Common Causes of Outpatient CT and MRI Callback Examinations: Opportunities for Improvement.

OBJECTIVE. The purposes of this study were to investigate factors driving callback MRI and CT examinations and to discern opportunities for optimizing the patient experience by reducing future callbacks. MATERIALS AND METHODS. All consecutive outpatient CT and MRI callback examinations from October 2015 to October 2017 in four radiology subspecialties (cardiothoracic imaging, abdominal imaging, neuroradiology, musculoskeletal imaging) were reviewed at an academic quaternary care center. Callback details (modality, subspecialty, protocoling radiologist, protocol assigned, protocol performed, interpreting radiologist, and reason for callback) were recorded, and reason for callback was categorized. Callback rates were calculated and compared across subspecialties and modalities. RESULTS. There were 194 callbacks among 147,068 MRI and 195,578 CT examinations. The callback rate for MRI was approximately nine times that of CT (MRI, 0.114% [n = 168]; CT, 0.013% [n = 26]). The callback rate was highest for musculoskeletal radiology (CT, 0.090% [7/7802]; MRI, 0.265% [73/27501]; p < 0.0001). Of 65 subspecialty radiologists, nine initiated 52% (101/194) of all callback examinations, and 20 initiated 80% (155/194). One musculoskeletal radiologist was responsible for 11.8% (23/194) of all callbacks. The most common reasons for callbacks were protocol error (28% [55/194]), inadequate anatomic coverage (21% [40/194]), incomplete examination (13% [25/194]), and perceived suboptimal image quality (11% [22/194]). The three most common causes of callbacks (62% [120/194] of all callbacks) were largely preventable. CONCLUSION. Outpatient callback examinations are uncommon, occur more often for MRI than CT, and are often preventable. Callback proclivities likely vary between attending radiologists. Targeted improvement efforts may mitigate callbacks.

Quantitative Imaging Assessment for Clinical Trials in Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Objective radiographic assessment is crucial for accurately evaluating therapeutic efficacy and patient outcomes in oncology clinical trials. Imaging assessment workflow can be complex; can vary with institution; may burden medical oncologists, who are often inadequately trained in radiology and response criteria; and can lead to high interobserver variability and investigator bias. This article reviews the development of a tumor response assessment core (TRAC) at a comprehensive cancer center with the goal of providing standardized, objective, unbiased tumor imaging assessments, and highlights the web-based platform and overall workflow. In addition, quantitative response assessments by the medical oncologists, radiologist, and TRAC are compared in a retrospective cohort of patients to determine concordance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The TRAC workflow includes an image analyst who pre-reviews scans before review with a board-certified radiologist and then manually uploads annotated data on the proprietary TRAC web portal. Patients previously enrolled in 10 lung cancer clinical trials between January 2005 and December 2015 were identified, and the prospectively collected quantitative response assessments by the medical oncologists were compared with retrospective analysis of the same dataset by a radiologist and TRAC. RESULTS: This study enlisted 49 consecutive patients (53% female) with a median age of 60 years (range, 29-78 years); 2 patients did not meet study criteria and were excluded. A linearly weighted kappa test for concordance for TRAC versus radiologist was substantial at 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46-0.85; standard error [SE], 0.10). The kappa value was moderate at 0.42 (95% CI, 0.20-0.64; SE, 0.11) for TRAC versus oncologists and only fair at 0.34 (95% CI, 0.12-0.55; SE, 0.11) for oncologists versus radiologist. CONCLUSIONS: Medical oncologists burdened with the task of tumor measurements in patients on clinical trials may introduce significant variability and investigator bias, with the potential to affect therapeutic response and clinical trial outcomes. Institutional imaging cores may help bridge the gap by providing unbiased and reproducible measurements and enable a leaner workflow.

