Natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Thoracoscopy and mediastinoscopy are common procedures with painful incisions and prominent scars. A natural orifice transesophageal endoscopic surgical (NOTES) approach could reduce pain, eliminate intercostal neuralgia, provide access to the posterior mediastinal compartment, and improve cosmesis. In addition NOTES esophageal access routes also have the potential to replace conventional thoracoscopic approaches for medial or hilar lesions. METHODS: Five healthy Yorkshire swine underwent nonsurvival natural orifice transesophageal mediastinoscopy and thoracoscopy under general anesthesia. An 8- to 9.8-mm video endoscope was introduced into the esophagus, and a 10-cm submucosal tunnel was created with blunt dissection. The endoscope then was passed through the muscular layers of the esophagus into the mediastinal space. The mediastinal compartment, pleura, lung, mediastinal lymph nodes, thoracic duct, vagus nerves, and exterior surface of the esophagus were identified. Mediastinal lymph node resection was easily accomplished. For thoracoscopy, a small incision was created through the pleura, and the endoscope was introduced into the thoracic cavity. The lung, chest wall, pleura, pericardium, and diaphragmatic surface were identified. Pleural biopsies were obtained with endoscopic forceps. The endoscope was withdrawn and the procedure terminated. RESULTS: Mediastinal and thoracic structures could be identified without difficulty via a transesophageal approach. Lymph node resection was easily accomplished. Pleural biopsy under direct visualization was feasible. Selective mainstem bronchus intubation and collapse of the ipsilateral lung facilitated thoracoscopy. In one animal, an inadvertent 4-mm lung incision resulted in a pneumothorax. This was decompressed with a small venting intercostal incision, and the remainder of the procedure was completed without difficulty. CONCLUSIONS: Transesophageal endoscopic mediastinoscopy, lymph node resection, thoracoscopy, and pleural biopsy are feasible and provide excellent visualization of mediastinal and intrathoracic structures. Survival studies will be needed to confirm the safety of this approach.

Leaders by example: Best practices and advice on establishing a state-of-the art surgical simulation center that optimizes available resources.

BACKGROUND: The role of simulation-based education continues to expand exponentially. To excel in this environment as a surgical simulation leader requires unique knowledge, skills, and abilities that are different from those used in traditional clinically-based education. METHODS: Leaders in surgical simulation were invited to participate as discussants in a pre-conference course offered by the Association for Surgical Education. Highlights from their discussions were recorded. RESULTS: Recommendations were provided on topics such as building a simulation team, preparing for accreditation requirements, what to ask for during early stages of development, identifying tools and resources needed to meet educational goals, expanding surgical simulation programming, and building educational curricula. CONCLUSION: These recommendations provide new leaders in simulation with a unique combination of up-to-date best practices in simulation-based education, as well as valuable advice gained from lessons learned from the personal experiences of national leaders in the field of surgical simulation and education.