Communication preferences and perceptions of cancer patient during their first medical oncology appointment.

BACKGROUND: The first medical oncology appointment serves as a platform for patients to comprehend their diagnosis and prognostic implications of cancer. This study aimed to determine patients' communication preferences during their first medical oncology appointment and to assess the disparities between patients' preferences and perceptions. METHODS: A total of 169 cancer patients participated by completing the Communication in First Medical Oncology Appointment Questionnaire (C-FAQ), a two-section questionnaire designed to assess patients' preferences and perceptions regarding Content (information provided and its extent), Facilitation (timing and location of information delivery), and Support (emotional support) during their first medical oncology appointment. A comparative analysis was conducted to assess the variations between preferences and perceptions. RESULTS: Content emerged as the most significant dimension compared to Facilitation and Support. The physician's knowledge, honesty, and ability to provide clear information were considered the most important attributes. Patients evaluated most of their preferences as "very important". Patients' perception of the communication dimensions present during their appointment was below preferences for 11 items, indicating significant discrepancies in clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Patients highly valued their preferences concerning Content, Facilitation, and Support dimensions of communication. However, patient preferences were more prominently oriented towards the Content dimension. The discrepancies between preferences and perceptions should be viewed as an opportunity for enhancing communication skills through training.

Adipocyte Microenvironment in Ovarian Cancer: A Critical Contributor?

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies and has low survival rates. One of the main determinants of this unfavorable prognosis is the high rate of peritoneal metastasis at diagnosis, closely related to its morbidity and mortality. The mechanism underlying peritoneal carcinomatosis is not clearly defined, but a clear preference for omental spread has been described. Growing evidence suggests that adipose tissue plays a role in promoting cancer onset and progression. Moreover, obesity can lead to changes in the original functions of adipocytes, resulting in metabolic and inflammatory changes in the adipose tissue microenvironment, potentially increasing the risk of tumor growth. However, the specific roles of adipocytes in ovarian cancer have not yet been fully elucidated. Due to the undeniable link between obesity and cancer, the adipose tissue microenvironment could also present a promising therapeutic target that warrants further research. This review discusses the complex relationship between ovarian cancer and the adipose tissue microenvironment.

Whipple's Disease: A Challenging Diagnosis.

Whipple's disease (WD) is a chronic multisystemic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei. It is a rare condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations, necessitating a high clinical suspicion to arrive at the diagnosis. We present the case of a 65-year-old woman who experienced chronic, intermittent, and migratory polyarthralgia, weight loss, anorexia, and pyrosis. She was admitted due to bilateral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). She exhibited lymphadenopathy without hepatosplenomegaly, and lymph node biopsy revealed reactive lymphadenitis with intrahistiocytic bacilli that reacted positively to periodic acid-Schiff staining. This led to the suspicion of WD, which was subsequently confirmed through small bowel biopsies. She initiated treatment with ceftriaxone and experienced rapid clinical improvement. WD poses a diagnostic challenge. The signs and symptoms are often nonspecific and can result in misdiagnosis as a rheumatic or neoplastic disease. The presentation with DVT, while unusual, has been reported as a manifestation of WD.

Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy: A Multicentric Study.

Introduction The standard treatment of cancer has dramatically improved with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite their proven advantage, many patients fail to exhibit a meaningful and lasting response. The beta-adrenergic signalling pathway may hold significant promise due to its role in promoting an immunosuppressive milieu within the tumour microenvironment. Inhibiting ß-adrenergic signalling could enhance ICI activity; however, blocking this pathway for this purpose has yielded conflicting results. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of beta-blocker use on overall survival and progression-free survival during ICI therapy. Methods A multicentric, retrospective, observational study was conducted in four Portuguese institutions. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with ICIs between January 2018 and December 2019 were included. Those using beta blockers for non-oncological reasons were compared with non-users. Results Among the 171 patients included, 36 concomitantly received beta blockers and ICIs. No significant increase was found in progression-free survival among patients who took ß-blockers (HR 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-1.12, p = 0.151), and no statistically significant difference was found in overall survival. An apparent trend was observed towards better outcomes in the beta-blocker group, with a median overall survival of 9.93 months in the group not taking ß-blockers versus 14.90 months in the ß-blocker group (p = 0.291) and a median progression-free survival of 5.37 in the group not taking ß-blockers versus 10.87 months in the ß-blocker group (p = 0.151). Nine (25%) patients in the beta-blocker group and 16 (12%) in the non-beta-blocker group were progressive disease-free at the end of follow-up. This difference between the two groups is statistically significant (p = 0.047). Conclusion Our study found no statistically significant evidence that beta blockers enhance the effectiveness of immunotherapy. Using adrenergic blockade to modulate the immune system shows promise, warranting the need to develop prospective clinical studies.

Correction: Association of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes With Survival in Stages II and III Colorectal Cancer.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31144.].

Association of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes With Survival in Stages II and III Colorectal Cancer.

The tumor microenvironment is crucial in tumourigenesis, response to therapy, and elimination of tumor cells. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) promote the host immune response and are associated with a better prognosis in colorectal cancer (CRC). This multicentric retrospective study evaluated the relationship between the presence and intensity of TILs and survival outcomes. A total of 651 patients from four Portuguese oncological centers who underwent surgical resection for stages II or III colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2016 and 2019 were included in this study. The mean age of the study population was 70 years; 58.2% were males. The median overall survival was 58.03 ± 1.29 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 55.50 - 60.56), and the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 53.02 ± 1.39 months (95% CI 50.29 - 55.74). Patients with high infiltrate (including those with moderate, abundant, or Crohn-like infiltrate) had significantly longer DFS i.e., 58.48 ± 1.84 months (95% CI 54.87 - 62.09 months) vs 49.22 ± 1.75 months (95% CI 45.79 - 52.64 months) in the group with absent or minimal infiltrate; p = 0.003. Assessing the side of the tumor, high infiltrate was associated with higher DFS (59.86 ± 2.36 months (95% CI 55.23 - 64.50 months) vs 49.60 ± 2.40 months (95% CI 44.90 - 54.29 months), p = 0.011). This work reinforces the importance of research into possible prognostic and predictive factors in patients with CRC.