Utility of Pelvic CT for Surveillance of T2-T4 Renal Cell Carcinoma After Nephrectomy With Curative Intent.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether routine pelvic imaging is necessary during postoperative surveillance of pathologic T2-T4 renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy for curative intent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective single-institution cohort study with 603 subjects undergoing partial or radical nephrectomy of T2-T4 renal cell carcinoma with curative intent was conducted from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2015. Clinical and imaging (CT or MRI) follow-up findings were evaluated in a prospectively maintained registry to determine the timing and location of recurrent and metastatic disease. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects with positive or equivocal findings in the pelvis and negative findings in the chest and abdomen. Binomial CIs were calculated and compared with a prespecified minimum detection threshold of 5%. RESULTS: The T category distribution was as follows: T2 (28.9% [174/603]), T3 (70.3% [424/603]), and T4 (0.8% [5/603]). Most (81.8% [493/603]) of the patients underwent radical nephrectomy, and 27.0% (163/603) had recurrence or metastasis (mean time to first recurrence, 600 ± 695 days). Pelvic imaging findings were negative in 97.0% (585/603) of cases. Four subjects (0.7% [95% CI, 0.2-1.7%]) had isolated positive findings in the pelvis (p < 0.0001 vs the 5% threshold). Two (0.3% overall [95% CI, 0.04-1.1%]) of these positive findings were in subjects who did not have symptoms. CONCLUSION: Routine pelvic imaging of patients undergoing surveillance for asymptomatic T2-T4 renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy performed with curative intent has minimal value and probably should not be performed.

Hemostatic Agents and Tissue Sealants: Potential Mimics of Abdominal Abnormalities.

OBJECTIVE: Topical tissue sealants and hemostatic agents, seen on postoperative imaging in a variety of intraabdominal and pelvic locations, have the potential to be mistaken for abdominal abnormalities, especially if the radiologist is not aware of the patient's surgical history. The normal appearance of these agents may mimic abscesses, tumors, enlarged lymph nodes, or retained foreign bodies. Therefore, it is important to be familiar with their typical imaging appearances and to review the surgical records when needed to avoid misdiagnoses. The purpose of this article is to increase the radiologist's familiarity with various types of topical tissue sealants and hemostatic agents used during surgical and percutaneous procedures in the abdomen and pelvis along with their radiologic appearances. CONCLUSION: Various types of hemostatic agents are now commonly used during surgery and percutaneous procedures in the abdomen and pelvis, and it is important to recognize the various appearances of these agents. Although there are suggestive features outlined in this article, the most important factor for the radiologist is to be aware of the patient's history and the possibility that a hemostatic agent may be present. On postoperative imaging, hemostatic agents may mimic abscesses, tumors, enlarged lymph nodes, or retained foreign bodies, and accurate diagnosis can save a patient unnecessary treatment. It is therefore crucial to incorporate knowledge of the patient's surgical history with recognition of the typical imaging appearances of hemostatic agents and other pseudolesions to avoid misdiagnoses.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the society of abdominal radiology and the american pancreatic association.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high mortality rate. Proper determination of the extent of disease on imaging studies at the time of staging is one of the most important steps in optimal patient management. Given the variability in expertise and definition of disease extent among different practitioners as well as frequent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of a standardized template for radiology reporting, using universally accepted and agreed on terminology for solid pancreatic neoplasms, is needed. A consensus statement describing a standardized reporting template authored by a multi-institutional group of experts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that included radiologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons was developed under the joint sponsorship of the Society of Abdominal Radiologists and the American Pancreatic Association. Adoption of this standardized imaging reporting template should improve the decision-making process for the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by providing a complete, pertinent, and accurate reporting of disease staging to optimize treatment recommendations that can be offered to the patient. Standardization can also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using appropriate and consistent staging by means of resectability status, thus allowing for comparison of results among different institutions.

Primary and secondary disease of the peritoneum and mesentery: review of anatomy and imaging features.

The largest and most complex serosal membrane in the body, the peritoneum, lines the abdominal cavity, and the abdominopelvic viscera. It is frequently involved in a variety of benign and malignant processes. While secondary involvement of the peritoneum is more common, primary tumors can be a diagnostic challenge. Knowledge of the anatomy is crucial in understanding the various pathologic processes. Cross-sectional imaging plays an important role in diagnosing and evaluating the extent of the disease processes. This article reviews the imaging anatomy of the peritoneum and mesentery and the common pathologies involving it.

MDCT findings in small bowel obstruction: implications of the cause and presence of complications on treatment decisions.

