Orthopedic Surgical Treatment and Perioperative Complications in Multiple Myeloma Bone Disease: Analysis of a Series (2009-2018).

BACKGROUND: More than 90% of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) develop lytic bone lesions that can be surgically treated for symptomatic relief and functional improvement. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational analytic study conducted between 2009 and 2018, including 58 patients with MM bone disease who underwent 77 orthopedic surgical procedures and were co-managed by internal medicine. Analysis of data related to MM bone disease, different modalities of surgical treatment, perioperative complications, and survival was performed. RESULTS: Median age was 72 years (66.5-77 years) and 56.9% of patients were males; 54.43% of injuries were located in the spine, 27.85% in the pelvis or lower limbs, 15.19% in the upper limbs, and 75.32% of patients had pathologic fractures. In 29.31% of the cases, the bone lesion was the debut of MM. Surgical procedures performed were mainly kyphoplasty (48.05%) and intramedullary nailing (29.87%). The overall complication rate following surgery was 74.03%. Only 20.78% of cases had a surgical complication. Among medical complications, we registered 28.57% transfusion requirements, 25.97% acute renal failures, 24.68% developed an infection, and 10.39% developed hypercalcemia. Patients were followed-up for a mean of 6.13 years and 37.93% suffered a new fracture. The median overall survival time for patients after surgery was 32.9 months (11.6-49). The estimated overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery was 81.17%, 57%, and 34.11%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The orthopedic surgical treatment of MM bone disease aims to improve symptomatology and patient quality of life; however, these patients have a high risk of perioperative complications and considerable early mortality, making multidisciplinary management with medical specialties essential.

EQ-5D-5L utilities per health states in Spanish population with knee or hip osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to obtain utilities by means of EQ-5D-5L for different health states in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) or hip osteoarthritis (HOA) in Spain, and to compare these values with those used in foreign studies with the aim of discussing their transferability for their use in economic evaluations conducted in Spain. METHODS: Primary study: Observational prospective study of KOA or HOA patients in Spain. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were collected to characterize the sample. Utilities were elicited using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. ANOVA and bivariable analyses were conducted to identify differences between health states. LITERATURE REVIEW: Using the bibliographic databases NSH EED and CEA Registry, we conducted searches of model-based cost utilities analyses of technologies in KOA or HOA patients. Health states and utilities were extracted and compared with values obtained from the Spanish sample. RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-seven subjects with KOA and 361 subjects with HOA were included, with average utilities of 0.544 and 0.520, respectively. In both samples, differences were found in utilities according to level of pain, stiffness and physical function (WOMAC) and severity of symptoms (Oxford scales), so that the worst the symptoms, the lower the utilities. The utilities after surgery were higher than before surgery. Due to limitations from our study related to sample size and observational design, it was not possible to estimate utilities for approximately half the health states included in the published models because they were directly related to specific technologies. For almost 100% of health states of the selected studies we obtained very different utilities from those reported in the literature. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the first article with detailed utilities estimated using the EQ-5D-5L in Spain for KOA and HOA patients. In both populations, utilities are lower for worse health states in terms of level of pain, stiffness and physical function according to WOMAC, and according to the Oxford scales. Most utilities obtained from the Spanish sample are lower than those reported in the international literature. Further studies estimating utilities from local populations are required to avoid the use of foreign sources in economic evaluations.

Validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford knee score and assessment of its utility to characterize quality of life of patients suffering from knee osteoarthritis: a multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) represents a heavy burden for patients and the society as a whole. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) is a well known tool to assess the quality of life in patients with Knee OA. The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the OKS, including its reliability, validity, and responsiveness. METHODS: Prospective observational study that included 397 patients diagnosed with knee OA according to the criterion of the American Rheumatism Association, which were recruited in 3 different Spanish regions. Their self-perceived health-related quality of life (HRQL) was assessed through 3 questionnaires: a generic one (the EQ-5D-5 L) and two specific ones adapted to Spanish (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Oxford Knee Score (OKS). The follow-up period was 6 months, and the acceptability of the OKS was evaluated, together with its psychometric properties, presence of ceiling and floor effects, validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. RESULTS: The OKS was fully answered in 99.5% of cases, with no evidence of ceiling or floor effects. Its factor structure can be explained in a single dimension. Its discriminating capacity was very good compared to the groups generated by the WOMAC and the EQ-5D-5 L. The correlation of the OKS with the dimensions of the latter questionnaires was around 0.7. The test-retest reliability was excellent (ICC 0.993; CI 95%: 0.990-0.995) and so was its internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.920). The effect size was 0.7 for moderate improvements in the HQRL, which is similar to that of the dimensions of the WOMAC and greater than for the EQ-5D-5 L. The minimum clinically significant difference that was detected by the questionnaire was 6.1 points, and the minimum detectable change was 4.4 points. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish-adapted version of the OKS is a useful, valid tool for assessing the perceived HRQL in patients suffering from knee OA, with psychometric properties similar to the WOMAC, and that allows for discriminating the patient's condition at a particular moment as well as for appraising changes over time.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Oxford Hip Score in patients with hip osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip is a disease that entails a major burden for patients and the society as a whole. One way of measuring this burden for the patient is through impact on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL). The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) is a well-known tool to measure HRQL in patients with OA of the hip. This study aims to assess the psychometric properties of the Spanish-adapted version of the OHS, including its reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. METHODS: Prospective observational study that included 361 patients diagnosed with hip OA (according to the criterion of the American College of Rheumatology) from 3 different Spanish regions. Their HRQL was assessed using a generic questionnaire, the EQ-5D-5 L, and two specific ones (the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WOMAC, and the OHS) adapted to Spanish. There was a follow-up period of 6 months, and the acceptability, psychometric properties, presence of ceiling and floor effects, validity, reliability, and sensitivity to changes of the OHS were measured. RESULTS: The OHS was fully answered in 99.4% of cases with no indication of ceiling or floor effects. Its factor structure can be explained in a single dimension. Its discriminative capacity was very good compared to the groups generated by the WOMAC and the EQ-5D-5 L. The correlation between the OHS and dimensions of the WOMAC or EQ-5D-5 L utilities was ≥0.7. Excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.992; CI95%: 0.994-0.998) and internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.928) were observed. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 7.0 points, and the minimum detectable change (MDC) was 5.5 points. The effect size for moderate improvement in perceived HRQL was 0.73, similar to that of WOMAC dimensions and higher than the EQ-5D-5 L. CONCLUSIONS: The Spanish-adapted version of the OHS is a useful, acceptable tool for the assessment of perceived HRQL in patients with hip OA, and has psychometric properties similar to those of the WOMAC that allow for discriminating both a patient's condition at a given moment and changes that can occur over time.

A clinical review of 11 cases of large-sized well-differentiated liposarcomas.

Well-differentiated liposarcomas of the extremities are one of the most frequent types of malignant soft tissue tumors in adults. These tumors are typically locally aggressive and show a tendency to recurrence after surgical excision even though they do not metastasize and very rarely dedifferentiate. Its clinical presentation is generally a progressively growing mass causing aesthetic, functional, or compressive symptoms depending on the tumor's size and localization. Several authors recommend a wide excision with free margins in order to minimize the risk of recurrence, while others report good results and a low rate of recurrence with more conservative or even marginal excision thereby avoiding complications due to surgical site morbidity. We present a retrospective study of 11 patients with a large-sized well-differentiated liposarcoma of the lower limb with a mean follow-up of 3.2 years. The mean size was 22 × 19 × 17 cm, and a marginal resection was made, respecting the affected neurovascular structures, in all cases. Only one recurrence was found and the functional results were 81.6% according to the MSTS functional scale 1 year after surgery. We believe that the marginal excision is a good alternative when the tumor is located near vascular or nerve structures, and as to our experience, it is not associated with elevated recurrences.

Structural bone allograft fractures in oncological procedures.

PURPOSE: We report our experience analysing the risk of fracture amongst allografts in limb-preserving surgery for bone tumours. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed our experience with bone allograft and its major complications when used for limb -preserving operations for bone tumours. Forty-one structural allografts were performed in 39 patients between 1992 and 2012. Minimum follow-up was 20 months. Massive allografts have a high complication rate. RESULTS: Excluding infection and nonunion, five acute fractures were found. All fractures occurred after the graft-host junction was united. Local factors-such as graft preservation, weight bearing, fixation to the host or systemic factors such as adjuvant treatments (chemotherapy or radiotherapy)-influence fracture rate. In our study, four patients achieved consolidation with internal fixation and autologous iliac-crest graft, whilst only one required graft exchange. DISCUSSION: There is no general consensus as to when to treat fractures using open reduction and internal fixation or by exchanging the allograft. Higher fracture rate in relation to systemic treatment was found. CONCLUSIONS: Massive structural allograft reconstruction still has a place in limb-preserving surgery, with an acceptable fracture rate and a durable solution.

Synovial Sarcoma of the Foot as an Atypical Cause of Persistent Metatarsalgia: A Report of 3 Cases.

CASE: Three cases of atypical metatarsalgia are presented, all diagnosed with foot synovial sarcomas (SSs) at different stages of evolution, after a year of medical consultations. One case was treated with marginal excision without requiring bone excision; the second patient required amputation of the first ray; and the third patient, with advanced disease, required amputation through Chopart's joint. CONCLUSION: Metatarsalgia is a recurrent reason for consultation in orthopaedics. Even so, patients with persistent symptoms should be studied further in depth. Computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can detect tumor pathology, such as SS, of insidious development.

Impact of lower limb osteoarthritis on health-related quality of life: A cross-sectional study to estimate the expressed loss of utility in the Spanish population.

OBJECTIVE: Osteoarthritis of the lower limb (OALL) worsens health-related quality of life (HRQL), but this impact has not been quantified with standardized measures. We intend to evaluate the impact of OALL on HRQL through measures based on individual preferences in comparison to the general population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was designed. A total of 6234 subjects aged 50 years or older without OALL were selected from the Spanish general population (National Health Survey 2011-12). An opportunistic sample of patients aged 50 years or older diagnosed with hip (n = 331) or knee osteoarthritis (n = 393), using the American Rheumatism Association criteria, was recruited from six hospitals and 21 primary care centers in Vizcaya, Madrid and Tenerife between January and December 2015. HRQL was measured with the EQ-5D-5L, and the results were transformed into utility scores. Sociodemographic variables (age, sex, social group, cohabitation), number of chronic diseases, and body mass index were considered. The clinical stage of OALL was collected using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the Oxford hip score and Oxford knee score. Generalized linear models were constructed using the utility index as the dependent variable. RESULTS: HRQL expressed by OALL patients was significantly worse than this of the general population. After adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the mean utility loss was -0.347 (95% CI: -0.390, -0.303) for osteoarthritis of the hip and -0.295 (95% CI: -0.336, -0.255) for osteoarthritis of the knee. OALL patients who were treated at a hospital had an additional utility loss of -0.112 (95% CI: -0.158, -0.065). CONCLUSION: OALL has a great impact on HRQL. People with OALL perceive a utility loss of approximately 0.3 points compared to the general population without osteoarthritis, which is very high in relation to the utility loss reported for other chronic diseases and for arthritis in general.

Paraneoplastic vasculitis associated to pelvic chondrosarcoma: a case report.

Vasculopathic syndromes have been associated with hematological and solid organ malignancies. The pathogenesis of these syndromes remains largely unknown and there are no biologic markers identified. Whether it is or is not a paraneoplastic syndrome is under discussion, the close temporal relationship of cancer and vasculitis suggests that these vasculitides are a paraneoplastic condition. We report a case of a 45-year-old female patient with pelvic chondrosarcoma who underwent surgical treatment and started to present visual loss, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SRIS), cardiac insufficiency, hepatosplenomegaly, cholestasis as well as pulmonary bleeding suggesting a sarcoma-associated vasculitis. All antibodies were negative as in secondary vasculitis. After corticoideal therapy the vasculitis resolved and at 3-year follow-up the patient had not showed any further medical complications or recurrences of the vasculitis. The parallel evolution of the vasculitis and the solid tumor combined with the resolution of the vasculitis after corticotherapy enhances the likelihood of a paraneoplastic vasculitis associated with a chondrosarcoma according to literature review.