as the first-line treatment in patients with LAPC.

Metformin and everolimus in neuroendocrine tumours: A synergic effect?

OBJECTIVE: To explore potential synergy in effectiveness between metformin and everolimus, 2 inhibitors of the mTOR pathway, for neuroendocrine tumours (NET). DESIGN AND METHODS: A cohort of patients with advanced gastroenteropancreatic or lung NETs treated by everolimus were stratified in to those without diabetes, those with diabetes and without metformin, and those with diabetes with metformin. The primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: A total of 213 patients were included, 165 of which were non-diabetic; among diabetic patients, 19 were treated with metformin and 29 with others anti-diabetic drugs. No significant difference in median PFS [95%CI] was found between the three groups: 10.05 months [8.27;11.83] for non-diabetic patients, 15.24 [19.88;49.43] for diabetic w/metformin, and 9.03 months [4.01;14.06] for diabetic w/o metformin group. In univariate analysis, factors significantly associated with longer PFS was a functioning NET, a number of metastatic sites<3, the absence of lung metastasis, and an uptake on Octreoscan®, but not the absence of metformin use; only uptake on Octreoscan® remained significant in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast with the literature, we did not find a synergy between everolimus and metformin in NET. Prospective studies are underway to improve the comprehension of the potential synergy regarding population and tumour type.

Characterization, Prognosis, and Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Lung Carcinoid Tumors.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic lung carcinoids (MLCs) remain poorly characterized and no prognostic stratification exists. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including patients with MLCs in two European expert centers. The aims were to characterize these cases and to identify prognostic factors of survival and effectiveness of their treatments. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with MLC were included: 50% were women, and the median age was 61 years. Half of the patients had synchronous metastases, mainly located in the liver (75%), bone (42%), and lung (25%). According to WHO classification, MLCs were typical (28%), atypical (60%), or unspecified (12%). A functioning syndrome was observed in 43% of cases and an uptake at somatostatin receptor scintigraphy in 76% of cases. The 5-year overall survival rate was 60% and at 10 years this was 25%. In multivariate analysis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.81, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.10-16.11), uptake on SRS (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22-0.66), low serum chromogranin A (HR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.36-3.81), and typical carcinoid (HR: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.26-2.78) were associated with better survival. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.0, the highest objective response rates were obtained after radiofrequency ablation of metastases (86%), liver embolization (56%), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (27%), and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (18%). CONCLUSIONS: MLCs are characterized by a high frequency of atypical carcinoids, functioning syndrome, and liver/bone metastases. WHO classification, performance status, somatostatin receptor scintigraphy, and chromogranin A were associated with longer survival. Partial response was more frequent with locoregional therapies, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Endoscopic management of 345 small rectal neuroendocrine tumours: A national study from the French group of endocrine tumours (GTE).

Introduction: Small rectal neuroendocrine tumours are good candidates for endoscopic resection provided that complete pathological resection (R0) is obtained and their risk of metastatic progression is low. We conducted a large multicentre nationwide study to evaluate the outcomes of the management of non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm diagnosed endoscopically. Patients and methods: The medical records, the endoscopic and pathological findings of patients with non-metastatic rectal neuroendocrine tumours ≤2 cm managed from January 2000-June 2018 in 16 French hospitals, were retrospectively analysed. The primary objective was to describe the proportion of R0 endoscopic resections. Results: A total of 329 patients with 345 rectal neuroendocrine tumours were included, 330 (96%) tumours were managed by local treatments: 287 by endoscopy only and 43 by endoscopy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The final endoscopic R0 rate was 134/345 (39%), which improved from the first endoscopy (54/225, 24%), to the second (60/100, 60%) and the third endoscopy (20/26, 77%). R0 was associated with endoscopic technique (90% for advanced techniques, 40% for mucosectomy and 17% for polypectomy), but not with tumour or patient characteristics. Twenty patients had metastatic disease, which was associated with tumour size ≥10 mm (odds ratio: 9.1, 95% confidence interval (3.5-23.5)), tumour grade G2-G3 (odds ratio: 4.2, (1.5-11.7)), the presence of muscular (odds ratio: ∞, (11.9-∞)) and lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio: 57.2, (5.6-578.9)). Conclusions: The resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumours often requires multiple procedures. Training of endoscopists is necessary in order to better recognise these tumours and to perform the appropriate resection technique.

Resection of small bowel adenocarcinoma metastases: Results of the ARCAD-NADEGE cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Data are lacking with regard to curative resection of metastasis from small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). This study evaluated outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with curatively resected metastatic SBA. METHODS: A series of 34 patients undergoing resection of metastatic SBA from January 2009 to November 2014 at French centers were included into this cohort study. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and prognostic factors. Univariate analyses were performed to determine prognostic risk factors. RESULTS: The sites of SBA metastases were peritoneal (29.4%), liver (26.5%), lymph nodes (11.8%), lung (2.9%), multiple (14.7%), and other (14.7%). Thirty (88.2%) patients received adjuvant or perioperative chemotherapy, mainly was oxaliplatin-based (76.5%). The median OS was 28.6 months and RFS was 18.7 months. Fourteen (41.2%) patients survived for more than 36 months. In univariate analysis, poor differentiation (P = 0.006), invaded margins (P = 0.003), and lymphatic invasion in the primary tumor (P = 0.039) were associated with decreased OS. CONCLUSION: Overall survival of patients after resection of metastatic SBA remains poor, but long-term survivors are observed. Resection of metastatic SBA should be consider if patients are expected to be operated on with curative intent and have moderately or well-differentiated tumors.

Cross-platform comparison for the detection of RAS mutations in cfDNA (ddPCR Biorad detection assay, BEAMing assay, and NGS strategy).

CfDNA samples from colon (mCRC) and non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) (CIRCAN cohort) were compared using three platforms: droplet digital PCR (ddPCR, Biorad); BEAMing/OncoBEAM™-RAS-CRC (Sysmex Inostics); next-generation sequencing (NGS, Illumina), utilizing the 56G oncology panel (Swift Biosciences). Tissue biopsy and time matched cfDNA samples were collected at diagnosis in the mCRC cohort and during 1st progression in the NSCLC cohort. Excellent matches between cfDNA/FFPE mutation profiles were observed. Detection thresholds were between 0.5-1% for cfDNA samples examined using ddPCR and NGS, and 0.03% with BEAMing. This high level of sensitivity enabled the detection of KRAS mutations in 5/19 CRC patients with negative FFPE profiles. In the mCRC cohort, comparison of mutation results obtained by testing FFPE to those obtained by testing cfDNA by ddPCR resulted in 47% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 70% positive predictive value (PPV) and 55% negative predictive value (NPV). For BEAMing, we observed 93% sensitivity, 69% specificity, 78% PPV and 90% NPV. Finally, sensitivity of NGS was 73%, specificity was 77%, PPV 79% and NPV 71%. Our study highlights the complementarity of different diagnostic approaches and variability of results between OncoBEAM™-RAS-CRC and NGS assays. While the NGS assay provided a larger breadth of coverage of the major targetable alterations of 56 genes in one run, its performance for specific alterations was frequently confirmed by ddPCR results.