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) accounts for a considerable proportion of emergency room visits, inpatient admissions, and surgical interventions in the United States. Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) plays a key role in imaging patients presenting with acute symptoms suggestive of SBO, which helps in establishing the diagnosis, elucidating the cause of obstruction, and detecting complications, such as ischemia or frank bowel necrosis and perforation. Recently, management of patients with SBO has shifted toward a more conservative approach with supportive care and nasogastric tube decompression, as the obstruction in many cases can resolve spontaneously without the need for operative intervention. However, management decisions in SBO remain notoriously difficult, relying on a combination of clinical, laboratory, and imaging factors to help stratify patients into conservative or surgical treatment. Imaging is often an important factor assisting in the decision-making process since traditional clinical signs of vascular compromise, such as acidosis, fever, leukocytosis, and tachycardia are often unreliable in predicting the need for operative intervention. Thus, it is critically important for radiologists to identify imaging features that suggest or indicated high likelihood of bowel vascular compromise in order to help optimize management prior to the development of bowel ischemia and eventually necrosis. By excluding signs of potentially ischemic or necrotic bowel on MDCT, patients may be spared unnecessary surgery, thus decreasing postsurgical complications and averting potential increase for the risk of future SBO and repeated surgery. Conversely, if imaging features indicate potential vascular compromise of the bowel wall that may lead to bowel ischemia, urgent surgical intervention may prevent progression to bowel necrosis and subsequent perforation.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma radiology reporting template: consensus statement of the Society of Abdominal Radiology and the American Pancreatic Association.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with a high mortality rate. Proper determination of the extent of disease on imaging studies at the time of staging is one of the most important steps in optimal patient management. Given the variability in expertise and definition of disease extent among different practitioners as well as frequent lack of complete reporting of pertinent imaging findings at radiologic examinations, adoption of a standardized template for radiology reporting, using universally accepted and agreed on terminology for solid pancreatic neoplasms, is needed. A consensus statement describing a standardized reporting template authored by a multi-institutional group of experts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma that included radiologists, gastroenterologists, and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons was developed under the joint sponsorship of the Society of Abdominal Radiologists and the American Pancreatic Association. Adoption of this standardized imaging reporting template should improve the decision-making process for the management of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by providing a complete, pertinent, and accurate reporting of disease staging to optimize treatment recommendations that can be offered to the patient. Standardization can also help to facilitate research and clinical trial design by using appropriate and consistent staging by means of resectability status, thus allowing for comparison of results among different institutions.

Adrenal Incidentaloma triage with single-source (fast-kilovoltage switch) dual-energy CT.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to evaluate single-source dual-energy CT (DECT) for distinguishing benign and indeterminate adrenal nodules, with attention to the effects of phase of IV contrast enhancement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review revealed 273 contrast-enhanced abdominal DECT examinations from November 2009 through March 2012. Fifty adrenal nodules 0.8 cm or larger were identified in 41 patients (22 women and 19 men; average age, 66 years; age range, 36-88 years). CT postprocessing and measurements were independently performed by two radiologists (readers 1 and 2) for each nodule, as follows: attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on true unenhanced images; contrast-enhanced attenuation (in Hounsfield units) on monochromatic spectral images at 40, 75, and 140 keV; and contrast-enhanced material density (in milligrams per milliliter) on virtual unenhanced images. Nodules were classified as benign (< 10 HU) and indeterminate (≥ 10 HU) according to true unenhanced images. RESULTS: Interreader agreement regarding benign and indeterminate nodules was high (κ = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.8-1.0). At 140 keV, the attenuation of benign nodules was significantly lower (reader 1, 7.0 ± 12.5 HU; reader 2, 7.8 ± 9.2 HU) than that of indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 15.7 ± 20.5 HU [p = 0.004]; reader 2, 17.5 ± 13.4 HU [p < 0.0001]). On virtual unenhanced images, benign nodules had significantly lower material density (reader 1, 992.4 ± 9.9 mg/mL; reader 2, 992.7 ± 9.6 mg/mL) than did indeterminate nodules (reader 1, 1001.1 ± 20.5 mg/mL [p = 0.038]; reader 2, 1007.6 ± 13.4 mg/mL [p < 0.0001]). CONCLUSION: DECT tools can mathematically subtract iodine or minimize its effects in high-energy reconstructions, approximating unenhanced imaging and potentially reducing the need for additional studies to triage adrenal nodules detected on contrast-enhanced DECT examinations.

Multimodality imaging of splenic lesions and the role of non-vascular, image-guided intervention.

Splenic lesions are often incidentally detected on abdominal-computed tomography (CT), ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and these can pose a diagnostic challenge in patients with suspected or known malignancy. This review will discuss the multimodality imaging features of various benign and malignant splenic pathologies including trauma, infection, infarct, granulomatous disease, benign neoplasms such as hemangioma, hamartoma, and littoral cell angioma, cystic entities such as peliosis, splenic cysts, and pseudocysts, and malignant processes such as metastasis, lymphoma, angiosarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma. While several of these splenic pathologies have characteristic imaging features that are helpful in diagnosis, others have nonspecific findings. In such clinical dilemmas, image-guided intervention may be essential, and we therefore discuss the role of non-vascular, image-guided splenic interventions for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. The radiologist can play a key part in the clinical diagnosis and management of splenic lesions, and therefore a thorough knowledge of the imaging features of splenic lesions and a thoughtful approach to their management is crucial.

CT imaging characteristics of oncocytic adrenal neoplasms (OANs): comparison with adrenocortical carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: Oncocytic adrenal neoplasms (OANs) are rare, but are an important subtype of adrenal tumors that is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. Unfortunately, the imaging characteristics of this tumor have not been well described. Our purpose was to identify CT features to differentiate OANs from adrenocortical carcinomas (ACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1991 to 2012, 18 patients with OANs were identified from our institution's pathology database. Twelve had CT examinations available for review. CT characteristics of five benign and seven malignant OANs were reviewed by two abdominal radiologists, and compared to ACC (n = 10). Morphologic characteristics and density measurements were recorded for each imaging phase. Absolute contrast washout was calculated and compared. RESULTS: Benign OANs were smaller [mean size 3.7 cm (range 2.6-5.3)] and more homogeneous than malignant OANs and demonstrated greater washout [mean washout percentage 72.3% (range 61-88)]. Malignant OANs demonstrated features similar to ACCs, including size [mean 9.4 cm (range 5.2-9.8)] and internal necrosis (n = 6). Mean enhancement washout percentage for malignant OANs was 12% (range -8 to 32). CONCLUSION: Benign OANs (oncocytomas) may be distinguished from lipid-rich adenomas on non-contrast CT but may be indistinguishable from lipid-poor adenomas. Malignant oncocytic neoplasms can demonstrate features similar to ACCs, including larger size, internal necrosis, and lower percentage enhancement washout.

Variability in computed tomography diameter measurements of solid renal masses.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the frequency of intra-observer measurement discrepancies ≥5 mm for solid renal masses varies by renal mass characteristics and CT contrast phase. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This HIPAA-compliant retrospective study was approved by our IRB. We selected single CT images performed during the nephrographic phase (NP) of renal enhancement in 97 patients, each with a single solid renal mass. Mass location, margin, heterogeneity, and growth pattern were assessed. Six readers measured each mass on two occasions >3 weeks apart. Readers also measured the masses on images in 50 patients who had corticomedullary phase (CMP) images obtained during the same study. Results were assessed using Chi-square/Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests, and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: For NP to NP comparisons, intra-reader measurement differences ≥5 mm were seen for 3.7% (17/463) of masses <4 cm, but increased to 16.8% (20/119) for masses >4 cm (p < 0.0001). Masses with poorly defined margins (15.9% [22/138] vs. 3.4% [15/444] for well-defined margins, p < 0.0001) and heterogeneity (15.3% [22/144], vs. 5.0% [14/282] for minimally heterogeneous, vs. 0.6% [1/156] for homogeneous, p < 0.0001), were more frequently associated with measurement differences ≥5 mm. Differences ≥5 mm were more frequent when only CMP images were utilized (14% [42/299]), or when CMP images were compared with NP images (26% [77/299]). CONCLUSIONS: A ≥5 mm intra-reader variation in measured size of solid renal masses <4 cm is uncommon for NP to NP comparisons. Variation increases when masses are ≥4 cm, poorly defined, or heterogeneous; or when CMP images are utilized.

A multi-institutional phase 2 study of neoadjuvant gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with radiation therapy in patients with pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate preoperative treatment with full-dose gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiation therapy (RT) in patients with localized pancreatic cancer. METHODS: Eligibility included confirmation of adenocarcinoma, resectable or borderline resectable disease, a performance status ≤2, and adequate organ function. Treatment consisted of two 28-day cycles of gemcitabine (1 g/m(2) over 30 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15) with RT during cycle 1 (30 Gray [Gy] in 2-Gy fractions). Patients were evaluated for surgery after cycle 2. Patients who underwent resection received 2 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Sixty-eight evaluable patients received treatment at 4 centers. By central radiology review, 23 patients had resectable disease, 39 patients had borderline resectable disease, and 6 patients had unresectable disease. Sixty-six patients (97%) completed cycle 1 with RT, and 61 patients (90%) completed cycle 2. Grade ≥3 adverse events during preoperative therapy included neutropenia (32%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and biliary obstruction/cholangitis (14%). Forty-three patients underwent resection (63%), and complete (R0) resection was achieved in 36 of those 43 patients (84%). The median overall survival was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval, 13-26.9 months) for all patients, 27.1 months (95% confidence interval, 21.2-47.1 months) for those who underwent resection, and 10.9 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-12.6 months) for those who did not undergo resection. A decrease in CA 19-9 level after neoadjuvant therapy was associated with R0 resection (P = .02), which resulted in a median survival of 34.6 months (95% confidence interval, 20.3-47.1 months). Fourteen patients (21%) are alive and disease free at a median follow-up of 31.4 months (range, 24-47.6 months). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative therapy with full-dose gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and RT was feasible and resulted in a high percentage of R0 resections. The current results are particularly encouraging, because the majority of patients had borderline resectable disease.

Pneumatosis and portal venous gas: do CT findings reassure?

BACKGROUND: Small, single-institution studies have suggested risk factors for bowel ischemia/necrosis (I/N) in patients with computed tomography (CT) findings of pneumatosis (PN) and portal venous gas (PVG). Here, analysis has been expanded in a large, multicenter study. MATERIALS & METHODS: Logistic regression models and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to construct a scoring system for I/N in cases of PN/PVG. RESULTS: Of 265 patients with PN/PVG identified, 209 had adequate data. In unadjusted analyses the following variables were significantly associated with I/N: age, peritoneal signs, ascites, the presence of both PVG and PN, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), CO2, albumin, and a history of hypertension, myocardial infarction, or stroke. In contrast, the CT findings of mesenteric stranding, bowel-wall thickening, and type of PN were not associated with I/N. In adjusted analyses, three variables were significantly associated with I/N: age ≥60 y (odds ratio = 2.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.26-4.97), peritoneal signs (10.58, 4.23-26.4), and BUN >25 mg/dL (3.08, 1.54-6.17), whereas presence of both PN and PVG (versus only one) was associated with an increase (but not statistically significant increase) in odds (2.01, 0.94-4.36). Although several ad hoc models were used to maximize diagnostic ability, with maximal odds ratio = 174, the areas of receiver operating characteristic curves were all below 0.80, revealing suboptimal accuracy to diagnose I/N. CONCLUSIONS: Older age, peritoneal signs, and high BUN are associated with I/N, suggesting an ability to predict which patients need operation. CT findings traditionally suggestive of ischemic PN/PVG, however, do not diagnose I/N accurately enough to reliably identify patients needing operation.

Differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes on CT and MRI.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of atypical papillary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) and identify imaging differences between type 1 and type 2 papillary RCCs once atypical papillary RCC tumors have been excluded. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-two papillary RCC tumors were classified at pathology as type 1, type 2, or atypical. The CT and MRI examinations of these tumors were reviewed. Imaging features such as tumor size, margins, heterogeneity, and enhancement were assessed and the findings in type 1 and type 2 tumors were compared. RESULTS: There were 43 type 1 and 13 type 2 tumors. Atypical histologic features (i.e., tumors containing both type 1 and type 2 components, clear cells, or components with atypically high nuclear grade [in type 1 tumors] or low nuclear grade [in type 2 tumors]) were seen in 26 tumors. On CT, type 2 tumors more commonly had infiltrative margins (p = 0.05) and were more likely to have calcifications (p = 0.04) than type 1 tumors, although these features were seen in all tumor types. Type 2 tumors were also more heterogeneous than type 1 tumors (p = 0.04). On CT, 11 papillary RCCs showed enhancement of less than 20 HU, seven of which showed enhancement of less than 10 HU. On MRI, all tumors showed enhancement on subtraction images. CONCLUSION: Nearly one third of papillary RCCs in our patient population had atypical features at histology. On CT and MRI, there are some significant differences in imaging features between type 1 and type 2 tumors; however, substantial overlap precludes categorization on a per-patient basis. On CT, many papillary RCCs do not enhance, indicating that assessment of enhancement alone is insufficient for differentiating papillary RCCs from hyperdense cysts.

Imaging effects of radiation therapy in the abdomen and pelvis: evaluating "innocent bystander" tissues.

