The impact of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) on anticoagulation therapy in rural Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the use of different anticoagulation therapies in rural Western Australia; to establish whether remoteness from health care services affects the choice of anticoagulation therapy; to gather preliminary data on anticoagulation therapy safety and efficacy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalised with a principal diagnosis of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) or venous thromboembolism (VTE) during 2014-2015. SETTING: Four hospitals serving two-thirds of the rural population of Western Australia. PARTICIPANTS: 609 patients with an indication for anticoagulation therapy recorded in their hospital discharge summary for index admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prescribing rates of anticoagulation therapies by indication for anticoagulation and distance of patient residence from their hospital. The primary safety outcome was re-hospitalisation with a major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding event; the primary lack-of-efficacy outcome was re-hospitalisation for a thromboembolic event. RESULTS: The overall rates of prescription of NOACs and warfarin were similar (34% v 33%). A NOAC was prescribed more often than warfarin for patients with AF (56.0% v 42.2% of those who received an anticoagulant; P < 0.001), but less often for patients with VTE (29% v 48%; P < 0.001). Warfarin was prescribed for 38% of patients who lived locally, a NOAC for 31% (P = 0.013); for non-local patients, the respective proportions were 29% and 36% (P = 0.08). 69% of patients with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 1 were prescribed anticoagulation therapy. Patients treated with NOACs had fewer bleeding events than patients treated with warfarin (nine events [4%] v 20 events [10%]; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: In rural WA, about one-third of patients with an indication for anticoagulation therapy receive NOACs, but one-third of patients with AF and at risk of stroke received no anticoagulant therapy, and may benefit from NOAC therapy.

Analysis of Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Soft Tissue Sarcoma.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity and abdominal wall. This is the retrospective analysis of patients from a prospectively maintained data base from a single institute. We identified 79 patients with intermediate- to high-grade soft tissue sarcomas who were treated at our institute between Jan 2015 and July 2018. Low-grade tumors were excluded. There were 60 males and 19 females with a mean age of 44.6 years. Of the 79 sarcomas, 50 were in the lower limb and 24 in the upper limb and 5 were in abdominal wall. The commonest subtypes were undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 21) and synovial sarcoma (n = 19). Only 9 patients had metastatic disease at presentation. All 79 patients underwent surgical resection with an intent to achieve clear margins. Amputation was done in 19 patients while wide excision of the tumor was done in 60 patients. Adjuvant radiotherapy was given in 49 patients while adjuvant chemotherapy was given in 35 patients. At last follow-up (73 patients), 48 patients are alive without disease, 9 are alive with disease, 12 patients had died of disease, and 4 patients died due to other causes. Overall survival (OS) for 3 year is 77.6%, and estimated mean survival is 55.05 months. Relapse-free surviva (RFS)l at 3 year is 74.3%, and estimated mean RFS is 51.78. The only independent factor that affected the OS was the dimension of primary tumor (p = 0.02). For disease-free survival, the independent factors that affected outcome were stage at presentation (p = 0.04) and dimension of the tumor (p = 0.04). Short-term results shown by this study shows good outcome in patient with intermediate- to high-grade sarcomas when multidisciplinary approach is utilized for the management. Patients who had metastatic disease at presentation did worse than patients who did not.

Clinical experience with insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with type 2 diabetes: Results from the Haryana cohort of the A1chieve study.

BACKGROUND: The A1chieve, a multicentric (28 countries), 24-week, non-interventional study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of insulin detemir, biphasic insulin aspart and insulin aspart in people with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care across four continents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected at baseline, at 12 weeks and at 24 weeks. This short communication presents the results for patients enrolled from Haryana, India. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were enrolled in the study. Four different insulin analogue regimens were used in the study. Patients had started on or were switched to biphasic insulin aspart (n = 236), insulin detemir (n = 66), insulin aspart (n = 28), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 1) and other insulin combinations (n = 14). At baseline glycaemic control was poor for both insulin naïve (mean HbA1c: 10.7%) and insulin user (mean HbA1c: 10.5%) groups. After 24 weeks of treatment, both the groups showed improvement in HbA1c (insulin naïve: -3.9%, insulin users: -3.3%). SADRs including major hypoglycaemic events or episodes did not occur in any of the study patients. CONCLUSION: Starting or switching to insulin analogues was associated with improvement in glycaemic control with a low rate of hypoglycaemia.