RESUMEN
The American Heart Association previously recommended implementation of cardiac resuscitation systems of care that consist of interconnected community, emergency medical services, and hospital efforts to measure and improve the process of care and outcome for patients with cardiac arrest. In addition, the American Heart Association proposed a national process to develop and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiac resuscitation systems of care. Significant experience has been gained with implementing these systems, and new evidence has accumulated. This update describes recent advances in the science of cardiac resuscitation systems and evidence of their effectiveness, as well as recent progress in dissemination and implementation throughout the United States. Emphasis is placed on evidence published since the original recommendations (ie, including and since 2010).
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Atención a la Salud , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , American Heart Association , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of patients fail to meet ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) guideline goals recommending a first medical contact-to-device time of <90 minutes for patients directly presenting to percutaneous coronary intervention-capable hospitals and <120 minutes for transferred patients. We sought to increase the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals by organizing coordinated regional reperfusion plans. METHODS: We established leadership teams, coordinated protocols, and provided regular feedback for 484 hospitals and 1253 emergency medical services (EMS) agencies in 16 regions across the United States. RESULTS: Between July 2012 and December 2013, 23 809 patients presented with acute STEMI (direct to percutaneous coronary intervention hospital: 11 765 EMS transported and 6502 self-transported; 5542 transferred). EMS-transported patients differed from self-transported patients in symptom onset to first medical contact time (median, 47 versus 114 minutes), incidence of cardiac arrest (10% versus 3%), shock on admission (11% versus 3%), and in-hospital mortality (8% versus 3%; P<0.001 for all comparisons). There was a significant increase in the proportion of patients meeting guideline goals of first medical contact-to-device time, including those directly presenting via EMS (50% to 55%; P<0.001) and transferred patients (44%-48%; P=0.002). Despite regional variability, the greatest gains occurred among patients in the 5 most improved regions, increasing from 45% to 57% (direct EMS; P<0.001) and 38% to 50% (transfers; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator demonstration project represents the largest national effort to organize regional STEMI care. By focusing on first medical contact-to-device time, coordinated treatment protocols, and regional data collection and reporting, we were able to increase significantly the proportion of patients treated within guideline goals.
Asunto(s)
American Heart Association/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Electrocardiografía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Adhesión a Directriz , Paro Cardíaco , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Transferencia de Pacientes , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Choque Cardiogénico/mortalidad , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Transporte de Pacientes , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the validity of three different computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation algorithms in correctly identifying STEMI patients in the prehospital environment who require emergent cardiac intervention. METHODS: This retrospective study validated three diagnostic algorithms (AG) against the presence of a culprit coronary artery upon cardiac catheterization. Two patient groups were enrolled in this study: those with verified prehospital ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) activation (cases) and those with a prehospital impression of chest pain due to ACS (controls). RESULTS: There were 500 records analyzed resulting in a case group with 151 patients and a control group with 349 patients. Sensitivities differed between AGs (AG1=0.69 vs AG2=0.68 vs AG3=0.62), with statistical differences in sensitivity found when comparing AG1 to AG3 and AG1 to AG2. Specificities also differed between AGs (AG1=0.89 vs AG2=0.91 vs AG3=0.95), with AG1 and AG2 significantly less specific than AG3. CONCLUSIONS: STEMI diagnostic algorithms vary in regards to their validity in identifying patients with culprit artery lesions. This suggests that systems could apply more sensitive or specific algorithms depending on the needs in their community.
Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Reconocimiento de Normas Patrones Automatizadas/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/etiología , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
New findings from the Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator program suggest that a regionalized approach to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMI) can cut time-to-treatment for patients modestly, thereby improving the prospects for better outcomes. The approach encourages hospitals, emergency medical services (EMS) and cardiologists in a region to work together to optimize treatment and efficiency so that patients in need of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) receive this care more expeditiously. The research included 484 hospitals, 1,253 EMS agencies, and nearly 24,000 patients in 16 regions across the United States. The goal was to increase the number of STEMI patients who receive PCI bed time parameters. Overall, the percentage of STEMI patients receiving PCI in accordance with guidelines improved from 50% to 55% during the study period. Key to the Mission: Lifeline approach is a focus on starting the clock ticking on time-to-treatment at first medical contact (FMC) as opposed to the hospital door, but this requires coordination with EMS and other hospitals. Some observers question whether a push for regionalization is worth the effort, considering the modest results thus far.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Acute vascular thrombotic disease, including acute myocardial infarction and pulmonary embolism, accounts for 70% of sudden outpatient cardiac arrest. The role of intra-arrest thrombolytic administration aimed at reversing the underlying cause of cardiac arrest remains an area of debate with recent guidelines advising against routine use. We present a case of prolonged refractory ventricular fibrillation electrical storm in a patient who demonstrated intra-arrest electrocardiographic and sonographic markers confirming acute myocardial infarction. Return of spontaneous circulation was rapidly achieved after rescue intra-arrest bolus thrombolysis.Highlights of this case are discussed in the context of the current evidence for thrombolytic therapy in cardiac arrest with specific attention to the issue of patient selection.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/etiología , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Ventricular/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Recurrencia , Tenecteplasa , Fibrilación Ventricular/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ultimate treatment goal for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is rapid reperfusion via primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). North Carolina has adopted a statewide STEMI referral strategy that advises paramedics to bypass local hospitals and transport STEMI patients directly to a PCI-capable hospital, even if a non-PCI-capable hospital is closer. METHODS AND RESULTS: We assessed the adherence of emergency medical services to this STEMI protocol, as well as subsequent associations with patient treatment times and outcomes by linking data from the Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry(®)-Get With the Guidelines(™) and a statewide emergency medical services data system from June 2008 to September 2010 for all patients with STEMI. Patients were divided into those (1) transported directly to a PCI hospital, thereby bypassing a closer non-PCI hospital and (2) first taken to a closer non-PCI center and later transferred to a PCI hospital. Among 6010 patients with STEMI, 1288 were eligible and included in our study cohort. Of these, 826 (64%) were transported directly to a PCI facility, whereas 462 (36%) were first taken to a non-PCI hospital and later transferred. In a multivariable model, increase in differential driving time and cardiac arrest were associated with a lesser likelihood of being taken directly to a PCI center, whereas a history of PCI was associated with a higher likelihood of being taken directly to a PCI center. Patients sent directly to a PCI center were more likely to have times between first medical contact and PCI within guideline recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients who were sent directly to a PCI center had significantly shorter time to reperfusion.
Asunto(s)
Electrocardiografía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Hospitales/clasificación , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Transporte de Pacientes/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , North Carolina , Transferencia de Pacientes , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: For patients with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) activation by emergency medical technicians or emergency physicians has been shown to substantially reduce treatment times. One drawback to this approach involves overtriage, whereby CCL staffs are activated for patients who ultimately do not require emergent coronary angiography or for patients who undergo angiography but are not found to have coronary artery occlusion. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined CCL activation at 14 primary angioplasty hospitals to determine the course of management, including the rate of inappropriate activation. Among 3973 activations (29% by emergency medical technicians, 71% by emergency physicians) between December 2008 and December 2009, appropriate CCL activations occurred for 3377 patients (85%), with 2598 patients (76.9% of appropriate activations) receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Reasons for inappropriate activations (596 patients; 15%) included ECG reinterpretations (427 patients; 72%) or the fact that the patient was not a CCL candidate (169 patients; 28%). The rate of cancellation because of reinterpretation of emergency medical technicians' ECG (6% of all activations) was more common than for cancellation because of reinterpretation of emergency physicians' ECG (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first report of the rates of CCL cancellation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction system activation by emergency medical technicians and emergency physicians in a large group of hospitals organized within a statewide program. The high rate of coronary intervention and relatively low rate of inappropriate activation suggest that systematic CCL activation by emergency personnel on a broad scale is feasible and accurate, and these rates set a benchmark for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction systems.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Médicos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite national guidelines calling for timely coronary artery reperfusion, treatment is often delayed, particularly for patients requiring interhospital transfer. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred nineteen North Carolina hospitals developed coordinated plans to rapidly treat patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction according to presentation: walk-in, ambulance, or hospital transfer. A total of 6841 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (3907 directly presenting to 21 percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals, 2933 transferred from 98 non-percutaneous coronary intervention hospitals) were treated between July 2008 and December 2009 (age, 59 years; 30% women; 19% uninsured; chest pain duration, 91 minutes; shock, 9.2%). The rate of patients not receiving reperfusion fell from 5.4% to 4.0% (P=0.04). Treatment times for hospital transfer patients substantially improved. First-hospital-door-to-device time for hospitals that adopted a "transfer for percutaneous coronary intervention" reperfusion strategy fell from 117 to 103 minutes (P=0.0008), whereas times at hospitals with a mixed strategy of transfer or fibrinolysis fell from 195 to 138 minutes (P=0.002). Median door-to-device times for patients presenting directly to PCI hospitals fell from 64 to 59 minutes (P<0.001). Emergency medical services-transported patients were most likely to reach door-to-device goals, with 91% treated within 90 minutes and 52% being treated with 60 minutes. Patients treated within guideline goals had a mortality of 2.2% compared with 5.7% for those exceeding guideline recommendations (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Through extension of regional coordination to an entire state, rapid diagnosis and treatment of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction has become an established standard of care independently of healthcare setting or geographic location.
Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Electrocardiografía , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Anciano , Ambulancias , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/normas , Atención a la Salud/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Transferencia de Pacientes , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emergency medical services (EMS) are critical in the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Prehospital system delays are an important target for improving timely STEMI care, yet few limited data are available. METHODS: Using a deterministic approach, we merged EMS data from the North Carolina Pre-hospital Medical Information System (PreMIS) with data from the Reperfusion of Acute Myocardial Infarction in Carolina Emergency Departments-Emergency Response (RACE-ER) Project. Our sample included all patients with STEMI from June 2008 to October 2010 who arrived by EMS and who had primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Prehospital system delays were compared using both RACE-ER and PreMIS to examine agreement between the 2 data sources. RESULTS: Overall, 8,680 patients with STEMI in RACE-ER arrived at a PCI hospital by EMS; 21 RACE-ER hospitals and 178 corresponding EMS agencies across the state were represented. Of these, 6,010 (69%) patients were successfully linked with PreMIS. Linked and notlinked patients were similar. Overall, 2,696 patients were treated with PCI only and were taken directly to a PCI-capable hospital by EMS; 1,750 were transferred from a non-PCI facility. For those being transported directly to a PCI center, 53% reached the 90-minute target guideline goal. For those transferred from a non-PCI facility, 24% reached the 120-minute target goal for primary PCI. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully linked prehospital EMS data with in hospital clinical data. With this linked STEMI cohort, less than half of patients reach goals set by guidelines. Such a data source could be used for future research and quality improvement interventions.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Sistema de Registros , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
The management of low-risk patients presenting to emergency departments is a common and challenging clinical problem entailing 8 million emergency department visits annually. Although a majority of these patients do not have a life-threatening condition, the clinician must distinguish between those who require urgent treatment of a serious problem and those with more benign entities who do not require admission. Inadvertent discharge of patients with acute coronary syndrome from the emergency department is associated with increased mortality and liability, whereas inappropriate admission of patients without serious disease is neither indicated nor cost-effective. Clinical judgment and basic clinical tools (history, physical examination, and electrocardiogram) remain primary in meeting this challenge and affording early identification of low-risk patients with chest pain. Additionally, established and newer diagnostic methods have extended clinicians' diagnostic capacity in this setting. Low-risk patients presenting with chest pain are increasingly managed in chest pain units in which accelerated diagnostic protocols are performed, comprising serial electrocardiograms and cardiac injury markers to exclude acute coronary syndrome. Patients with negative findings usually complete the accelerated diagnostic protocol with a confirmatory test to exclude ischemia. This is typically an exercise treadmill test or a cardiac imaging study if the exercise treadmill test is not applicable. Rest myocardial perfusion imaging has assumed an important role in this setting. Computed tomography coronary angiography has also shown promise in this setting. A negative accelerated diagnostic protocol evaluation allows discharge, whereas patients with positive findings are admitted. This approach has been found to be safe, accurate, and cost-effective in low-risk patients presenting with chest pain.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , American Heart Association , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The aim of this study was determine whether hospitals accredited by the Society of Chest Pain Centers hospitals (accredited chest pain centers [ACPCs]) are associated with better performance regarding Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services core measures for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than nonaccredited hospitals. The study was a retrospective, observational cohort study of hospitals reporting Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services core measures for AMI from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2005, on the basis of the presence or absence of Society of Chest Pain Centers accreditation. Data were obtained from the Web sites of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (Hospital Compare), Society of Chest Pain Centers listings, and the American Hospital Directory. Groups were compared in terms of demographics and mean percentage compliance with all 8 AMI core measures. Student's t test, chi-square analysis, and logistic regression were used to analyze bivariate relations. Multivariate logistic regression models used a propensity-score adjustment factor. Of the 4,197 hospitals that reported core measures for AMI, 178 (4%) were accredited and 4,019 (96%) were not. ACPCs had been accredited for an average of 12 months and were larger (378 vs 204 beds), more often teaching hospitals (52% vs 30%), and more often urban (95% vs 69%) (all p <0.0001). There were 395,250 patients with AMIs, of whom 55,418 (14%) presented to ACPCs and 339,832 (86%) presented to nonaccredited hospitals. There was significantly greater compliance with all 8 AMI core measures at ACPCs (p <0.0001), except for lytic therapy <30 minutes after arrival (p = 0.04), for which unadjusted performance was the same. In conclusion, ACPCs were associated with better compliance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services core measures and saw a greater proportion of patients with AMIs.
Asunto(s)
Acreditación , Instituciones Cardiológicas/normas , Dolor en el Pecho , Medicaid , Medicare , Infarto del Miocardio , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Benchmarking , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Modelos Estadísticos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Despite 2 decades of evidence demonstrating benefits from prompt coronary reperfusion, registries continue to show that many patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are treated too slowly or not at all. OBJECTIVE: To establish a statewide system for reperfusion, as exists for trauma care, to overcome systematic barriers. DESIGN AND SETTING: A quality improvement study that examined the change in speed and rate of coronary reperfusion after system implementation in 5 regions in North Carolina involving 65 hospitals and associated emergency medical systems (10 percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] hospitals and 55 non-PCI hospitals). PATIENTS: A total of 1164 patients with STEMI (579 preintervention and 585 postintervention) eligible for reperfusion were treated at PCI hospitals (median age 61 years, 31% women, 4% Killip class III or IV). A total of 925 patients with STEMI (518 preintervention and 407 postintervention) were treated at non-PCI hospitals (median age 62 years, 32% women, 4% Killip class III or IV). INTERVENTIONS: Early diagnosis and the most expedient coronary reperfusion method at each point of care: emergency medical systems, emergency department, catheterization laboratory, and transfer. Within 5 regions, PCI hospitals agreed to provide single-call catheterization laboratory activation by emergency medical personnel, accept patients regardless of bed availability, and improve STEMI care for the entire region regardless of hospital affiliation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reperfusion times and rates 3 months before (July to September 2005) and 3 months after (January to March 2007) a year-long implementation. RESULTS: Median reperfusion times significantly improved according to first door-to-device (presenting to PCI hospital 85 to 74 minutes, P < .001; transferred to PCI hospital 165 to 128 minutes, P < .001), door-to-needle in non-PCI hospitals (35 to 29 minutes, P = .002), and door-in to door-out for patients transferred from non-PCI hospitals (120 to 71 minutes, P < .001). Nonreperfusion rates were unchanged (15%) in non-PCI hospitals and decreased from 23% to 11% in the PCI hospitals. For patients presenting to or transferred to PCI hospitals, clinical outcomes including death, cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock did not significantly change following the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide program focused on regional systems for reperfusion for STEMI can significantly improve quality of care. Further research is needed to ensure that programs that result in improved application of reperfusion treatments will lead to reductions in mortality and morbidity from STEMI.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Reperfusión Miocárdica , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Reperfusión Miocárdica/normas , Reperfusión Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , North Carolina , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the utilization and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) among ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients in contemporary practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using data from National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines between 2007 and 2014, we analyzed trends in CABG utilization and hospital-level variation in CABG rates. Patients undergoing CABG during the index admission were categorized by the most common scenarios: (1) CABG only as the primary reperfusion strategy; (2) CABG after primary percutaneous coronary intervention; and (3) CABG after fibrinolytic therapy. A total of 15 145 patients (6.3% of the STEMI population) underwent CABG during the index hospitalization, with a decrease in utilization from 8.3% in 2007 to 5.4% in 2014 (trend P value <0.001). The hospital-level use of CABG in STEMI varied widely from 0.5% to 36.2% (median, 5.3%; interquartile range [IQR], 3.5%-7.8%; P value <0.001). Of all patients undergoing CABG, 45.8% underwent CABG only, 38.7% had CABG after percutaneous coronary intervention, and 8.2% CABG after fibrinolytic therapy. The median time intervals from cardiac catheterization/percutaneous coronary intervention to CABG were 23.3 hours (IQR, 3.0-70.3 hours) in CABG only, 49.7 hours (IQR, 3.2-70.3 hours) in CABG after percutaneous coronary intervention, and 56.6 hours (IQR, 22.7-96.0 hours) in CABG after fibrinolytic therapy. The Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network mortality risk scores differed modestly (median, 33; IQR, 28-40 versus median, 32; IQR, 27-38) between CABG and non-CABG patients. Patients undergoing CABG had similar in-hospital mortality rate (5.4% versus 5.1%) as those not treated with CABG. CONCLUSIONS: CABG is performed infrequently in STEMI patients during the index hospitalization, with rates declining in contemporary US practice over time. There was marked hospital-level variation in the use of CABG, and CABG was typically performed within 1 to 3 days after angiography. Observed mortality rates appear low, suggesting that CABG might be safely performed in select STEMI patients in a timely fashion.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/tendencias , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Angiografía Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/efectos adversos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/tendencias , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico por imagen , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Terapia Trombolítica/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Mission: Lifeline STEMI Systems Accelerator program, implemented in 16 US metropolitan regions, resulted in more patients receiving timely reperfusion. We assessed whether implementing key care processes was associated with system performance improvement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitals (n=167 with 23 498 ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients) were surveyed before (March 2012) and after (July 2014) program intervention. Data were merged with patient-level clinical data over the same period. For reperfusion, hospitals were grouped by whether a specific process of care was implemented, preexisting, or never implemented. Uptake of 4 key care processes increased after intervention: prehospital catheterization laboratory activation (62%-91%; P<0.001), single call transfer protocol from an outside facility (45%-70%; P<0.001), and emergency department bypass for emergency medical services direct presenters (48%-59%; P=0.002) and transfers (56%-79%; P=0.001). There were significant differences in median first medical contact-to-device times among groups implementing prehospital activation (88 minutes implementers versus 89 minutes preexisting versus 98 minutes nonimplementers; P<0.001 for comparisons). Similarly, patients treated at hospitals implementing single call transfer protocols had shorter median first medical contact-to-device times (112 versus 128 versus 152 minutes; P<0.001). Emergency department bypass was also associated with shorter median first medical contact-to-device times for emergency medical services direct presenters (84 versus 88 versus 94 minutes; P<0.001) and transfers (123 versus 127 versus 167 minutes; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The Accelerator program increased uptake of key care processes, which were associated with improved system performance. These findings support efforts to implement regional ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction networks focused on prehospital catheterization laboratory activation, single call transfer protocols, and emergency department bypass.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Reperfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Tiempo de Tratamiento/organización & administración , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Servicio de Cardiología en Hospital/organización & administración , Vías Clínicas/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Reperfusión Miocárdica/efectos adversos , Reperfusión Miocárdica/mortalidad , Reperfusión Miocárdica/normas , Transferencia de Pacientes/organización & administración , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud/normas , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We compare the diagnostic accuracy of 3 methods--attribute matching, physician's written unstructured estimate, and a logistic regression formula (Acute Coronary Insufficiency-Time Insensitive Predictive Instrument, ACI-TIPI)--of estimating a very low pretest probability (< or = 2%) for acute coronary syndromes in emergency department (ED) patients evaluated in chest pain units. METHODS: We prospectively studied 1,114 consecutive patients from 3 academic EDs, evaluated for acute coronary syndrome. Physicians collected data required for pretest probability assessment before protocol-driven chest pain unit testing. A pretest probability greater than 2% was considered "test positive." The criterion standard was the outcome of acute coronary syndrome (death, myocardial infarction, revascularization, or > 60% stenosis prompting new treatment) within 45 days, adjudicated by 3 independent reviewers. RESULTS: Fifty-one of 1,114 enrolled patients (4.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4% to 6.0%) developed acute coronary syndrome within 45 days, including 4 of 991 (0.4%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.0%) patients, discharged after a negative chest pain unit evaluation result, who developed acute coronary syndrome. Unstructured estimate identified 293 patients with pretest probability less than or equal to 2%, 2 had acute coronary syndrome, yielding sensitivity of 96.1% (95% CI 86.5% to 99.5%) and specificity of 27.4% (95% CI 24.7% to 30.2%). Attribute matching identified 304 patients with pretest probability less than or equal to 2%; 1 had acute coronary syndrome, yielding a sensitivity of 98.0% (95% CI 89.6% to 99.9%) and a specificity of 26.1% (95% CI 23.6% to 28.7%). ACI-TIPI identified 56 patients; none had acute coronary syndrome, yielding sensitivity of 100% (95% CI 93.0% to 100%) and specificity of 6.1% (95% CI 4.7% to 7.9%). CONCLUSION: In a low-risk ED population with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome, patients with a quantitative pretest probability less than or equal to 2%, determined by attribute matching, unstructured estimate, or logistic regression, may not require additional diagnostic testing.
Asunto(s)
Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Dolor en el Pecho/etiología , Enfermedad Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad Coronaria/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , California , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Carolina , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Probabilidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
The electrocardiogram (ECG) continues to be a critical component of the evaluation of patients who have signs and symptoms of emergency cardiac conditions. This tool is now approximately 100 years old and has been a standard in clinical practice for more than half a century. Application of new signal processing techniques and an expansion in the use of additional leads allows clinicians to extract more and more information from the cardiac electrical activity. An understanding of the technology inherent in the recording of ECGs allows one to more fully understand the benefits and limitation of electrocardiography.
Asunto(s)
Tecnología Biomédica/tendencias , Electrocardiografía/instrumentación , Electrocardiografía/tendencias , Diseño de Equipo , HumanosRESUMEN
Patients present to the emergency department (ED) with a wide range of complaints and ED clinicians are responsible for identifying which conditions are life threatening. Cardiac monitoring strategies in the ED include, but are not limited to, 12-lead electrocardiography and bedside cardiac monitoring for arrhythmia and ischemia detection as well as QT-interval monitoring. ED nurses are in a unique position to incorporate cardiac monitoring into the early triage and risk stratification of patients with cardiovascular emergencies to optimize patient management and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Monitoreo Fisiológico/enfermería , Arritmias Cardíacas/enfermería , Enfermería de Urgencia , Humanos , Isquemia/enfermería , TriajeRESUMEN
First-medical-contact-to-device (FMC2D) times have improved over the past decade, as have clinical outcomes for patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, with improvements in FMC2D times, false activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) has become a challenging problem. The authors define false activation as any patient who does not warrant emergent coronary angiography for STEMI. In addition to clinical outcome measures for these patients, STEMI systems should collect data regarding the total number of CCL activations, the total number of emergency coronary angiograms, and the number revascularization procedures performed.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria , Electrocardiografía , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Mal Uso de los Servicios de Salud/prevención & control , Humanos , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Tiempo de TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: About 10% of patients admitted to a chest pain unit (CPU) exhibit atrial fibrillation (AF). HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether calcium scores (CS) are superior over common risk scores for coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients presenting with atypical chest pain, newly diagnosed AF, and intermediate pretest probability for CAD within the CPU. METHODS: In 73 subjects, CS was related to the following risk scores: Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score, including a new model of a frequency-normalized approach; Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction score; European Society of Cardiology Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE); Framingham risk score; and Prospective Cardiovascular Münster Study score. Revascularization rates during index stay were assessed. RESULTS: Median CS was 77 (interquartile range, 1-270), with higher values in men and the left anterior descending artery. Only the modified GRACE (ρ = 0.27; P = 0.02) and the SCORE (ρ = 0.39; P < 0.005) were significantly correlated with CS, whereas the GRACE (τ = 0.21; P = 0.04) and modified GRACE (τ = 0.23; P = 0.02) scores were significantly correlated with percentile groups. Only the CS significantly discriminated between those with and without stenosis (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Apart from modified GRACE score, overall correlations between risk scores and calcium burden, as well as revascularization rates during index stay, were low. By contrast, the determination of CS may be used as an additional surrogate marker in risk stratification in AF patients with intermediate pretest likelihood for CAD admitted to a CPU.