Economic impact of switching to fixed-dose combination therapy for Japanese hypertensive patients: a retrospective cost analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prescription of fixed-dose combinations (FDC) of antihypertensive drugs has increased rapidly since the relaxation of the prescription-term restriction. In this study, we used the opportunity of this policy change in Japan as an instrument to assess the causal impact of switching to FDC on hypertensive treatment costs. METHODS: Claims data from 64 community pharmacies located in Tokyo were used to identify hypertensive patients under continuous treatment with angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs). Patients switching to FDC between December 2010 and April 2011 were compared to patients who did not receive FDC (control group). Changes in annual antihypertensive drug costs were compared using a difference-in-differences approach to adjust for patient characteristics and use of concomitant medication. Subpopulation analyses were also performed, taking into account pre-index treatment patterns and prescribers' characteristics. RESULTS: There were 542 patients who switched to FDC and 9664 patients in the control group. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups, except for antihypertensive drug use patterns before the policy change and prescribers' characteristics. The switch to FDC was associated with an annual saving of 10,420 yen (US$112.0) in antihypertensive drug costs. Approximately 20% of the FDC patients, however, switched from ARB alone, and their drug costs increased by 2376 yen (US$25.5). CONCLUSIONS: For hypertensive patients who required ARB-based combination therapy, switching to FDC drugs had a significant cost-saving effect. However, the policy change of relaxing the prescription-term restriction could encourage aggressive treatment, i.e., switching to a combination therapy from monotherapy, regardless of medical conditions. Further research is required to evaluate the possible negative aspects of FDC drugs.

Cross-sectional study of patient satisfaction with oral analgesics in patients with chronic pain in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is often difficult to treat, and many patients are not satisfied with analgesic treatment. The authors assessed patient satisfaction with oral analgesics in patients with chronic pain in Japan. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was an observational cross-sectional study conducted in dispensing pharmacies. A patient satisfaction questionnaire survey was conducted in 781 patients prescribed one nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or neuropathic pain (NeP) drug for at least 90 consecutive days. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction with analgesics. The secondary endpoints were pain relief, activity of daily living (ADL) improvement and doctor-patient communication. RESULTS: The proportions of patients who answered 'satisfied if anything' or better for patient satisfaction in the NSAID and NeP drug groups were 70.0% and 65.2%, respectively, whereas those of patients who answered 'satisfied' were 43.3% and 29.4%, respectively. The proportions of patients with improved pain relief, ADL improvement, and good doctor-patient communication were numerically higher than those of patients who answered 'satisfied if anything' or better. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately two-thirds of the patients were satisfied with current analgesics. Patient satisfaction with oral analgesics could be influenced by multiple factors. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000036456.