The evaluation of the scoring systems: the fixed effects model under known variances.

A number of scoring systems for proficiency testing and interlaboratory comparison are in use by the metrology community. The choice of scoring system for a given study is often based on the study coordinator's experience and anecdotal knowledge, perhaps attributable to a historic lack of detailed and formal explanation about the foundation of these systems. This has influenced the development of new scoring systems, some of them departing from the well-established hypothesis testing theory. Often, different scoring systems give different results not because one may be better than the others but because, as they are documented, the user cannot control the confidence level of the test. We present a formal evaluation of seven of these systems under the fixed effects model assuming known variances. Under these sound assumptions, the systems analyzed all have the same statistical properties. Furthermore, these systems are all members of a family of systems based on strictly increasing functions in which the statistical decision problem is invariant. Under the fixed effects model with known variances, no unbiased scoring system can provide greater statistical power than the members of this family of systems. We apply these results to the lead content of water example provided in International Standard ISO 13528:2015 "Statistical methods for use in proficiency testing by interlaboratory comparisons."

An international assessment of the metrological equivalence of higher-order measurement services for creatinine in serum.

The Consultative committee for amount of substance-metrology in chemistry (CCQM)-K80 Key Comparison directly assessed the equivalence of many of the world's higher-order value-assigned materials (HOVAMs) for creatinine in human serum. This 2009 international study compared the certified values and uncertainties of the materials using measurements made under repeatability conditions. The study evaluated 17 materials submitted by 6 national metrology institutes (NMIs). The creatinine quantity in these materials ranged from 3 mg/kg to 57 mg/kg (about 0.3 mg/dL to 6 mg/dL or 30 nmol/L to 500 nmol/L). All materials were stored and prepared according the specifications provided by the participating NMIs. Samples were processed and analyzed under repeatability conditions by one analyst using isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in two measurement campaigns. The certified values and repeatability measurements were compared using uncertainty-weighted generalized distance regression. The instrumental repeatability relative standard deviation was 1.2%. The measurement design required assessment of within-unit and between-campaign variability in addition to measurement repeatability. At a 95% level of confidence, the certified values for all 17 materials agreed to within their assigned uncertainties. CCQM-K80 demonstrated the metrological equivalence of the currently available HOVAMs for creatinine in human serum and of the creatinine measurement services provided by the participating NMIs.

A quantitative LC-MS/MS method for comparative analysis of capture-antibody affinity toward protein antigens.

A mass spectrometry-based antibody selection procedure was developed to evaluate optimal 'capture' monoclonal antibodies that can be used in a variety of analytical measurement applications. The isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (ID LC-MS/MS) methodology is based on the use of multiple-reaction monitoring of tryptic peptide fragments derived from protein antigens. A panel of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) was evaluated based on a quantitative determination of relative binding affinity to human cardiac troponin I following immunoprecipitation. Dissociation constants (K(d)) were determined for 'bound mAb-antigen' vs. 'unbound antigen' using non-linear regression analysis. Relative quantification of both antigen and antibody was based on the use of stable isotope-labeled synthetic peptides as internal standards. Optimal 'capture' mAbs were determined through evaluation of relative K(d) constants of all monitored peptide transitions. A panel of six pre-screened candidate capture mAbs was concluded to consist of two subsets of mAbs, each with statistically equivalent K(d) constants as determined using NIST Standard Reference Material (SRM) 2921 - Human Cardiac Troponin Complex. This ID LC-MS/MS method is shown to be capable of quantitatively differentiating mAbs based on relative binding affinities. Selection of optimal capture mAbs can be applied toward a number of analytical applications which require metrological traceability and unbiased quantification.