A randomized phase III trial on maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or in combination with erlotinib after chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT Trial.

BACKGROUND: The main objective was to study the effect on progression-free survival (PFS) of adding erlotinib to bevacizumab as maintenance treatment following chemotherapy and bevacizumab as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated mCRC received doublet chemotherapy + bevacizumab during 18 weeks and those without tumor progression were eligible for randomization to bevacizumab + erlotinib (arm A) or bevacizumab alone (arm B), until progression or unacceptable toxic effect. RESULTS: Of the 249 patients enrolled, 80 started maintenance treatment in arm A and 79 in arm B. The rate of any grade 3/4 toxic effect was 53% in arm A and 13% in arm B. Median PFS was 5.7 months in arm A and 4.2 months in arm B (HR = 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.55-1.12; P = 0.19). Overall survival (OS) from start of induction chemotherapy was 26.7 months in the randomized population, with no difference between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of erlotinib to bevacizumab as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy in mCRC did not improve PFS significantly. On-going clinical and translational studies focus on identifying subgroups of patients that may benefit from erlotinib in the maintenance setting. CLINICAL TRIALS NUMBER: NCT00598156.

The predictive value of genetic variations in the vascular endothelial growth factor A gene in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF-A) gene may have clinical implications. The aim of this study was to investigate the possible predictive value of the VEGF-A SNPs, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with first-line capecitabine and oxaliplatin (XELOX). The study included 72 patients with mCRC. Genomic DNA was isolated from whole blood, and SNPs were analyzed by PCR. SNPs were correlated with response and progression-free survival (PFS). Haplotypes were estimated using the PHASE program. Response was observed in 21% of the patients with the -2578 CA genotype compared with 59% of the patients with CC+AA, P=0.002, in 26% of the patients with the -460 CT genotype compared with 57% with CC+TT, P=0.01, and in 27% of the patients with the +405 GC genotype compared with 54% with GG+CC, P=0.02. Two SNPs were significantly related to PFS. A haplotype with a significant relationship to response was identified. The results demonstrated obvious relationships between genetic variations in the VEGF-A gene and response to first-line XELOX in patients with mCRC, which translated to a significant difference in PFS. The results call for validation in a larger cohort of patients.

A melt-electrowritten filter for capture and culture of circulating colon cancer cells.

Metastasis is the major cause of death in cancer patients accounting for about 90% of the mortality. The detection and analysis of the hallmark of metastasis, circulating tumor cells (CTCs), have significant impact in cancer biology and clinical practice. However, the scarcity of CTCs in blood, particularly in that of colorectal cancer patients, is a serious bottleneck in the development of CTC-based precision medicine. Herein, the melt electrowriting (MEW) technology was used for reproductive fabrication of a biocompatible antibody-presenting polycaprolactone filter with tailored porous structure. It is demonstrated, for the first time, that such filter can be used not only to catch cancer cells spiked in whole blood but also to culture the cancer cells directly on site. Specifically, HT29 colon cancer cells can be captured with an efficiency of 85%, and when spiked into 4 mL of whole blood, 47% were captured on one Ø12mm filter. Furthermore, repeated capture and culture experiments have shown that as few as 20 HT29 colon cancer cells spiked into 4 mL of whole blood can be captured on the filter and within 2 weeks be expanded on site to become tumor bodies that are visible to the untrained eye. This filter allows for downstream analysis, such as flow cytometry, immunocytochemistry, Western blotting, and rt-qPCR. This technology represents a simple and cost-effective platform that potentially enables fast and efficient culture of rare CTCs from patients' blood. This provides non-invasive alternatives for solid biopsy tumor materials for treatment screening, with great potential to realize precision medicine for cancer treatment.

The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The effect of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies (mAb) in metastatic colorectal cancer seems limited to KRAS wild-type (wt) tumours, but still a major fraction of KRASwt patients are nonresponders and supplementary selection criteria are needed. We investigated methodological aspects of KRAS testing and the predictive and prognostic value of KRAS status combined with three EGFR-related gene polymorphisms [single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)] in patients treated with cetuximab and irinotecan. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 71 patients referred to third-line cetuximab-irinotecan. Blood samples were analysed for SNPs. KRAS analysis was carried out by sequencing analysis and quantitative PCR (DxS kit) in primary tumour and distant metastases. RESULTS: There was a clear correlation between KRAS status in primary tumours and metastasis. The DxS kit presented the highest sensitivity. Response was confined to KRASwt patients (40% response rate versus 0%, P < 0.1(-3)), which translated into a significant difference in PFS. The EGF61A>G polymorphism showed relation to clinical outcome. A combined biomarker analysis showed a 19% progression rate in KRASwt-EGF61 homozygote patients and 60% in the EGF61A/G patients (P = 0.006) and a significant increase in overall survival (17.1 versus 5.9 months, log-rank, P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: The combined biomarker analysis maybe an attractive approach to selection of patients for third-line treatment including anti-EGFR mAbs.