Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 40
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38968382

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although routine nurse caregiving is vital for the overall health of preterm infants, variations in approaches may exert distinct effects on preterm infants' stress responses and behavior state. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine routine nurse caregiving in the neonatal intensive care unit and its effect on stress responses and behavior state in preterm infants. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL for studies published between 2013 and 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies enrolled preterm infants born <37 weeks gestational age and investigated nurse caregiving practices and effects on stress responses and/or behavior state. DATA EXTRACTION: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, data about study design, methods, findings, and limitations were extracted and summarized. Included studies were evaluated for bias using the National Health, Lung, and Blood Institute quality assessment tools. RESULTS: All 13 studies included in the review received a fair quality rating. Nurse caregiving activities, including suctioning, diaper changes, bathing, and weighing, were associated with increases in heart and respiratory rates, blood pressure, energy expenditure, and motor responses, lower oxygen saturations, and fewer sleep states. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Adapting nurse caregiving frequency and duration, aligning caregiving with infant state, and integrating developmental care strategies may reduce infant stress responses and support behavioral rest. Further research is needed to understand how caregiving activities affect stress responses and behavior state in preterm infants, aiding in identifying modifiable caregiving stressors to promote optimal development.

2.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 2024 Jul 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38975667

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Though prior literature has demonstrated that communication in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) needs to be improved, in-depth descriptions of parents' views of NICU communication are lacking. PURPOSE: We sought (1) to explore parent perceptions of communication in the NICU and (2) to understand parents' communication needs and preferences. METHODS: We conducted in-depth semi-structured cognitive interviews utilizing concurrent probes with parents of 10 patients in our urban level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit over a period of 4 months (July 2021-October 2021). Interview questions were derived from the Quality of Communication scale. We conducted thematic analysis of interview transcripts modeled after work by Braun and Clarke. RESULTS: Four overarching themes were identified: Strengths, Challenges, People, and Coping Strategies. Parents reported a range of communication quality in the NICU. Results revealed that the first 48 hours of NICU hospitalization represent a period of vulnerability and uncertainty for parents. Parents value clear yet hopeful communication about a baby's clinical status and expected course. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: We hope that the concrete findings from this study can both inform practice in the NICU now and influence practice guidelines to include such components as emphasis on the first 48 hours, desire for proactive information sharing, and the importance of including hope.

3.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 24(1): 71-77, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37703135

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonatal care has advanced significantly in recent years, yet racial health inequities persist in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), with infants from racial and ethnic minority groups less likely to receive recommended treatment. Healthcare providers acknowledge that there are steps that can be taken to increase knowledge and awareness regarding health inequities. PURPOSE: To better understand current health equity-related initiatives in the neonatal community and solicit feedback from National Association of Neonatal Nurses (NANN) membership about advancing racial equity within the organization. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in January 2021. The anonymous, onetime survey was distributed to active NANN members via SurveyMonkey and included questions related to racial equity initiatives, recommendations, and demographics. Data analysis was conducted using an exploratory approach using descriptive statistics, and thematic analysis was used to summarize responses to open-ended questions. RESULTS: There were 325 members who completed the full survey, of whom were White (83%), female (96%), staff nurses (42%), and those with more than 16 years of experience (69%), and most (69%) were familiar with NANN's racial equity position statement. Recommendations were summarized into the following themes: (1) research, (2) education, (3) workforce diversity, (4) communication, (5) scholarships, (6) resources, and (7) community outreach. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: NANN members offered clear and actionable recommendations to advance health equity within the neonatal community and organization, which included offering more diversity, inclusion, and equity education at the annual conferences, in ANC articles, and newsletters, and the creation of scholarships or reduced membership fees to encourage diverse enrollment in the organization.


Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Enfermeras Neonatales , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Grupos Minoritarios , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal
4.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 24(3): 243-252, 2024 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729653

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Rising admission rates of Hispanic/Latinx families to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) have increased the number of non-English-speaking individuals who may wish to participate in research studies. However, a lack of appropriately translated research study materials may limit the opportunity for these families to be involved in research that could impact the care that infants and families receive in the NICU. PURPOSE: The primary purpose was to pilot test study materials that were transcreated from English to Spanish with the assistance of a bilingual community advisory board with Spanish-speaking parents of NICU infants. METHODS: A total of 19 Spanish-speaking parents (15 mothers and 4 fathers) who were representative of the population of interest completed paper-and-pencil surveys, along with a cognitive interview. Preliminary data related to decision-making and goals of care, infant symptoms, and their experiences in the NICU were also collected. RESULTS: The internal reliability of the transcreated study instruments ranged from good to excellent (α= 0.82-0.99). Participants reported that study materials were not offensive and did not make them feel uncomfortable; however, they found some words/phrases to be confusing. Parents had the opportunity to provide suggested wording changes. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Language barriers and a lack of cultural responsiveness can affect the care that infants and their families receive. More accurate and culturally appropriate transcreation of study materials can remove barriers to research participation and facilitate better communication with non-English-speaking families, which may lead to the development of better-informed evidence-based interventions and clinical practices in the NICU.


Asunto(s)
Hispánicos o Latinos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Padres , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Padres/psicología , Masculino , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Barreras de Comunicación , Lenguaje , Traducción
5.
J Pediatr Psychol ; 48(6): 503-511, 2023 07 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36308772

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Research suggests families whose infants are admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) experience elevated distress and may have pre-existing risk factors for maladjustment. This study sought to validate the newly developed Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT-NICU/Cardiac Intensive Care Unit [CICU]), a comprehensive screening measure for family psychosocial risk in the NICU. METHODS: The sample included 171 mothers, who completed the PAT-NICU/CICU and other related measures within 2 weeks of their infant's NICU admission at a level 4 unit within a large pediatric hospital. PAT-NICU/CICU scores were compared to a companion risk survey completed by NICU social workers. Test-retest reliability was assessed through repeated measures at 2-month follow-up. RESULTS: Analyses suggest the PAT-NICU/CICU is effective in classifying psychosocial risk. This is supported by statistically significant correlations between the PAT-NICU/CICU and validated measures, in addition to elevated scores on concurrent measures by risk classification. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and acceptability for the PAT-NICU/CICU were satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study demonstrates the validity, reliability, and acceptability of the PAT-NICU/CICU as a psychosocial screening tool to aid identification of families who may benefit from supportive services during NICU admission. This new measure is a more comprehensive tool that assesses a wide variety of risk factors and stress responses. However, future studies of this measure are needed with more diverse samples. Prompt screening of NICU parents may facilitate earlier linkage with appropriate levels of resources or intervention. This research is crucial in improving risk assessment and psychosocial care for families in the NICU.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Madres , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Padres/psicología , Medición de Riesgo
6.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 23(3): 212-219, 2023 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36912673

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Admission rates of Hispanic/Latinx families to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are rising, yet knowledge regarding their experiences is limited. Non-English-speaking families are often excluded from research because study measures are not available in their language. The inclusion of these families in NICU research is crucial to understand the impact of cultural and language barriers in infant and family care, and the translation of study measures into Spanish could better ensure that these families' perspectives are included. However, previous research has utilized the standard translation-backtranslation method with which problems have been noted. PURPOSE: This article describes the planning, preparation, and action phases that were completed with the use of a community advisory board (CAB) to prepare and transcreate research study materials from English to Spanish for pilot testing. METHODS: Community members of interest were invited to form the CAB, and 2 meetings were held to review study materials in the English and Spanish versions. Prior to the second meeting, a professional translation company translated study materials from English to Spanish. RESULTS: Feedback from the CAB ensured consistent content and reading levels, and culturally appropriate language usage. The CAB also provided suggestions to the research protocol and advised sensitive methods of recruitment and measure administration. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: More accurate and culturally appropriate transcreation of study measures can reduce barriers to research participation and facilitate better communication with non-English-speaking families in health equity research to better inform evidence-based interventions and clinical practices across diverse groups.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Lenguaje , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Humanos , Comunicación , Barreras de Comunicación
7.
Nurs Crit Care ; 27(3): 296-325, 2022 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33089659

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate interventions that have been used to engage families in direct care activities (active family engagement) in adult, paediatric, and neonatal intensive care unit (ICU) settings. BACKGROUND: Family engagement is universally advocated across ICU populations and practice settings; however, appraisal of the active family engagement intervention literature remains limited. SEARCH STRATEGY: Ovid Medline, PsycArticles & PsycInfo, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched for family interventions that involved direct care of the patient to enhance the psychological, physical, or emotional well-being of the patient or family in neonatal, paediatric, or adult ICUs. INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies were included if an active family engagement intervention was evaluated. Studies were excluded if they were not published in English or reported non-interventional research. RESULTS: A total of 6210 abstracts were screened and 19 studies were included. Most studies were of low to moderate quality and were conducted in neonatal ICUs within the United States. Intervention dosage and frequency varied widely across studies. The interventions focused on developmental care (neonatal ICU) and involved families in basic patient care. Family member outcomes measured included satisfaction, stress, family-centred care, confidence, anxiety, and depression. Most studies found improvements in one or more outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: There is a paucity of literature about active family engagement interventions, especially in adult and paediatric populations. The optimal dosage and frequency of family engagement interventions remains unknown. Our systematic review found that data are limited on the relationship between family engagement and patient outcomes, and provides a timely appraisal to guide future research. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Further research on the efficacy of family engagement interventions is warranted. The translation of active family engagement interventions into clinical practice should also be supported.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Familia , Adulto , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal
8.
Nurs Res ; 69(5S Suppl 1): S66-S78, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32555010

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neonatal exposure and subsequent withdrawal from maternal substance use disorder are a growing problem and consequence of the current opioid epidemic. Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is defined by a specified cluster of symptoms with treatment guided by the expression and severity of these symptoms. The mechanisms or pathophysiology contributing to the development of NAS symptoms are not well known, but one factor that may influence NAS symptoms is the gut microbiota. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this integrative review was to examine evidence that might show if and how the gut microbiota influence expression and severity of symptoms similar to those seen in NAS. METHODS: Using published guidelines, a review of research studies that focused on the gut microbiome and symptoms similar to those seen in NAS was conducted, using the Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus databases, from 2009 through 2019. RESULTS: The review results included findings of aberrant microbial diversity, differences in microbial communities between study groups, and associations between specific taxa and symptoms. In studies involving interventions, there were reports of improved microbial diversity, community structure, and symptoms. DISCUSSION: The review findings provide evidence that the gut microbiota may play a role in modifying variability in the expression and severity of symptoms associated with NAS. Future research should focus on examining the gut microbiota in infants with and without the syndrome as well as exploring the relationship between symptom expression and aberrant gut microbiota colonization in infants with NAS.


Asunto(s)
Microbioma Gastrointestinal/fisiología , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/complicaciones , Síndrome , Correlación de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Síndrome de Abstinencia Neonatal/fisiopatología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/etiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología
9.
Nurs Res ; 69(5S Suppl 1): S29-S35, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32555012

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infants in the neonatal intensive care unit experience aversive stimuli that cause pain and distress. Maintaining adequate relief from pain and distress is challenging because of infants' varying ages and stages of development and their nonverbal status. Thus, pain and distress must be interpreted by a healthcare provider or other proxy from their own observations or perceptions. There is no standard research or clinical measure for pain and distress in infants. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the use of the COMFORT Behavior (COMFORT-B) Scale as a measure of pain and distress in infants diagnosed with life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses in the neonatal intensive care unit in comparison with the nurse-documented Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; the infants' Technology Dependence Scale; and the mothers' report of total perceived symptom scores. METHODS: Infants diagnosed with life-threatening or life-limiting illnesses and hospitalized in a Level IV neonatal intensive care unit in the Midwestern United States and their parents were included. Measurement of pain and distress in infants was collected weekly from enrollment through 12 weeks or until discharge, whichever occurred first. Observations for the COMFORT-B Scale were conducted before and after standard caregiving activities. Pearson r correlations were used to compare means between pain and distress, technology dependence, and mothers' total perceived symptom scores over time. RESULTS: Data from 78 infants (46 male and 32 female infants) of ages 23-41 weeks of gestation at birth were analyzed. No correlations were found among the COMFORT-B Scale; the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale; and mothers' total perceived symptom scores. Moderate correlations were found among the Technology Dependence Scale; mothers' total perceived symptom scores; and the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale. DISCUSSION: Performing COMFORT-B observations can be challenging, and it is unclear whether the information obtained from the COMFORT-B Scale added to the assessment of the infant's pain and distress that is typically recorded in the health record or from parents. Further evaluation is needed to determine if it is more reliable to collect the Neonatal Pain, Agitation and Sedation Scale scores rather than conduct observations using the COMFORT-B Scale in studies of infants with life-threatening and life-limiting illnesses in the neonatal intensive care unit.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Observación Conductual/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica , Técnicas de Observación Conductual/instrumentación , Técnicas de Observación Conductual/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos
10.
Nurs Res ; 69(2): 127-132, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31972849

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Infants who are admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) may experience significant symptom burden. Parents are often distressed by these symptoms, which can affect their long-term coping and distress. There is limited research examining nurse perceptions of infant well-being (symptoms, suffering, and quality of life [QOL]) and associations with nurse distress. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this descriptive study was to explore associations between nurse perceptions of infant well-being and self-reported distress. METHODS: Nurses caring for infants with potentially life-threatening/life-limiting conditions were recruited from a Level IV NICU in the Midwestern United States as a part of a study on infant symptom burden. Nurses reported their perceptions of infant well-being and their own distress on a 5-point Likert scale. Surveys were administered at the bedside weekly for up to 12 weeks, depending on length of stay. Infant suffering and QOL were examined in relation to nurse distress. A cross-classified multilevel model was used to account for dependence within nurse and within patient. RESULTS: A total of 593 surveys were collected from nurses. Using a cross-classified multilevel model with variables entered simultaneously, nurse perceptions of greater infant suffering and lower infant QOL were significantly associated with greater nurse distress. DISCUSSION: Preliminary evidence shows that greater perceived infant suffering and lower perceived infant QOL may be associated with greater levels of self-reported distress in NICU nurses. Further work is needed to better understand factors related to symptom management in the NICU and the potential role of caregiver distress and compassion fatigue in NICU nurses.


Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Lactante/psicología , Enfermeras Neonatales/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Autoinforme , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Estudios Longitudinales , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , Nacimiento Prematuro , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
11.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 20(2): 118-126, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569093

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Learning directly from bereaved parents about their experiences in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) can improve services at end-of-life (EOL) care. Parents who perceive that their infant suffered may report less satisfaction with care and may be at greater risk for distress after the death. Despite calls to improve EOL care for children, limited research has examined the EOL experiences of families in the NICU. PURPOSE: We examined parent perceptions of their infant's EOL experience (eg, symptom burden and suffering) and satisfaction with care in the NICU. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: Forty-two mothers and 27 fathers (representing 42 infants) participated in a mixed-methods study between 3 months and 5 years after their infant's death (mean = 39.45 months, SD = 17.19). Parents reported on healthcare satisfaction, unmet needs, and infant symptoms and suffering in the final week of life. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Parents reported high levels of healthcare satisfaction, with relative strengths in providers' technical skills and inclusion of the family. Greater perceived infant suffering was associated with lower healthcare satisfaction and fewer well-met needs at EOL. Parents' understanding of their infant's condition, emotional support, communication, symptom management, and bereavement care were identified as areas for improvement. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Parents value comprehensive, family-centered care in the NICU. Additionally, monitoring and alleviating infant symptoms contribute to greater parental satisfaction with care. Improving staff knowledge about EOL care and developing structured bereavement follow-up programs may enhance healthcare satisfaction and family outcomes. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Prospective studies are needed to better understand parental perceptions of EOL care and the influence on later parental adjustment.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal/psicología , Evaluación de Necesidades , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Padres/psicología , Satisfacción Personal , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Adulto , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos
12.
Comput Inform Nurs ; 39(1): 24-31, 2020 Jun 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32568899

RESUMEN

This quality improvement project formalized central venous catheter tip surveillance augmented by the use of electronic patient reporting tool. The project setting was a large level IV academic neonatal intensive care unit with a representative convenience sample of patients with central venous catheters and quality improvement reports of complications from tip migration. Providers received education before implementation of a central venous catheter tip surveillance program using a revised electronic reporting tool was initiated. Provider evaluations of the electronic reporting tool included compliance with the guidelines and use of the tool in multidisciplinary patient rounds, and were entered into a database for analysis. Nine evaluations of the electronic reporting tool were completed, with an average of 97% compliance with guidelines. Seven evaluations during multidisciplinary patient rounds using the reporting tool data demonstrated use by both resident physicians and advanced practice nurses. Central venous catheter patient data were reviewed after process implementation. Overall, infant central venous catheter complications related to tip migration decreased following implementation. Therefore, the use of an electronic reporting tool improved compliance with evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and resulted in a decrease in the risk for central venous line complications related to tip migration in this setting.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/normas , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Recolección de Datos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Rol de la Enfermera
13.
Nurs Outlook ; 68(1): 73-82, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31375348

RESUMEN

The provision of safe and effective nursing care to children is dependent upon pediatric nurse scientists creating knowledge that guides and directs day-to-day nursing practice. Current trends demonstrating steady decreases of pediatric nurses and inadequate numbers of PhD-prepared pediatric nurse scientists put the health of our children at risk. The purposes of this paper are to (1) summarize current health care demands in pediatrics, (2) present our concern that the number of pediatric nurse scientists is inadequate to generate foundational knowledge to guide pediatric nursing practice, (3) present our perspectives on factors influencing the number of pediatric nurse scientists, and (4) recommend specific actions for nursing leaders, nursing faculty, and professional nursing organizations to increase the depth and breadth of pediatric nursing science to meet current and future pediatric care needs.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería/economía , Predicción , Investigación en Enfermería , Enfermería Pediátrica/tendencias , Niño , Salud Infantil , Atención a la Salud , Humanos
15.
J Adv Nurs ; 74(1): 172-180, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28746750

RESUMEN

AIMS: To examine the impact of errors or adverse events on emotional distress and professional quality of life in healthcare providers in the neonatal intensive care unit, and the moderating role of coworker support. BACKGROUND: Errors or adverse events can result in negative outcomes for healthcare providers. However, the role of coworker support in improving emotional and professional outcomes has not been examined. DESIGN: A cross-sectional online survey from a quality improvement initiative to train peer supporters in a neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: During 2015, 463 healthcare providers in a neonatal intensive care unit completed a survey assessing their experiences with an error or adverse event, anxiety, depression, professional quality of life and coworker support. RESULTS: Compared with those who did not experience an error or adverse event (58%), healthcare providers who observed (23%) or were involved (19%) in an incident reported higher levels of anxiety and secondary traumatic stress. Those who were involved in an event reported higher levels of depression and burnout. Differences between the three groups (no event, observation and involvement) for compassion satisfaction were non-significant. Perceived coworker support moderated the association between experiencing an event and both anxiety and depression. Specifically, experiencing an event was associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression when coworkers were perceived as low in supportiveness, but not when they were viewed as highly supportive. CONCLUSION: Findings suggest that errors or adverse events can have a harmful impact on healthcare providers and that coworker support may reduce emotional distress.


