Orocutaneous and pharyngocutaneous fistula closure using a vacuum-assisted closure system.

OBJECTIVES: The vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system is a topical negative pressure dressing that has been used extensively to manage a multitude of complicated wounds, including enterocutaneous fistula. We hypothesize that the VAC system may also facilitate the closure of orocutaneous and pharyngocutaneous fistulas. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. RESULTS: Three patients were identified. Two patients developed fistulas after undergoing salvage laryngectomy, and 1 patient developed a fistula after having a hemiglossectomy defect reconstructed by a radial forearm free flap. The VAC system was successful in closing the fistula in 2 of the 3 patients. Complete fistula closure took 3 and 11 days in the 2 cases. The 1 failure of fistula closure was due to poor collapsibility of the neck tissue along the fistula tract caused by fibrosis following prior radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: The VAC system is a feasible treatment option for closing head and neck fistulas, especially when collapsible tissue is present at the fistula site.

Health-related quality-of-life outcomes following IMRT versus conventional radiotherapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: To compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) outcomes of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) vs. conventional radiotherapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were extracted from the database of an ongoing longitudinal Outcome Assessment Project. Eligible criteria included (1) treated with definitive radiation, and (2) provided 12-month posttreatment HRQOL data. Excluded were 7 patients who received IMRT before October 1, 2002, during this institution's developmental phase of the IMRT technique. The HRQOL outcomes of patients treated with IMRT were compared with those of patients who received CRT. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients treated using IMRT and 27 patients treated using CRT were included. Patients in the IMRT group were older and had more advanced-stage diseases and more patients received concurrent chemotherapy. However, the IMRT group had higher mean Head and Neck Cancer Inventory scores (which represent better outcomes) for each of the four head-and-neck cancer-specific domains, including eating, speech, aesthetics, and social disruption, at 12 months after treatment. A significantly greater percentage of patients in the CRT group had restricted diets compared with those in the IMRT group (48.0% vs. 16.0%, p = 0.032). At 3 months after treatment, both groups had significant decreases from pretreatment eating scores. However, the IMRT group had a significant improvement during the first year, but the CRT group had only small improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Proper delivery of IMRT can improve HRQOL for patients with oropharyngeal cancer compared with CRT.

The failure patterns of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma after intensity-modulated radiotherapy-the university of iowa experience.

PURPOSE: Determine the failure patterns of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between May 2001 and July 2005, 55 patients with oral cavity SCC were treated with IMRT for curative intent. Forty-nine received postoperative IMRT, 5 definitive IMRT, and 1 neoadjuvant. Three target volumes were defined (clinical target CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3). The failure patterns were determined by coregistration or comparison of the treatment planning computed tomography to the images obtained at the time of recurrence. RESULTS: The median follow-up for all patients was 17.1 months (range, 0.27-59.3 months). The median follow-up for living patients was 23.9 months (range, 9.3-59.3 months). Nine patients had locoregional failures: 4 local failures only, 2 regional failures only, and 3 had both local and regional failures. Five patients failed distantly; of these, 3 also had locoregional failures. The 2-year overall survival, disease-specific survival, local recurrence-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant disease-free survival was 68%, 74%, 85%, 82%, and 89%, respectively. The median time from treatment completion to locoregional recurrence was 4.1 months (range, 3.0-12.1 months). Except for 1 patient who failed in contralateral lower neck outside the radiation field, all failed in areas that had received a high dose of radiation. The locoregional control is strongly correlated with extracapsular extension. CONCLUSIONS: Intensity-modulated RT is effective for oral cavity SCC. Most failures are in-field failures. Further clinical studies are necessary to improve the outcomes of patients with high-risk features, particularly for those with extracapsular extension.

Is planned neck dissection necessary for head and neck cancer after intensity-modulated radiotherapy?

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine regional control of local regional advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), along with the role and selection criteria for neck dissection after IMRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 90 patients with stage N2A or greater HNSCC were treated with definitive IMRT from December 1999 to July 2005. Three clinical target volumes were defined and were treated to 70 to 74 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy, respectively. Neck dissection was performed for selected patients after IMRT. Selection criteria evolved during this period with emphasis on post-IMRT [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in recent years. RESULTS: Median follow-up for all patients was 29 months (range, 0.2-74 months). All living patients were followed at least 9 months after completing treatment. Thirteen patients underwent neck dissection after IMRT because of residual lymphadenopathy. Of these, 6 contained residual viable tumor. Three patients with persistent adenopathy did not undergo neck dissection: 2 refused and 1 had lung metastasis. Among the remaining 74 patients who were observed without neck dissection, there was only 1 case of regional failure. Among all 90 patients in this study, the 3-year local and regional control was 96.3% and 95.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriately delivered IMRT has excellent dose coverage for cervical lymph nodes. A high radiation dose can be safely delivered to the abnormal lymph nodes. There is a high complete response rate. Routine planned neck dissection for patients with N2A and higher stage after IMRT is not necessary. Post-IMRT [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography is a useful tool in selecting patients appropriate for neck dissection.

Patient-reported factors associated with discontinuing employment following head and neck cancer treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patients' reported reasons for discontinuing employment following treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). Discontinuing employment is a serious problem for patients with HNC and has an impact on many aspects of their lives. DESIGN: Prospective, observational outcomes study. SETTING: Tertiary care institution. PATIENTS: A total of 666 patients with carcinomas of the head and neck who were treated from January 1, 1998, to October 31, 2004. INTERVENTIONS: Patients provided information about the status of their employment at the time of diagnosis and then at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after diagnosis. Patients who discontinued employment after treatment rated the importance of 5 factors (eating, speech, appearance, pain or discomfort, and fatigue) in that decision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 5 factors were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (5 being most important) as to their importance in the decision to discontinue work. The relationships of patient, disease, and treatment variables to employment status were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 666 patients, 239 were employed at the time of their diagnosis. After treatment, 91 (38.1%) of the 239 reported discontinuing work because of their cancer and treatment. Eighty-two (90.1%) of these 91 patients rated each of the 5 factors. Fatigue had the highest percentage (58.5%) of 4 or 5 ratings, followed by speech (51.2%), eating (45.1%), pain or discomfort (37.8%), and appearance (17.1%). Thirty-seven (40.7%) of the 91 patients who discontinued work returned to work within 1 year of treatment. CONCLUSION: Identification of the factors associated with the decision to discontinue work is a first step in providing focused solutions to minimize disability.

General health measures and long-term survival in patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a self-reported, subjective general health assessment tool can provide prognostic information about survival in patients with head and neck cancer. DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Five hundred seventy-one patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract who were enrolled in the institution's longitudinal Outcomes Assessment Project between January 1, 1995, and November 30, 2004. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Actuarial 5-year observed and disease-specific survival. RESULTS: The physical component summary obtained from the SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey) was significantly associated with ACE-27 (Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27) comorbidity ratings. The mental component summary was not associated with ACE-27 scores or survival. Although the comorbidity rating was an independent predictor of observed survival (P = .002) only, the physical component summary was independently predictive of both observed (P<.001) and disease-specific (P = .001) survival. These associations continued to be independently significant when site and stage were included in the analysis (P = .003, P<.001, and P = .004, respectively). CONCLUSION: The physical component summary generated by the SF-36, a self-reported, subjective measure of general physical health, is predictive of both observed and disease-specific survival.

Weight loss after head and neck cancer: A dynamic relationship with depressive symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Weight loss and depressive symptoms are critical head and neck cancer outcomes, yet their relation over the illness course is unclear. METHODS: Associations between self-reported depressive symptoms and objective weight loss across the year after head and neck cancer diagnosis were examined using growth curve modeling techniques (n = 564). RESULTS: A reciprocal covariation pattern emerged-changes in depressive symptoms over time were associated with same-month changes in weight loss (t [1148] = 2.05; p = .041), and changes in weight loss were associated with same-month changes in depressive symptoms (t [556] = 2.43; p = .015). To the extent that depressive symptoms increased, patients lost incrementally more weight than was lost due to the passage of time and vice versa. Results also suggested that pain and eating-related quality of life might explain the reciprocal association between depressive symptoms and weight loss. CONCLUSION: In head and neck cancer, a transactional interplay between depressive symptoms and weight loss unfolds over time. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 370-379, 2017.

Management of the radial forearm free flap donor site with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system.

INTRODUCTION: The radial forearm free flap is a popular reconstructive flap in modern head and neck surgery. Poor wound healing at the forearm donor site is common and frequently results in tendon exposure. The Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) system (Kinetic Concepts Inc., San Antonio, TX) is a topical negative pressure dressing that has been shown to improve skin graft viability when used as a bolster dressing. In this study, we investigated the use of the VAC system in the management of the radial forearm free flap donor site. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on all subjects who underwent a radial forearm free flap reconstruction in which the VAC system was used as a bolster dressing at the donor site from January 1, 2003, through March 31, 2005. RESULTS: Thirty-four consecutive subjects were included in the study. Exposed tendon did not occur in 14 (0%) subjects in which the VAC bolster was used for a minimum of 6 days. Eleven of the 20 subjects (55%) who used the VAC bolster for 5 days demonstrated small amounts of tendon exposure (<2 cm) on follow-up clinic examination. The minimum follow up for all subjects was 4 months. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the VAC system is a feasible alternative to conventional bolster dressing in the management of the radial forearm free flap skin-grafted donor site. Based on this study, when used for a minimum of 6 days, the VAC bolster dressing eliminated tendon exposure at the forearm donor site.

Deltopectoral flap revisited in the microvascular era: a single-institution 10-year experience.

OBJECTIVES: In 1965, Bakamjian described the deltopectoral (DP) flap as a reconstructive option in head and neck surgery. It served as the premier flap for reconstructing complex head and neck defects until the late 1970s. Today, the DP flap is often overlooked; although its role has diminished, its use is still warranted in certain select clinical situations. METHODS: A retrospective patient chart review of 25 DP flap procedures performed at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics and Iowa City Veterans Administration Hospital between January 1, 1991, and June 1, 2002, was undertaken. The data collected included patient demographics and assessment of DP flap survival and its ability to accomplish established preoperative reconstructive goals. RESULTS: The DP flap was used for the following situations: vascularized skin coverage of the neck, carotid arteries, and face (16 cases), including simultaneous coverage of other reconstructive flaps in 6 cases; controlled orocutaneous fistula development (3 cases) or fistula closure (5 cases); and pharyngoesophageal reconstruction (4 cases). In 3 cases the flap was used for more than one of the preoperative goals described above (n = 25). Minor flap-related complications that required local wound treatment developed in 5 cases (20.0%), but the flaps were successfully salvaged and no subsequent reconstructive procedure was required. In an additional 5 cases (20.0%), the flap failed in some measure to accomplish its preoperative goal, necessitating further surgical reconstruction. Sixteen patients (64%) had undergone previous or simultaneous reconstructive procedures that limited other available reconstructive options. CONCLUSIONS: The technical simplicity of the DP flap, coupled with its predictable vascular supply, has allowed it to maintain a niche role in contemporary reconstructive surgery. The DP flap provides an excellent method of reconstruction in select cases in which vascularized skin coverage of the neck is needed. The DP flap also provides a valuable salvage option in situations in which other reconstructive techniques are not possible.

Correlating thyroid cytology and histopathology: Implications for molecular testing.

BACKGROUND: A gene expression classifier (GEC) has been advocated in management of some indeterminate nodules without surgery. We assessed the potential negative predictive value (NPV) of the GEC at our academic center. METHODS: Retrospectively, all cytologically indeterminate fine-needle aspirates (FNAs) diagnosed by University of Iowa cytopathologists over a 3-year period were identified. Histopathologic findings were recorded. Using published sensitivity and specificity, NPVs were calculated. RESULTS: Of 178 nodules (17, 135, and 26 in classes III, IV, and V, respectively), 71 (40%) were malignant. Prevalence of malignancy was 41%, 29%, and 96% for classes III, IV, and V, respectively. Using sensitivities and specificities for the GEC, NPVs were 91% for the cohort: 88%, 92%, and 26% for classes III, IV, and V, respectively. CONCLUSION: Molecular testing should be associated with an NPV no lower than that from clinical criteria alone. With the prevalences reported, GEC use may result in more missed cancer diagnoses. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: 1104-1106, 2016.

The role of FDG PET in management of neck metastasis from head-and-neck cancer after definitive radiation treatment.

PURPOSE: The role of neck dissection after definitive radiation for head-and-neck cancer is controversial. We select patients for neck dissection based on postradiation therapy (post-RT), computed tomography (CT), and [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET). We summarize the clinical outcomes of patients treated with this policy to further elucidate the role of FDG PET in decision making for neck dissection after primary radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between December 1999 and February 2004, 53 eligible patients were identified. These patients had stage N2A or higher head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma and had complete response of the primary tumor after definitive radiation with or without chemotherapy. PET or computed tomography (CT) scans were performed within 6 months after treatment. Neck dissection was performed in patients with residual lymphadenopathy (identified by clinical examination or CT) and a positive PET scan. Those without residual lymph nodes and a negative PET were observed without neck dissection. For patients with residual lymphadenopathy, but a negative PET scan, neck dissection was performed at the discretion of the attending surgeon and decision of the patient. There was a total of 70 heminecks available for analysis (17 patients had bilateral neck disease). RESULTS: There were 21 heminecks with residual lymphadenopathy identified on CT imaging or clinical examination and negative PET. Of these, 4 had neck dissection and were pathologically negative. The remaining 17 were observed without neck dissection. There was a total of 42 heminecks without residual lymph nodes on post-RT CT imaging or clinical examination with a negative PET. They were also observed without neck dissection. Seven heminecks had a positive PET scan and residual lymphadenopathy. Six of them had neck dissection and 1 had fine-needle aspiration of a residual node; 3 contained residual viable cancer and 4 were pathologically negative. At median follow up of 26 months (range, 12-57 months), no regional failure was identified. The negative predictive value of PET was 100% and positive predictive value was 43%. CONCLUSION: For patients who have no evidence of residual lymphadenopathy and a negative FDG PET scan 12 weeks after definitive radiation, neck dissection can be safely withheld. Even in cases in which small residual lymphadenopathy was observed, regional recurrences have not occurred when the post-RT PET scan was negative and neck dissection was withheld. For patients with large residual lymphadenopathy (greater than 2.0-3.0 cm in size) but a negative post-RT FDG PET, further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to determine the appropriateness of withholding neck dissection.

Intensity-modulated radiation treatment for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma--the University of Iowa experience.

PURPOSE: To review the University of Iowa experience with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in the treatment of head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From October 1999 to April 2004, 151 patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma were treated with IMRT for curative intent. One patient was lost to follow-up 2 months after treatment and therefore excluded from analysis. Of the remaining 150 patients, 99 were treated with definitive IMRT, and 51 received postoperative IMRT. Sites included were nasopharynx, 5; oropharynx, 56; larynx, 33; oral cavity, 29; hypopharynx, 8; nasal cavity/paranasal sinus, 8; and unknown primary, 11. None of the patients treated with postoperative IMRT received chemotherapy. Of 99 patients who had definitive IMRT, 68 patients received concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy. One patient received induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but no concurrent chemotherapy was given. Three clinical target volumes (CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3) were defined. The prescribed doses to CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3 in the definitive cohort were 70-74 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy, respectively. For high-risk postoperative IMRT, the prescribed doses to CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3 were 64-66 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy, respectively. For intermediate-risk postoperative IMRT, the prescribed doses to CTV1, CTV2, and CTV3 were 60 Gy, 60 Gy, and 54 Gy. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 18 months (range, 2-60 months). All living patients were followed for at least 6 months. There were 11 local-regional failures: 7 local failures, 3 regional failures, and 1 failure both in the primary tumor and regional lymph node. There were 16 patients who failed distantly, either with distant metastasis or new lung primaries. The 2-year overall survival, local progression-free survival, locoregional progression-free survival, and distant disease-free survival rates were 85%, 94%, 92%, and 87%, respectively. The median time from treatment completion to local-regional recurrence was 4.7 months (range, 1.8 to 15.6 months). Only one marginal failure was noted in a patient who had extensive tonsil cancer with tumor extension into the orbit and cavernous sinus. Patients with oropharyngeal cancer did significantly better than patients with oral cavity and laryngeal cancer, with a 2-year local-regional control rate of 98%, compared with 78% for oral cavity cancer and 85% for laryngeal cancer (p = 0.005). There was no significant difference in local-regional control for patients who received postoperative radiation or definitive radiation (p = 0.339) and for patients who had chemotherapy or not (p = 0.402). Neither T stage nor N stage had a significant effect on local-regional control (p = 0.722 and 0.712, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our results have confirmed the effectiveness of IMRT in head-and-neck cancer. It offers excellent outcomes in local-regional control and overall survival. More studies are necessary to further improve the outcomes of laryngeal cancer as well as oral cavity cancer.

Long-term quality of life for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the long-term, health-related quality-of-life outcomes in patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (SRT) or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CRT). DESIGN: Matched-pair study comparing patients with advanced HNC treated with SRT or CRT at least 12 months after treatment. Patients completed 2 validated surveys addressing HNC-specific outcomes and depressive symptoms and provided information on employment and tobacco and alcohol use. Results for the 2 groups were compared using paired-sample t test and chi2 analysis. SETTING: University-based study. PATIENTS: Patients with stage III or IV squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, hypopharynx, and larynx who underwent SRT or received CRT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Head and neck cancer-specific health-related quality of life from the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory and level of depressive symptoms from the Beck Depression Inventory. RESULTS: The matching process resulted in 27 patients in each treatment group. The HNC-specific domain scores (with higher scores representing better outcomes) for CRT vs SRT were eating, 37.8 vs 40.8 (P = .69); speech, 65.1 vs 56.0 (P = .23); aesthetics, 80.3 vs 69.2 (P = .14); and social disruption, 69.7 vs 70.6 (P = .90). Overall health-related quality of life was 64.0 with SRT and 55.0 with CRT (P = .142). For the Beck Depression Inventory (with higher scores representing worse outcomes), patients who underwent SRT had a mean score of 9.6 compared with 11.6 for patients who received CRT (P = .42). CONCLUSION: As nonsurgical means of treating HNC have become more aggressive and surgical techniques have become more focused on function preservation and rehabilitation, the overall health-related quality of life resulting from these different approaches is similar.

Definitive management of severe facial trauma utilizing free tissue transfer.

OBJECTIVE: Severe ballistic or avulsion injuries to the face create complex, composite defects. We report the results of an aggressive management algorithm to optimize facial form and function: (1) the initial encounter, (2) definitive reconstruction with vascularized tissue, and (3) aesthetic and prosthetic refinement. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective case series of 49 patients in 2 tertiary care institutions. Patients were evaluated for age, gender, mechanism of injury, anatomic subsites involved, surgical procedures, flaps utilized, complications, and functional outcomes. RESULTS: Forty defects were gunshot wounds, 9 resulted from major avulsive trauma. Involved sites included 13 oromandibular, 21 midface/upper face, and 15 combined sites; 54 free flaps were utilized, 21 were soft tissue and 33 contained bone. No flap failures occurred. Function and cosmesis were best in the oromandibular only group, and worst in the combined group with nasal and/or orbital tissue loss. CONCLUSION: Treatment of severe facial trauma requires early tissue debridement with bony repair and/or stenting to minimize scar contracture. Free tissue transfer techniques allow simultaneous reconstruction of the bony framework and overlying tissues. Multiple secondary procedures are frequently required for optimal aesthetic restoration. EBM RATING: C.

Value of FDG PET in assessment of treatment response and surveillance in head-and-neck cancer patients after intensity modulated radiation treatment: a preliminary report.

