Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 406(2): 367-375, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550453

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has transformed medical care worldwide. General surgery has been affected in elective procedures, yet the implications for emergency surgery are unclear. The current study analyzes the effect of the COVID-19 lockdown in spring 2020 on appendicitis treatment in Germany. METHODS: Hospitals that provided emergency surgical care during the COVID-19 lockdown were invited to participate. All patients diagnosed with appendicitis during the lockdown period (10 weeks) and, as a comparison group, patients from the same period in 2019 were analyzed. Clinical and laboratory parameters, intraoperative and pathological findings, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1915 appendectomies from 41 surgical departments in Germany were included. Compared to 2019 the number of appendectomies decreased by 13.5% (1.027 to 888, p=0.003) during the first 2020 COVID-19 lockdown. The delay between the onset of symptoms and medical consultation was substantially longer in the COVID-19 risk group and for the elderly. The rate of complicated appendicitis increased (58.2 to 64.4%), while the absolute number of complicated appendicitis decreased from 597 to 569, (p=0.012). The rate of negative appendectomies decreased significantly (6.7 to 4.6%; p=0.012). Overall postoperative morbidity and mortality, however, did not change. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 lockdown had significant effects on abdominal emergency surgery in Germany. These seem to result from a stricter selection and a longer waiting time between the onset of symptoms and medical consultation for risk patients. However, the standard of emergency surgical care in Germany was maintained.


Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicitis/cirugía , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Apendicectomía/efectos adversos , Apendicitis/diagnóstico , Apendicitis/etiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/epidemiología , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Front Pediatr ; 12: 1382000, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38550628

RESUMEN

Introduction: Centralization of neonatal surgical care for congenital malformations is already under discussion. Acute care of neonatal emergencies in perinatal centers with affiliated hospitals is not uniformly regulated in Germany. Materials and methods: Analyses are based on acute pediatric surgical care at four affiliated hospitals of a perinatal center. Epidemiologic data and outcome parameters "survival", "intracerebral hemorrhage", and "revision of surgical indication" are assessed. Comparison is made between patients receiving surgical treatment at affiliated hospitals (group A) and patients with transfer to the university center for therapy in case of surgical indication for gastrointestinal diseases (group B). Results: 17 group A-patients are compared to 40 group B-patients. Comparison of epidemiological data reveals no significant differences. There is a survival advantage with transfer to the university center (mortality of 29% in group A vs. 2% in group B, p = 0.007). Intracerebral hemorrhage occurred more frequently in externally treated patients (group A 24% vs. group B 2%, p = 0.024). Surgical indication was revised in 30% of group B at the university center (p = 0.011) with consecutive successful conservative treatment. Conclusion: Transfer of patients at the beginning of the acute phase of gastrointestinal diseases is key to optimize the quality of neonatal surgical care. However, larger population studies should confirm the presented results, discuss restricting factors of real care structures and should rule out bias in triage of patients.

3.
J Med Educ Curric Dev ; 11: 23821205241262684, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38882026

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Animated videos have become popular in teaching medical students, although there is a certain lack of evidence concerning its efficacy. Surgery seems to be an ideal field for its application, since animations are very helpful to understand anatomic structures and complex procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of animated videos compared to textbooks on learning gain. METHODS: A prospective 2-arm cohort study with 5th-year medical students was conducted during their 2-week surgical training module. The initial cohort of students received textbook sections on 3 major topics in visceral surgery as learning medium (text cohort). During the following semester, the second cohort of students received 3 animated whiteboard videos (animated videos) containing equivalent content (video cohort). All participants completed a multiple-choice test consisting of 15 questions on the learning content at baseline (pre-test) and after the learning period (post-test) and answered an additional evaluation questionnaire. RESULTS: Both cohorts were similar in their descriptive data and demonstrated significant learning gain during the 2-week learning period. The video cohort achieved better results (80% vs 73% correct answers; P = .028) and a higher learning gain (17% vs 11%; P = .034) in the post-test compared to the text cohort. The estimated learning time was longer in the video cohort (62 min vs 37 min; P < .001) and watching the videos resulted in higher learning gain (21% vs 6%; P < .001). Subgroups with higher learning gain by video learning were female gender (20% vs 11%; P = .040), native German speakers (18% vs 11%; P = .009), students without prior surgical experience (19% vs 12%; P = .033) and those undecided concerning a surgical career (22% vs 9%; P = .020). Interestingly, "low digital orientation" students benefited from videos (22% vs 13%; P = .021), whereas "high digital orientation" students did not. CONCLUSIONS: Animated videos increase medical students' learning gain and interest in surgery.

4.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 77: 345-348, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33212308

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Hepatic angiomyolipoma (HAML) is a rare mesenchymal liver tumour which belongs to the family of perivascular epithelioid cell tumours (PEComas). It is typically composed of blood vessels, smooth muscle, and adipose cells, and shows strong immunoreactivity for HMB-45. PRESENTATION OF THE CASE: A 57-year-old woman was referred to our hospital with an unclear liver lesion. A fine needle biopsy revealed a suspicion of hepatic angiomyolipoma with extramedullary haematopoiesis. Preoperative imaging revealed a tumour 17 cm in diameter in the left liver lobe segments II and III. A lobectomy of the left lobe segments II and III was performed. The pathological diagnosis of hepatic angiomyolipoma was obtained. DISCUSSION: Variations in the predominance of the tissue components in HAML impedes diagnosis based on imaging alone. The most promising evidence of HAML is the histological identification of lipomatous, myomatous, and angiomatous tissue combined with immunohistochemical positivity for HMB-45. Although the tumour is considered benign, some cases have been described with malignant behaviour. Surgical resection should be considered in case of symptoms, inconclusive biopsy, or growth in follow-up. Other surgical indications may include aggressive patterns such as vascular invasion, p53 immunoreactivity, or rapidly proliferating tumour cells. CONCLUSION: HAML is a rare liver tumour. In patients with symptoms, uncertain diagnosis, or tumour growth, surgical resection should be performed according to oncological criteria.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA