Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 158
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Pain Med ; 21(10): 2430-2440, 2020 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33118603

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify central sensitization-related symptom severity subgroups in a large multicountry sample composed of patients with chronic pain and pain-free individuals using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). METHODS: A large, pooled international (N = 8 countries) sample of chronic pain patients plus healthy subjects (total N = 2,620) was randomly divided into two subsamples for cross-validation purposes. First, a hierarchical cluster analysis (HCA) was performed using CSI item-level data as clustering variables (test sample; N = 1,312). Second, a latent profile analysis (LPA) was conducted to confirm the optimal number of CSI clusters (validation sample; N = 1,308). Finally, to promote implementation in real-world clinical practice, we built a free online Central Sensitization Inventory Symptom Severity Calculator. RESULTS: In both HCA (N = 1,219 valid cases) and LPA (N = 1,245 valid cases) analyses, a three-cluster and three-profile solution, respectively, emerged as the most statistically optimal and clinically meaningful. Clusters were labeled as follows: (i) Low Level of CS-Related Symptom Severity, (ii) Medium Level of CS-Related Symptom Severity, and (iii) High Level of CS-Related Symptom Severity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that a three-cluster solution clearly captured the heterogeneity of the CSI data. The calculator might provide an efficient way of classifying subjects into the cluster groups. Future studies should analyze the extent to which the CSI cluster classification correlates with other patient-reported and objective signs and symptoms of CS in patients with chronic pain, their associations with clinical outcomes, health-related costs, biomarkers, (etc.), and responsiveness to treatment.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Dolor Crónico , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Humanos
2.
BMC Fam Pract ; 21(1): 44, 2020 02 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32106823

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pain-related fear-avoidance (FA) is a common problem affecting many patients with painful medical conditions. As there is great interest in the clinical importance of the relationship between FA and disability, several questionnaires have been developed to measure FA. The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a recently developed patient-reported instrument that addresses critical issues not previously considered in previous FA-related questionnaires. The original English version of the FACS demonstrated good reliability, internal consistency, and construct, criterion, and predictive validity. Two factors were determined: General Fear Avoidance and Types of Activities That are Avoided. The aim of this study was to to translate the FACS into European-style Spanish (FACS-Sp), and validate its psychometric properties. METHODS: This two-stage psychometric study included 330 subjects with various chronic musculoskeletal pain disorders. An initial translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FACS, from English to Spanish, was performed. Then, critical psychometric properties were analysed, including internal consistency by Cronbach's α coefficients, structural validity from the Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE), and convergent validity by Pearson correlation with the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). RESULTS: This study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS. Total scores ranged from 0 to 88 points, with a mean of 30.49 (±17.18). The FACS-Sp showed a high internal consistency for factor 1 (α = 0.902) and factor 2 (α = 0.88). Factor structure was two-dimensional and supported structural validity, accounting for 48.75% of the total variance. Convergent validity analysis found a significant Pearson correlation r = 0.414. CONCLUSION: This study reports for the first time the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FACS-Sp. Psychometric properties supported the validation of FACS-Sp and ensured the conceptual equivalence with the original English version. In primary care and chronic pain rehabilitation, FA assessment is crucial for clinical decision-making and treatment guidance. The FACS-Sp offers a new measure of FA in Spanish speaking populations. Future research on the FACS-Sp should evaluate test-retest reliability, treatment responsiveness and psychometric comparisons with other translated versions.


