Examining lack of referrals to heart valve specialists as mechanisms of potential underutilization of aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest that aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains underutilized. AIMS: Investigate the potential role of non-referral to heart valve specialists (HVS) on AVR utilization. METHODS: Patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) between 2015 and 2018, who met class I indication for intervention, were identified. Baseline data and process-related parameters were collected to analyze referral predictors and evaluate outcomes. RESULTS: Among 981 patients meeting criteria AVR, 790 patients (80.5%) were assessed by HVS within six months of index TTE. Factors linked to reduced referral included increasing age (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.94-0.97; P < .001), unmarried status (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.43-0.83; P = .002) and inpatient TTE (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.19-0.38; P < .001). Conversely, higher hematocrit (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.09-1.16; P < .001) and eGFR (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 1.00-1.02; P = .003), mean aortic valve gradient (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; P < .001) and preserved LVEF (OR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.02-2.48; P = .04), were associated with increased referral likelihood. Moreover, patients assessed by HVS referral as a time-dependent covariate had a significantly lower two-year mortality risk than those who were not (aHR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.23-0.39; P < .001). CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of severe AS patients meeting indications for AVR are not evaluated by HVS and experience markedly increased mortality. Further research is warranted to assess the efficacy of care delivery mechanisms, such as e-consults, and telemedicine, to improve access to HVS expertise.

Standardized diagnostic reference levels for paediatric interventional cardiology: Data from an Italian referral centre.

PURPOSE: To provide data on radiation exposure in paediatric interventional cardiology procedures, addressing the scarcity of valuable Local Diagnostic Reference Levels (LDRLs),established according to the standardized approach proposed by the Radiation Protection 185 report (RP185). METHODS: Paediatric catheterization procedures conducted at the University-Hospital of Padua from September 2019 to December 2022 were stratified by body weight (BW) classes and procedure type. LDRLs were calculated for groups with at least 20 patients as the 75th percentile of Kerma-Area Product (PKA) and Air Kerma at reference point (Ka,r) values. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to evaluate differences in the dose-related quantities among BW groups for a selected procedure and among procedures for the same BW class. Results were compared with recent literature. RESULTS: A total of 838 procedures were analysed. LDRL were provided for five therapeutic procedures. The 75th percentile of PKA and Ka,r increases with weight, regardless procedure type. PKA and Ka,r are generally statistically different between BW groups, for both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, and between different procedures at fixed weight group. Angioplasty and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract treatments (PVR) showed exposure values approximately doubled then other procedures. PKA/(BW·FT) is not statistically different among procedures except for Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) closures. LDRL values from this study are generally lower than the published ones. CONCLUSIONS: The study stands out as one of the few that presents a considerable number of LDRLs for weight categories and procedure types with a sample size of at least 20 patients per group, in agreement with RP185. PKA shows strong correlation with the product BW·FT.

[Drug-eluting stents in contemporary interventional practice: the STENT PANORAMA project (Part I)]. / Gli stent coronarici a rilascio di farmaco nella pratica interventistica contemporanea: progetto STENT PANORAMA (Parte I).

STENT PANORAMA is a project carried out by the Young Interventional Cardiologists of Triveneto coordinated by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) Veneto delegation. The project includes two parts: the first, here reported, is aimed at describing in a standardized and easily usable way the main technological characteristics of the latest generation of the drug eluting stents (DES) that are most widely used in the Italian cath-labs. The second, to follow, will aim to summarize the main scientific evidence regarding the performance of individual devices with particular reference to subgroups of clinical interest. The ambitious goal of the STENT PANORAMA working group is to provide the interventional cardiologist with a thorough, practical, and functional knowledge of the DES currently available in the modern therapeutic armamentarium to promote a therapeutic strategy tailored to the patient.

Management of high and intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism: A position paper of the Interventional Cardiology Working Group of the Italian Society of Cardiology.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a potentially life-threatening condition that remains a major global health concern. Noteworthy, patients with high- and intermediate-high-risk PE pose unique challenges because they often display clinical and hemodynamic instability, thus requiring rapid intervention to mitigate the risk of clinical deterioration and death. Importantly, recovery from PE is associated with long-term complications such as recurrences, bleeding with oral anticoagulant treatment, pulmonary hypertension, and psychological distress. Several novel strategies to improve risk factor characterization and management of patients with PE have recently been introduced. Accordingly, this position paper of the Working Group of Interventional Cardiology of the Italian Society of Cardiology deals with the landscape of high- and intermediate-high risk PE, with a focus on bridging the gap between the evolving standards of care and the current clinical practice. Specifically, the growing importance of catheter-directed therapies as part of the therapeutic armamentarium is highlighted. These interventions have been shown to be effective strategies in unstable patients since they offer, as compared with thrombolysis, faster and more effective restoration of hemodynamic stability with a consistent reduction in the risk of bleeding. Evolving standards of care underscore the need for continuous re-assessment of patient risk stratification. To this end, a multidisciplinary approach is paramount in refining selection criteria to deliver the most effective treatment to patients with unstable hemodynamics. In conclusion, the current management of unstable patients with PE should prioritize tailored treatment in a patient-oriented approach in which transcatheter therapies play a central role.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at High Risk of Coronary Obstruction.

Background: Coronary obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a life-threatening complication. For patients at elevated risk, it is not known how valve choice is influenced by clinical and anatomic factors and how outcomes differ between valve platforms. For patients at high risk of coronary obstruction, we sought to describe the anatomical and clinical characteristics of patients treated with both balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expanding (SE) valves. Methods: This was a multicenter international registry of patients undergoing TAVR who are considered to be at high risk of coronary obstruction and receiving pre-emptive coronary protection. Results: A total of 236 patients were included. Patients receiving SE valves were more likely to undergo valve-in-valve procedures and also had smaller sinuses of Valsalva and valve-to-coronary distance. Three-year cardiac mortality was 21.6% with SE vs 3.7% with BE valves. This was primarily driven by increased rates of definite or probable coronary occlusion, which occurred in 12.1% of patients with SE valves vs 2.1% in patients with BE valves. Conclusions: In patients undergoing TAVR with coronary protection, those treated with SE valves had increased rates of clinical and anatomic features that increase the risk of coronary obstruction. These include an increased frequency of valve-in-valve procedures, smaller sinuses of Valsalva, and smaller valve-to-coronary distances. These patients were observed to have increased cardiac mortality compared with patients treated with BE valves, but this is likely due to their higher risk clinical and anatomic phenotypes rather than as a function of the valve type itself.