RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Challenges to communication between families and care providers of paediatric patients in intensive care units (ICU) include variability of communication preferences, mismatched goals of care, and difficulties carrying forward family preferences from provider to provider. Our objectives were to develop and test an assessment tool that queries parents of children requiring cardiac intensive care about their communication preferences and to determine if this tool facilitates patient-centred care and improves families' ICU experience. DESIGN: In this quality improvement initiative, a novel tool was developed, the Parental Communication Assessment (PCA), which asked parents with children hospitalised in the cardiac ICU about their communication preferences. Participants were prospectively randomised to the intervention group, which received the PCA, or to standard care. All participants completed a follow-up survey evaluating satisfaction with communication. MAIN RESULTS: One hundred thirteen participants enrolled and 56 were randomised to the intervention group. Participants who received the PCA preferred detail-oriented communication over big picture. Most parents understood the daily discussions on rounds (64%) and felt comfortable expressing concerns (68%). Eighty-six percent reported the PCA was worthwhile. Parents were generally satisfied with communication. However, an important proportion felt unprepared for difficult decisions or setbacks, inadequately included or supported in decision-making, and that they lacked control over their child's care. There were no significant differences between the intervention and control groups in their communication satisfaction results. CONCLUSIONS: Parents with children hospitalised in the paediatric ICU demonstrated diverse communication preferences. Most participants felt overall satisfied with communication, but individualising communication with patients' families according to their preferences may improve their experience.
RESUMEN
Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancer. In colorectal cancer (CRC), KRAS mutations are present in more than 50% of cases, and the KRAS glycine-to-cysteine mutation at codon 12 (KRAS G12C) occurs in up to 4% of patients. This mutation is associated with short responses to standard chemotherapy and worse overall survival compared to non-G12C mutations. In recent years, several KRAS G12C inhibitors have demonstrated clinical activity, although all patients eventually progressed. The identification of negative feedback through the EGFR receptor has led to the development of KRAS inhibitors plus an anti-EGFR combination, thus boosting antitumor activity. Currently, several KRAS G12C inhibitors are under development, and results from phase I and phase II clinical trials are promising. Moreover, the phase III CodeBreaK 300 trial demonstrates the superiority of sotorasib-panitumumab over trifluridine/tipiracil, establishing a new standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer harboring KRAS G12C mutations. Other combinations such as adagrasib-cetuximab, divarasib-cetuximab, or FOLFIRI-panitumumab-sotorasib have also shown a meaningful response rate and are currently under evaluation. Nonetheless, most of these patients will eventually relapse. In this setting, liquid biopsy emerges as a critical tool to characterize the mechanisms of resistance, consisting mainly of acquired genomic alterations in the MAPK and PI3K pathways and tyrosine kinase receptor alterations, but gene fusions, histological changes, or conformational changes in the kinase have also been described. In this paper, we review the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors in colorectal cancer as well as the main mechanisms of resistance.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Cetuximab , Panitumumab , Fosfatidilinositol 3-Quinasas/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Temblor , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , MutaciónRESUMEN
The treatment of unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer has evolved over the last two decades, as knowledge of cancer biology has broadened and new targets have emerged. 'The Hallmarks of Cancer' illustrate the crucial capabilities acquired by cells to become malignant and represent the evolution of knowledge of tumor biology. This review integrates these novel targets and therapies into selected hallmarks: sustaining proliferative signaling, inducing vasculature, avoiding immune destruction, genome instability and mutation, reprogramming cellular metabolism, and resisting cell death. The different strategies and combinations under study are based on treatments with anti-EGFR, anti-VEGF, and anti-HER2 agents, KRAS G12C inhibitors, BRAF and MEK inhibitors, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, new approaches are emerging, including vaccines, WEE1 inhibitors, and PARP inhibitors, among others. The further deciphering of cancer biology will unravel new targets, develop novel therapies, and improve patients' outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Animales , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a complex and genetically heterogeneous disease presenting a specific metastatic pattern, with the liver being the most common site of metastasis. Around 20%-25% of patients with CRC will develop exclusively hepatic metastatic disease throughout their disease history. With its specific characteristics and therapeutic options, liver-limited disease (LLD) should be considered as a specific entity. The identification of these patients is particularly relevant in view of the growing interest in liver transplantation in selected patients with advanced CRC. Identifying why some patients will develop only LLD remains a challenge, mainly because of a lack of a systemic understanding of this complex and interlinked phenomenon given that cancer has traditionally been investigated according to distinct physiological compartments. Recently, multidisciplinary efforts and new diagnostic tools have made it possible to study some of these complex issues in greater depth and may help identify targets and specific treatment strategies to benefit these patients. In this review we analyze the underlying biology and available tools to help clinicians better understand this increasingly common and specific disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Prior studies demonstrate that 20%-50% of adolescents and young adults (age 15-39 years) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) receive care at specialty cancer centers, yet a survival benefit has been observed for patients at these sites. Our objective was to identify patients at risk of severe geographic barriers to specialty cancer center-level care. METHODS: We used data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Cancer in North America database to identify adolescent and young adult ALL patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 across 43 US states. We calculated driving distance and travel time from counties where participants lived to the closest specialty cancer center sites. We then used multivariable logistic regression models to examine the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics of counties where adolescent and young adult ALL patients resided and the need to travel more than 1 hour to obtain care at a specialty cancer center. RESULTS: Among 11â813 adolescent and young adult ALL patients, 43.4% were aged 25-39 years, 65.5% were male, 32.9% were Hispanic, and 28.7% had public insurance. We found 23.6% of adolescent and young adult ALL patients from 60.8% of included US counties would be required to travel more than 1 hour one way to access a specialty cancer center. Multivariable models demonstrate that patients living in counties that are nonmetropolitan, with lower levels of educational attainment, with higher income inequality, with lower internet access, located in primary care physician shortage areas, and with fewer hospitals providing chemotherapy services are more likely to travel more than 1 hour to access a specialty cancer center. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial travel-related barriers exist to accessing care at specialty cancer centers across the United States, particularly for patients living in areas with greater concentrations of historically marginalized communities.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones Oncológicas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Viaje , Humanos , Adolescente , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto Joven , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Viaje/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Instituciones Oncológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Modelos Logísticos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Cetuximab, a chimeric IgG1 monoclonal antibody targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has revolutionized personalized treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. This review highlights the mechanism of action, characteristics, and optimal indications for cetuximab in mCRC. Cetuximab has emerged as a pivotal partner for novel therapies in specific molecular subgroups, including BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, and HER2-altered mCRC. Combining cetuximab with immunotherapy and other targeted agents further expands the therapeutic landscape, offering renewed hope for mCRC patients who face the development of resistance to conventional therapies. Ongoing clinical trials have continued to uncover innovative cetuximab-based treatment strategies, promising a brighter future for mCRC patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of cetuximab's role and its evolving importance in personalized targeted therapy of mCRC patients, offering valuable insights into the evolving landscape of colorectal cancer treatment.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The global prevalence of colorectal cancer highlights the need to enhance treatment strategies for improved patient outcomes. The pivotal role of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in regulating cellular processes for this disease pinpoints its value as a therapeutic target, despite the emergence of resistance mechanisms over time. AREAS COVERED: This review discusses the clinical evidence supporting the use of EGFR inhibitors in molecularly-selected patients based on molecular characteristics (notably BRAF V600E and KRAS G12C) including combination approaches targeting different points in in the signaling pathway, as well as strategies such as EGFR inhibitor rechallenge. The role of HER2 inhibitors and emerging approaches such as bispecific antibodies are also reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: Recently, inhibitors targeting the KRAS G12C variant have emerged, albeit with modest monotherapy activity compared to other tumor types, emphasizing the influence of histologic origins on the EGFR signaling pathway. Integration of EGFR inhibitors into precision medicine has facilitated tailored therapies addressing resistance mechanisms. Patient selection for EGFR inhibitor rechallenge guided by ctDNA findings is crucial, with ongoing investigations exploring novel combinations to enhance EGFR blockade, highlighting the transformative potential of precision medicine in shaping the future of mCRC treatment toward personalized and targeted approaches.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Resistencia a Antineoplásicos , Receptores ErbB , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Medicina de Precisión , Transducción de Señal , Humanos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/genética , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores ErbB/genética , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Selección de Paciente , Animales , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/genética , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas p21(ras)/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
Importance: Preoperative goals of care discussion and documentation are important for patients undergoing surgery, a major health care stressor that incurs risk. Objective: To assess the association of race, ethnicity, and other factors, including history of mental health disability, with disparities in preoperative goals of care documentation among veterans. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed data from the Veterans Healthcare Administration (VHA) of 229â¯737 veterans who underwent surgical procedures between January 1, 2017, and October 18, 2022. Exposures: Patient-level (ie, race, ethnicity, medical comorbidities, history of mental health comorbidity) and system-level (ie, facility complexity level) factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Preoperative life-sustaining treatment (LST) note documentation or no LST note documentation within 30 days prior to or on day of surgery. The standardized mean differences were calculated to assess the magnitude of differences between groups. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were estimated with logistic regression. Results: In this study, 13â¯408 patients (5.8%) completed preoperative LST from 229â¯737 VHA patients (209â¯123 [91.0%] male; 20â¯614 [9.0%] female; mean [SD] age, 65.5 [11.9] years) who received surgery. Compared with patients who did complete preoperative LST, patients tended to complete preoperative documentation less often if they were female (19â¯914 [9.2%] vs 700 [5.2%]), Black individuals (42â¯571 [19.7%] vs 2416 [18.0%]), Hispanic individuals (11â¯793 [5.5%] vs 631 [4.7%]), or from rural areas (75â¯637 [35.0%] vs 4273 [31.9%]); had a history of mental health disability (65â¯974 [30.5%] vs 4053 [30.2%]); or were seen at lowest-complexity (ie, level 3) facilities (7849 [3.6%] vs 78 [0.6%]). Over time, despite the COVID-19 pandemic, patients undergoing surgical procedures completed preoperative LST increasingly more often. Covariate-adjusted estimates of preoperative LST completion demonstrated that patients of racial or ethnic minority background (Black patients: OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.77-0.80; P <.001; patients selecting other race: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; P <.001; Hispanic patients: OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.76-0.81; P <.001) and patients from rural regions (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.93; P <.001) had lower likelihoods of completing LST compared with patients who were White or non-Hispanic and patients from urban areas. Patients with any mental health disability history also had lower likelihood of completing preoperative LST than those without a history (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.92-0.94; P = .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, disparities in documentation rates within a VHA cohort persisted based on race, ethnicity, rurality of patient residence, history of mental health disability, and access to high-volume, high-complexity facilities.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Veteranos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Transversales , Pandemias , Grupos Minoritarios , Documentación , Planificación de Atención al PacienteRESUMEN
This cross-sectional study evaluates growth of transport policies and policy components that directed emergency medical services (EMS) to bypass local emergency departments for the closest certified stroke centers as a proven treatment for stroke.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
INTRODUCCIÓN: La hospitalización por enfermedad aguda en pacientes ancianos puede significar la aparición de deterioro funcional hospitalario (DFH). Por su elevada frecuencia y las graves consecuencias derivadas, analizamos el deterioro funcional en pacientes ingresados en una unidad de Hospitalización a Domicilio (HAD). MÉTODO: Estudio descriptivo retrospectivo de pacientes ≥ 80 años ingresados en HAD. Se obtuvieron variables demográficas y sociofamiliares, procedencia del ingreso, duración del ingreso previo e ingreso en HAD, variables clínicas y comorbilidad. Se recogió situación funcional basal, al ingreso, al alta y a los 3 meses según índice de Barthel (IB). Se excluyeron las estancias cortas, los paliativos, los fallecidos, aquellos con IB previo < 10 y los reingresos como motivo de alta. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 168 pacientes ≥80 años, 52.4% hombres. El 71.4% procedentes de urgencias. Los pacientes institucionalizados presentaron peor resultado funcional. El 40,5% presentó pérdida funcional (PF) al ingreso. Al alta, mejoraron 1.2%, se mantuvieron el 59,3% y empeoraron el 39,4%. La PF al alta es menor si la estancia hospitalaria es ≤ 2 días y la estancia total <7 días. El uso de sonda vesical se asocia a peor resultado funcional al alta y se mantiene a los 3 meses. CONCLUSIONES: La HAD puede reducir el DFH si se acorta la estancia hospitalaria previa
INTRODUCTION: Hospitalization for acute illness in elderly patients may precipitate the appearance of hospital functional impairment (HFI). Due to its high frequency and the serious consequences derived, we analysed functional results in patients admitted to a Hospital at Home (HAH) unit. METHOD: Retrospective descriptive study of patients ≥ 80 years admitted to HAH. We collected sociodemographic characteristics, source of referral, previous hospital stay and HAH stay, clinical assessment and comorbidity. Functional status previous, at admission, at discharge and after 3 months was collected according to the Barthel index (BI). Short stays, palliative care, deaths, those with a previous BI <10, and readmissions as a reason for discharge were excluded. RESULTS: 168 patients ≥80 years old, 52.4% men, were included. 71.4% admitted from the emergency department. Institutionalized patients presented worse functional results. 40.5% presented functional loss (FL) at admission. At discharge, they improved 1.2%, remained 59.3% and worsened 39.4%. The FL at discharge is lower if the previous hospital stay is ≤ 2 days and the total stay <7 days. The use of bladder catheter is associated with a worse functional result at discharge and is maintained at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: HAH can reduce HFI if the previous hospital stay is shortened
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Servicios de Atención a Domicilio Provisto por Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años/psicología , Rendimiento Físico Funcional , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Anciano Frágil/psicología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Comorbilidad , Función Ejecutiva/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Introducción: la detección de antígeno en heces se ha considerado una prueba prometedora para el diagnóstico de la infección por Helicobacter pylori. Para su introducción en la práctica médica, es un requisito indispensable demostrar el desempeño adecuado del método en la población de estudio. Objetivo: evaluar la capacidad diagnóstica de los sistemas comerciales ELISA SD y SD BIOLINE, del fabricante Standard Diagnostics, Corea, en pacientes cubanos con síntomas gastroduodenales. Métodos: se evaluaron 101 muestras de heces de pacientes previamente clasificados como H. pylori positivos y negativos por las pruebas de referencia de histología y prueba rápida de la ureasa. Se calcularon los parámetros de desempeño de ambos sistemas diagnósticos por el programa EPIDAT 3.1. Resultados: la sensibilidad para los sistemas ELISA SD y SD BIOLINE fue de 85,25 por ciento y 75,41 por ciento, respectivamente. La especificidad para ambos fue de 92,50 por ciento. Los valores predictivos positivos y negativos, los índices de validez y de Youden y la confiabilidad diagnóstica de ambas pruebas fueron satisfactorios. Conclusiones: Los sistemas evaluados exhibieron un desempeño comparable con la histología y la prueba rápida de ureasa para la detección activa de la infección por H. pylori, lo que demuestra su utilidad para el diagnóstico y el manejo oportuno del paciente, sin la necesidad de emplear pruebas invasivas(AU)
Introduction: stool antigen tests have been considered to be promising for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. For their incorporation into medical practice, it is indispensable to demonstrate their accuracy in a study population. Objective: evaluate the diagnostic capacity of the commercial systems ELISA SD and SD BIOLINE, Standards Diagnostics, Korea, in Cuban patients with gastroduodenal symptoms. Methods: an evaluation was conducted of 101 stool samples from patients previously classified as H. pylori positive and negative by reference histological tests and the rapid urease test. Estimation was made of performance parameters for both diagnostic systems using the software EPIDAT 3.1. Results: Sensitivity for the systems ELISA SD and SD BIOLINE was 85.25 percent and 75.41 percent, respectively. Specificity for both was 92.50 percent. Positive and negative predictive values, validity and Youden's indices, and diagnostic reliability were satisfactory for both tests. Conclusions: the systems evaluated were found to have a performance level comparable with histological tests and the rapid urease test for active detection of H. pylori infection. This confirms their usefulness for the diagnosis and timely management of patients without having to use invasive tests(AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Heces/parasitología , Antígenos/análisis , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnósticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: At present only monoclonal EIA (enzyme-immunoassay) stool antigen-tests have obtained optimal accuracy in the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori. Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of two stool antigen-tests, the validated Premier Platinum HpSA PLUS (EIA test) and the newly available ImmunoCard STAT! HpSA HD (rapid test) for the initial diagnosis and the confirmation of eradication of H. pylori infection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with indication of H. pylori diagnosis, or confirmation after treatment were included. Data were coded to protect personal data and ensure blindness between tests. Accuracy was considered as coincident diagnosis with the gold standard (13C-urea breath test, UBT). The EIA was used as a bench standard. All stool tests were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: 264 patients completed the protocol (100 naïve, 164 post-eradication). Average age was 52 years, 61% women, 11% ulcer. Positive diagnoses by UBT were 41% for naïve and 17% for post-eradication. Overall ImmunoCard and EIA accuracies were respectively 91% (95%C. I. =88-94%) and 89% (86-93%), sensitivities 72% (67-78%) and 72% (67-78%), and specificities 98% (96-100%), and 95% (92-97%). Concordance between ImmunoCard and EIA was 95% (93-98%). DISCUSSION: Our results indicate that the newly available ImmunoCard rapid stool antigen-test achieves 90% accuracy, with high specificity but suboptimal sensitivity. The ImmunoCard attained equivalent accuracies as the EIA bench standard, with 95% concordance
ANTECEDENTES: En la actualidad, únicamente los métodos de detección de antígenos en heces monoclonales basados en enzimoinmunoanálisis (ELISA) han obtenido una adecuada precisión para el diagnóstico de la infección por Helicobacter pylori. Nuestro objetivo fue evaluar la exactitud (sensibilidad y especificidad) de 2 métodos de antígenos en las heces, el previamente validado Premier Platinum HpSA® PLUS (ELISA) y el nuevo ImmunoCard® STAT! HpSA® HD (test rápido), para el diagnóstico inicial y la confirmación de la erradicación de la infección por H. pylori. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron pacientes en los que estaba indicado el diagnóstico inicial de la infección por H. pylori o su confirmación tras el tratamiento. Los datos fueron codificados y los evaluadores de ambos test fueron ciegos para los resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas. El resultado principal fue la coincidencia con el resultado del patrón oro (prueba del aliento con 13C-urea). Los test en heces se realizaron por duplicado. RESULTADOS: Doscientos sesenta y cuatro pacientes completaron el protocolo (100 naïve, 164 posterradicación). La edad media fue de 52 años, el 61% fueron mujeres y el 11% tenían úlcera péptica. La prueba del aliento fue positiva en el 41% de los pacientes naïve y en el 17% posterradicación. La exactitud global del método rápido y del ELISA fue, respectivamente, 91% (IC 95%: 88-94%) y 89% (86-93%), la sensibilidad 72% (67-78%) y 72% (67-78%), y la especificidad 98% (96-100%) y 95% (92-97%). La concordancia entre el método ImmunoCard® y ELISA fue del 95% (93-98%). DISCUSIÓN: El nuevo método rápido de antígenos en heces (ImmunoCard® STAT! HpSA® HD) tiene una exactitud diagnóstica del 90%, con una elevada especificidad, pero una sensibilidad insuficiente. El método ImmunoCard® tiene una exactitud equivalente al método ELISA estándar, con una concordancia del 95%