Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Calcif Tissue Int ; 85(3): 203-10, 2009 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19609737

RESUMEN

Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) is a potential screening tool for vertebral fractures, but it is uncertain how to optimize the selection of women for VFA. We investigate the use of a probability score (VFscore) to select women for VFA screening and compare this to other means of targeting VFA. We identified 1,572 treatment-naive women over age 65 who had undergone routine VFA screening. Risk factors for fracture on VFA were identified using multivariate logistic regression, and a VFscore was created. Different thresholds of VFscore were examined and compared to using BMD as a means of targeting screening. After multivariate logistic regression, the risk factors significantly associated with the presence of a fracture on VFA were age, femoral neck BMD, prior clinical fracture, and height loss/kyphosis. The VFscore derived from these factors had a 65.5% sensitivity and a 65.5% specificity for determining vertebral fracture status. For equal resource requirements, the VFscore identified more women with fracture than using BMD category to target VFA. Compared to routinely screening all women, VFscore enabled a 30% reduction in the number of women undergoing VFA while still identifying >90% of women with a vertebral fracture. Overall, a large proportion of the population is required to undergo VFA in order to ensure that the majority of women with a vertebral fracture are selected for screening. The VFscore increased the efficiency of VFA screening to a modest degree compared to screening routinely or according to BMD category.


Asunto(s)
Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Osteoporosis/complicaciones , Osteoporosis/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Absorciometría de Fotón , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Densidad Ósea , Femenino , Fracturas del Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico , Cuello Femoral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuello Femoral/patología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/prevención & control , Columna Vertebral/patología
2.
Int J Older People Nurs ; 12(3)2017 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28078772

RESUMEN

AIMS: The aims of this study were to (i) assess the effect of low-cost hygiene and emollient regimens on the skin barrier function (SBF) of people aged >65 year with xerosis (dry skin) on their lower legs; (ii) to assess the utility of portable measures of skin barrier function in terms of stratum corneum hydration (SCH) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in community settings; and iii) to provide evidence for a randomised controlled trial on the treatment of adults in a resource-poor country with dry skin on their lower legs which causes and exacerbates the skin disease podoconiosis (non-filarial elephantiasis). BACKGROUND: Age increases the risk of impaired skin barrier function which can precipitate skin breakdown. Older skin is frequently characterised by troublesome xerosis and pruritus (itching). Hygiene and emollient practices are central to maintaining skin integrity but are currently under-researched. METHOD: A quasi-experimental pilot study of five combinations of cleansing and emollient interventions was applied to the xerotic lower legs of ten participants with no skin disease for five consecutive days. Stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss were measured at baseline and day six. Products were chosen because of effectiveness, low cost and availability in a poor-resource country. RESULTS: The greatest difference in transepidermal water loss pre-intervention-postintervention was indicated by the regimen of soapy water, 2% glycerine soak and Vaseline™ (mean 1.14, SD 1.27). This regimen also indicated the greatest difference in stratum corneum hydration (mean 7.92, SD 3.93). The improvement in stratum corneum hydration was significantly greater than for the control (p = .011), soap (p = .050) or water soak (p = .011). CONCLUSION: A regimen of washing skin with soapy water, soaking in 2% glycerine for 30 min and applying Vaseline™ has a beneficial effect on the skin barrier function in older people. The study supports previous findings on the positive effects of glycerine on skin barrier function. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE AND RESEARCH: Skin barrier function in older people can be improved using a regimen of washing, soaking in 2% glycerine and applying Vaseline™ .


Asunto(s)
Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Glicerol/administración & dosificación , Ictiosis/prevención & control , Pierna , Vaselina/administración & dosificación , Prurito/prevención & control , Cuidados de la Piel/enfermería , Jabones/química , Pérdida Insensible de Agua/efectos de los fármacos , Administración Tópica , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Concentración de Iones de Hidrógeno , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA