Ecallantide for treatment of acute attacks of acquired C1 esterase inhibitor deficiency.

Acquired C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) deficiency exposes patients to angioedema recurrences (acquired angioedema [AAE]) mediated by bradykinin pathway activation. C1-INH replacement and specific inhibition of plasma kallikrein with ecallantide have been successful in the treatment of hereditary angioedema (HAE), a more common related disorder. C1-INH replacement has also been used in the treatment of AAE, but because of the underlying mechanism of rapid catabolism, some patients may not respond. As part of preclinical investigation of ecallantide, a potent bradykinin pathway inhibitor, we evaluated three AAE patients treated successfully with that agent. This study was designed to assess ecallantide for treatment of attacks in AAE. Three patients with AAE were treated a total of 12 times with various dosing regimens of ecallantide based on the protocols established for the studies using ecallantide in HAE (Evaluation of DX-88's Effects in Mitigating Angioedema trials). Response to therapy was also based on outcome measures determined by these protocols. Ecallantide effectively relieved symptoms in three patients with various manifestations of AAE over 12 acute episodes. Kallikrein inhibition with ecallantide appears effective in the treatment of AAE and may be an alternative for patients with resistance to C1-INH replacement therapy.

The efficacy of allergen immunotherapy with cat dander in reducing symptoms in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to cat dander is a common form of allergic disease. Allergen immunotherapy has been demonstrated to be effective in decreasing allergic symptoms. OBJECTIVES: To examine outcomes in allergic asthmatic patients on cat immunotherapy (CIT) compared to allergic asthmatics on traditional immunotherapy (IT) without cat sensitivity. METHODS: A retrospective review identified allergic asthmatics on CIT for at least three years. An equal number of allergic asthmatics on IT were identified for comparison. Outcomes investigated include measurements of risk of asthma exacerbation. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were identified in each group. There were no differences in the CIT group versus the comparison group regarding total number of prednisone tapers (18 tapers versus 14 tapers, resp.), number of patients requiring prednisone tapers (10 patients versus 10 patients, resp.), total number of acute visits (29 visits versus 38 visits, resp.), and number of patients requiring acute visits (15 patients versus 21 patients, resp.). When stratified by concomitant ICS use, patients on CIT were less likely to require an acute visit (46% versus 78%, resp.). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic asthmatics with cat sensitivity on CIT with close dander exposure have similar risk of asthma exacerbation compared to allergic asthmatics without cat sensitivity on immunotherapy.