RESUMEN
The reprocessing of medical products is an important topic both in urological practices and in hospitals. The complexity is caused by the increasing variety of medical instruments and also by the increasing demands on the legally required quality of the reprocessing. The Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) have published recommendations for the processing of MD and last updated them in 2012. This article summarizes the legal framework for the reprocessing of medical devices, how medical devices are categorized before the appropriate procedure for reprocessing can be selected and the various steps in the reprocessing. A special focus is placed on medical products that are typically found in urological practices or outpatient departments and are processed there. Furthermore, the necessity of validating the processing method and the required training (expertise) of the personnel are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Equipos y Suministros , Higiene , Esterilización , Hospitales , Endoscopía , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & controlRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We assessed the value of contrast-enhanced US for differentiating between benign and malignant axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 axillary lymph nodes in 92 patients with breast cancer were studied. All patients underwent grayscale US examination, unenhanced and enhanced color and power Doppler US, and enhanced grayscale harmonic US examination. RESULTS: The mean size of the 120 axillary lymph nodes was 1.5 cm (range 0.5 - 3.4 cm). Of all 120 axillary lymph nodes studied, 80 (67 %) were malignant and 40 (33 %) were benign according to pathological examination. The total number of vessels in baseline US did not increase between benign and malignant lymph nodes (3.3 +/- 2.2 vs. 5.4 +/- 4.0; p > 0.05). The total number of peripheral vessels was 0.5 +/- 0.8 for benign lymph nodes vs. 2.0 +/- 1.7 for malignant lymph nodes (p > 0.05). Enhanced US studies showed enhancement in both benign and malignant lymph nodes after contrast administration with a significantly higher degree of enhancement in malignant lymph nodes (p < 0.01). The total number of vessels was significantly higher in malignant lymph nodes after contrast administration (17.3 +/- 8.0 vs. 8.2 +/- 5.1, p < 0.01). Malignant lymph nodes demonstrated longer contrast enhancement duration compared to benign lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: This preliminary data shows that contrast-enhanced US can differentiate between benign and malignant lymph nodes in breast cancer.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Aumento de la Imagen/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Metástasis Linfática/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Doppler en Color/métodos , Ultrasonografía Mamaria/métodos , Anciano , Axila/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Mama/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/irrigación sanguínea , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neovascularización Patológica/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The increasing spread and technical enhancement of endourological methods has led to displacement of the surgical therapy of renal and ureteral calculi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Based on a review of current literature, we describe indications, technique, and clinical importance of the open and laparoscopic management of urolithiasis. RESULTS: In Europe and North America, the surgical therapy of urolithiasis only plays a role in cases of very large or hard stones, after failure of shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotripsy, or ureteroscopic stone removal, and in cases of abnormal renal anatomy, i.e., only in a few percent of all stone therapies. However, in developing countries and emerging markets with different structure and funding of the health care system where the methods of endourology are not readily available, these techniques still have a higher importance. Particularly in Europe, laparoscopic surgery is emerging because calculi can be removed from almost all locations in the kidney and ureter using a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal access. Functional outcomes and complication rates are comparable. The benefits of laparoscopy are less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay, faster convalescence, and better cosmetic results. CONCLUSIONS: Although procedures for open and laparoscopic removal of renal and ureteral calculi are only performed in rare cases in daily urological practice, they are superior to the endourological techniques in some circumstances. Therefore, they should still be part of the urologist's skills.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Cálculos Ureterales/cirugía , Diseño de Equipo , Predicción , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Laparoscopía/tendencias , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cálculos Ureterales/diagnóstico por imagen , UrografíaRESUMEN
Robotic surgery in urology has become a reality in the year 2007 with several thousand robotic prostatectomies having been performed already worldwide. Compared to conventional laparoscopy, the process of learning the robotic technique is short and the operative results are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopy or even open surgery. However, there are still some disadvantages with the robotic systems, mainly technical (tactile feedback) and financial (investment and running costs). Alternative and more inexpensive technologies must be considered in order to overcome the difficulties of conventional laparoscopy (instrument handling, degrees of freedom, 3-D vision), while also integrating advantages of the robotic systems.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Robótica , Telemedicina , Humanos , Masculino , Robótica/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become an equivalent alternative to the open retropubic approach, offering the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. It is being applied increasingly in Germany and the rest of Europe. Whether the surgical robot da Vinci will be used for this procedure to the same extent as in the United States is unpredictable because of high investment and maintenance costs. Similarly, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy has proven to be a viable option compared to open transabdominal or transvaginal surgery, showing a significant reduction in postoperative morbidity. The value of radical cystectomy is controversial despite proven feasability. On one hand, the technical difficulties of purely laparoscopic urinary diversion result in very long operating times, and in the case of the laparoscopically assisted creation of a neobladder, the advantage of this approach has to be questioned. On the other hand, a maximum rate of 30% of local recurrences and distant metastases indicates at least poor patient selection. In conclusion, this procedure should be limited to a few experienced centers.
Asunto(s)
Cistectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Incontinencia Urinaria/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Reoperación , Robótica , Terapia Recuperativa , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patología , Reservorios Urinarios Continentes , Vagina/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine which ion current predominantly affects defibrillation outcomes by using specific pharmacologic probes (lidocaine [a sodium channel blocking agent] and cesium [an outward potassium channel blocking agent]) in 26 swine. BACKGROUND: The effect of a drug on sodium or potassium channel conductance, or both, may affect defibrillation threshold values. However, it is unknown which ion channel predominates. METHODS: Each pig was randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups with two treatment phases: group 1 = placebo (D5W) in treatment phase I followed by placebo plus cesium in treatment phase II (n = 6); group 2 = lidocaine followed by lidocaine plus placebo (n = 7); group 3 = lidocaine followed by lidocaine plus cesium (n = 7); group 4 = placebo followed by placebo plus placebo (n = 6). Defibrillation threshold values and electrocardiographic measurements were obtained at baseline and at treatment phases I and II. RESULTS: Lidocaine increased defibrillation threshold values from baseline by 71% in group 2 (p = 0.02) and by 92% in group 3 (p < 0.01). There were no changes in defibrillation threshold values from baseline to D5W in groups 1 and 4. When D5W was added to lidocaine in group 2 and D5W in group 4, there were no significant changes in defibrillation threshold values. However, when cesium was added to lidocaine in group 3, the elevated defibrillation threshold values (mean +/- SD) returned to baseline values (from 15.7 +/- 3.46 to 7.55 +/- 3.19 J, p < 0.01). Cesium added to D5W in group 1 also significantly reduced defibrillation threshold values from 7.10 +/- 1.27 to 4.14 +/- 1.75 J (p < 0.01). The effect of cesium on defibrillation threshold values was similar between groups 1 and 3, regardless of lidocaine, such that these values were reduced by 40 +/- 14% and 51 +/- 18%, respectively (p = 0.28). CONCLUSIONS: Cesium, through potassium blockade, reverses lidocaine-induced elevation in defibrillation threshold values. The magnitude of defibrillation threshold reduction when cesium was added to lidocaine was similar to the defibrillation threshold reduction when cesium was added to placebo. Thus, inhibiting outward potassium conductance and prolonging repolarization decreases defibrillation threshold values independent of sodium channel blockade.
Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/farmacología , Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Canales de Potasio/efectos de los fármacos , Canales de Sodio/efectos de los fármacos , Fibrilación Ventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Cesio/farmacología , Cesio/uso terapéutico , Lidocaína/farmacología , Lidocaína/uso terapéutico , PorcinosRESUMEN
Hypertonic saline solution may enhance cardiac conduction via the fast inward sodium channel and alter transmembrane Ca+2 conductance via the sodium-calcium exchanger. Evidence suggests that both Ca+2 conductance and myocardial conduction velocity may affect ventricular defibrillation. Since hypertonic saline solution solutions (ie, sodium bicarbonate) may be administered to patients who have conditions that often require ventricular defibrillation (ie, cardiac arrest or hypovolemic shock), we studied the effect of hypertonic saline solution on the defibrillation threshold (DFT) in 16 pentobarbital-anesthetized domestic farm swine (20 to 30 kg). Defibrillation was performed using two interfaced epicardial electrode patches. DFTs were determined at baseline and during treatment phase. Pigs were randomly assigned to treatment consisting of either hypertonic saline solution (6 mmol/kg load, 2.0 to 3.0 mmol/kg infusion) to maintain serum sodium concentrations 10 to 15 mmol/L above baseline or control (D5W given in equal volume). DFT values (joules) that predicted 50% success were modeled from a best-fit histogram. Hypertonic saline solution did not change DFT values from baseline values (10.2 +/- 4.3 vs 10.8 +/- 7.0, respectively). Likewise, placebo (D5W) did not change DFT values from baseline values (10.1 +/- 4.5 vs 11.3 +/- 4.3). During treatment phase, DFT values were 99 +/- 28% of baseline values in the hypertonic saline solution group and 116 +/- 23% of baseline values in the D5W groups (p = 0.21). The administration of hypertonic saline solution also did not affect ventricular conduction velocity, right ventricular action potential duration, or right ventricular effective refractory period. These data indicate that hypertonic saline solution does not appreciably affect defibrillation efficacy or electrical treatment of ventricular fibrillation.
Asunto(s)
Cardioversión Eléctrica , Solución Salina Hipertónica , Animales , Calcio/sangre , Conductividad Eléctrica , Corazón/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco/efectos de los fármacos , Solución Salina Hipertónica/farmacología , Sodio/sangre , PorcinosRESUMEN
Laparoscopic nephropexy is a suitable and clinically established procedure for the treatment of symptomatic nephroptosis. The availability of a minimally invasive therapy can facilitate decisions regarding the indication after careful selection of patients.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Prolapso Visceral/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/cirugía , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Espacio Retroperitoneal , UrografíaRESUMEN
Ultrasonography was first used as a therapeutic aid in endourology in the early 1970s. Since that time, ultrasound has played an important role, and nowadays, interventional ultrasonography is an established procedure in urology. Procedures on the kidney, bladder, and prostate, which require different puncture techniques, are performed under ultrasound guidance. Today, extracorporeal shockwaves for the treatment of stones and Peyronie's disease are applied under ultrasonic control. Furthermore, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is used experimentally for the treatment of renal tumors and, clinically, for the treatment of prostate cancer. In urologic emergencies, diagnostic and interventional ultrasonography is an important tool. Interventional ultrasound in urology has become an outstanding tool for the planning and performance of a variety of procedures, and every urologist should be able to use these technologies.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Urológico , Sistema Urinario/diagnóstico por imagen , Biopsia con Aguja/métodos , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Humanos , Riñón/diagnóstico por imagen , Litotricia , Masculino , Nefrostomía Percutánea/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Punciones , Ultrasonografía , Uréter/diagnóstico por imagen , Uretra/diagnóstico por imagen , Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Cateterismo Urinario/métodosRESUMEN
Endoscopic pyelotomy is a minimally invasive procedure that is increasingly used for the management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. We report the results and advantages in the management of UPJ obstruction using a ureteroscopic retrograde laser-assisted approach (laser endopyelotomy; LEP). Thirty-four patients were treated between December 1994 and June 1997 by this new technique. Twenty-seven obstructions were primary. The mean time of follow-up is 18 months. An indwelling ureteral catheter was placed 3 weeks prior to treatment. Intraoperatively, after the removal of the stent, a guidewire was passed across the stenosis, and the ureter was entered with a semirigid ureteroscope. The LEP was then performed under visual control using a contact laser fiber until all obstructive fibers had been cut. Follow-up examinations included sonography, intravenous urography, and, in unclear cases, a radionuclide renal scan with furosemide application after 3 months. The success rate was 85%. The most important factor influencing the outcome was the grade of hydronephrosis. Postoperative side effects have been minimal, and minor complications occurred in only 5 patients (15%). Laser endopyelotomy is a minimally invasive procedure with less morbidity for the treatment of UPJ obstruction. Only patients with a severe extrinsic cause of obstruction should be excluded from this technique. These cases can be approached laparoscopically.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Pelvis Renal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Obstrucción Ureteral/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
Laparoscopic or retroperitoneoscopic interventions such as nephrectomy or tumor nephrectomy call for the removal of large quantities of tissue, which can no longer be extracted via the relatively confined lumen of a cannula. For this purpose, a variety of organ retrieval systems have been designed and are commercially available with the aim of safe tissue retrieval. This paper summarizes the results of an experimental and clinical comparison of the most important organ entrapment systems suitable for endoscopic nephrectomy. The LapSacs was the first organ bag especially designed for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Despite various new modifications of this entrapment system, it still represents one of the best alternatives and has been used worldwide with success. However, because of its simplicity, it requires a certain laparoscopic expertise and involves a learning curve. Newly developed retrieval systems (i.e., LapBag, Extraction Bag, Endo-Catch) offer some advantages regarding the handling of the bag, which may be particularly useful during retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy with a restricted working space. Retrieval systems (i.e., Endobag, Endopouch) with low resistance to tearing forces or permeability to tumor cells or bacteria (i.e., Espiner Bag) cannot be recommended for endoscopic nephrectomy.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopios , Nefrectomía/instrumentación , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Animales , Diseño de Equipo , Seguridad de Equipos , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The difficulties of minimally invasive reconstructive surgery, laparoscopically or retroperitoneoscopically, are caused by spatial limitation and fixed trocar positions and, therefore, restricted movement and handling of the instruments. In addition to a standardization of the technique, continual training, and improved instrument technologies, optimization of the geometry of reconstructive surgery, such as angles and distances between the working ports or the camera and needle position, are imperative to providing an optimal clinical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After designing a standardized suturing technique and conducting an experimental analysis of the geometric factors important in reconstructive surgery, we transferred these results to our clinical setting. A series of 116 reconstructive laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic procedures (nephropexy, pyeloplasty, bladder neck suspension, and radical prostatectomy) were analyzed according to the technical realization and quality of reconstruction. Trocar and table positions were adjusted according to our preliminary results, as were the position of the instruments and camera. RESULTS: The trocar and instrument positions are critical for the clinical outcome of reconstructive surgery. Continual training in a standardized suturing technique, together with the clinical application of the important geometric rules, can reduce surgery time by 50%. The time required for suturing single knots could be decreased even more: as much as 75%, thus ensuring efficient and safe reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty or radical prostatectomy can be standardized and performed in an acceptable amount of time with adequate quality when adhering to a standardized technique and the important geometric rules. Improved performance in terms of time and quality will increase the acceptance of these procedures, which can help to solve the problem associated with a low total number of indications for laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Masculino , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Técnicas de Sutura/instrumentación , Técnicas de Sutura/normas , Enfermedades Urológicas/cirugía , Cirugía Asistida por VideoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To demonstrate the operative steps of transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the ascending approach (Heilbronn technique). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The technique is based on our experience with more than 1000 cases of clinically localized prostate cancer from March 1999 to April 2004. The technical steps, instrumental requirements, patient data, complications, and reintervention rate were reviewed. RESULTS: The principles of the technique include the routine use of a voice-controlled robot (AESOP) for the camera, exposure of the prostatic apex with 120 degree retracting forceps, free-hand suturing for Santorini plexus control, application of 5-mm clips during the nerve-sparing technique, control of the prostatic pedicles by 12-mm Hem-o-Lock clips, the bladder neck-sparing technique in patients with stage T1c and T2a tumors, and use of interrupted sutures for the urethrovesical anastomosis. A considerable improvement was observed when comparing the first 300 with the most recent 300 cases (mean operating time 280 v 208 minutes; conversion rate 2.7% v 0.3%; reintervention rate 3.7% v 1.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Through our experience with more than 1000 cases, transperitoneal access for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has proven to be feasible and transferable with results comparable to those of the original open approach. Besides the well-known advantages of minimally invasive surgery, the video endoscopic approach may offer further benefits in permitting optimization of the technique by video assessment.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Peritoneo/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía/instrumentación , ReoperaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spatial limitation, together with a fixed trocar position, restricted handling, and movement of the instruments, is inevitably associated with reconstructive laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy. This problem includes not only suturing technique and instruments but also geometric factors of endoscopic reconstruction, such as optimal distances between the working trocars, length of instruments, and angles between the instruments and the object. We present an experimental access to determine the specific impact of these factors on reconstructive laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an in vitro model, end-to-end anastomoses of porcine intestine were performed using a standardized intracorporeal suturing technique. Suturing was performed without and after training in reconstructive surgery with variation of the following geometric factors: (1) the distance between the working trocars (between 6 and 12 cm); (2) the position of the object (lateral right, medially, lateral left); (3) the camera position (medially, lateral right, lateral left); (4) the angle between the instruments and a horizontal line (15 degrees , 55 degrees, 90 degrees); (5) the intracorporeal length of instruments (between 10 and 25 cm); and (6) narrowed space available for the instruments (between 4 and 25 cm). RESULTS: Continual training decreased the time required for suturing between 30% to 50%. Training decreased the time required for nonsuturing activities between 50% and 70% but the time required for suturing activities only between 20% and 45%. If the space between instruments and camera was limited, shifting the camera into a lateral position simplified the procedure of intracorporeal suturing. Angles of <55 degrees between instruments and the horizontal line simplified laparoscopic suturing, as did angles of <45 degrees between the instruments. In cases of maximally narrowed space (diameter of 4 cm), a suture filament length of <10 cm decreased the time required by 30%. CONCLUSION: We suggest an isosceles triangle between the instruments with an angle between 25 degrees and 45 degrees and an angle of <55 degrees between the instruments and the horizontal line as the optimal geometry for intracorporeal suturing. These data should be considered when planning a reconstructive laparoscopic procedure (i.e., alignment of trocars, table position). However, further studies are required to confirm these preliminary results.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Laparoscopía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Técnicas de Sutura , Animales , PorcinosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease is an idiopathic disorder of the penis that produces erectile dysfunction. It affects mainly the tunica albuginea. We describe our preliminary results with extracorporal shockwave therapy (ESWT) as a new noninvasive modality for the treatment of Peyronie's disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 24 patients aged 36 to 67 years were treated with ESWT on the Lithostar overhead-module (Siemens). All our patients had unsuccessful medical treatment before ESWT. The average plaque was 7x15 mm. The number of shockwaves ranged from 15,000 to 25,000 (18-21 kV) delivered in four to ten sessions. Most patients needed local anesthesia before therapy. RESULTS: Four patients (17%) showed marked improvement and complete remission of the penile deviation. Six patients (25%) showed partial remission with painless erections after treatment. Four patients had painless erections after treatment but still had some penile deviation. In 10 patients (41%), ESWT failed, necessitating subsequent penile surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results with a response rate of 59% with ESWT for Peyronie's disease, including a 17% complete remission rate, is encouraging. However, further multicenter studies will have to prove if ESWT is a real therapeutic option for this disease.
Asunto(s)
Litotricia/instrumentación , Induración Peniana/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Diseño de Equipo , Disfunción Eréctil/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Eréctil/etiología , Disfunción Eréctil/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Induración Peniana/complicaciones , Induración Peniana/diagnóstico por imagen , Pene/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
We describe our experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 19 patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Twelve patients had stage I disease with no clinical evidence (CT-scan, ultrasound, tumor markers) of metastases; 7 patients (stage IIb=2, stage IIc=5) had residual tumor after chemotherapy but with negative tumor markers. A laparoscopic dissection was used to asses more fully the pathologic status of the relevant retroperitoneal lymph nodes of both groups. The patient was positioned and trocars introduced at sites similar to that used for transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (flank position, five ports - 3 x 10 mm; 2 x 5 mm). After reflecting the colon anteromedially, the landmarks of the lymph node dissection were isolated-namely the ureter, aorta, inferior vena cava, and both renal veins. The lymph node dissection included the paracaval, interaorto-caval, upper preaortic, and right common iliac zonal nodes for right-sided tumors, and paraaortic, upper preaortic zones for left-sided tumors. Retrieval of the lymph nodal chains was accomplished using a small organ bag. The mean duration of the procedure was 298 (range 150-405) minutes. In only one patient was a lymph node positive for tumor (stage I). Otherwise nodes showed extensive necrosis (after chemotherapy). No intraoperative complications were encountered but three patients developed a delayed complication (ureteral stenosis, pulmonary embolism, and retrograde ejaculation, respectively). Whereas we completed the dissection in each patient with stage I tumors, the laparoscopic procedure was more difficult in patients with stage II tumors after chemotherapy. In two patients with stage IIb disease laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was successful. In four other patients parts of the dissection had to be done after conversion to an open (conventional) operation using a small incision (suprainguinal or pararectal); in one patient the laparoscopic approach was abandoned and converted to an open operation. In the post-chemotherapy group the outcome depended primarily on the tumor bulk prior to drug treatment. In two patients in whom all residual necrotic tissue was removed laparoscopically they had "minor" disease (stage IIb); the others had stage IIc tumors. Our preliminary experience suggests that a modified laparoscopic lymph node dissection is feasible for stage I tumors and in selected patients with marker negative residual tumor after chemotherapy (stage IIb).
