Hypersensitivity Reactions to Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs among Adults: Clinical Features and Risk Factors for Diagnosis Confirmation.

BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are among the most common causes of drug hypersensitivity (HS) reactions. The diagnosis is based on a careful clinical history, and provocation tests are considered the gold standard for diagnosis. Skin tests have some value to study reactions to pyrazolones. Laboratory investigations are mostly used for research purposes. Different phenotypes have been described. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Our aim was to describe the most common clinical manifestations of NSAID HS in a large population of adult patients, the drugs involved, the association with previously described risk factors, and the outcome of diagnostic procedures. The classification of reactions proposed by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Drug Allergy Interest Group was adopted. RESULTS: Acetylsalicylic acid was the drug most often involved in reactions (34%), isolated cutaneous symptoms were the most reported (60%), and immediate reactions (58%) were the most common. There was an overall female predominance (64%) and 35% of the patients were atopic. HS to NSAIDs was confirmed in 21% of the patients. The most common phenotypes encountered among HS patients were NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema and single-NSAID-induced urticaria/angioedema or anaphylaxis. Logistic regression analysis showed that gender and atopy were not significant risk factors for HS confirmation, but diagnosis depended on the number of previous reactions, the type of reaction, and the time interval between drug intake and reaction. CONCLUSION: Only 21% of suspected HS reactions were confirmed after diagnostic workup. Patients describing >1 previous reaction and suffering immediate reactions had a higher probability of a positive investigation.

[Airways inflammation evaluation. Upper and lower airways]. / Avaliação da inflamação das vias aéreas. Vias áreas superiores e compartimento broncopulmonar.

It is done a review of evaluation methods of the inflammation in upper airways and bronchi used for diagnosis, therapeutic approach and prognosis of pathologies like rhinosinusitis and asthma. It is also analysed methods that supply relevant information of inflammation in COPD. The chronic inflammation of the airways is associated to respiratory distress, obstruction in basal lung function tests and to bronchial and nasal hyperreactivity. Computerized tomography informs about lumen dimensions, bronchial walls thickness and pulmonary density. These changes are associated to inflammation and to remodelling of the airways. Localized inflammation in respiratory tract can be detected by modifications of systemic inflammatory markers. The direct evaluation of inflammatory airways changes are based on immune, histological and chemical analysis of lung tissue obtained by biopsies and by fluids recoil in basal conditions or after stimulation. The eosinophils are increased in biopsies and in nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage in asthma and rhinitis and can change with therapy. Proteins and mRNA expression of cellular activation mediators are also observed. The induced sputum identifies eosinophilic inflammation that is inversely associated with lung function parameters. In each respiratory cycle the air is enriched in organic volatile compounds produced by cellular breathing. FENO is the bio marker more deeply studied in asthma and its increase is well documented in this disorder. In the exhaled air condensed, reactive oxygen species, membrane mediators, cytokines, and chemokines are identified. If the non invasive evaluation of inflammation became reliable and reproducible it will be indispensable in monitoring the airways diseases.