Type II endoleak and aortic aneurysm sac shrinkage after preemptive embolization of aneurysm sac side branches.

OBJECTIVE: Type II endoleak (T2EL) is the most common endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Its optimal management has been controversially discussed. Thus, preliminary selective embolization of aneurysm sac side branches (ASSBs) has been adopted to prevent T2EL. Our goal was to determine the rate of T2EL and the diameter decrease of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) after EVAR performed after preemptive embolization of ASSBs. METHODS: From September 2014 to September 2019, 139 patients with AAAs underwent percutaneous ASSB embolization before EVAR. Follow-up imaging studies were performed at 1 and 6 months and annually thereafter. The end points included freedom from T2EL, AAA sac shrinkage, T2EL-related reinterventions, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 23 ± 16 months (range, 1-61 months). The patients had had a median of five (range, one to eight) patent ASSBs found on preoperative imaging studies. After completion of embolization, 76.4% of the initially patent ASSBs were occluded, with no major procedure-related complications. Follow-up imaging studies showed T2ELs in seven patients (5%), with an aneurysm sac increase seen in six of these patients. The number of ASSBs remaining patent after embolization was the only discriminative factor in patients with and without T2EL. Six T2EL-related reinterventions were performed during follow-up. Most patients (n = 91; 86.7%) had experienced aneurysm sac shrinkage, and the mean diameter reduction was 9.2 ± 7.7 mm (P < .001) in all patients with follow-up data available. One aneurysm-related death occurred within 30 days after EVAR. CONCLUSIONS: Preemptive embolization of ASSBs for patients with AAAs is safe and effective in preventing T2ELs after EVAR. Aneurysm sac shrinkage was observed in a high proportion of patients.

The Influence of 3D Printed Aortic Models on the Evolution of Physician Modified Stent Grafts for the Urgent Treatment of Thoraco-abdominal and Pararenal Aortic Pathologies.

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to describe the outcomes of high risk patients with symptomatic or contained rupture of pararenal (PRAs) and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) with anatomy unsuitable for commercially available stent grafts who underwent fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) using physician modified stent grafts (PMSGs) planned with 3D image analysis software (3DIMAS), and 3D printed aortic models (3DAMs). METHODS: Nineteen consecutive patients (17 male; mean age, 70 ± 9 years) underwent PMSG-FEVAR between 2015 and 2019. 3DAMs to plan the PMSGs were introduced in 2018. End points were all cause mortality, freedom from any endoleak, target vessel patency, and re-intervention. RESULTS: Seven patients (36.8%) were treated with PMSGs using 3DIMAS (three PRAs, three type IV, and one type III TAAAs), and 12 patients (63.2%) received PMSGs using 3DAMs (five PRAs, seven type IV TAAAs). Six patients presented with contained aortic rupture and 13 patients were treated for symptomatic aortic aneurysm. Mean aortic diameter was 72 ± 10 mm. The choice of stent graft for fenestration was the Valiant Captivia Closed Web (Medtronic), except for one patient. Sixteen (84.2%) stent grafts were manufactured with four fenestrations. Technical success was 100%. Seventy-one renovisceral branch vessels were targeted with fenestrations. Mean length of hospital stay was 17.3 ± 10.4 days. Thirty day mortality was 0%. Two patients developed reversible spinal cord injury. Mean follow up was 14.4 months (range 1-52 months). During follow up one non-aneurysm related death occurred, and two successful re-interventions were performed: one to re-establish renal artery patency, and one to treat a type 1c endoleak. CONCLUSION: PMSGs for urgent treatment of pararenal and thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysms in high risk patients unsuitable for commercially available stent grafts are feasible and safe. 3D printing technology may improve urgent construction of patient specific devices for treatment of complex aortic pathologies and improve outcomes.

Stroke rate after thoracic endovascular aortic repair using de-airing of stentgrafts with high-volume of saline solution.

Background: Our aim was to determine the rate of ischemic stroke following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) after reducing gas volume released during stentgraft deployment by de-airing of thoracic stentgrafts with high-volume of 0.9% heparinized saline solution. Patients and methods: A single center retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients undergoing TEVAR from 2014 to 2019 was performed. All thoracic stentgrafts were flushed with 120 ml 0.9% heparinized saline solution before implantation, according to our institutional protocol. Endpoints were in-hospital rates of ischemic stroke and spinal cord ischemia (SCI), and all-cause mortality. Results: One hundred and fifty-four patients (mean age: 66.8 ± 13.6 years, 64.9% males) were treated with TEVAR during the study period. Indications for treatment were thoracic aortic aneurysms (n = 75, 48.7%), acute type B aortic dissections (n = 46, 29.9%), aortic arch aneurysms and penetrating aortic ulcers (n = 28, 18.2%), and blunt traumatic aortic injuries (n = 5, 3.2%). Timing of procedure was urgent in 75 patients (48.7%). Proximal landing zone were zone 0-1-2 (n = 75, 48.7%), zone 3 (n = 66, 42.9%) and zone 4 (n = 13, 8.4%). Supra-aortic vessels were revascularized with custom-made fenestrated stentgrafts in 9 patients (5.8%), using chimney technique in 4 patients (2.6%), and with debranching procedures in 19 patients (12.3%). Left subclavian artery was covered without revascularization in 46 patients (29.9%). In-hospital stroke occurred in two patients (1.3%) and SCI in another two patients (1.3%). In-hospital mortality rate was 0.6%. No further in-hospital events were noted. Conclusions: De-airing of stentgrafts with high-volume of 0.9% heparinized saline solution seems to be safe and can be used as an adjunct to keep occurrence of neurological events after TEVAR as low as possible.

[Surgeon-modified Stent Grafts for Complex Aortic Reconstructions - What is Feasible?] / Surgeon-modified Stentgrafts für komplexe Aortenrekonstruktionen ­ was ist möglich?

BACKGROUND: The close anatomical relationship to the visceral vessels renders the treatment of complex throacoabdominal aortic pathologies challenging. In emergent cases, off-the-shelf stent grafts and parallel techniques are feasible treatment options. Alternatively, the treating surgeon can alter a conventional stent graft, creating a so-called surgeon-modified stent graft (SMSG) to adapt it to the complex aortic pathology. The aim of this publication is to present the possibilities and results of this method. RESULTS: The location of SMSG's fenestrations can be determined after manual measurements of the centerline of flow reconstructions of the aortic computed tomography-angiography. The planning of the SMSG can be simplified and standardized by creating personalized 3D aortic models, and by using algorithms for the automated determination of the ideal fenestration positions. Most approved stent grafts can be used as platforms for SMSG. Different manufacturing techniques have been described. In addition to simple fenestrations, mini-cuffs, directional branches, and inner branches are used. Furthermore, diameter reducing ties and preloaded catheters could facilitate the implantation. The treatment of complex aortic pathologies using SMSG has achieved good results, with high technical success rate of 90-100%, and low 30-day mortality, especially when compared to open surgical treatment of similar patients. The rate of endoleak of 0-14% was also acceptable. Long-term durability results after treatment with SMSG are not yet available. CONCLUSION: Surgeon-modified stent grafts are safe and feasible for the endovascular treatment of patients with urgent complex thoracoabdominal aortic pathologies. They represent compassionate use and show promising results in the published literature.

A novel latex patch model enables cost-effective hands-on teaching in vascular surgery.

Objectives: We developed a new simulator for hands-on teaching of vascular surgical skills, the Leipzig Latex Patch Model (LPM). This study aimed to quantify the effectiveness and acceptance of the LPM evaluated by students, as well as evaluation of the results by experienced vascular surgeons. Methods: A prospective, single-center, single-blinded, randomized study was conducted. Fifty 5th-year medical students were randomized into two groups, first performing a patch suture on the LPM (study group) or established synthetic tissue model (control), then on porcine aorta. The second suture was videotaped and scored by two surgeons using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) score. We measured the time required for suturing; the participants completed questionnaires. Results: Participants required significantly less time for the second suture than the first (median: LPM 30 min vs. control 28.5 min, p = 0.0026). There was no significant difference in suture time between the groups (median: 28 min vs. 30 min, p = 0.2958). There was an increase in confidence from 28 % of participants before to 58 % after the course (p < 0.0001). The cost of materials per participant was 1.05€ (LPM) vs. 8.68€ (control). The OSATS-scores of the LPM group did not differ significantly from those of the control (median: 20.5 points vs. 23.0 points, p = 0.2041). Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated an increase in technical skills and confidence through simulator-based teaching. Our data suggests comparable results of the LPM compared to the conventional model, as assessed by the OSATS-score. This low-cost, low-threshold training model for vascular suturing skills should make hands-on training more accessible to students and surgical residents. Key message: We developed and validated a low-cost, low-threshold training model for vascular suturing skills. This should make hands-on training more accessible to medical students and surgical residents in the future.

Endovascular occlusion of segmental arteries feeding the anterior spinal artery to stage endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic repair.

Objective: Minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization was introduced to prevent spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. There is no consensus on whether the endovascular occlusion of segmental arteries feeding directly the anterior radiculomedullary artery and anterior spinal artery can be safely performed without causing spinal cord ischemia. Our aim was to investigate the feasibility and clinical impact of endovascular occlusion of segmental arteries supplying the anterior spinal artery during minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods: Between January 2018 and July 2020, 54 patients (36 male; mean age, 71.1 ± 9.3 years) underwent direct embolization of segmental arteries feeding the anterior radiculomedullary artery before endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. End points included technical success of minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization of segmental arteries, anterior radiculomedullary artery, neurological complications, and in-hospital mortality after minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization and endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Results: The thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm classification was type I (n = 8), type II (n = 24), type III (n = 11), and type IV (n = 11). During minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization, 388 segmental arteries were occluded, each patient having 7.2 ± 3.1 coiled segmental arteries occluding 64.5% (25-100%) of open segmental arteries within the treated aortic segment. Altogether, 66 anterior radiculomedullary arteries were seen originating between Th8 and L3 levels from 85 (21.9%) segmental arteries. In 10 patients (18.5%), 2 large anterior radiculomedullary arteries were identified, and 1 patient (1.9%) showed 3 anterior radiculomedullary arteries on the spinal arteriography. No spinal cord ischemia or procedure-related complications occurred after minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization. After 47.9 ± 39.4 days, all patients received endovascular repair of their thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. There was no in-hospital mortality. One male patient developed incomplete temporary spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair. Conclusions: Minimally invasive segmental artery coil embolization of segmental arteries feeding the anterior spinal artery in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms to prevent spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair is feasible and clinically safe.

Does Timepoint of Surgical Procedure Affect the Outcome in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation? A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis over 20 Years.

Background: Sleep deprivation and disturbances in circadian rhythms may hinder surgical performance and decision-making capabilities. Solid organ transplantations, which are technically demanding and often begin at uncertain times, frequently during nighttime hours, are particularly susceptible to these effects. This study aimed to assess how transplant operations conducted during daytime versus nighttime influence both patient and graft outcomes and function. Methods: simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplants (SPKTs) conducted at the University Hospital of Leipzig from 1998 to 2018 were reviewed retrospectively. The transplants were categorized based on whether they began during daytime hours (8 a.m. to 6 p.m.) or nighttime hours (6 p.m. to 8 a.m.). We analyzed the demographics of both donors and recipients, as well as primary outcomes, which included surgical complications, patient survival, and graft longevity. Results: In this research involving 105 patients, 43 SPKTs, accounting for 41%, took place in the daytime, while 62 transplants (59%) occurred at night. The characteristics of both donors and recipients were similar across the two groups. Further, the rate of (surgical) pancreas graft-related complications and reoperations (daytime 39.5% versus nighttime 33.9%; p = 0.552) were also not statistically significant between both groups. In this study, the five-year survival rate for patients was comparable for both daytime and nighttime surgeries, with 85.2% for daytime and 86% for nighttime procedures (p = 0.816). Similarly, the survival rates for pancreas grafts were 75% for daytime and 77% for nighttime operations (p = 0.912), and for kidney grafts, 76% during the day compared to 80% at night (p = 0.740), indicating no significant statistical difference between the two time periods. In a multivariable model, recipient BMI > 30 kg/m2, donor age, donor BMI, and cold ischemia time > 15 h were independent predictors for increased risk of (surgical) pancreas graft-related complications, whereas the timepoint of SPKT (daytime versus nighttime) did not have an impact. Conclusions: The findings from our retrospective analysis at a big single German transplant center indicate that SPKT is a reliable procedure, regardless of the start time. Additionally, our data revealed that patients undergoing nighttime transplants have no greater risk of surgical complications or inferior results concerning long-term survival of the patient and graft. However, due to the small number of cases evaluated, further studies are required to confirm these results.