Asunto(s)
Emociones , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Errores Médicos/psicología , Personal de Hospital/psicología , Rol Profesional , Adulto , Ansiedad/etiología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/etiología , Empatía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupo Paritario , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
J Pediatr ; 190: 118-123.e4, 2017 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28647272

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency of postnatal discussions about withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining therapy (WWLST), ensuing WWLST, and outcomes of infants surviving such discussions. We hypothesized that such survivors have poor outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective review included registry data from 18 centers of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Infants born at 22-28 weeks of gestation who survived >12 hours during 2011-2013 were included. Regression analysis identified maternal and infant factors associated with WWLST discussions and factors predicting ensuing WWLST. In-hospital and 18- to 26-month outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: WWLST discussions occurred in 529 (15.4%) of 3434 infants. These were more frequent at 22-24 weeks (27.0%) compared with 27-28 weeks of gestation (5.6%). Factors associated with WWLST discussion were male sex, gestational age (GA) of ≤24 weeks, birth weight small for GA, congenital malformations or syndromes, early onset sepsis, severe brain injury, and necrotizing enterocolitis. Rates of WWLST discussion varied by center (6.4%-29.9%) as did WWLST (5.2%-20.7%). Ensuing WWLST occurred in 406 patients; of these, 5 survived to discharge. Of the 123 infants for whom intensive care was continued, 58 (47%) survived to discharge. Survival after WWLST discussion was associated with higher rates of neonatal morbidities and neurodevelopmental impairment compared with babies for whom WWLST discussions did not occur. Significant predictors of ensuing WWLST were maternal age >25 years, necrotizing enterocolitis, and days on a ventilator. CONCLUSIONS: Wide center variations in WWLST discussions occur, especially at ≤24 weeks GA. Outcomes of infants surviving after WWLST discussions are poor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00063063.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/estadística & datos numéricos , Privación de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Mortalidad Infantil , Recién Nacido , Recien Nacido Prematuro , Masculino , Morbilidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
17.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 17(3): 175-183, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28195841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite technological advances in the neonatal intensive care unit, not all infants survive. Limited research has focused on infants' symptoms and suffering at end of life (EOL) from multiple perspectives. PURPOSE: To compare retrospective parent report and electronic medical record (EMR) documentation of symptoms and to examine associations with parent perceptions of infants suffering at EOL. METHODS/SEARCH STRATEGY: Bereaved parents of 40 infants (40 mothers and 27 fathers) retrospectively reported on their perceptions of infant symptoms and suffering during the last week of life. EMRs were also reviewed. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Parents were asked about their observations of 23 symptoms. Within the 27 parental dyads, mothers reported 6.15 symptoms (standard deviation = 3.75), which was not significantly different from fathers' report of 5.67 symptoms (standard deviation = 5.11). Respiratory distress, agitation, and pain were most common according to mothers and EMR, whereas respiratory distress, agitation, and lethargy were most common according to fathers. Few differences were found between mothers, fathers, and EMRs. However, missing data (range: 0%-20%) indicated that some parents had challenges assessing symptoms. Parents reported that the worst symptom was respiratory distress. In addition, parents reported moderate infant suffering, which was correlated with the total number of symptoms. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Parents demonstrate awareness of their infant's symptoms at EOL, and these observations should be valued as they closely parallel EMR documentation. However, some parents did have difficulty reporting symptoms, highlighting the importance of education. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH: Future larger sample research should prospectively examine parent perceptions of infant symptom burden, suffering, and associations with other infant and parent outcomes (eg, decision making and grief).


Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Padre/psicología , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Madres/psicología , Cuidado Terminal/psicología , Adulto , Toma de Decisiones , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Dolor/psicología , Padres , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos
18.
19.
Nurs Res ; 69(5S Suppl 1): S1-S2, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32858716
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA