Total neoadjuvant therapy with mFOLFIRINOX versus preoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: long-term results of the UNICANCER-PRODIGE 23 trial.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer results in an excellent local disease control but the metastasis rates remain high. PRODIGE 23 demonstrated improved disease-free and metastatic-free survival with total neoadjuvant therapy versus standard of care in this population. Long-term analysis of overall survival is reported here. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study design, participants, and primary endpoint disease-free survival (DFS) have been reported for this multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial investigating the neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX (6 cycles) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (6 cycles), versus chemoradiotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (12 cycles) in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma under peritoneal reflection on MRI, and staged cT3/T4. Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and local and metastatic recurrence rate. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 82.2 months, the 7-year DFS were 67.6% (95% CI 60.7%-73.9%) and 62.5% (95% CI 55.6%-68.6%) (RMST difference 5.73 months; 95% CI 0.05-11.41; p=0.048) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the standard of care groups, respectively. The 7-year MFS was 79.2% (95% CI 73.0%-84.4%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 72.3% (95% CI 65.8%-77.8%) in the standard of care group (RMST difference 6.1 months; 95% CI 0.93-11.37; p=0.021). The 7-year OS was 81.9% (95% CI 75.8%-86.6%) in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy group and 76.1% (95% CI 69.7-81.2) in the standard of care group (RMST difference 4.37 months; 95% CI 0.35-8.38; p=0.033). The safety profile remained unchanged since the previous analysis. CONCLUSION(S): Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiotherapy improved OS, confirmed long-term DFS and MFS benefits in locally advanced rectal cancer patients and should be considered as a one of the best options of care for these patients.

Randomized phase III trial in elderly patients comparing LV5FU2 with or without irinotecan for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (FFCD 2001-02).

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) frequently occurs in elderly patients. However, data from a geriatric tailored randomized trial about tolerance to and the efficacy of doublet chemotherapy (CT) with irinotecan in the elderly are lacking. The benefit of first-line CT intensification remains an issue in elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Elderly patients (75+) with previously untreated mCRC were randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design (four arms) to receive 5-FU (5-fluorouracil)-based CT, either alone (FU: LV5FU2 or simplified LV5FU2) or in combination with irinotecan [IRI: LV5FU2-irinotecan or simplified LV5FU2-irinotecan (FOLFIRI)]. The CLASSIC arm was defined as LV5FU2 or LV5FU2-irinotecan and the SIMPLIFIED arm as simplified LV5FU2 or FOLFIRI. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), safety and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From June 2003 to May 2010, 71 patients were randomly assigned to LV5FU2, 71 to simplified LV5FU2, 70 to LV5FU2-irinotecan and 70 to FOLFIRI. The median age was 80 years (range 75-92 years). No significant difference was observed for the median PFS: FU 5.2 months versus IRI 7.3 months, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.84 (0.66-1.07), P = 0.15 and CLASSIC 6.5 months versus SIMPLIFIED 6.0 months, HR = 0.85 (0.67-1.09), P = 0.19. The ORR was superior in IRI (P = 0.0003): FU 21.1% versus IRI 41.7% and in CLASSIC (P = 0.04): CLASSIC 37.1% versus SIMPLIFIED 25.6%. Median OS was 14.2 months in FU versus 13.3 months in IRI, HR = 0.96 (0.75-1.24) and 15.2 months in CLASSIC versus 11.4 months in SIMPLIFIED, HR = 0.71 (0.55-0.92). More patients presented grade 3-4 toxicities in IRI (52.2% versus 76.3%). CONCLUSION: In this elderly population, adding irinotecan to an infusional 5-FU-based CT did not significantly increase either PFS or OS. Classic LV5FU2 was associated with an improved OS compared with simplified LV5FU2. CLINICALTRIALSGOV: NCT00303771.

Spontaneous dialytic ultrafiltration with intraperitoneal reinfusion of the concentrate versus large paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with intractable ascites: a randomized study.

Dialytic ultrafiltration of ascites through a hemofilter associated with peritoneal reinfusion (DUF) of the concentrate has been proposed for the treatment of refractory ascites. In five cirrhotic patients, 18 ascites evacuation procedures were randomized either to DUF (n = 8) or to large paracenteses (LP) (n = 10). The effects of these two methods on hemodynamic and renal function were assessed. After DUF, the protein concentration in ascites increased transiently from 28 +/- 7 g/l to 64.8 +/- 8 g/l (p less than 0.04); urinary output increased from day 1 to day 4 (1000 +/- 100) VS 1430 +/- 140 ml/24h; p less than 0.02). After LP, ascitic protein concentration and urinary output were unchanged. No side effects were observed with the two methods. The mean amount of albumin infused was 20 +/- 15 g after DUF and 15 +/- 5 after LP (ns).

Spontaneous dialytic ultrafiltration with intraperitoneal reinfusion of the concentrate in 15 cirrhotic patients with intractable ascites.

The clinical efficacy and tolerance of dialytic ultrafiltration of ascites through a hemofilter (DUF) with peritoneal reinfusion of the concentrate was evaluated in 15 cirrhotic patients with intractable ascites. All together, 51 DUF procedures were carried out. An average of 8.6 was ultrafiltered during 12 h with no significant change in blood pressure, hemoglobin, coagulation parameters or plasma creatinine. A significant increase in ascitic protein concentration was observed immediately after the procedure and a slight but significant increase in 24 h urinary output. A controlled evaluation of DUF compared to large paracenteses seems to be justified by these preliminary results.

[Sarcoidosis and sarcoid reaction associated with Hodgkin's disease]. / Sarcoïdose et réaction sarcoïdosique associées à la maladie de Hodgkin.

The authors report a case of Hodgkin's disease associated with pulmonary and mediastinal sarcoidosis, and they recall the frequency of sarcoid reactions in lymphoma, notably in Hodgkin's disease. The Hodgkin's disease-sarcoidosis association is much less common and sometimes raises difficult diagnostic problems. The physiopathological mechanisms that are possibly involved are analyzed.