Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Crit Care ; 17(3): R103, 2013 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23718723

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) related to a central venous catheter varies considerably in ICUs depending on the population included. The aim of this study was to determine subclavian central venous catheter (SCVC)-related DVT risk factors in severely traumatized patients with regard to two kinds of polyurethane catheters. METHODS: Critically ill trauma patients needing a SCVC for their usual care were prospectively included in an observational study. Depending on the month of inclusion, patients received one of the two available products in the emergency unit: either an aromatic polyurethane SCVC or an aliphatic polyurethane SCVC. Patients were screened weekly by ultrasound for SCVC-related DVT. Potential risk factors were collected, including history-related, trauma-related and SCVC-related characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were included with a median Injury Severity Sore of 30 and a high rate of severe brain injuries (21% of high intracranial pressure). Incidence of SCVC-related DVT was 37% (95% confidence interval: 26 to 40) in patients or 20/1,000 catheter-days. SCVC-related DVT occurred within 8 days in 65% of cases. There was no significant difference in DVT rates between the aromatic polyurethane and aliphatic polyurethane SCVC groups (38% vs. 36%). SCVC-related DVT independent risk factors were age>30 years, intracranial hypertension, massive transfusion (>10 packed red blood cell units), SCVC tip position in the internal jugular or in the innominate vein, and ipsilateral jugular catheter. CONCLUSION: SCVC-related DVT concerned one-third of these severely traumatized patients and was mostly clinically silent. Incidence did not depend on the type of polyurethane but was related to age>30 years, intracranial hypertension or misplacement of the SCVC. Further studies are needed to assess the cost-effectiveness of routine screening in these patients in whom thromboprophylaxis may be hazardous.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Poliuretanos/efectos adversos , Vena Subclavia , Trombosis de la Vena/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Poliuretanos/química , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Trombosis de la Vena/diagnóstico , Trombosis de la Vena/terapia , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto Joven
2.
Ann Intensive Care ; 9(1): 81, 2019 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31312921

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although lung protection with low tidal volume and limited plateau pressure (Pplat) improves survival in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients (ARDS), the best way to set positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is still debated. METHODS: This study aimed to compare two strategies using individual PEEP based on a maximum Pplat (28-30 cmH2O, the Express group) or on keeping end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure positive (0-5 cmH2O, PLexpi group). We estimated alveolar recruitment (Vrec), end-expiratory lung volume and alveolar distension based on elastance-related end-inspiratory transpulmonary pressure (PL,EL). RESULTS: Nineteen patients with moderate to severe ARDS (PaO2/FiO2 < 150 mmHg) were included with a baseline PEEP of 7.0 ± 1.8 cmH2O and a PaO2/FiO2 of 91.2 ± 31.2 mmHg. PEEP and oxygenation increased significantly from baseline with both protocols; PEEP Express group was 14.2 ± 3.6 cmH2O versus 16.7 ± 5.9 cmH2O in PLexpi group. No patient had the same PEEP with the two protocols. Vrec was higher with the latter protocol (299 [0 to 875] vs. 222 [47 to 483] ml, p = 0.049) and correlated with improved oxygenation (R2 = 0.45, p = 0.002). Two and seven patients in the Express and PL,expi groups, respectively, had PL,EL > 25 cmH2O. CONCLUSIONS: There is a great heterogeneity of PLexpi when Pplat is used to titrate PEEP but with limited risk of over-distension. A PEEP titration for a moderate positive level of PLexpi might slightly improve alveolar recruitment and oxygenation but increases the risk of over-distension in one-third of patients.

3.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg ; 11(4): 515-7, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20603275

RESUMEN

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for the management of pain after thoracopulmonary surgery. However, it is not without side-effects and complications. We report the case of a 52-year-old man who underwent left lower lobectomy for a carcinoid tumor. He received multimodal anesthesia combining epidural thoracic anesthesia and balanced intravenous general anesthesia. He presented with pneumocephalus on the 10th postoperative day. Etiological assessment consisted of isotopic cisternography and cerebromedullar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), revealing a breach in the fourth left spinal dural nerve sheath. Although it was initially suspected, the thoracic epidural was eventually excluded as the cause. Management consisted of prompt surgical repair.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Epidural , Tumor Carcinoide/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/efectos adversos , Neumocéfalo/etiología , Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumocéfalo/diagnóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA