Improving Drug Safety in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients with Hemato-Oncological Diseases: A Prospective Study of Active Pharmacovigilance.

The acquisition of relevant pediatric clinical safety data is essential to ensure tolerable drug therapies. Comparing the real number of Adverse Drug Reaction (ADR) reports in clinical practice with the literature, the idea of ADR underreporting emerges. An active pharmacovigilance observational prospective study was conducted to assess the safety of oncology pharmacological prescriptions in patients aged 0-24 years at Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo in Trieste and IRCCS CRO National Cancer Institute in Aviano (Italy) between January 2021 and October 2023. Prescriptions and ADRs were evaluated by a multidisciplinary team. A total of 1218 prescriptions for 38 patients were analyzed, and 190 ADRs of grade 3-5 were collected. As compared to historical data, we registered a significant increase (p < 0.001) in the number of ADRs. The risk of ADR was 3.4 times higher in the case of off-label prescriptions compared to on-label ones (OR 3.4; [1.47; 7.89]; p-value = 0.004). The risks of error and near-miss were reported for 6.3% and 18.2% of total prescriptions, respectively. Of the total of 133 interactions, 47 (35.3%) resulted in ADRs. This study shows the importance of pro-active pharmacovigilance to efficiently highlight ADRs, and the fundamental role of multidisciplinary teams (oncologist, pharmacist, pharmacologist, pediatrician, nurse) in improving patients' safety during therapy.

Gestational diabetes mellitus: Impact of adherence on patient management and maternal-neonatal complications.

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus is a form of diabetes whose prevalence is constantly increasing, thus leading to a growth in the necessary resources and organization of diabetes and obstetric facilities. The literature suggests that adherence to diet and therapy in patients with GDM might be highly variable and only sometimes optimal, and that this suboptimal compliance might be associated with more complicated treatment management or some adverse perinatal outcomes. This study evaluates this adherence and the benefits of constant blood glucose monitoring regarding maternalneonatal complications. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre prospective observational study, including all patients diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus and aged ≥ 18 years, between January 2019 and November 2021. We measured patients' adherence by clinical diary monitoring (medical evaluation) and observation of data obtained from glycaemic control (glucometer analysis). Patients were divided into three groups the adherent patient group, the non-adherent patient group and the partially adherent patient group; then, we compared the groups to assess the impact of non-adherence on patients' health. RESULTS: 122 (46.9 %) were classified in the adherent group (AG), 91 (35.0 %) in the partially adherent group (PG), and 47 (18.1 %) in the non-adherent group (NG) out of a population of 260 patients. The AG and PG groups were associated with a RRR of 74 % (95 % CI:0.13-1.03, p = 0.057) and 32 % (95 % CI:0.25-1.84, p = 0449) in operative delivery, respectively. Finally, this study proved that full or partial adherence is associated with decreased insulin administration during labour in 67 % (OR=0.33 p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: The study showed that patients' adherence to diet and/or therapy proposed by the diabetologist could significantly influence optimal glycaemic control during pregnancy Better compliance may lead to a lower incidence of operative deliveries and insulin utilization during pregnancy and labour.

Safety and Appropriateness in the Management of the Treatment Pathway of Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes.

Gestational diabetes (GDM) is quite common during pregnancy, and its prevalence is rising because of the increased overweight and obesity rates. In patients with GDM, proper glycemic control, adherence to a suitable diet and antidiabetic treatments can reduce the likelihood of maternal-neonatal complications. For this reason, this study aims to assess the therapy adherence of pregnant women with GDM. Treatment adherence was assessed by both glucometer and diabetologist's analysis reported in the electronic medical record. Cohen's Kappa was used to assess the agreement between the two classifications. Moreover, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify potential risk factors for non-adherence to treatment. Overall, 287 patients were enrolled, and 271 were available for follow-up. Low concordance between the glucometer and the diabetologist's analysis was found, mainly due to the complexity of patients with GDM. Indeed, 46% of patients were classified as not adherent due to glucometer results and 42% based on medical assessment. This study highlights the importance of monitoring patients with gestational diabetes to assess and increase adherence to therapy properly.

Pneumatosis Intestinalis Induced by Anticancer Treatment: A Systematic Review.

Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) is a rare condition due to the presence of gas within the bowel wall; it is mainly caused by endoscopic procedures, infections and other gastrointestinal diseases. Oncological therapies have been reported to be a cause of PI as well, but their role is not clearly defined. This systematic review investigates the concurrency of PI and antitumor therapy in cancer patients, considering both solid tumors and onco-hematological ones. We performed a literature review of PubMed, Embase and the Web of Science up to September 2021 according to the PRISMA guidelines. A total of 62 papers reporting 88 different episodes were included. PI was mainly reported with targeted therapies (sunitinib and bevacizumab above all) within the first 12 weeks of treatment. This adverse event mostly occurred in the metastatic setting, but in 10 cases, it also occurred also in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting. PI was mostly localized in the large intestine, being fatal in 11 cases, while in the remaining cases, symptoms were usually mild, or even absent. A significant risk of PI reoccurrence after drug reintroduction was also reported (6/18 patients), with no fatal outcomes. Potential pharmacological mechanisms underlying PI pathogenesis are also discussed. In conclusion, although uncommonly, PI can occur during oncological therapies and may lead to life-threatening complications; therefore, consideration of its occurrence among other adverse events is warranted in the presence of clinical suspicion.

Pharmacovigilance of anti-cancer medicines: opportunities and challenges.

INTRODUCTION: The foundations of pharmacovigilance are the monitoring of drug safety in real-world medicine, and identification of new adverse effects, unknown at the time of market approval. Cancer patients are prone to adverse drug reactions due to the complexity of the neoplastic disease and its treatment. Pharmacovigilance of anti-cancer medicines is further complicated because patients have comorbidities, as for elderly patients. It is even more challenging when complete safety and risk data for a drug are lacking, as may occur for new molecules or when it comes to drugs for children. AREAS COVERED: This article introduces the field of pharmacovigilance of anti-cancer drugs, describing the various layers of complexity that make the recognition of adverse drug events in oncology particularly problematic, including the type of medicines, the phenomenon of underreporting and polypharmacy. Finally, it reviews new digital tools to help pharmacovigilance activities in oncology. EXPERT OPINION: The authors outline some crucial challenges and opportunities that can be useful for pharmacovigilance to keep up with the times and follow the current technological and scientific progress. In addition to the evaluations made by researchers, it will, of course, be necessary to have an equality important concrete response from the institutions and regulatory bodies.

JAK-Inhibitors for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Focus on the Present and an Outlook on the Future.

Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) belong to a new class of oral targeted disease-modifying drugs which have recently revolutionized the therapeutic panorama of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other immune-mediated diseases, placing alongside or even replacing conventional and biological drugs. JAKi are characterized by a novel mechanism of action, consisting of the intracellular interruption of the JAK-STAT pathway crucially involved in the immune response. The aim of this narrative review is to globally report the most relevant pharmacological features and clinical outcomes of the developed and incoming JAKi for RA, based on the available preclinical and clinical evidence. A total of 219 papers, including narrative and systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), observational studies, case reports, guidelines, and drug factsheets, were selected. The efficacy and safety profile of both the first generation JAKi (baricitinib and tofacitinib) and the second generation JAKi (upadacitinib, filgotinib, peficitinib, decernotinib and itacitinib) were compared and discussed. Results from RCTs and real-life data are encouraging and outline a rapid onset of the pharmacologic effects, which are maintained during the time. Their efficacy and safety profile are comparable or superior to those of biologic agents and JAKi proved to be efficacious when given as monotherapy. Finally, the manufacturing of JAKi is relatively easier and cheaper than that of biologics, thus increasing the number of compounds being formulated and tested for clinical use.

Safety Profiles and Pharmacovigilance Considerations for Recently Patented Anticancer Drugs: Advanced Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine neoplasia and represents approximately 1.5% to 2.1% of all cancers diagnosed annually worldwide. Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (RR-DTC) and advanced/metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma are relatively uncommon yet prognostically significant thyroid cancers. Gene rearrangements resulting in the aberrant activity of tyrosine kinases have been identified as drivers of oncogenesis in a variety of cancers, including thyroid cancer. Many Multi-Kinase Inhibitors (MKIs) which are now FDA-/EMA approved for thyroid cancer have shown clinical benefit in patients with advanced cancer. Treatment related toxicities occur frequently with these drugs and can be severe or life-threatening. OBJECTIVES: This review summarizes the role of targeted therapy with MKIs in the management of RRDTC and advanced/metastatic MTC patients, focusing on side-effect profiles of these drugs, with a presentation of several recent patents published in this field. METHODS: We review the scientific literature on advanced thyroid cancer and analyze the International Pharmacovigilance database (FAERS, Eudravigilance, and WHO Vigibase) for adverse drug reactions. RESULTS: This systematic analysis highlights the difference in the safety profile of the recent drugs used in the treatment of advanced thyroid cancer and the recent discoveries for diagnosis or treatment of the thyroid cancer. CONCLUSION: It is essential to investigate the safety profile of recent anticancer drugs for advanced thyroid cancer to allow health professionals to make the best choice for each patient by conducting risk/benefit assessment.

Safety Profiles and Pharmacovigilance Considerations for Recently Patented Anticancer Drugs: Cutaneous Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma is a skin cancer responsible for 90% of cutaneous cancer- related deaths. In recent years, breakthroughs in treatment strategy have revolutionized the prognosis in both early and advanced melanoma patients. In particular, treatment with monoclonal antibodies targeting co-inhibitory checkpoints or specific molecular pathways leads to a new era of promising options, by prolonging the survival time of these patients. Moreover, unlike the chemotherapy that was used until some time ago, these new drugs have a good and more manageable toxicity profile. However, because of the recent introduction in clinical practice of the new agents, there is a learning curve among physicians regarding early recognition and management of the associated side effects. OBJECTIVES: The analysis of the toxicity profiles of the different agents currently studied for the treatment of early and advanced melanoma, and the description of several relevant recent patents in this field, are the aims of this review. METHODS: This is a systematically conducted review based on current clinical guidelines and on international Pharmacovigilance databases (AERS-Eudravigilance - WHO Vigibase). RESULTS: Our systematic analysis outlines a comprehensive overview of the pharmacology, clinical application and the safety of recent anticancer drugs to treat melanoma, which can be an essential instrument for health professionals and researchers. CONCLUSION: The new oncological therapies against melanoma are based on increasingly specific biological and immunological targets. For this reason, the potential toxicities that are expected from patients would be less relevant than the systemic "classical" chemotherapy. However, the new therapies are not free from the risk of causing adverse reactions, some of which must be managed promptly and appropriately; moreover, the multiplicity of the metabolic pathways exposes the new target therapies to relevant potential interactions. This review can help to understand how important it is not to underestimate potential adverse drug reactions related to new targeted therapies.

Pharmacovigilance workflow in Europe and Italy and pharmacovigilance terminology.

The terminology used in pharmacovigilance can cause confusion, because there are similar terms that describe different phenomena (e.g. adverse reactions, adverse drug reactions, and side effects). Incorrect use of terminology can have negative effects on the reporting of adverse drug reactions and on the interpretation of these reports. To explain the most common terms used in pharmacovigilance, this article first describes the pharmacovigilance workflow process in the European Union and, as an example, in Italy. Then, the article reviews common pharmacovigilance terms.

EU pharmacovigilance regulatory requirements of anticancer biosimilar monoclonal antibodies.

An increasing number of innovative oncology monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have been introduced into the global market, and biosimilar versions have now also been approved in Europe. Being complex to develop and difficult to manufacture, the biosimilar is a drug similar but not identical in physicochemical characteristics, efficacy, and safety to an original biological drug already approved in the European Union, for which marketing exclusivity rights have expired. Generally, the safety monitoring of biosimilars follows the same requirements that apply to all biologicals, even if specific pharmacovigilance measures exist and some of them are still being debated. The manufacturing process, immunogenicity, traceability, and extrapolation of indication are keywords which may impact on the achievement of additional knowledge about the safety of a biosimilar mAb. In this article, we aim to discuss elements that play a central role in the pharmacovigilance legislation of biosimilar mAbs.

An Update of Efficacy and Safety of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer, representing 13% of all diagnosed cancers. Cetuximab is a recombinant chimeric monoclonal IgG1 antibody and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor. Cetuximab is approved for the first-line treatment in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent in patients who have failed or are intolerant to chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-expressing, RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Cetuximab efficacy emerged from studies that were conducted to approve the drug. Cetuximab is well tolerated; its toxicities are caused by its mechanism of action and the most common adverse reaction is skin toxicity. The main purpose of this manuscript is to present an update on the evidence-based summary of efficacy and safety and on the cost-effectiveness of cetuximab. Furthermore, it suggests a management of adverse drug reactions to improve the tolerability of the drug.

An historical overview over Pharmacovigilance.

Pharmacovigilance started about 170 years ago, although it was not yet named as such at that time. It is structured activity in the professional health field, with important social and commercial implications aimed at monitoring the risk/benefit ratio of drugs, improving patient's safety and the quality of life. In this commentary we report the milestones of pharmacovigilance up to the present day, in order to understand all the steps that have characterized the historical evolution; from the first reports, which were essentially letters or warnings sent by clinicians to publishers of important and famous scientific journals, up to today's modern and ultra-structured electronic registries. The historical phases also help us to understand why pharmacovigilance helped us to achieve such important results for man's health and for pharmacology itself, and to identify the challenges that await Pharmacovigilance in future years.

Pharmacovigilance in oncology.

Background Side effects of cancer therapy are one of the most important issues faced by cancer patients during their illness. Pharmacovigilance, namely the science and activities aimed at monitoring the safety of drugs, is particularly important in oncology, due to the intrinsic biologic toxicity of antineoplastic agents, their narrow therapeutic windows, and the high doses and rigid timing of treatment regimens. Aim of the review To identify the main issues in carrying out an effective pharmacovigilance activity in oncology. Method We searched PubMed for articles about pharmacovigilance in relation to chemotherapy, radiotherapy and targeted therapy for cancer, using MeSH terms and text words. We also searched Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, Micromedex, the Cochrane Library, two pharmacovigilance databases and the gray literature for articles published in 2012-2018. Overall, 137 articles were considered potentially relevant and were critically appraised independently by two authors, leading to the inclusion of 44 relevant studies, guidelines and reviews. Another 10 important research reports were included in the review. Results Eight critical issues of pharmacovigilance in oncology were identified. These issues pertain to: terminology; range of side effects; targeted therapy and immunotherapy; chemoradiotherapy; generic drugs and biosimilars; drug interactions, pharmacogenetics and polypharmacy; special patient categories; and under-reporting of ADRs. Conclusion The importance of pharmacovigilance in oncology must be highlighted with every effort, to improve safety and offer cancer patients every possible help to improve their quality of life during such a critical period of their lives.

Biosimilar Oncology Drugs in Europe: Regulatory and Pharmacovigilance Considerations.

The introduction in clinical practice of pharmaceutical products known as biosimilars, as part of a more complex series of progress in the field of biological drugs, represents an excellent therapeutic resource. A biosimilar drug is a biological/biotechnological drug that is highly similar to an approved reference biologic product. Given their complexity, biosimilars require attention and a continued vigilance to ensure appropriate use, especially in cancer therapy. There is the urgent need, both at Italian and European levels, of clear and more comprehensive guidelines to elucidate the open questions. Probably, the acquisition of new data, obtained from larger samples of patients than those used in the pre-approval studies and with extremely variable clinical conditions, will allow clarifying the extent to which biosimilar drugs are similar in safety and efficacy to their biologic reference drug. The aims of this article are to provide health professionals with basic, but essential information about biosimilars, and to identify current critical points and future perspectives for clinical practice, cancer care, regulatory aspects, and pharmacovigilance.