Clinical fate of branch duct and mixed forms of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the pancreas.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical fate of, and to gain new insights into, branch duct and mixed (predominantly main duct type) forms of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia of the pancreas (IPMN). METHODS: During a 17-year period, 99 successive IPMN patients (52 men, 47 women; mean age, 64 years) were included and divided into two groups for further comparison: one group had branch duct IPMN, whereas the other had mixed IPMN. RESULTS: Patients from the mixed IPMN group (n = 52) displayed a greater rate of symptoms (83% vs 55%, P = 0.004), pancreatic resection (67% vs 38%, P = 0.007), malignancy (35% vs 13%, P = 0.017) and death (15% vs 4%, P = 0.09) than those from the branch duct IPMN group. A 38-month follow up of non-operated, symptom-free patients confirmed that more than 85% of branch duct IPMN patients were asymptomatic without evidence of malignancy. Borderline lesions and carcinoma are found in up to 50% of symptomatic resected branch duct IPMN cases. CONCLUSION: Patients with the mixed form of IPMN as well as with symptomatic branch duct IPMN should require pancreatic resection because of symptoms and the risk for malignancy. In silent branch duct IPMN without radiological signs of malignancy, a non-operative watch-and-wait strategy can be discussed.

Peroral transgastric/transduodenal necrosectomy: success in the treatment of infected pancreatic necrosis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the results and complications of an endoscopic transgastric/transduodenal approach as a possible alternative to conventional surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Infected organized pancreatic necrosis carries a high mortality despite antibiotic therapy and numerous conventional and laparoscopic surgical techniques of debridement. The advent of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) provides a possible alternative approach. METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, patients with infected organized pancreatic necrosis were referred for endoscopic necrosectomy as their initial treatment of choice. Accessibility was confirmed by CT and endoscopic ultrasound. Access to the cavities was transgastric or transduodenal, after passing the endoscope inside the retroperitoneal cavity all necrotic and purulent material was evacuated under direct endoscopic vision. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (12 men, mean age: 55 years, range: 38-66 years) underwent endoscopic necrosectomy. Two patients had complementary percutaneous drainage for endoscopically inaccessible cavities. Resolution infection was the rule in all cases. Infection recurred in 4 patients and a necrotic cavity persisted in 1 patient; all were managed by further endoscopic necrosectomies (total = 23 necrosectomy sessions; mean, 1.8 per patient; range, 1-3). Mean duration of each session was 3.5 hours (range, 2.5-4 hours). Endoscopic treatment was eventually successful in all patients with gradual diminution of the necrotic cavities on CT images. Average duration of follow-up was 19.5 months (range, 2-56 months) with no recurrence of the infectious process and no surgery was required for any patient. Complications included bleeding (n = 3) and transient aggravation of sepsis (n = 3). No mortality occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This technique is highly effective and safe in the treatment of infected organized pancreatic necrosis. Results are achievable and sustainable with a limited number of sessions.

Safety and long-term outcome of a new concept for surgical adhesion-reduction strategies (Prevadh): a prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: No agent has been consistently effective in preventing formation of peritoneal adhesions and postoperative bowel obstruction after abdominal surgery. The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to assess clinical safety and efficiency of a new adhesion-reduction barrier METHODOLOGY: Between September 2000 and April 2001, Prevadh was used in 78 patients. Operative procedures included 25 hepatic resections, 7 cholecystectomies, 32 colonic resections, 7 protectomies, 3 colostomy or recovery of continuity, 1 gynaecologic surgery and 3 others. Eleven patients were operated on by laparoscopy and 67 by laparotomy. RESULTS: The overall incidence of abscesses and wound complications was 2.4% and 9% respectively. After a mean follow-up of 36 months (range: 4-51 months), no patients experienced adverse events related to the adhesion barrier. Surgical reoperative procedures were performed in 10 patients for unrelated causes and no bowel obstruction occurred within the protected area. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the safety of Prevadh adhesion barrier and suggested that this resorbable barrier might provide prevention from adhesion formation on peritoneal injured surfaces. However, a large randomized controlled trial remains necessary to prove the real effectiveness of adhesion barriers on clinical long-term outcome.

Does vagal nerve stimulation affect body composition and metabolism? Experimental study of a new potential technique in bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: It has been shown that vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) can affect body mass. The aim of this study was to evaluate effect of VNS on body mass, body composition, metabolic rate, and plasma leptin and IGF-I levels. METHODS: Eight female pigs were included in the study. Under general anesthesia, a bipolar electrode was implanted on the anterior vagal nerve by laparoscopy. Group A was treated by VNS, and group B was the control. After 4 weeks, stimulation was discontinued in group A and started in group B. The following parameters were evaluated: body mass, body composition, metabolic rate, plasma leptin and IGF-1 levels and intramuscular fat content (IMF). RESULTS: VNS attenuated body weight gain (2.28 +/- 3.47 kg vs 14.04 +/- 6.75 kg; P = .0112, for stimulation and nonstimulation periods, respectively), backfat gain (0.04 +/- 0.26 mm vs 2.31 +/- 1.12 mm) and IMF gain (-3.76 +/- 6.06 mg/g MS vs 7.24 +/- 12.90 mg/g MS; P = .0281). VNS resulted in lower backfat depth/loin muscle area ratio (0.33 +/- 0.017 vs 0.38 +/- 0.35; P = .0476). Lower plasma IGF-I concentration was found after VNS (-3.67 +/- -11.55 ng/mL vs 9.86 +/- 10.74 ng/mL; P = .0312). No significant changes in other parameters were observed. CONCLUSIONS: VNS affects body weight mainly at the expense of body fat resources; however, metabolic rate is not affected.

Risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: multivariate analysis in 300 patients.

BACKGROUND: Studies of risk factors after pancreatoduodenectomy are few: some concern restricted populations and others are based on administrative data. METHODS: Multicenter clinical data were collected for 300 patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy to determine (by univariate and multivariate analysis) preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for mortality and intra-abdominal complications (IACs), including pancreatic fistula. Fourteen factors including the center and volume effect were analyzed. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, mortality was increased with age 70 years or more, extended resection(s), and volume and center effects. IACs occurred more often with main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less, normal parenchyma texture, extended resection(s), and the center effect. Pancreatic fistula was more frequent with main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less, normal parenchyma texture, and the center effect. In multivariate analysis, independent risk factor(s) for mortality were age greater than 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-8) and extended resection (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.2-22), risk factors for IACs were extended resection (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.2-22) and main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less (OR, 2; 95% CI, 1.1-3), and the risk factor for pancreatic fistula was main pancreatic duct diameter of 3 mm or less (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2-4.6). CONCLUSIONS: Age more than 70 years, extended resections, and main pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm are independent risk factors that should be considered in indications for and techniques of pancreatoduodenectomy.

A controlled randomized multicenter trial of pancreatogastrostomy or pancreatojejunostomy after pancreatoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: Only 2 large (more than 100 patients) prospective trials comparing pancreatogastrostomy (PG) with pancreatojejunostomy (PJ) after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) have been reported until now. One nonrandomized study showed that there were less pancreatic and digestive tract fistula with PG, whereas the other, a randomized trial from a single high-volume center, found no significant differences between the two techniques. METHODS: Single blind, controlled randomized, multicenter trial. The main endpoint was intra-abdominal complications (IACs). RESULTS: Of 149 randomized patients, 81 underwent PG and 68 PJ. No significant difference was found between the two groups concerning pre- or intraoperative patient characteristics. The rate of patients with one or more IACs was 34% in each group. Twenty-seven patients sustained a pancreatoenteric fistula (18%), 13 in PG (16%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 8-24%) and 14 in PJ (20%; 95% CI 10.5-29.5%). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups concerning the mortality rate (11% overall), the rate of reoperations and/or postoperative interventional radiology drainages (23%), or the length of hospital stay (median 20.5 days). Univariate analysis found the following risk factors: (1) age > or =70 years old, (2) extrapancreatic disease, (3) normal consistency of pancreas, (4) diameter of main pancreatic duct <3 mm, (5) duration of operation >6 hours, and (6) a center effect. Significantly more IAC, pancreatoenteric fistula, and deaths occurred in one center (that included the most patients) (P = .05), but there were significantly more high-risk patients in this center (normal pancreas consistency, extrapancreatic pathology, small pancreatic duct, higher transfusion requirements, and duration of operation >6 hours) compared with the other centers. In multivariate analysis, the center effect disappeared. Independent risk factors included duration of operation >6 hours for IAC and for pancreatoenteric fistula (P = .01), extrapancreatic disease for pancreatoenteric fistulas (P < .04), and age > or =70 years for mortality (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: The type of pancreatoenteric anastomosis (PJ or PG) after PD does not significantly influence the rate of patients with one or more IAC and/or pancreatic fistula or the severity of complications.

Octreotide in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications following elective pancreatic resection: a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled trial.

HYPOTHESIS: Prophylactic administration of octreotide acetate decreases the rate of postoperative intra-abdominal complications (IACs) after elective pancreatic resection. DESIGN: Single-blind, controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: Multicenter (N = 20) trial in France. PATIENTS: Of 230 randomized patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy and pancreatic enteric anastomosis or distal pancreatectomy for either malignant or benign tumor or chronic pancreatitis, 122 were allotted intraoperatively to receive octreotide; 108 served as controls. RESULTS: All 230 patients were analyzed. Both groups were comparable except that significantly more patients in the octreotide group had biological glue injected into the main pancreatic duct alone (P<.001) or reinforcing the pancreatic enteric anastomosis (68% [83/122] vs 39% [42/108]; P =.002). Fewer patients (P =.08) in the octreotide group sustained 1 or more IACs (22% vs 32%). In subgroup analysis, octreotide significantly reduced the rate of patients sustaining 1 or more IACs when the main pancreatic duct diameter was less than 3 mm (P<.02), when pancreatojejunostomy was performed (P<.02), or both (P<.02). No significant differences were found regarding IAC severity. Twenty-three patients (10%) died postoperatively, 16 (70% of deaths) of whom had 1 or more IACs. The only independent risk factor for IACs found on multivariate analysis was pancreatoduodenectomy compared with distal pancreatectomy (P<.01) (odds ratio, 3.54 [95% confidence interval, 1.44-8.65]). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that octreotide is not necessary for all patients undergoing pancreatic resection; it could be useful when the main pancreatic duct is less than 3 mm in diameter and when pancreatoduodenectomy is completed by pancreatojejunostomy.

Surgeon-dependent predictive factors for mortality after elective colorectal resection and immediate anastomosis for cancer or nonacute diverticular disease: multivariable analysis of 2,605 patients.

BACKGROUND: Multivariable analysis best identifies independent risk factors. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a prospective evaluation of 2,605 patients through univariate analysis followed by nonconditional multiple logistic regression analysis on 39 pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors, analyzed according to preoperative factors alone, preoperative and intraoperative factors together, and all 3 combined. The purpose was to identify surgeon-dependent independent risk factors for mortality after elective colorectal surgery, with immediate anastomosis for cancer and nonacute diverticular disease. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 3.5%. Through multivariable analysis, five risk factors were found when preoperative data were analyzed alone. Four remained (age between 60 and 75 years, age greater than 75 years, male gender, and heart failure) and 4 new factors (palliative resection, total colectomy, respiratory failure, and surgeon-dependent fecal soiling [the only surgeon-dependent factor]) appeared when pre- and intraoperative factors were analyzed together. Of the latter, two remained stable when all three categories of risk factors were combined and analyzed (palliative resection and total colectomy), and the two others disappeared. Of the eight pre-, intra-, and postoperative factors combined, two new factors appeared: extrasurgical site (ESS) and surgeon-dependent, organ space surgical site (O/SSS) morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Every effort must be made to collect specific, surgeon-dependent (technical and clinical) data, along with administrative data, for multivariable analysis of risk factors. Classification into three periods (pre-, pre- and intraoperative together, and pre-, intra-, and postoperative combined) enables determination of relevant, surgeon-dependent risk factors (fecal soiling and postoperative morbidity) for which there are direct preventive actions.

Blood salvage autotransfusion during transplantation for hepatocarcinoma: does it increase the risk of neoplastic recurrence?

Impact of intraoperative blood salvage autotransfusion (IBSA) on neoplastic recurrence. during liver transplantations for hepatocellular carcinoma (LT-HCC). Between January 1989 and February 2003, 16 patients received a LT-HCC without IBSA. This group was compared with 31 patients who received the same surgical procedure during the same period, but with IBSA. Data were prospectively collected. All patients had at least a 1-year postoperative follow up. Pairing was made according to the size of the largest nodule. The percentage of recurrence observed in the two groups was similar: 6.4% in the IBSA group vs. 6.3% in the group without IBSA. The median amount of transfused salvage blood was 1558 ml. The differences observed between the two groups concerned the Child score which was A in 58% patients of the IBSA group vs. 80% in the other group; the percentage of severe portal hypertension was 55% in the IBSA group vs. 31%; the median number of packed red blood cell units transfused intraoperatively was 7 in the IBSA group vs. 0, and the median number of frozen fresh plasma units transfused intraoperatively was 11 in the IBSA group vs. 4.5. It appears that IBSA, essentially used during the most haemorrhagic transplantations, could be used in the case of HCC because it does not modify the risk of neoplastic recurrence.

Temporary fibrin glue occlusion of the main pancreatic duct in the prevention of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection: prospective randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether temporary occlusion of the main pancreatic duct with human fibrin glue decreases the incidence of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' knowledge, there are no randomized studies comparing outcomes after pancreatic resection with or without main pancreatic duct occlusion by injection of fibrin glue. Of three nonrandomized studies, two reported no fistulas after intracanal injection and ductal occlusion with fibrin glue after PD with immediate pancreatodigestive anastomosis, while another study reported no protective effect of glue injection. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded, multicenter study, conducted between January 1995 and January 1999, included 182 consecutive patients undergoing PD followed by immediate pancreatic anastomosis or DP, whether for benign or malignant tumor or for chronic pancreatitis. One hundred two underwent pancreatic resection followed by ductal occlusion with fibrin glue (made slowly resorbable by the addition of aprotinin); 80 underwent resection without ductal occlusion. The main end point was the number of patients with one or more of the following intra-abdominal complications: pancreatic or other digestive tract fistula, intra-abdominal collections (infected or not), acute pancreatitis, or intra-abdominal or digestive tract hemorrhage. Severity factors included postoperative mortality, repeat operations, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The two groups were similar in pre- and intraoperative characteristics except that there were significantly more patients in the ductal occlusion group who were receiving octreotide, who had reinforcement of their anastomosis by fibrin glue, and who had fibrotic pancreatic stumps. However, the rate of patients with one or more intra-abdominal complications, and notably with pancreatic fistula, did not differ significantly between the two groups. There was still no significant difference found after statistical adjustment for these patient characteristic discrepancies, confirming the inefficacy of fibrin glue. The rate of intra-abdominal complications was significantly higher in the presence of a normal, nonfibrotic pancreatic stump and main pancreatic duct diameter less than 3 mm, whereas reinforcement of the anastomosis with fibrin glue or use of octreotide did not influence outcome. In multivariate analysis, however, normal pancreatic parenchyma was the only independent risk factor for intra-abdominal complications. No significant differences were found in the severity of complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ductal occlusion by intracanal injection of fibrin glue decreases neither the rate nor the severity of intra-abdominal complications after pancreatic resection.