Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Birth ; 2024 May 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38804004

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This exploratory review aimed to provide empirical evidence on the definitions of labor, the statistical approaches and measures reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies measuring the duration of labor. METHODS: A systematic electronic literature search was conducted using different databases. An extraction form was designed and used to extract relevant data. English, French, and German studies published between 1999 and 2019 have been included. Only RCTs and observational studies analyzing labor duration (or a phase of labor duration) as a primary outcome have been included. RESULTS: Ninety-two RCTs and 126 observational studies were eligible. No definition of the onset of labor was provided in 21.7% (n = 20) of the RCTs and 23.8% (n = 30) of the observational studies. Mean was the most frequently applied measure of labor duration in the RCTs (89.1%, n = 82), and median in the observational studies (54.8%, n = 69). Most RCTs (83%, n = 76) and observational studies (70.6%, n = 89) analyzed labor duration using a bivariate method, with the t-test being the most frequently applied (45.7% and 27%, respectively). Only 10.8% (n = 10) of the RCTs and 52.4% (n = 66) of the observational studies conducted a multivariable regression: 3 (30%; out of 10) RCTs and 37 (56%; out of 66) observational studies used a time-to-event adapted model. CONCLUSION: This survey reports a lack of agreement with respect to how the onset of labor and phases of labor duration are presented. Concerning the statistical approaches, few studies used survival analysis, which is the appropriate statistical framework to analyze time-to-event data.

2.
Matern Child Health J ; 26(6): 1375-1383, 2022 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35028891

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Mothers in resource-limited areas face barriers in initiating care for ill newborns, leading to delays that may contribute to newborn mortality. This qualitative study conducted in rural Lufwanyama District in Zambia aimed to (1) explore mothers' healthcare-seeking related to newborn illness and (2) identify reasons for delaying care-seeking for ill newborns. METHODS: We examined the perspectives of 60 mothers and 77 grandmothers of children under three years of age in 14 focus group discussions as part of the Lufwanyama Integrated Neonatal and Child Health Program study. We conducted a thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts using dedicated software. RESULTS: Mothers and grandmothers were generally able to identify newborn danger signs and established a hierarchy of care-seeking based on the perceived severity of danger signs. However, inability to afford transportation, inaccessible health care facilities, high costs of medication prescribed at the health clinics, lack of respectful treatment and fear of newborns dying in the hospital prevented participants from seeking timely care. As traditional birth attendants (TBAs) and community health care workers (CHWs) have limited roles in newborns care beyond the immediate delivery setting, mothers often resorted to traditional healers for newborn care. CONCLUSIONS: Based on cultural beliefs and influenced by traditions, mothers in Lufwanyama have developed hierarchical strategies to seek care for ill newborns. Barriers to treatment at health facilities often resulted in traditional care. Training both TBAs and CHWs in providing community-based newborn care and appropriate referrals could improve care-seeking and prevent newborn mortality in rural Zambia.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Materna , Partería , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Embarazo , Población Rural , Zambia
3.
Sex Reprod Healthc ; 37: 100895, 2023 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37597272

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The time between self-assessed first symptoms and clinical confirmation of labour onset is marked by uncertainty, particularly for primiparas. Accordingly, primiparas often seek professional care to confirm their perceptions of labour onset. This paper describes the transition into early labour among primiparas considering their level of certainty in labour onset and their perception of labour onset symptoms prior to birth. METHODS: A prospective exploratory cohort study was conducted in Germany between July 2020 - March 2021 among a convenience sample of 69 primiparas. Respondents recorded in a non-validated questionnaire their perceptions of nine symptoms and degree of certainty about labour onset every day from 37 weeks gestation. Descriptive analysis included certainty in labour onset and dedicated symptoms in relation to days before birth. RESULTS: The participants (n=69) reported a little certainty of labour onset up to 32 days before birth and most of them became certain up to four days before birth. Associated symptoms were regular and irregular pain, symptoms of vaginal loss and emotional symptoms. Gastrointestinal symptoms and nausea were not indicated by a majority. Uncertainty of labour onset, however, was indicated up until the day of birth. CONCLUSION: Although interpretation is based on a small sample size, primiparas are able to self-diagnose labour onset and report connected symptoms up to four days before birth. We suggest calling this time between self-diagnosis of labour onset and confirmed labour onset based on clinical parameters the transition into early labour.


Asunto(s)
Trabajo de Parto , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Parto , Inicio del Trabajo de Parto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA