Complication, vertical bone gain, volumetric changes after vertical ridge augmentation using customized reinforced PTFE mesh or Ti-mesh. A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this non-inferiority randomized clinical trial was to compare the surgical and healing complications, vertical bone gain, and volumetric bone changes after vertical ridge augmentation using two different approaches: customized Ti-reinforced d-PTFE mesh versus customized CAD/CAM Ti-mesh. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with vertical bone defects were randomly treated with Ti-reinforced d-PTFE mesh (control group) or CAD/CAM Ti-mesh (test group) and a mix of autogenous bone and deproteinized bovine bone matrix. Surgical and healing complication rates (SCR-HCR), vertical bone gain (VBG), regenerated bone volume (RBV), and regeneration rates (RR and ERR) were recorded and analysed [significance level (α) of 0.05]. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients, 48 underwent bone augmentation surgery. SCR were 4% and 12% in PTFE and Ti-mesh, whereas HCR were 12.5% and 8.3%. VBG were 5.79 ± 1.71 mm (range: 3.2-8.8 mm) in the PTFE group and 5.18 ± 1.61 mm (range: 3.1-8.0 mm) in the Ti-mesh group (p = .233), whereas RBV were 1.46 ± 0.48 cc and 1.26 ± 0.55. RR was 99.5% and 87.0%, demonstrating a statistically significant difference (p = .013). Finally, the values related to pseudo-periosteum, bone density, and implant stability were similar in the two study groups. Osseointegration rates were 98.2% and 98.3%. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the non-inferiority of customized CAD/CAM titanium meshes with respect to reinforced PTFE meshes in terms of surgical and healing complications. Although PTFE meshes showed higher vertical bone gain and regeneration rates than Ti-meshes, no significant differences were found.

Efficacy of an automatic electric toothbrush with nylon bristles in dental plaque removal: a cross-over randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this single-use, five-treatment, five-period, cross-over randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare the efficacy in dental plaque removal of a new Y-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (Y-brush) compared to a U-shaped automatic electric toothbrush (U-brush), a manual toothbrushing procedure (for 45 and 120 s), and no brushing (negative control). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eligible participants were volunteer students randomized to the treatments in the five periods of the study. The primary outcome measure was the reduction in full-mouth plaque score (FMPS) after brushing while the secondary outcome variable was a visual analogic scale (VAS) on subjective clean mouth sensation. Mixed models were performed for difference in FMPS and VAS. RESULTS: After brushing procedures, manual toothbrushing (120 s) showed a statistically significant reduction in FMPS than Y-brush (difference 36.9; 95%CI 29.6 to 44.1, p < 0.0001), U-brush (difference 42.3; 95%CI 35.1 to 49.6, p < 0.0001), manual brushing (45 s) (difference 13.8; 95%CI 6.5 to 21.1, p < 0.0001), and No brushing (difference 46.6; 95%CI 39.3 to 53.9, p < 0.0001). Y-brush was significantly more effective than No brushing (difference 9.8; 95%CI 2.5 to 17.0, p = 0.0030), while there was no significant difference compared to U- brush. Similar results were obtained for the differences in the Clean Mouth VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Y-brush was significantly more effective than no brushing (negative control) in removing dental plaque. When compared to manual toothbrushing for both 45 and 120 s, however, Y-brush was less effective in dental plaque removal. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Modified design of automatic toothbrushing devices could improve plaque reduction, especially in patients with intellectual disabilities or motor difficulties.

Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the conventional alginate impression and the digital impression taken with an intraoral scanner of both dental arches in children, using a randomized crossover design. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a monocentric, controlled, superiority, randomized, crossover, open study. METHODS: Twenty-four orthodontic patients between 6 and 11 years of age underwent intraoral scanning (TRIOS 3; 3Shape) and alginate impression of both dental arches with an interval of 1 week between the two procedures. Participants were recruited from September 2021 to March 2022 and the study was completed in April 2022. Impression time for the two procedures was compared. Patients were asked which one of the two impression procedures they preferred. A questionnaire including Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for comfort, pain, gag reflex and difficulty in breathing, was administered to the patients. RESULTS: Eighteen out of 24 patients preferred digital impression (75%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 55% to 88%; P = .014). Scanning time was significantly shorter than alginate impression time (difference -118 seconds; 95% CI: -138 to -99; P < .001). Comfort was significantly higher for digital impression (difference 1.7; 95% CI: 0.5 to 2.8; P = .007). There was no difference in pain (difference -0.2; 95% CI: -1.5 to 1.0; P = .686) while gag reflex and breathing difficulties were smaller for digital impression (gag reflex difference -2.5; 95% CI: -4.0 to -0.9; P = .004 and breathing difficulties difference -1.5; 95% CI: -2.5 to -0.5; P = -.004). CONCLUSIONS: Digital impression is preferred by children aged 6-11 years and it is significantly faster in acquisition time than conventional alginate impression. REGISTRATION: The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with registration number NCT04220957 on January 7th, 2020 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04220957).

Effects produced by the facemask with and without skeletal anchorage for the orthopaedic treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

BACKGROUND: Skeletally anchored facemask has been proposed to maximize skeletal effects and minimize dental effects in the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare the dento-skeletal effects produced by the facemask with or without skeletal anchorage for the treatment of Class III malocclusion in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and OpenGrey were used for the electronic search without language, publication status, and year restrictions. Only RCTs were included. Inclusion criteria were: growing patients (age under 18 years) with Class III malocclusion, with indications for treatment with the facemask. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. GRADE statement was executed. The mean of differences (MD) and the risk ratio (RR) were used. RESULTS: Three articles with a total of 123 patients were included. One article was at low risk of bias while two were at high risk of bias. There were no significant differences between the two groups in ANB angle, Wits appraisal, SNB angle, and SN-MP angle. SNA angle was significantly increased in the skeletally anchored facemask (pooled MD = 0.80 favouring skeletal anchorage, 95% CI from 0.29 to 1.31, P = 0.002, I2 = 12 per cent, three studies, GRADE moderate). The U1-SN angle was significantly reduced in the skeletally anchored facemask (pooled MD = -5.91 favouring skeletal anchorage, 95% CI from -7.64 to -4.27, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0 per cent, two studies, GRADE moderate). There were significantly less complications in tooth-anchored facemask (pooled RR = 7.98 favouring dental anchorage, 95 per cent CI from 1.04 to 61.27, P = 0.05, I2 = 0 per cent, two studies, GRADE low). LIMITATIONS: Few RCTs (three) were included, and two studies were at high risk of bias. There were no long-term RCTs comparing skeletally anchored facemask with dental-anchored facemask. Only Asiatic patients were included in this systematic review. CONCLUSIONS: Skeletally anchored facemask was associated to a greater increase of SNA angle at the end of treatment though clinically not significant. Facemask with skeletal anchorage determined a reduced inclination of maxillary incisors compared to dental-anchored facemask with greater risks of complications. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO register (CRD42020221982).

Post-pubertal effects of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols for the early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a retrospective controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the stability of the effects of the modified Alt-RAMEC and facial mask (FM) protocol at a post-pubertal observation. METHODS: Twenty-one Class III patients (11 males and 10 females, 6.5 ± 0.7 years) treated consecutively with the Alt-RAMEC/FM approach and presenting with lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), and at post-pubertal observations (T3) were compared with 22 Class III patients (9 males and 13 females, 6.9 ± 1.2 years) treated with the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and FM protocol and with 15 Class III untreated subjects (7 males and 8 females, 6.2 ± 2.2 years). At T3, all patients showed a post-pubertal skeletal maturation stage (CS4-CS6). Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons between the three groups at T1 and for the T3-T1, T2-T1, and T3-T2 changes were assessed by means of the ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: During the overall observation period, Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols produced statistically significant favourable effects when compared with the Control group (ANB + 2.8° and +2.2°, respectively; Wits appraisal +4.4 mm and +2.7 mm, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found between the outcomes of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols neither at the post-pubertal or short-term observations. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study and the comparison with an historical control sample of subjects with untreated Class III malocclusion. CONCLUSIONS: The Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol cannot be recommended as the approach of choice for the therapy of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony in very young subjects compared to the conventional RME/FM protocol.

