Heart transplantation from donation after circulatory death: Impact on waitlist time and transplant rate.

The effect of using donation after circulatory death (DCD) hearts on waitlist outcomes has not been substantiated. We retrospectively analyzed 184 heart transplant (HT) candidates at our institution from 2019 to 2021. Patients were stratified into 2 observation periods centered on September 12, 2020, when the adult DCD HT program officially began. The primary outcome was a comparison of transplant rate between period 1 (pre-DCD) and period 2 (post-DCD). Secondary outcomes included waitlist time-to-transplant, waitlist mortality rate, independent predictors of incidence of HT, and posttransplant outcomes. A total of 165 HTs (n = 92 in period 1 and n = 73 in period 2) were performed. The median waitlist time-to-transplant decreased from 47.5 to 19 days in periods 1 and 2, respectively (P = .004). The transplant rate increased from 181 per 100 patient-years in period 1 to 579 per 100 patient-years in period 2 (incidence rate ratio, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.04-3.38; P = .038). There were no statistical differences in waitlist mortality rate (P = .566) and 1-year survival (P = .699) between the 2 periods. DCD HTs (n = 36) contributed to 49.3% of overall HT activity in period 2. We concluded that utilization of DCD hearts significantly reduced waitlist time and increased transplant rate. Short-term posttransplant outcomes were comparable between the pre-DCD and post-DCD periods.

Outcome of patients on heart transplant list treated with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: Insights from the TRans-Atlantic registry on VAd and TrAnsplant (TRAViATA).

BACKGROUND: Geographic variations in management and outcomes of individuals supported by continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVAD) between the United States (US) and Europe (EU) is largely unknown. METHODS: We created a retrospective, multinational registry of 524 patients who received a CF-LVAD (either HVAD or Heartmate II) between January 2008 and April 2017. Follow up spanned from date of CF-LVAD implant to post-HTx period with a median follow up of 44.8 months. RESULTS: The cohort included 299 (57.1%) EU and 225 (42.9%) US patients. Although the US cohort was significantly older with a higher prevalence of comorbidities, survival was similar between the cohorts (US 63.1%, EU 68.4% at 5 years, unadjusted log-rank test p = 0.43).Multivariate analyses suggested that older age, higher body mass index, elevated creatinine, use of temporary mechanical circulatory support prior CF-LVAD, and implantation of HVAD were associated with increased mortality. Among CF-LVAD patients undergoing HTx, the median time on CF-LVAD support was shorter in the US, meanwhile US donors were younger. Finally, the pattern of adverse events (stroke, gastrointestinal bleedings, late right ventricular failure, and driveline infection) during support differed significantly between US and EU. CONCLUSIONS: Although waitlisted patients in the US on CF-LVAD have higher risk comorbid conditions, the overall outcome is similar in US and EU. Geographic variations with regards to donor characteristics, duration of CF-LVAD support prior to transplant, and adverse events on support can explain the disparity in the utilization of mechanical bridge to transplant strategy between US and EU.

Novel Use of Cangrelor With Heparin During Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Patients With Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Who Require Cardiovascular Surgery: A Case Series.

Optimal anticoagulation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) remains uncertain in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) who require urgent/emergent cardiac surgery. We describe our strategy and experience with utilizing cangrelor in combination with heparin for anticoagulation during CPB in patients with different phases of HIT undergoing a wide range of urgent/emergent cardiovascular surgery. Cangrelor is an intravenous direct-acting P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist that achieves therapeutic effect and eliminates rapidly. Its antiplatelet activity is unaffected by stagnation of blood, nor is it influenced by patient's sex, age, renal status, or hepatic function. Our institutional alternative intraoperative anticoagulation strategy for HIT patients is to administer cangrelor with a loading dose of 30 µg/kg, followed by continuous infusion of 4 µg/kg/min throughout CPB via a dedicated intravenous access. VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction unit point-of-care assay is utilized to monitor platelet inhibition throughout surgery. Cangrelor infusion is discontinued 10 minutes prior to heparin reversal with protamine. Ten urgent/emergent cardiovascular surgeries were performed at our institution using cangrelor with heparin for anticoagulation during CPB, and the majority were pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (60%). HIT was confirmed in 3 cases and was suspected in 4 which was found to be negative after the operation. One case of subacute B HIT and 2 cases of remote HIT were included in this series. This novel alternative intraoperative anticoagulation strategy was well tolerated by all patients. There was neither serious postoperative thrombotic event nor major postoperative bleeding complication that required reoperation. One death occurred in a patient with advanced intracardiac malignancy, whose life support was ultimately withdrawn postoperatively. Median postoperative intensive care unit stay was 7.2 ± 5.5 days, while median postoperative hospital stay was 16.3 ± 10.8 days. In patients with various phases of HIT who require urgent/emergent on-pump cardiovascular surgery, the use of cangrelor with heparin may be a convenient, safe, and effective alternative intraoperative anticoagulation strategy providing acceptable outcomes.

The impact of using hepatitis c virus nucleic acid test-positive donor hearts on heart transplant waitlist time and transplant rate.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies suggest that direct-acting anti-virals (DAAs) for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection permits the transplantation of HCV-viremic donor organs in uninfected recipients. This opportunity may expand the donor pool. We assessed the impact of using HCV nucleic acid test-positive (NAT+) donor hearts on heart transplant (HTx) waitlist time and transplant rate. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients who were listed for HTx from October 2015 through October 2018. Patients were stratified into 2 periods centered on April 27, 2017, when the protocol to accept HCV NAT+ donor organs for transplantation in non-HCV-infected recipients began, Period 1 (October 27, 2015 to April 26, 2017) and Period 2 (April 27, 2017 to October 26, 2018). RESULTS: In Period 1, 57 of the 71 patients on the HTx waitlist were transplanted, whereas in Period 2, 57 of the 85 patients were transplanted. The median waitlist time to transplant decreased from 63.1 days in Period 1 to 34.1 days in Period 2 (p = 0.002). The transplant rate increased from 168.2 per 100 patient-years in Period 1 to 280.0 per 100 patient-years in Period 2 (incidence rate ratio 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3; p = 0.006). Waitlist mortality rate, hospital stay post-transplantation, and post-transplant mortality did not differ significantly between the time periods. Nineteen patients received HCV NAT+ donor hearts. The short-term post-transplant outcomes were similar between the recipients who received HCV NAT+ and HCV NAT- donor hearts. CONCLUSIONS: This single-center retrospective analysis suggests that the use of HCV NAT+ donor hearts may result in a reduced HTx waitlist time and an increased transplant rate. In addition, transplanting HCV NAT+ donor hearts into non-HCV-infected recipients, followed by DAAs, can provide acceptable short-term post-transplant outcomes.

The value of Stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplantation (SIPAT) in prediction of clinical outcomes following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

BACKGROUND: The Stanford integrated psychosocial assessment for transplantation (SIPAT) is a validated psychosocial evaluation tool in the transplant population. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated SIPAT in predicting post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) outcomes, including cumulative re-admissions, driveline infections, pump malfunction, pump thrombosis, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, stroke and right ventricular failure. METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 LVAD patients at an academic institution in the United States who had a pre-implant SIPAT score during the years 2015-2017. Patients were split into two groups based on SIPAT score, separating a "excellent"/"good" from a "minimally acceptable"/"poor" candidate. Poisson regression, using SIPAT as both a categorical and continuous variable, was used to compare the incidence rates of the primary outcome of cumulative re-admissions and secondary outcomes of LVAD complications. RESULTS: The patient cohort was predominantly male 93.5% vs 89.4% (p = 0.629) with a median age of 67.0 vs 58.0 years (p = 0.037), planned destination therapy 48.4% vs 68.4% (p = 0.242) and median LVAD follow-up time of 241 vs 379 days (p = 0.10) in the low- and high- SIPAT groups, respectively. SIPAT was not a significant predictor for cumulative re-admissions, but there was an association between higher SIPAT scores and major bleeding. CONCLUSION: In this single-center retrospective study, SIPAT did not predict cumulative re-admissions. Further study is required to validate SIPAT before clinical implementation.

Which advanced heart failure therapy strategy is optimal for patients over 60 years old?

BACKGROUND: The optimal advanced heart failure (HF) therapy strategy for patients aged 60 or older with end-stage HF refractory to optimal medical therapy remains uncertain. This study compares outcomes of three advanced HF therapy strategies in this patient population. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in 95 patients aged 60-73 years who had undergone isolated heart transplantation (HTx) or continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation from 2010 to 2017. Patients were stratified into three cohorts by strategy; HTx-only (N.=25), LVAD-to-HTx (N.=29), and LVAD-only (N.=41). Primary end point was 2-year overall survival. Secondary end points included incidence of post-operative adverse events, freedom from first readmission at 1 year, and percentage of days spent in hospital following advanced HF therapy. RESULTS: Two-year survival was 91% in HTx-only patients, 88% in LVAD-to-HTx patients, and 49% in LVAD-only patients (P=0.0008). No significant difference in post-transplant survival was found between patients with or without LVAD-related adverse events preceding transplantation (P=0.42). One-year freedom from first readmission was 38.3% in HTx-only patients, 17.2% in LVAD-to-HTx patients and 7.3% in LVAD-only patients (P=0.0028). Patients in LVAD-to-HTx cohort had higher incidences of gastrointestinal bleeding (38% vs. 3%; P<0.01), major bleeding (28% vs. 3%; P=0.02), and right heart failure (69% vs. 31%; P<0.01) during post-LVAD period compared with post-HTx period. Their percentage of days spent in hospital during post-LVAD period was significantly higher than post-HTx period (7.9% vs. 1.2%; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with patients over 60 years old undergoing advanced therapy suggests that HTx-only and LVAD-to-HTx strategies had superior medium-term survival than LVAD-only strategy. LVAD-to-HTx strategy is effective in reducing incidence of adverse events and percentage of hospitalized days in this specific patient population.

The use of cangrelor with heparin for left ventricular assist device implantation in a patient with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: Optimal anticoagulation strategy for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in end-stage heart failure patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requiring left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains uncertain. Presently, there are no large-scale randomized studies comparing outcomes of alternative anticoagulation strategies for CPB in this patient population. A novel antiplatelet agent - cangrelor, which is a potent P2Y12 inhibitor with robust antiplatelet efficacy, rapid reversibility, and measurable drug effect, has become available since 2015. Intraoperative anticoagulation for CPB using cangrelor with heparin has not been reported before. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 47-year-old male with ischemic cardiomyopathy and acute HIT, who underwent an urgent LVAD implantation using cangrelor with heparin for anticoagulation on CPB. This novel strategy resulted in satisfactory anticoagulation for CPB without perioperative thromboembolic events or major bleeding requiring reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Cangrelor with heparin was an effective anticoagulation strategy for CPB in this critically ill patient with acute HIT requiring an urgent LVAD implantation. Further studies are warranted to evaluate its efficacy and replicability in other patients with acute or subacute HIT who require urgent cardiac surgery.