PURPOSE: [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) imaging has been shown to be valuable in early detection of persistent and recurrent head-and-neck cancer after treatment. Previous studies have reported its use in patients treated with conventional radiation. Many patients are now treated with intensity-modulated radiation treatment (IMRT). We evaluated the value of FDG PET in the assessment of treatment response and surveillance in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We performed a retrospective review of 85 head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT at our institution between December 2000 and September 2003 who had FDG PET in their follow-up. Of these, 58 were treated with primary IMRT with or without chemotherapy, and 27 were treated with postoperative IMRT. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients had negative initial FDG PET after treatment. Forty of them, who had 6 to 24 months of follow-up after the imaging study, had no evidence of local or regional recurrence, although three of them developed distant disease. Twenty-one patients had a positive initial FDG PET after treatment, with 11 positive at the primary site, 9 positive in the neck, and 3 positive distantly. Six of 11 patients with a positive FDG PET at the primary site were true positive, and 3 had salvage surgery. Eight of 9 patients positive in the neck had a salvage neck dissection. One had fine needle aspiration of the lymph node with positive cytology but refused surgery later. For patients with follow-up of 6 months and longer, only 1 of 45 patients with a negative initial FDG PET at the primary site developed a local recurrence. None of 49 patients with a negative initial FDG PET in the neck developed a regional recurrence. Two cases are presented in which abnormal FDG PET preceded laryngoscopy or computed tomography in detection of tumor recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: FDG PET is useful in the posttreatment management of head-and-neck cancer patients treated with IMRT. It is highly accurate in the detection of persistent and recurrent disease after treatment and allows salvage treatment to be initiated in a timely manner. It also provides prognostic information concerning the risk of recurrence after curative therapy.

The role of post-radiation therapy FDG PET in prediction of necessity for post-radiation therapy neck dissection in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The role of neck dissection after radiation therapy ([RT] with or without chemotherapy) for regionally advanced head and neck cancer is controversial. As much as 50% of residual lymphadenopathy after radiation has no viable tumor cells present on histopathologic analysis. [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) imaging can detect metabolically active cancer. This study examines the ability of post-RT FDG PET imaging to predict the tumor status of residual lymphadenopathy after nonsurgical management of regionally advanced neck disease. METHODS AND MATERIAL: From February 2000 to October 2002, 41 patients were treated definitively by radiation (with or without chemotherapy) and underwent FDG PET and computed tomography (CT) imaging after treatment to assess response. Patients with negative CT and FDG PET scans were observed and did not undergo neck dissection. Patients with radiographically persistent lymphadenopathy underwent either neck dissection or fine-needle aspiration of the lymph nodes using ultrasound guidance. The results of the FDG PET scans were correlated with the pathologic findings. RESULTS: Twelve patients with persistent lymphadenopathy underwent either neck dissection or fine-needle aspiration. Four of the 12 were found to have viable residual tumor in the cervical lymph nodes. The pathology did not correlate with the size of the lymph nodes in the pre-RT or post-RT CT studies. However, the pathology correlated strongly with the post-RT FDG PET studies. All patients with a negative post-RT FDG PET or those with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUV(max)) of less than 3.0 in the post-RT FDG PET were found to be free of residual viable tumor. Using an SUV(max) of less than 3.0 as the criterion for a negative FDG PET study, the negative predictive value was 100% and the positive predictive value was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: A negative post-RT FDG PET scan is very predictive of negative pathology in neck dissection or fine-needle aspiration even with large residual lymphadenopathy. Therefore, if the post-RT FDG PET scan is negative, neck dissection might not be required for regional control. A prospective study with longer follow-up and greater patient numbers is needed to determine whether a policy of deferring neck dissection based on a negative FDG PET is supported.

Fibula free flaps: the role of angiography in patients with abnormal results on preoperative color flow Doppler studies.

BACKGROUND: The reliability of normal color flow Doppler (CFD) study results in predicting the safety of fibula free flap harvest has been recognized. The significance of abnormal CFD study results when used for preoperative assessment of a potential fibula free flap donor site is less well defined. OBJECTIVE: To determine if abnormal preoperative CFD study results should exclude fibula free flap harvest or if patients, in whom the fibula free flap is thought to be the best reconstructive option, should undergo further evaluation with angiography to better determine fibula free flap candidacy. METHODS: A retrospective review identified 17 potential fibula free flap candidates (34 legs) evaluated by both a lower extremity CFD study and a lower extremity angiogram. The results of the CFD study were then compared with those of angiography. RESULTS: There were 16 legs with normal CFD study results and subsequent angiographic findings confirming the safety of each of these legs for fibula free flap harvest. There were 18 legs that demonstrated abnormal CFD study results. Angiography revealed anatomy that was considered to represent a high risk for fibula free flap harvest in 16 legs and considered safe in the other 2 legs. All 14 legs that had at least 1 vessel with a monophasic waveform or no flow on the CFD study revealed a high-risk angiogram result. Of the 4 legs with biphasic waveforms in all trifurcation vessels on the CFD study, 2 revealed angiogram results that showed that they were safe for flap harvest. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CFD studies that reveal a monophasic waveform or absence of flow accurately identify unsafe donor sites. Fibula free flap harvest in these cases can be excluded based on abnormal CFD study results alone, eliminating the need to perform angiography.

Clinical significance of health status assessment measures in head and neck cancer: what do quality-of-life scores mean?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the magnitude of clinically significant differences in domain scores for a quality-of-life questionnaire specific to head and neck cancer; and to demonstrate a clinically relevant method of presenting head and neck cancer-specific quality-of-life data using cutoff scores and clinical anchors. DESIGN: Anchor-based and distribution-based techniques for determining clinically significant differences in health-related quality-of-life scores were used. SETTING: University-based tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 421 patients with head and neck cancer enrolled in a longitudinal outcomes project. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Head and Neck Cancer Inventory; clinical anchor health status in the domains of speech, eating, and social disruption; and distribution-based clinically significant score differences. RESULTS: Clinical anchor health states representing incremental levels of dysfunction were significantly correlated with domain scores for eating, speech, and social disruption. The anchor-based clinically important difference magnitudes were consistent with the values obtained using distribution-based techniques. For mean domain scores (minimum, 0; maximum, 100), differences of approximately 4, 10, and 14 or greater represented small, intermediate, and large clinically significant differences, respectively. Stratifying mean domain scores into low (0-30), intermediate (31-69), and high (70-100) categories allowed presentation of the health-related quality-of-life data in a clinically relevant format. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides benchmarks for small, intermediate, and large clinically significant changes in scores and demonstrates the presentation of health-related quality-of-life data in a clinically useful format.

Free tissue transfer versus pedicled flap cost in head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the overall 1-year management costs for patients receiving a free tissue transfer with those of patients receiving a pedicled flap reconstruction as a component of their primary head and neck cancer treatment. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Case-control, cost identification analysis of 21 matched pairs of patients and multivariate analysis of variables associated with treatment costs was conducted in a tertiary referral academic institution. RESULTS: No significant difference in total 1-year charges between the pedicled and free tissue transfer groups was found. A structured measure of patient comorbidity was the only variable significantly associated with total 1-year charges. CONCLUSIONS: Total 1-year treatment costs of primary upper aerodigestive tract cancers are similar for patients reconstructed with free tissue transfer or a pedicled flap. SIGNIFICANCE: Within the context of overall 1-year management costs, the primary determinants of health care expense for these patients are comorbidity and extent of disease, not reconstructive technique.

Fear of recurrence impacts health-related quality of life and continued tobacco use in head and neck cancer survivors.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of fear of recurrence (FOR) on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and tobacco use among head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. METHODS: A cross-sectional subset of patients (N = 138) from a large, prospective study of oncologic outcomes in HNC was assessed for FOR, in addition to the parent study's ongoing assessments of HRQOL and tobacco use. FOR was measured using the Fear of Cancer Recurrence Inventory and HNC-specific HRQOL was assessed with the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI). Tobacco use was patient-reported as "Current," "Previous," or "Never." RESULTS: After controlling for relevant clinical and demographic variables, hierarchical regression analyses revealed that higher FOR significantly predicted lower HRQOL across all HNCI domains (eating (p < .05), aesthetics (p < .01), speech (p < .01), and social disruption (p = .001)) and increased tobacco use (p < .01). A total of 60.1% of the sample expressed clinically significant levels of FOR. These patients reported lower HRQOL (eating: p < .05, aesthetics: p < .05, social disruption: p < .05) and were more likely to be using tobacco compared with patients with subclinical FOR (26.6% and 4.9%, respectively; p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that FOR is prevalent among HNC survivors and is related to decreased HRQOL and increased tobacco use.