Intra- and Interexaminer Repeatability of Diagnostic Peri-Implant Clinical Measurement: A Pilot Study.

Despite the crucial role of examiner reliability on quality research and practice, there is still limited literature analyzing factors affecting examiner variability of peri-implant clinical measurements. The present study investigated clinical peri-implant parameters to quantify their repeatability and investigate factors that may affect their accuracy. Thirty-three implants were examined by 4 operators. Peri-implant probing depth (PD), recession (REC), and gingival index (GI) were measured for agreement and included in the analysis. Agreement was quantified using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs; 95% confidence interval); mixed linear and logistic regressions were used to assess additional variables. The overall interexaminer agreement was comparable between PD (0.80) and REC (0.78) but significantly worse for GI (0.45; P < .001). Similarly, the intraexaminer agreement was similar for PD (0.81) and REC (0.80) but significantly worse for GI (0.57; P < .05). The magnitude of PD did not influence the agreement. In contrast, increasing disagreement was noted for positive REC (odds ratio [OR]: 3.0), negative REC (OR: 4.8), and lower GI (OR: 4.4). The incidence of bleeding on probing and severity of GI increased for deeper PD (0.113-unit increase per millimeter). Negative and positive values of recession and lower GI were associated with increasing disagreement. Radiographic bone loss, restoration contour, and implant diameter did not affect PD accuracy in this study. In conclusion, within the limitations of the study, GI measurements presented higher variability than PD and REC did. The PD and GI were associated with one another and increased after multiple measurements.

Vertical and horizontal ridge augmentation using customized CAD/CAM titanium mesh with versus without resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the role of resorbable membranes applied over customized titanium meshes related to soft tissue healing and bone regeneration after vertical/horizontal bone augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with partial edentulism of the maxilla/mandible, with vertical/horizontal reabsorption of the alveolar bone, and needing implant-supported restorations, were randomly divided into two groups: Group A was treated using only custom-made meshes (Mesh-) and Group B using custom-made meshes with cross-linked collagen membranes (Mesh+). Data collection included surgical/technical and healing complications, "pseudo-periosteum" thickness, bone density, planned bone volume (PBV), regenerated bone volume (RBV), regeneration rate (RR), vertical bone gain (VBG), and implant survival in regenerated areas. Statistical analysis was performed between the two study groups using a significance level of α = .05. RESULTS: Regarding the healing complications, the noninferiority analysis proved to be inconclusive, despite the better results of group Mesh+ (13%) compared to group Mesh- (33%): estimated value -1.13 CI-95% from -0.44 to 0.17. Superiority approach confirmed the absence of significant differences (p = .39). RBV was 803.27 mm3 and 843.13 mm3 , respectively, and higher RR was observed in group Mesh+ (82.3%) compared to Mesh- (74.3%), although this value did not reach a statistical significance (p = .44). All 30 patients completed the study, receiving 71 implants; 68 out of them were clinically stable and in function. CONCLUSION: The results showed that customized meshes alone do not appear to be inferior to customized meshes covered by cross-linked collagen membranes in terms of healing complication rates and regeneration rates, although superior results were observed in group Mesh+compared to group Mesh- for all variables.

Dento-skeletal effects produced by rapid versus slow maxillary expansion using fixed jackscrew expanders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No systematic review and meta-analysis of dento-skeletal effects following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and slow maxillary expansion (SME) using the same jackscrew expander with different activation protocols is available. OBJECTIVE: To compare dento-skeletal effects produced by RME with those induced by SME using the same fixed jackscrew expanders in growing patients. SEARCH METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, and OpenGrey were searched with no language or publication date restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected and the following inclusion criteria were used: growing patients in mixed or permanent dentition, with maxillary transverse discrepancy, dental crowding, and treated with fixed jackscrew maxillary expander (e.g. Hyrax, Haas) activated to achieve either RME or SME. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by two independent reviewers. The quality of the included RCTs was assessed according to the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0). For the aggregation of continuous data, the mean of the differences (MD) between treatments was used. A random effect model was applied. RESULTS: From 4855 retrieved articles, 3 studies were selected, 1 at unclear risk and 2 at high risk of bias. Maxillary intermolar distance showed no significant differences between the two modalities of expansion [pooled MD = 0.99 mm favouring RME, with 95% confidence interval (CI) = -2.09 to 4.06, P = 0.53, I2 = 90%]. As for maxillary molar inclination measured as the angle formed by the axes passing through the disto-buccal cusps and the apexes of the palatine root of the first upper molars, it was significantly smaller in the SME group (MD = -11.51°, with 95% CI = -15.23 to -7.79, P < 0.0001). Posterior maxillary expansion was significantly greater in RME than SME (pooled MD = 0.75 mm, with 95% CI = 0.27-1.23, P = 0.002, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Both RME and SME produce an effective dento-skeletal expansion of the maxilla. RME is slightly more effective in increasing the posterior transverse skeletal width of the maxilla while SME induces smaller molar inclination. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CDR42018105530.

Periodontal implications of surgical-orthodontic treatment of an impacted dilacerated maxillary incisor: A case report with a 2-year follow-up.

The treatment of an 8-year-old girl with a dilacerated maxillary incisor began in the mixed dentition; a modified palatal arch attached to the molars served as anchorage for the forced eruption of the dilacerated tooth to prevent the intrusion of the adjacent teeth and reduce the risk of root resorption. Two surgical sessions were planned: the first to permit the closed eruption; the second was an apically positioned flap to add attached gingiva to the labial side of the erupting tooth. The result was an optimal periodontal outcome; moreover, the roots of the adjacent teeth did not show any sign of resorption at the end of the forced eruption. The tooth was vital at the end of the treatment, and the apex covered by alveolar mucosa. The root developed normally throughout the treatment, and the periodontium was healthy and esthetically acceptable at the 2-year follow-up. Further study is needed to assess the advantages of the combined surgical-orthodontic treatment.

A clinical dilemma: Performing or avoiding root instrumentation in the treatment of the acute phase of endodontic-periodontal lesions? A case report.

BACKGROUND: This study presents the diagnois, management, and tissue response to an acute periodontal lesion with deep pocketing affecting a maxillary central incisor in a young patient devoid of caries or a history of periodontitis. METHODS: Clinical and radiographic examinations facilitated the diagnosis of the pathology as an endoperiodontal lesion (EPL) with root damage, exhibiting supracrestal invasive root resorption. Orthograde endodontic therapy was employed to decontaminate and seal the endodontic space. The resorptive site was treated through the endodontic access, debrided, and sealed. No periodontal therapy (surgical or nonsurgical) was performed. No mechanical instrumentation was performed within the pocketed root surface. RESULTS: At 6-month and 1-year follow-ups after endodontic therapy the periodontium displayed a physiologically healthy condition without pus or inflammation, exhibiting a circumferential probing depth of 2 mm, and absence of tooth mobility. These favorable outcomes persisted throughout a 4-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The spontaneous healing of pocketing and abscess occurred without mechanical root instrumentation following endodontic therapy and treatment of external invasive root resorption in an EPL. KEY POINTS: Accurate diagnosis and identification of relevant etiologic factors are pivotal for effectively managing endodontic-periodontal lesions. Once a diagnosis is established, the therapy focuses on eliminating the primary cause, followed by a subsequent diagnostic phase after healing. The definitive understanding of the diagnosis and etiology of endodontic-periodontal lesions often becomes clear in retrospect, based on the outcomes of the therapy. When probing acute periodontal lesions, deep probing depths may occur without permanent loss of periodontal attachment. If the acute lesion was not induced by a periodontal cause and if no periodontal etiology arises secondarily, resolving the primary cause of the endoperiodontal lesion can lead to the spontaneous resolution of the pocketing. This results in spontaneous healing of periodontium without the need for intentional periodontal therapy. A clinical dilemma arises when considering periodontal treatment during the acute inflammatory phase of endo-periodontal pathology. It is advisable to refrain from mechanical root instrumentation particularly if a clear periodontal cause is not apparent, to prevent from iatrogenic damage to periodontal fibers and the potential risk of gingival recessions. However, this does not imply avoiding periodontal therapy entirely for every case. Rather, it is recommended to delay the decision on root instrumentation until a new diagnostic phase is conducted following the healing of the endodontic etiology.

The influence of vertical ridge augmentation techniques on peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The primary aim of this systematic review was to investigate and compare the outcomes of different vertical ridge augmentation (VRA) techniques in relation to peri-implant bone loss (PBL), after at least 12 months of functional loading. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search was conducted to find all the studies about VRA and measurements of PBL with at least 12 months follow-up. Three pairwise meta-analysis (MA) was performed to completely evaluate the outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 42 studies were included, of which 11 were randomized clinical trials (RCTs). RCTs were available only for guided bone regeneration (GBR), onlay, and inlay techniques. The weighted mean estimate (WME) of PBL value was found to be 1.38 mm (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.10-1.66) after a mean follow-up of 41.0 ± 27.8 months. GBR, Inlay, Onlay, osteodistraction, and SBB represented in weight 32.9%, 30.6%, 25.0%, 7.6%, and 3.9%, respectively; and their WME (95% CI) were 1.06 (0.87-1.26) mm, 1.72 (1.00-2.43) mm, 1.31 (0.87-1.75) mm, 1.81 (0.87-1.75) mm, and 0.66 (0.55-0.77) mm, respectively. Among the secondary outcomes, the analysis was conducted for vertical bone gain, healing complication rate, surgical complication rate, implant survival, and success rate. CONCLUSIONS: The primary findings of the meta-analysis, based on the changes between final and baseline values, showed that the peri-implant bone loss could be influenced by the type of intervention but there is a need to evaluate in RCTs the behavior of the peri-implant bone levels after long-term follow-up for all techniques.

Diagnostic reproducibility of the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recessions: Comparing photographic and in-person diagnoses.

BACKGROUND: To assess how the diagnostic reproducibility of the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects (GRD) could be applied when comparing in-person chairside measurements with photographic measurements. METHODS: Thirty-four GRD were photographed and evaluated by 4 masked operators. For each case, the operators measured twice recession type (RT), recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), gingival thickness (GT), detectability of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and presence of root steps (RSs), chairside, and on photographs. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated for RD and KTW; Kappa with 95% CI was used for GT, CEJ, and RS; quadratic weighted Kappa with 95% CI was used for RT. RESULTS: RD, KTW, and RT showed excellent overall intra-operator agreement (> 0.93), and from good to excellent overall inter-operator agreement (> 0.80), for both clinical and photographic measurements. Agreements were lower for GT, CEJ, and RS. Overall clinical and photographic agreements were within 0.1 difference for every variable, except for inter-operator agreement for RS which was 0.72 for clinical measurements and 0.45 for photographic measurements. The lowest overall agreement between clinical versus photographic measurements existed for CEJ (0.28) and RS (0.35). CONCLUSIONS: Variables composing the 2018 Classification of GRD are reproducible, both clinically and on photographs, with comparable agreements. The overall agreement was higher for KTW, RD, and RT, and lower for GT, CEJ, and RS, for both clinical and photographic measurements. The comparison between chairside and photographic evaluations indicated fair to excellent agreement for most variables, with CEJ and RS showing fair agreement. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: As digital diagnostics evolve to facilitate clinical diagnostic measurement, we aimed to assess the effectiveness of intraoral photography for diagnosing gingival recession defects (GRD) according to the 2018 Classification of GRD, compared to traditional clinical examination. Standardized photographs of thirty-four GRD cases were captured. Four masked operators evaluated the same gingival recessions twice in a clinical setting and twice using photographs. Measurement repeatability within and between operators was calculated for both clinical and photographic settings, and the two settings were compared. Continuous measurements such as recession depth and keratinized tissue width, as well as the evaluation of interproximal attachment height (recession type), showed excellent agreement both clinically and photographically. Agreement was lower for gingival thickness and the detectability of tooth anatomical landmarks, such as the cemento-enamel junction and the presence of root steps. Overall, the agreement between chairside and photographic evaluations was generally good, but lower when evaluating tooth anatomical landmarks. The variables composing the 2018 Classification of GRD are reproducible in both clinical and photographic settings, with comparable levels of agreement. However, there was consistently worse agreement for gingival thickness and when evaluating tooth anatomical landmarks.

Translational approach to tooth autotransplantation: A 27-year case study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this case report was to present a translational approach to tooth autotransplantation using jiggling forces to enlarge the periodontal ligament (PDL) space before autotransplantation, with the goal of improving treatment success and long-term survival. METHODS: A 23-year-old patient, undergoing orthodontic therapy and with an unrestorable maxillary first molar, was proposed to have a healthy and fully-erupted maxillary third molar transplanted in the socket of the first molar. Jiggling forces were applied to the third molar to enlarge the PDL space and facilitate the preservation of PDL fibers on the root surfaces during the extraction. RESULTS: Jiggling forces induced hypermobility and widened PDL space of the third molar. The autotransplantation was successful and the patient was followed regularly over a 27-year period. At the 27-year visit, the patient showed optimal chewing function, oral plaque control, and absence of gingivitis. The transplanted molar exhibited periodontal health and absence of mobility. Probing depth of 5 mm and radiographic external root resorption was noted on a localized area of the transplanted tooth which had experienced traumatic and unintentional removal of PDL fibers during the extraction. CONCLUSIONS: A translational approach was proposed by integrating knowledge from the fields of orthodontics, trauma from occlusion, and replantation. It validated the crucial importance of maintaining healthy PDL fibers on the root surface and demonstrated clinically the successful autotransplantation of a fully formed third molar into the socket of a first molar with a retention of 27 years. KEY POINTS: Why is this case new information? This case provided evidence of successful autotransplantation of a molar with complete root formation. It reported the longest-term follow-up (27 years) present in the literature. Most importantly, it used a translational medicine approach to apply concepts from the fields of orthodontics and traumatic occlusion to improve the success of the autotransplantation procedure. What are the keys to the successful management of this case? Jiggling forces induced tooth hypermobility and increased the PDL space of the tooth planned for autotransplantation. In turn, they facilitated the atraumatic extraction and preservation of the PDL fibers on the transplanted tooth, improving the success of the reattachment of periodontal fibers. What are the primary limitations to success in this case? Traumatic extraction resulting in the unintended removal of PDL fibers from the tooth planned for autotransplantation, or intentional removal of PDL fibers with root planing are expected to decrease the success rate of the autotransplantation procedure. This is due to the lack of viable PDL cells necessary for reattachment.

Diagnostic reproducibility of the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects and Gingival Phenotype: A multicenter inter- and intra-examiner agreement study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate the inter- and intra-examiner agreement among international experts on the diagnosis of gingival recession defects using the 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects and Gingival Phenotype as proposed in the 2017 World Workshop. METHODS: Standardized intraoral photographs from 28 gingival recession defects were evaluated twice by 16 expert periodontists. Recession type (RT), recession depth (RD), keratinized tissue width (KTW), gingival thickness (GT), detectability of the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ), and presence of root steps (RS) were recorded and used for the analysis. Intra- and inter-examiner agreements were calculated for individual variables and for the overall classification. Intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% CI was used for RD and KTW; Kappa with 95% CI was used for GT, CEJ, and RS; quadratic weighted Kappa with 95% CI was used for RT. RESULTS: Overall intra- and inter-examiner agreements were highest for KTW (0.95 and 0.90), lowest for GT (0.75 and 0.41), with the other variables in between (RD: 0.93 and 0.68, RS: 0.87 and 0.65, RT: 0.79 and 0.64, CEJ: 0.75 and 0.57). Overall intra- and inter-examiner agreements for the matrix were 62% and 28%, respectively. Significant effects existed between one variable's measurement and other variables' agreements. CONCLUSIONS: The 2018 Classification of Gingival Recession Defects and Gingival Phenotype is clinically reproducible within the examiners, and when the variables forming the matrix are analyzed individually. The between-examiner agreement for the complete matrix showed lower reproducibility. The agreement was highest for KTW and RD, and least for GT.

Computer-Assisted Mandibular Reconstruction with a Single-Step Free Fibula Flap and Simultaneous Implant Placement.

The free fibula flap is a reliable approach used to reconstruct maxillofacial osseous defects. Virtual surgical planning facilitates the execution of such segmental bony reconstruction, usually preceding the placement of endosseous implants for dental rehabilitation. Novel advances in digital technology allow for fabrication of 3D guides for implant placement in the fibula bone segments before their fixation to the facial defect, with reduced ischemic time, reduced treatment time, faster dental rehabilitations, and unprecedented improvements in the overall treatment efficiency. This case report illustrates the use of digitally designed 3D-printed surgical plates for a single-stage surgery of free fibula flap with implant placement. The patient was successfully treated and followed over 2 years. Comparison between preoperative virtual planning and postoperative scans revealed a high accuracy of implant and bone segment positioning.

Gingival recessions caused by Herpes Simplex Virus in a patient with COVID-19 infection.

Herpes Simplex Virus type 1 (HSV-1) is a very common infection often localized in the mucocutaneous junction of the lip. Rarely, it could be detected also in periodontal tissues, associated with an elevated risk of periodontal disease progression and gingival recessions. Recently, HSV-1 and numerous co-infections have been reported in literature associated with the Coronavirus and subsequent COVID-19 disease. This report illustrates a case of HSV-1 in a patient with Covid-19 infection, showing the presence of ulcers and vesicles on the gingival margin of maxillary teeth associated with soreness and pain. The histology highlighted the presence of intraepithelial cell ballooning, confirming the diagnosis of HSV-1 infection.

Paradigm Shifts in the Evolution of Implant Therapy.

Making treatment decisions in dental implantology has evolved over the last five decades. These decisions and the clinical management of sites thereafter are selected based on recent changes, including the achievement of osseointegration, reestablishment of biologic width bone remodeling, the peri-implant soft tissue phenotype, the way peri-implantitis is defined, and advancements in digital technology. This article discusses these key aspects and their effects and influence on implant therapy.

Comparison of rapid versus slow maxillary expansion on patient-reported outcome measures in growing patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: No systematic review and meta-analysis are present in the literature comparing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in rapid maxillary expansion (RME) versus slow maxillary expansion (SME) in growing patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to compare PROMs in RME versus SME in growing patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Electronic search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and OpenGrey was conducted. Only RCTs were included. Inclusion criteria were: growing patients in the mixed dentition or early permanent dentition, mild-to-moderate maxillary transverse deficiency, dental crowding, treatment with fixed expanders for rapid and slow maxillary expansion. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2. GRADE statement was performed. The mean of the differences (MD) and the risk ratio (RR) were used for the aggregation of data. A random effect model was applied. RESULTS: Two articles with a total of 157 patients were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. One article was at low risk of bias, while one was at risk of bias with some concerns. Pain presence was less, though not statistically significant, in SME patients (RR = 2.02, 95%CI from 0.55 to 7.49, P = 0.29, I2 = 95%, 2 studies, GRADE very low). Pain intensity was significantly lower in SME appliance in the first week of treatment (pooled MD = 0.86 favoring SME, 95%CI from 0.47 to 1.26, P < 0.0001, I2 = 6%, 2 studies, GRADE moderate). There were no significant differences between the two groups in difficulty in speaking, difficulty in swallowing, hypersalivation, difficulty in hygiene, and patient and parent satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Pain intensity was significantly lower in SME compared to RME during the first week of treatment. For the following weeks, there were no differences in pain between the two protocols.

Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Different Immune Signatures in HPV- and HPV + Driven Human Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a significant health problem and related to poor long-term outcomes, indicating more research to be done to deeply understand the underlying pathways. Objective: This current study aimed in the assessment of the viral- (especially human papilloma virus [HPV]) and carcinogen-driven head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) microenvironment based on single-cell sequencing analysis. Methods: Data were downloaded from GEO database (GSE139324), including 131224 cells from 18 HP- HNSCC patients and 8 HPV+ HNSCC patients. Following data normalization, all highly variable genes in single cells were identified, and batch correction was applied. Differentially expressed genes were identified using Wilcoxon rank sum test. A gene enrichment analysis was performed in each cell cluster using KEGG analysis. Single-cell pseudotime trajectories were constructed with MONOCLE (version 2.6.4). Cell-cell interactions were analyzed with CellChat R package. Additionally, cell-cell communication patterns in key signal pathways were compared in different tissue groups. A hidden Markov model (HMM) was used to predict gene expression states (on or off) throughout pseudotime. Five-year overall survival outcomes were compared in both HPV+ and HPV- subsets. Results: 20,978 high-quality individual cells passed quality control. RNA-seq data were used from 522 HNSCC primary tumor samples. 1,137 differentially expressed genes between HPV+ and HPV- HNSCC patients were investigated. 96 differentially expressed genes were associated with overall survival and highly enriched in B cell associated biological process. Cell composition differed between types of samples. MHC-I, MHC-II, and MIF signaling pathways were found to be most relevant. Within these pathways, some cells were either signal receiver or signal sender, depending on sample type, respectively. Six genes were obtained, AREG and TGFBI (upregulation), CD27, CXCR3, MS4A1, and CD19 (downregulation), whose expression and HPV types were highly associated with worse overall survival. AREG and TGFBI were pDC marker genes, CXCR3 and CD27 were significantly expressed in T cell-related cells, while MS4A1 and CD19 were mainly expressed in B naïve cells. Conclusions: This study revealed dynamic changes in cell percentage and heterogeneity of cell subtypes of HNSCC. AREG, TGFBI, CD27, CXCR3, MS4A1, and CD19 were associated with worse overall survival in HPV-related HNSCC. Especially B-cell related pathways were revealed as particularly relevant in HPV-related HNSCC. These findings are a basis for the development of biomarkers and therapeutic targets in respective patients.

Identifying crosstalk genetic biomarkers linking a neurodegenerative disease, Parkinson's disease, and periodontitis using integrated bioinformatics analyses.

Objective: To identify the genetic linkage mechanisms underlying Parkinson's disease (PD) and periodontitis, and explore the role of immunology in the crosstalk between both these diseases. Methods: The gene expression omnibus (GEO) datasets associated with whole blood tissue of PD patients and gingival tissue of periodontitis patients were obtained. Then, differential expression analysis was performed to identify the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) deregulated in both diseases, which were defined as crosstalk genes. Inflammatory response-related genes (IRRGs) were downloaded from the MSigDB database and used for dividing case samples of both diseases into different clusters using k-means cluster analysis. Feature selection was performed using the LASSO model. Thus, the hub crosstalk genes were identified. Next, the crosstalk IRRGs were selected and Pearson correlation coefficient analysis was applied to investigate the correlation between hub crosstalk genes and hub IRRGs. Additionally, immune infiltration analysis was performed to examine the enrichment of immune cells in both diseases. The correlation between hub crosstalk genes and highly enriched immune cells was also investigated. Results: Overall, 37 crosstalk genes were found to be overlapping between the PD-associated DEGs and periodontitis-associated DEGs. Using clustering analysis, the most optimal clustering effects were obtained for periodontitis and PD when k = 2 and k = 3, respectively. Using the LASSO feature selection, five hub crosstalk genes, namely, FMNL1, MANSC1, PLAUR, RNASE6, and TCIRG1, were identified. In periodontitis, MANSC1 was negatively correlated and the other four hub crosstalk genes (FMNL1, PLAUR, RNASE6, and TCIRG1) were positively correlated with five hub IRRGs, namely, AQP9, C5AR1, CD14, CSF3R, and PLAUR. In PD, all five hub crosstalk genes were positively correlated with all five hub IRRGs. Additionally, RNASE6 was highly correlated with myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in periodontitis, and MANSC1 was highly correlated with plasmacytoid dendritic cells in PD. Conclusion: Five genes (i.e., FMNL1, MANSC1, PLAUR, RNASE6, and TCIRG1) were identified as crosstalk biomarkers linking PD and periodontitis. The significant correlation between these crosstalk genes and immune cells strongly suggests the involvement of immunology in linking both diseases.