Accurate interpretation of posttherapeutic images obtained in radiation oncology patients requires familiarity with modern radiation therapy techniques and their expected effects on normal tissues. Three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiation therapy techniques (eg, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy), although they are designed to reduce the amount of normal tissue exposed to high-dose radiation, inevitably increase the amount of normal tissue that is exposed to low-dose radiation, with the potential for resultant changes that may evolve over time. Currently available internal radiation therapy techniques (eg, arterial radioembolization for hepatic malignancies, brachytherapy for prostate cancer and gynecologic cancers) also carry risks of possible injury to adjacent nontargeted tissues. The sensitivity of tissues to radiation exposure varies according to the tissue type but is generally proportional to the rate of cellular division, with rapidly regenerating tissues such as intestinal mucosa being the most radiosensitive. The characteristic response to radiation-induced injury likewise varies according to tissue type, with atrophy predominating in epithelial tissue whereas fibrosis predominates in stromal tissue. Moreover, changes in irradiated tissues evolve over time: In the liver, decreased attenuation at computed tomography and increased signal intensity at T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reflect hyperemia and edema in the early posttherapeutic period; later, veno-occlusive changes alter the hepatic enhancement pattern; and finally, fibrosis develops in some patients. In the small bowel, wall thickening and mucosal hyperenhancement predominate initially, whereas luminal narrowing is the most prominent feature of chronic enteropathy. Correlation of posttherapeutic images with images used for treatment planning may be helpful when interpreting complex cases.

Imaging appearance of renal epithelioid angiomyolipomas.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the computed tomographic (CT) imaging appearance of renal epithelioid angiomyolipomas (eAMLs). METHODS: The CT scans and electronic medical records of 8 patients with histologically confirmed eAMLs identified by biopsy and/or surgical excision who had available imaging performed between 1995 and 2012 were reviewed. Preoperative CT imaging appearance, histologic features, and clinical follow-up were recorded for each patient. RESULTS: Macroscopic fat was identified in 3 (38%) of 8 eAMLs on preoperative CT imaging. Seven of the eAMLs demonstrated postcontrast enhancement of greater than 20 Hounsfield units. None of the eAMLs showed evidence of local invasion, vascular involvement, or distant metastases on the initial preoperative CT; however, 1 patient developed local recurrence and another developed distant metastatic disease on follow-up imaging. CONCLUSIONS: Epithelioid angiomyolipomas may or may not demonstrate macroscopic fat. Those with macroscopic fat do not possess any CT imaging characteristics that allow them to be distinguished from typical angiomyolipomas. Epithelioid angiomyolipomas without macroscopic fat are indistinguishable from renal cancers.

Renal vein leiomyosarcoma: imaging and clinical features of a renal cell carcinoma mimic.

Renal vein leiomyosarcoma is a rare tumor whose clinical and imaging features can significantly overlap with those of advanced primary renal neoplasms, particularly renal cell carcinoma. IRB approval was obtained for a retrospective review of clinical and imaging information for five patients with the pathologically proven diagnosis of renal vein leiomyosarcoma at two institutions. Among the five patients, two were female and three male; average age 58.6 (range 42-77). Three patients presented with flank or abdominal pain, one with pulmonary embolism, and one with weight loss and fatigue. Mass size ranged from 4 to 10 cm. Four masses were left-sided and one right-sided. Tumors involved and expanded the renal vein in all cases, with tumor extension to the renal hilum in one case, through the renal hilum into renal parenchyma in two cases, and into inferior vena cava in two cases. All masses demonstrated contrast enhancement, which was solely peripheral in one case. In all cases, extrarenal tumor volume was greater than renal parenchymal tumor volume. When renal masses are predominantly or exclusively intravascular, consideration should be given to the diagnosis of renal vein leiomyosarcoma because preoperative biopsy results could significantly alter management.

Vascular pancreatic lesions: spectrum of imaging findings of malignant masses and mimics with pathologic correlation.

The differential diagnosis of hypervascular pancreatic lesions is complex, and includes endocrine and exocrine tumors of the pancreas, metastases to the pancreas, and masses, or mass-like lesions, arising from the neurovascular networks traversing the pancreas. In this manuscript, we will discuss salient imaging findings of these masses, pertinent differential diagnoses, as well as review clinical symptomatology that may aid in the diagnosis of some of these lesions.

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: tailoring imaging to specific clinical scenarios.

The clinical and imaging presentation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) is variable and depends on tumor grade, stage, and functional status. This degree of variability combined with a multitude of treatment options and imaging modalities results in complexity when choosing the most appropriate imaging studies across various clinical scenarios. While various guidelines exist in the management and evaluation of PanNETs, there is an overall lack of consensus and detail regarding optimal imaging guidelines and protocols. This manuscript aims to fill gaps where current guidelines may lack specificity regarding the choice of the most appropriate imaging study in the diagnosis, treatment planning, monitoring, and surveillance of PanNETs under various clinical scenarios.