Effectiveness of Cognitive Functional Therapy Versus Core Exercises and Manual Therapy in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain After Spinal Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to investigate whether cognitive functional therapy (CFT) was more effective than core exercises and manual therapy (CORE-MT) in improving pain and function for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled superiority trial in a university hospital and a private physical therapist clinic in Santa Catarina, Brazil. Eighty participants who were 18 to 75 years old and had chronic low back pain after spinal surgery received 4 to 12 treatment sessions of CFT or CORE-MT once per week for a maximum period of 12 weeks. Primary outcomes were pain intensity (numeric pain rating scale, scored from 0 to 10) and function (Patient-Specific Functional Scale, scored from 0 to 10) after intervention. RESULTS: We obtained primary outcome data for 75 participants (93.7%). CFT was more effective, with a large effect size, than CORE-MT in reducing pain intensity (mean difference [MD] = 2.42; 95% CI = 1.69-3.14; effect size [d] = 0.85) and improving function (MD = -2.47; 95% CI = -3.08 to -1.87; effect size = 0.95) after intervention (mean = 10.4 weeks [standard deviation = 2.17] after the beginning of treatment). The differences were maintained at 22 weeks for pain intensity (MD = 1.64; 95% CI = 0.98-2.3; effect size = 0.68) and function (MD = -2.01; 95% CI = -2.6 to -1.41; effect size = 0.81). CONCLUSION: CFT was more effective than CORE-MT, with large effect sizes, and may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery. IMPACT: CFT reduces pain and improves function, with large effect sizes, compared with CORE-MT. The difference between CFT and CORE-MT was sustained at the midterm follow-up. Treatment with CFT may be an option for patients with chronic low back pain after spinal surgery.

Beliefs and expectations of patients with fibromyalgia about telerehabilitation during Covid-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Telerehabilitation as an alternative to physiotherapeutic care has been increasingly implemented in diverse populations. However, this mode of service can evoke beliefs and expectations in patients with fibromyalgia, depending on sociocultural and clinical context, that can cause poor adaptation and dropout from treatment. OBJECTIVE: To explore beliefs and expectations of individuals with fibromyalgia about physical exercises delivered through telerehabilitation. METHODS: Thirty individual semi-structured interviews were conducted via videoconference with women with fibromyalgia recruited during COVID-19 pandemic through intentional sampling. These interviews were guided by four questions addressing the beliefs and expectations about telerehabilitation. The interviews were recorded after consent and transcribed using the MAXQDA® software. The inductive approach was performed in which raw data were coded into categories and subcategories. RESULTS: Participants expect to benefit from telerehabilitation due to flexible hours, no need of travel, socialization, and lower risk of contamination. However, they believe they have difficulties related to the physical absence of the therapist, complexity of the exercises, internet connection problems, adaptation to the domestic routine and availability of schedules. CONCLUSION: Women with fibromyalgia showed positive expectations about telerehabilitation, relating better socialization with other individuals diagnosed with fibromyalgia, home care with flexible schedule and, to provide needed service to underserved. However, they listed barriers such as the physical absence of the therapist and instability of the internet connection and, the FM symptoms themselves.

Choosing what works for whom: towards a better use of mechanistic knowledge in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians commonly try to use mechanism-based knowledge to make sense of the complexity and uncertainty of chronic pain treatments to create a rationale for their clinical decision-making. Although this seems intuitive, there are some problems with this approach. DISCUSSION: The widespread use of mechanism-based knowledge in clinical practice can be a source of confusion for clinicians, especially when complex interventions with different proposed mechanisms of action are equally effective. Although the available mechanistic evidence is still of very poor quality, in choosing from various treatment options for people with chronic pain, an approach that correctly incorporates mechanistic reasoning might aid clinical thinking and practice. CONCLUSION: By explaining that not all evidence of mechanism is the same and by making a proposal to start using mechanism-based knowledge in clinical practice properly, we hope to help clinicians to incorporate mechanistic reasoning to prioritize and start choosing what may best work for whom.

Cognitive functional therapy (CFT) compared with core training exercise (CTE) in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS): A study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the efficacy of cognitive functional therapy (CFT) compared to core training exercise (CTE) on pain and specific disability of patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). DESIGN: This will be a randomized controlled clinical trial of two groups with blinded evaluators. SETTING: The study will be conducted at the Federal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC) and a private clinic in Florianópolis, SC, Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 80 participants, of both sexes, with FBSS. INTERVENTION: Subjects will be randomized into two groups: one group receiving CFT or CTE. Individuals will be assisted once a week, for a maximum period of 12 weeks, with four being the minimum number of visits and 12 being the maximum number of visits. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcomes will be pain and specific disability. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study investigating whether CFT is efficacious for patients with FBSS and chronic low back pain. The study's sample size was calculated to detect the effect of clinically relevant treatment with a low risk of bias. This clinical trial was designed to be able to reproduce an approach as a physiotherapist trained in CFT would do. That is, in a pragmatic way, increasing the significance of this study. CTE comprises a strategy widely used by physiotherapists to treat low back pain. Given that the scientific evidence of its efficacy for pain management is limited, the findings of this study will assist physiotherapists in their clinical decision-making.

There is no difference in footstrike pattern distribution in recreational runners with or without anterior knee pain.

BACKGROUND: There are no studies comparing footstrike pattern distribution between recreational runners with or without anterior knee pain. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate if there was any difference in footstrike pattern between recreational runners with or without anterior knee pain. METHODS: This cross-sectional study involved 62 runners without anterior knee pain and 60 runners with anterior knee pain. We recruited runners in public parks and amateur road running competitions. A 2D record was made using a high-speed camera with an acquisition frequency of 300 Hz and shutter speed of 300s-1. Also, demographic information, running characteristics, knee pain characteristics, and running biomechanics variables were collected. Besides the footstrike pattern, running step length, mean velocity, footstrike angle, and ankle push-off were evaluated. RESULTS: The distribution of rearfoot strike pattern was similar between groups, observed in 96.6 % of the subjects with anterior knee pain and in 93.5 % of the subjects without it. In the secondary analysis, a logistic regression was conducted, and none of the demographic information, running training characteristics, and running biomechanics variables evaluated in this study were associated with runners presenting knee pain. CONCLUSION: Runners with or without anterior knee pain do not differ in regard to footstrike pattern. Both groups had predominantly rearfoot strike patterns, and none of the collected variables were associated with anterior knee pain on runners.