Asunto(s)
Germinoma/patología , Laparoscopía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Neoplasias Testiculares/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Germinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Germinoma/secundario , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
UNLABELLED: A retroperitoneal access is most commonly applied for open procedures in urology. With introduction of the balloon dissecting technique, this anatomical route could also be used for laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 12/1992 to 10/1997, a total of 200 retroperitoneoscopic procedures have been performed in 197 patients (age 4-82 years): 78 nephrectomies, 50 renal cyst resections, 14 nephropexies, 11 ureterolyses, 8 retroperitoneal lymph-node dissections, 8 renal biopsies, 6 adrenalectomies, 6 heminephrectomies, 6 pyeloplasties, 5 ureterolithotomies, 6 ureterocutaneostomies and 2 others. Thirty-eight patients (19%) had undergone previous abdominal surgery; 22 (11%) had had kidney and ureter operations. Dissection of the retroperitoneal space was done with a balloon catheter in 14 or a balloon trocar system in 93 cases, and in the last 93 patients digital dissection with the index finger proved to be sufficient. RESULTS: We classified 76 as simple (i.e., renal biopsy, renal cyst resections, ureterocutaneostomy) and 102 as difficult (i.e. adrenalectomy, nephrectomy, nephropexy) and 22 (11%) as very difficult operations (i.e., pyeloplasty, heminephrectomy, lymphadenectomy). There has been a significant learning curve during the first 50 cases as reflected by increased operating time and complications and the conversion rate to open surgery. After that, the OR times mainly depended on the difficulty of the procedure, averaging 45-100 min for an easy retroperitoneoscopy, 95-185 min for a difficult and 185-240 min for a very difficult operation. In the last 50 cases, the complications, conversion and reintervention rate have become comparable to open surgery (2, 4 and 2%). CONCLUSIONS: After more than 200 cases of retroperitoneoscopy, the access technique has been significantly simplified. The procedure is standardized, safe and reproducible.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopios , Enfermedades Urológicas/cirugía , Neoplasias Urológicas/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cateterismo/instrumentación , Niño , Preescolar , Diseño de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Espacio RetroperitonealRESUMEN
Laparoscopic surgery in general is handicapped by the reduction of the range of motion from 6 to 4 degrees of freedom. This has a major impact on technically difficult procedures such as laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Solutions for this problem include understanding the geometry of laparoscopy with sophisticated training programs, but also newly developed surgical robots, computer simulators, and telementoring. This article evaluates the value of these alternatives based on own experience and an analysis of the current literature. Our experience with robot-assisted surgery includes 244 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies using a voice-controlled camera arm (AESOP) and 6 telesurgical interventions with the da Vinci system. Additionally, experimental studies were performed focussing on the geometry of laparoscopy and new training concepts such as perfused pelvitrainers and computer simulation. Three-dimensional systems have not yet proved to be effective due to handling problems such as shutter glasses, video helmets, or reduced brightness. At present, there are only two robotic surgical systems (ZEUS, da Vinci) in clinical use for telesurgery, of which only the da Vinci provides stereovision and all 6 degrees of freedom (DOF). In the meantime, more than 100 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies have been performed with this system. However, there was no evidence of any advantages over the conventional laparoscopic approach. The ZEUS in combination with the telecommunication system SOKRATES is the only device that enables telemanipulation and telementoring over long distances (i.e., transatlantic). Robotic surgery represents a turning point in surgical research. However, broad use of robotic systems is limited mainly because of high investment and running costs. Whereas audiovisual telementoring will play a clear role in future training concepts, the need for telemanipulation or telesurgery has not yet been clarified.
Asunto(s)
Capacitación en Servicio , Laparoscopios , Enfermedades Urogenitales Masculinas/cirugía , Mentores , Consulta Remota/instrumentación , Robótica/instrumentación , Simulación por Computador , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/instrumentación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Prostatectomía/instrumentación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Equipo Quirúrgico , Estudios de Tiempo y MovimientoRESUMEN
We report on our clinical experience with laparoscopic nephrectomy in 35 patients. We have performed a total of 18 transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies (TLN) for benign renal disease. After the introduction of a hydraulic dissecting device, we have since performed 17 retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomies (RLN). These data were compared with those in 19 consecutive open nephrectomies (N). All groups were comparable in terms of indication. The mean operative time for benign disease was 206.5 min for TLN, 211.2 min for RLN and 117 min for N. Analgesic medication requirement per patient was 2 days for TLN, 1 day for RLN and 4 days for N, while the postoperative hospital stay averaged 7 days for TLN, 6 days for RLN and 10 days for N. Our results demonstrate the advantage of a laparoscopic approach over open surgery and also reveal the distinct benefit of a retroperitoneal approach. However, due to the small number of indications this procedure should be restricted to a few urologic centers.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopios , Nefrectomía/instrumentación , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/patología , Tiempo de Internación , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Peritoneo/patología , Peritoneo/cirugía , Espacio Retroperitoneal/patología , Espacio Retroperitoneal/cirugía , Instrumentos Quirúrgicos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The main problem with clinical introduction of laparoscopic techniques in urology is that despite experience with endoscopy no significant endoscopic training is given. Laparoscopic nephrectomy, in particular, is a rather complicated procedure and needs an adequate training concept: The beginner should have the possibility of practising in vitro in a closed "pelvi-trainer" to learn video-optical coordination and orientation; then it is necessary to get used to handling the instruments and practise the different steps of the procedure (i.e. clipping of vessels, sacking of the kidney) either in phantom models or in explanted animal organs. On this basis, we performed laparoscopic nephrectomy in an animal model (n = 18 porcine kidneys). We were able to standardize the technique of creating a pneumoperitoneum, the positioning of the animal, the site and size of the trocars, and preparation and clipping techniques (i.e. Endo-GIA) and entrapment of the kidney (testing different organ bags). A step-by-step approach was used for the introduction to clinical application. For simulation and training of video-assisted preparation techniques in patients and step-wise introduction to laparoscopy (instruments, endocoagulation, trocars), we created a "lap-tent", which was placed over the wound after exposition of Gerota's fascia. Further preparation was performed under laparoscopic conditions (without pneumoperitoneum) with a limited time allowed (1 h). Thereafter, we started with time-limited laparoscopy and laparoscopic lymphadenectomy prior to pelvic surgery (prostatectomy, cystectomy) to introduce the staff to the technique of pneumoperitoneum and placement of the trocars and to the use of the instruments in general. Based on this step-by-step training concept, after a 6-months period we were successful in introducing transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (TLN) to our clinical routine. So far, we have performed 20 laparoscopic nephrectomies, 1 nephro-ureterectomy, 4 tumour nephrectomies (inducing adrenalectomy), 2 adrenalectomies, and 6 modified retroperitoneal lymphadenectomies. In the lesser pelvis we have experience with 20 laparoscopic varicocelectomies, 23 pelvic lymphadenectomies, and 5 diagnostic laparoscopies for cryptorchidism (February 1993).