Asunto(s)
Reacción de Prevención , Miedo/psicología , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente/normas , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Psicometría/métodos , Enfermedad Crónica , Comparación Transcultural , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Musculoesquelético/psicología , Dolor Musculoesquelético/rehabilitación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , España , Traducciones , Pesos y Medidas
3.
J Transl Med ; 17(1): 306, 2019 09 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31492167

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Identifying how pain transitions from acute to chronic is critical in designing effective prevention and management techniques for patients' well-being, physically, psychosocially, and financially. There is an increasingly pressing need for a quantitative and predictive method to evaluate how low back pain trajectories are classified and, subsequently, how we can more effectively intervene during these progression stages. METHODS: In order to better understand pain mechanisms, we investigated, using computational modeling, how best to describe pain trajectories by developing a platform by which we studied the transition of acute chronic pain. RESULTS: The present study uses a computational neuroscience-based method to conduct such trajectory research, motivated by the use of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity-history over a time-period as a way to mimic pain trajectories. A numerical simulation study is presented as a "proof of concept" for this modeling approach. CONCLUSIONS: This model and its simulation results have highlighted the feasibility and the potential of developing such a broader model for patient evaluations.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo/patología , Dolor Crónico/patología , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/patología , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Hidrocortisona/metabolismo , Sistema Hipotálamo-Hipofisario/patología , Sistema Hipófiso-Suprarrenal/patología
4.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 19(1): 188, 2019 09 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31547804

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Pain Medication Questionnaire (PMQ) assesses the risk of opioid abuse in people with non-oncological chronic pain. METHODS: This is a methodological study conducted at a hemotherapy centre in Recife, Pernambuco state, Brazil. A Cross-cultural adaptation was carried out by a committee of nine specialists, and we applied the PMQ to a pre-final sample of 40 individuals with sickle cell anemia, in addition to a sociodemographic and clinical questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean agreement indexes for PMQ equivalences were the following: semantic (0.996), idiomatic (0.970), experiential (0.991), conceptual (0.953), language clarity (0.991), practical relevance (0.906), and theoretical relevance (0.945). Assessment of the PMQ showed that 50% of participants obtained a score equivalent to medium risk of opioid abuse. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the adapted PMQ instrument was 0.705, ranging from 0.641 to 0.736 among its items. CONCLUSION: The cross-cultural adaptation of the Pain Medication Questionnaire was satisfactory and easy to apply in the Brazilian population. It is clinically relevant, contributing professional practice and enlightening patients with sickle cell anemia on their behavioral dynamics with respect to opioid consumption. It will also contribute to teaching and research, because it is a useful tool for investigating the risk of abusive behavior in people with chronic pain.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/prevención & control , Lenguaje , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Traducciones , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Brasil , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Comparación Transcultural , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto Joven
5.
J Occup Rehabil ; 28(1): 57-67, 2018 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28224414

RESUMEN

Purpose Functional restoration programs (FRPs), for patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders (CDOMDs), have consistently demonstrated positive socioeconomic treatment outcomes, including decreased psychosocial distress and increased work return. The pre-treatment length of disability (LOD), or time between injury and treatment admission, has been shown to influence FRP work outcomes. Some studies have found that shorter LOD is associated with better work outcomes. However, few studies have actually examined cohorts with LOD duration longer than 18 months. This present study evaluated the effects of extended LOD (beyond 18 months) on important treatment outcomes. Methods A total cohort of 1413 CDOMD patients entered an FRP. Of those, 312 did not complete the program, so they were eliminated from outcome analyses. The 1101 patients who completed the FRP were classified based on LOD: Late Rehabilitation (LR, 3-6 months, n = 190); Chronic Disability (CD, 7-17 months, n = 494); and Late Chronic Disability (LCD). The LCD, in turn, consisted of four separate subgroups: 18-23 months (LCD-18, n = 110); 24-35 months (LCD-24, n = 123); 36-71 months (LCD-36, n = 74); and 72+ months (LCD-72, n = 110). Patients were evaluated upon admission and were reassessed at discharge. Those patients who chose to pursue work goals post-treatment (n = 912) were assessed 1-year later. Results Longer LOD was associated with less likelihood of completing the FRP (p < .001). Compared to the other LOD groups, a relatively large percentage of patients (47%) in the longest- disability group were receiving social security disability benefits. Associations were found between longer LOD and more severe patient-reported pain, disability, and depressive symptoms at treatment admission. At discharge, symptom severity decreased for these patient-reported variables in all LOD groups (p < .001). Using binary logistic regressions, it was found that LOD significantly predicted work-return (Wald = 11.672, p = .04) and work-retention (Wald = 11.811, p = .04) after controlling for covariates. Based on the LOD groups, the percentage of patients returning to, and retaining work, ranged from 75.6 to 94.1%, and from 66.7 to 86.3%, respectively. The odds of LCD-24 and LCD-72 patients returning to work were 2.9, and 7.4, respectfully, less likely, compared to LR patients. Furthermore, the odds of LCD-24 and LCD-72 patients retaining work were 3.3 and 3.8 times, respectively, less likely, compared to LR patients. Conclusions Long LOD was a risk factor for FRP non-completion, and was associated with more severe patient-reported variables, including pain intensity and perceived disability. Furthermore, long LOD was a significant predictor for work outcomes at 1 year following FRP discharge. Nevertheless, a large percentage of longer LOD (>24 months) patients had returned to work within the year after discharge (above 85%), and had retained at least part-time work 1-year later (above 66%). These results support the effectiveness of the FRP in mitigating the effects of extended LOD in a large percentage of long-term LOD patients.


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Sistema Musculoesquelético/lesiones , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/rehabilitación , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Estudios de Cohortes , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Personas con Discapacidad/clasificación , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/psicología , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Factores de Riesgo , Ausencia por Enfermedad/economía , Ausencia por Enfermedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Indemnización para Trabajadores/legislación & jurisprudencia , Indemnización para Trabajadores/estadística & datos numéricos
6.
Pain Pract ; 17(2): 166-175, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26989894

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to create and validate severity levels for the central sensitization inventory (CSI), a valid and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument designed to identify patients whose presenting symptoms may be related to a central sensitivity syndrome (CSS; eg, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, irritable bowel syndrome), with a proposed common etiology of central sensitization (CS). METHODS: Based on CSI score means and standard deviations from previously published subject samples, the following CSI severity levels were established: subclinical = 0 to 29; mild = 30 to 39; moderate = 40 to 49; severe = 50 to 59; and extreme = 60 to 100. The concurrent validity of the CSI severity levels was then confirmed in a separate chronic pain patient sample (58% with a CSS diagnosis and 42% without) by demonstrating associations between CSI scores and (1) the number of physician-diagnosed CSSs; (2) CSI score distributions in both CSS and non-CSS patient samples; (3) patient-reported history of CSSs; and (4) patient-reported psychosocial measures, which are known to be associated with CSSs. RESULTS: Compared to the non-CSS patient subsample, the score distribution of the CSS patient subsample was skewed toward the higher severity ranges. CSI mean scores moved into higher severity levels as the number of individual CSS diagnoses increased. Patients who scored in the extreme CSI severity level were more likely to report previous diagnoses of fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, temporomandibular joint disorder, tension/migraine headaches, and anxiety or panic attacks (P < 0.01). CSI severity levels were also associated with patient-reported depressive symptoms, perceived disability, sleep disturbance, and pain intensity (P ≤ 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study provides support for these CSI severity levels as a guideline for healthcare providers and researchers in interpreting CSI scores and evaluating treatment responsiveness.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Manejo del Dolor/instrumentación , Dimensión del Dolor/instrumentación , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica/psicología , Femenino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Fibromialgia/psicología , Cefalea/diagnóstico , Cefalea/psicología , Humanos , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/diagnóstico , Síndrome del Colon Irritable/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastorno de Pánico/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Pánico/psicología , Estándares de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/psicología , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
J Occup Rehabil ; 26(2): 216-28, 2016 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26330300

RESUMEN

Purpose Chronic pain poses a significant problem for the US military. The benefits of self-management treatments for chronic pain are well-documented, but interpersonal responses also influence physical and psychological health and may not be addressed through self-management treatments alone. The current study examines whether perceived interpersonal responses to pain, as measured by the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI), change as a result of participation in an intensive pain management program. It was hypothesized that interpersonal responses to pain would be significantly correlated to psychosocial and physical pain outcomes and that interpersonal responses to pain would change significantly for completers of a functional restoration (FR) program compared to those who were randomized to treatment-as-usual in the military medical system. Methods Forty-four participants were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups. One treatment group received FR (n = 26) and the other group received treatment-as-usual (n = 18). Significant other responses to chronic pain were measured by the MPI (Pain 23(4):345-356, 1985). Participants also completed measures of impacted quality of life, reported disability, psychological distress, fear avoidance, pain interference, and physical activity. Results Perceived higher punishing responses from a significant other were significantly related to worse physical health-related quality of life (p = .037), work-related fear avoidance (p = .008), pain interference (p = .026), affective distress (p = .039), and pain while lifting (p = .017). Perceived higher solicitous responses from significant others were significantly associated with lower mental health-related quality of life (p = .011), household activity (p = 017), general activity (p = .042), self-reported disability (p = .030), lifting capacity (p = .005), and aerobic capacity (p = .009). Conclusions While findings are preliminary and of limited scope, it appears that the perception of significant others' responses may be impacted by psychosocial and physical pain outcomes and may change after treatment. More work in this area is needed to uncover the benefits one might achieve when a significant other is included within the FR treatment framework.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Relaciones Interpersonales , Personal Militar/psicología , Manejo del Dolor , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Personas con Discapacidad/psicología , Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Pain Pract ; 16(4): 435-50, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26228238

RESUMEN

Pain-related fear avoidance (FA), a common problem for patients with painful medical conditions, involves pain-related catastrophizing cognitions, hypervigilance, and avoidance behaviors, which can ultimately lead to decreased functioning, depression, and disability. Several patient-reported instruments have been developed to measure FA, but they have been criticized for limited construct validity, inadequate item specificity, lack of cutoff scores, and missing important FA components. The Fear-Avoidance Components Scale (FACS) is a new patient-reported measure designed to comprehensively evaluate FA in patients with painful medical conditions. It combines important components of FA found in prior FA scales, while trying to correct some of their deficiencies, within a framework of the most current FA model. Psychometric evaluation of the FACS found high internal consistency (α = 0.92) and high test/retest reliability (r = 0.90-0.94, P < 0.01). FACS scores differentiated between 2 separate chronic pain patient samples and a nonpatient comparison group. When clinically relevant severity levels were created, FACS severity scores were highly associated with FA-related patient-reported psychosocial and objective lifting performance variables. These results suggest that the FACS is a psychometrically strong and reliable measure that can help healthcare providers assess FA-related barriers to function and recovery.


Asunto(s)
Miedo/psicología , Dolor/psicología , Psicometría/métodos , Adulto , Catastrofización/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
9.
Pain Pract ; 16(2): 168-74, 2016 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25565481

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The patient health questionnaire (PHQ) is designed for screening psychopathology in primary care settings. However, little is known about its clinical utility in other chronic pain populations, which usually have high psychiatric comorbidities. DESIGN: A consecutive cohort of 546 patients with chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder (CDOMD) was administered and compared upon psychosocial assessments, including the PHQ and a structured clinical interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Four PHQ modules were assessed: major depressive disorder (MDD), generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder (PD), and alcohol use disorders (AUD) [including both alcohol abuse and dependence]. Based on the SCID diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity were determined. RESULTS: The specificity of the PHQ ranged from moderate to high for all 4 PHQ modules (MDD, 0.79; GAD, 0.67; PD, 0.89; AUD, 0.97). However, the sensitivity was relatively low: MDD (0.58); GAD (0.61); PD (0.49); and AUD (0.24). The PHQ was also associated with psychosocial variables. Patients whose PHQ showed MDD, GAD, or PD reported significantly more depressive symptoms and perceived disability than patients who did not (Ps < 0.001). Patients with MDD or GAD reported significantly higher pain than those without (Ps < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The strong specificity of the PHQ appears to be its primary strength for this cohort. Due to its high specificity, the PHQ could be employed as an additional screening tool to help rule out potential psychiatric comorbidity in patients with CDOMD. The low sensitivity of the PHQ in this population, however, remains a weakness of the PHQ.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/complicaciones , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/complicaciones , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto Joven
10.
J Occup Rehabil ; 25(2): 303-15, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25194706

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite extensive evidence for the treatment effectiveness of interdisciplinary functional restoration (FR) for chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorders (CDOMD), there is little documentation on the cost-effectiveness of early rehabilitation using FR. METHODS: A total of 1,119 CDOMD patients were classified according to duration of disability on FR entry, corresponding to early rehabilitation (ER: 4-8 months of disability, N = 373), intermediate duration (ID: 9-18 months, N = 373), and delayed rehabilitation (DR: >18 months, N = 373). Groups were matched on sex, age, ethnicity, and injured musculoskeletal region. One-year post-rehabilitation outcomes included return-to-work, work retention and healthcare utilization. Economic analyses included a cost-effectiveness analysis of the FR program, and estimation of the total cost-of-illness. RESULTS: At 1-year post-rehabilitation, all groups were comparable on return-to-work (overall 88%), work retention (overall 80%), and additional healthcare utilization (overall, 2.2% of patients received re-operations/new surgeries, 2 visits to new healthcare provider). Savings of up to 64% in medical costs, and up to 80% in disability benefits and productivity losses was associated with the ER group. The cost of rehabilitation was also up to 56% lower when administered early. Overall, ER resulted in estimated cost savings of up to 72% (or almost $170,000 per claim). CONCLUSIONS: Duration of disability does not negatively impact objective work or healthcare utilization outcomes following interdisciplinary FR. However, early rehabilitation is more likely to be a cost-effective solution compared to cases that progress >8 months and receiving FR as a treatment of "last resort".


Asunto(s)
Personas con Discapacidad/rehabilitación , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/economía , Enfermedades Profesionales/economía , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Reinserción al Trabajo/economía , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
11.
J Occup Rehabil ; 25(2): 378-86, 2015 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25294727

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine how the economy affects psychosocial and socioeconomic treatment outcomes in a cohort of chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder (CDOMD) patients who completed a functional restoration program (FRP). METHODS: A cohort of 969 CDOMD patients with active workers' compensation claims completed an FRP (a medically-supervised, quantitatively-directed exercise progression program, with multi-modal disability management). A good economy (GE) group (n = 532) was released to work during a low unemployment period (2005-2007), and a poor economy (PE) group (n = 437) was released during a higher unemployment period (2008-2010). Patients were evaluated upon admission for demographic and psychosocial variables, and were reassessed at discharge. Socioeconomic outcomes, including work return and work retention 1 year post-discharge, were collected. RESULTS: Some significant differences in psychosocial self-report data were found, but most of the effect sizes were small, so caution should be made when interpreting the data. Compared to the PE group, the GE group reported more depressive symptoms and disability at admission, but demonstrated a larger decrease in depressive symptoms and disability and increase in self-reported quality of life at discharge. The PE group had lower rates of work return and retention 1-year after discharge, even after controlling for other factors such as length of disability and admission work status. CONCLUSIONS: CDOMD patients who completed an FRP in a PE year were less likely to return to, or retain, work 1-year after discharge, demonstrating that a PE can be an additional barrier to post-discharge work outcomes. A difference in State unemployment rates of <3% (7 vs. 5%) had a disproportionate effect on patients' failure to return to (19 vs. 6%) or retain (28 vs. 15%) work.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/rehabilitación , Enfermedades Profesionales/rehabilitación , Reinserción al Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Indemnización para Trabajadores/economía , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Personas con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/economía , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/economía , Psicología , Recuperación de la Función , Rehabilitación Vocacional/economía , Rehabilitación Vocacional/métodos , Reinserción al Trabajo/economía , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos
12.
Ann Fam Med ; 11(2): 122-9, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23508598

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We studied the efficacy of osteopathic manual treatment (OMT) and ultrasound therapy (UST) for chronic low back pain. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, 2 × 2 factorial design was used to study OMT and UST for short-term relief of nonspecific chronic low back pain. The 455 patients were randomized to OMT (n = 230) or sham OMT (n = 225) main effects groups, and to UST (n = 233) or sham UST (n = 222) main effects groups. Six treatment sessions were provided over 8 weeks. Intention-to-treat analysis was performed to measure moderate and substantial improvements in low back pain at week 12 (30% or greater and 50% or greater pain reductions from baseline, respectively). Five secondary outcomes, safety, and treatment adherence were also assessed. RESULTS: There was no statistical interaction between OMT and UST. Patients receiving OMT were more likely than patients receiving sham OMT to achieve moderate (response ratio [RR] = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.16-1.64; P <.001) and substantial (RR = 1.41, 95% CI, 1.13-1.76; P = .002) improvements in low back pain at week 12. These improvements met the Cochrane Back Review Group criterion for a medium effect size. Back-specific functioning, general health, work disability specific to low back pain, safety outcomes, and treatment adherence did not differ between patients receiving OMT and sham OMT. Nevertheless, patients in the OMT group were more likely to be very satisfied with their back care throughout the study (P <.001). Patients receiving OMT used prescription drugs for low back pain less frequently during the 12 weeks than did patients in the sham OMT group (use ratio = 0.66, 95% CI, 0.43-1.00; P = .048). Ultrasound therapy was not efficacious. CONCLUSIONS: The OMT regimen met or exceeded the Cochrane Back Review Group criterion for a medium effect size in relieving chronic low back pain. It was safe, parsimonious, and well accepted by patients.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Osteopatía , Terapia por Ultrasonido , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Texas
13.
Ann Intern Med ; 167(8): 606, 2017 10 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29049771
14.
J Occup Rehabil ; 23(2): 239-47, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23065194

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) was designed to help capture unique characteristics of chronic pain patients. The present study examined the proportion of subgroups classified by the MPI in a chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder (CDOMD) patient cohort, and described characteristics of MPI profile groups in terms of other psychosocial variables. METHODS: A cohort of 1,270 CDOMD patients undergoing an interdisciplinary functional restoration program was studied. Before the start of the program, all patients received a standard psychosocial assessment battery. A MPI computer program scored and identified pre-defined MPI subgroups: Adaptive Coper (AC); Interpersonally Distressed (ID); and Dysfunctional (DYS). RESULTS: The distribution of MPI profiles for CDOMD patients was similar with those of highly disabled patients, with the largest proportion of patients having the DYS profile (44 %), followed by AC (33 %) and ID (23 %). The DYS profile group showed the highest level of pain severity, and psychosocial distress; the ID group had a moderate level; and the AC profile group had the lowest level. Higher rates of psychiatric disorders were also found in the DYS and ID groups. The DYS profile group was less likely to complete the treatment program. CONCLUSION: The present study further demonstrated the clinical utility of the MPI classification in a large cohort of CDOMD patients, indicating that the MPI profiles successfully distinguish among patients who may require extra psychosocial attention to achieve successful treatment gains and program completion.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/clasificación , Dolor Crónico/clasificación , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/clasificación , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis de Varianza , Enfermedad Crónica/psicología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Personas con Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/psicología , Inventario de Personalidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
15.
Pain Pract ; 13(8): 604-13, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23336585

RESUMEN

AIMS: Symptoms of central sensitization syndrome (CSS) were evaluated among three different groups of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) patients. Additionally, TMD group differences in pain and pain-related disability were assessed, as well as emotional distress. METHODS: Participants were 250 patients with symptoms of acute TMD, recruited from dental clinics within a major metropolitan area. Sequential regressions and multivariate analyses of covariance were conducted in order to make group comparisons. RESULTS: Those with a TMD Muscle Disorder (ie, myofacial TMD [m-TMD]) and those with more than one TMD diagnosis had the most symptoms of CSS and higher reports of pain and pain-related disability. Moreover, emotional distress accounted for a substantial amount of the variance for physical symptoms and mediated all TMD comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Myofacial TMD is characterized by a high degree of comorbidity of symptoms of CSS and associated emotional distress.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/psicología , Adulto , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Síndrome
16.
Pain Pract ; 13(5): 422-31, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23017210

RESUMEN

Although telehealth-based pain management research has grown over the last decade, it is difficult to determine the state of the research because of methodological differences and variability in quality among existing studies. In a previous systematic review, we outlined these differences and preliminarily explored the promise of telehealth for pain intervention. We completed a PRISMA compliant meta-analysis of telehealth pain management research to more precisely describe the state of the research and to uncover gaps in the existing literature that highlight directions for future research. We identified 10 relevant studies completed between 2000 and 2011 including 3 noninferiority and 7 superiority studies. Meta-analysis revealed an overall benefit of telehealth interventions over control conditions and equivalence with in-person intervention. However, some of the reviewed studies found no benefit for telehealth over control conditions. Some methodological concerns among the examined research included poor research quality, small sample sizes, and the examination of telehealth pain interventions without proven efficacy for in-person treatment. Recommendations for future studies are reviewed.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor , Telemedicina/métodos , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos
17.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 93(2): 268-74, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22289236

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for work retention (a patients' ability to both obtain and retain employment) at 1 year after treatment for a chronic disabling occupational musculoskeletal disorder (CDOMD). DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Consecutive patients undergoing interdisciplinary functional restoration treatment in a regional rehabilitation referral center. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of 1850 consecutive CDOMD patients, who were admitted to and completed a functional restoration program, were subsequently classified as work retention or nonwork retention at a 1-year posttreatment evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures, including medical evaluations, demographic and occupational data, psychosocial diagnostic evaluation, and validated measures of pain, disability, and depressive symptoms, were obtained at admission to, and discharge from, the program. RESULTS: Using a multivariate logistic regression analysis, the following variables were found to be significant predictors of failure to retain work: older age (odds ratio [OR]=1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.54), female sex (OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.94), nonworking status at discharge (OR=1.65; 95% CI, 1.11-2.45), extreme disability at admission (OR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.06-2.00), antisocial personality disorder (OR=2.11; 95% CI, 1.09-4.08), receipt of government disability benefits at admission (OR=2.28; 95% CI, 1.06-4.89), and dependence on opiate pain medications (OR=1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.00). The final model improved prediction by 75% over assigning all patients to the larger (work retention) group. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified demographic, psychosocial, and occupational factors that were predictive of failure to retain work. These risk factors may be used to individualize treatment plans for CDOMD patients in order to provide optimal functional restoration.


Asunto(s)
Empleo , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/rehabilitación , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/rehabilitación , Factores de Edad , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/epidemiología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Seguridad Social/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
18.
J Orofac Pain ; 26(1): 7-16, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22292135

RESUMEN

AIMS: To assess the biopsychosocial factors associated with acute temporomandibular disorders (TMD) based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). METHODS: Participants were assessed in community-based dental clinics and evaluated by trained clinicians using physical and psychosocial measures. A total of 207 subjects were evaluated. Patients' high-risk versus low-risk status for potentially developing chronic TMD was also determined. Analyses of variance and chi square analyses were applied to these data. RESULTS: Participants' characteristic pain intensity differed among RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses. They also significantly varied in their self-reported graded chronic pain, depression, somatization (pain inclusive), somatization (pain excluded), and physical well-being. In addition, participants with differing RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses varied in self-reported pain during their chewing performance. Finally, there were also significant differences in chewing performance between high-risk versus low-risk (for developing chronic TMD) patients. CONCLUSION: Participants with multiple diagnoses reported higher pain, as well as other symptoms, relative to participants without a TMD diagnosis. For chewing performance, participants with mutual diagnoses reported more pain compared to other participants. Finally, the risk-status of patients significantly affected chewing performance.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/psicología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Artralgia/fisiopatología , Artralgia/psicología , Artritis/fisiopatología , Artritis/psicología , Enfermedad Crónica , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Estudios de Cohortes , Depresión/psicología , Dolor Facial/clasificación , Dolor Facial/fisiopatología , Dolor Facial/psicología , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Luxaciones Articulares/fisiopatología , Luxaciones Articulares/psicología , Masculino , Masticación/fisiología , Músculos Masticadores/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Osteoartritis/fisiopatología , Osteoartritis/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Trastornos Somatomorfos/fisiopatología , Trastornos Somatomorfos/psicología , Disco de la Articulación Temporomandibular/fisiopatología , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/clasificación , Trastornos de la Articulación Temporomandibular/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
19.
Pain Pract ; 12(7): 570-7, 2012 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22303839

RESUMEN

Pain is generally undertreated in the United States, owing to a number of barriers including geographic distance from specialty treatment providers; functional disability that limits mobility; treatment-related stigma; economic limitations; and educational barriers. Pain undertreatment exacerbates pain chronicity and emotional disruption that can significantly erode a pain patient's quality of life, and there is widespread agreement that pain care must evolve to address this significant problem. The growing field of telehealth (defined for the purposes of this paper as technology that allows for distance interaction between providers and/or patients) offers a novel opportunity to expand pain assessment, consultation, and treatment services beyond the walls of the specialty pain clinic, but there is limited availability of resources describing how to best use this technology to improve access to care. A recent literature review (September 2011) using universally endorsed MeSH search criteria revealed only 32 MEDLINE references focusing on telehealth for pain. This is surprising in light of the very large number of references covering telehealth (14,164 references) and pain (104,564 references), respectively. Of the studies available, there are very few randomized trials of telehealth pain care and only one general overview of e-health and chronic pain, which dedicates just a few paragraphs to telehealth. This manuscript represents one of the first comprehensive reviews of the current state of telehealth and pain management research and practice. The goals are to provide a rationale for the potential benefit of telehealth-based pain management services; describe the various applications of telehealth technology for pain management; orient the reader to cost models for telehealth; present examples of services in place; and offer recommendations for future research based on the current state of knowledge.


Asunto(s)
Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/tendencias , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Clínicas de Dolor , Manejo del Dolor/tendencias
20.
Pain Pract ; 12(4): 276-85, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21951710

RESUMEN

Central sensitization (CS) has been proposed as a common pathophysiological mechanism to explain related syndromes for which no specific organic cause can be found. The term "central sensitivity syndrome (CSS)" has been proposed to describe these poorly understood disorders related to CS. The goal of this investigation was to develop the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), which identifies key symptoms associated with CSSs and quantifies the degree of these symptoms. The utility of the CSI, to differentiate among different types of chronic pain patients who presumably have different levels of CS impairment, was then evaluated. Study 1 demonstrated strong psychometric properties (test-retest reliability = 0.817; Cronbach's alpha = 0.879) of the CSI in a cohort of normative subjects. A factor analysis (including both normative and chronic pain subjects) yielded 4 major factors (all related to somatic and emotional symptoms), accounting for 53.4% of the variance in the dataset. In Study 2, the CSI was administered to 4 groups: fibromyalgia (FM); chronic widespread pain without FM; work-related regional chronic low back pain (CLBP); and normative control group. Analyses revealed that the patients with FM reported the highest CSI scores and the normative population the lowest (P < 0.05). Analyses also demonstrated that the prevalence of previously diagnosed CSSs and related disorders was highest in the FM group and lowest in the normative group (P < 0.001). Taken together, these 2 studies demonstrate the psychometric strength, clinical utility, and the initial construct validity of the CSI in evaluating CS-related clinical symptoms in chronic pain populations.


Asunto(s)
Sensibilización del Sistema Nervioso Central/fisiología , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Dolor Crónico/fisiopatología , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA