Uncovering Subtle Gait Deterioration in People with Early-Stage Multiple Sclerosis Using Inertial Sensors: A 2-Year Multicenter Longitudinal Study.

Limited longitudinal studies have been conducted on gait impairment progression overtime in non-disabled people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). Therefore, a deeper understanding of gait changes with the progression of the disease is essential. The objective of the present study was to describe changes in gait quality in PwMS with a disease duration ≤ 5 years, and to verify whether a change in gait quality is associated with a change in disability and perception of gait deterioration. We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study. Fifty-six subjects were assessed at baseline (age: 38.2 ± 10.7 years, Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS): 1.5 ± 0.7 points) and after 2 years, participants performed the six-minute walk test (6MWT) wearing inertial sensors. Quality of gait (regularity, symmetry, and instability), disability (EDSS), and walking perception (multiple sclerosis walking scale-12, MSWS-12) were collected. We found no differences on EDSS, 6MWT, and MSWS-12 between baseline and follow-up. A statistically significant correlation between increased EDSS scores and increased gait instability was found in the antero-posterior (AP) direction (r = 0.34, p = 0.01). Seventeen subjects (30%) deteriorated (increase of at least 0.5 point at EDSS) over 2 years. A multivariate analysis on deteriorated PwMS showed that changes in gait instability medio-lateral (ML) and stride regularity, and changes in ML gait symmetry were significantly associated with changes in EDSS (F = 7.80 (3,13), p = 0.003, R2 = 0.56). Moreover, gait changes were associated with a decrease in PwMS perception on stability (p < 0.05). Instrumented assessment can detect subtle changes in gait stability, regularity, and symmetry not revealed during EDSS neurological assessment. Moreover, instrumented changes in gait quality impact on subjects' perception of gait during activities of daily living.

Balance Impairments in People with Early-Stage Multiple Sclerosis: Boosting the Integration of Instrumented Assessment in Clinical Practice.

The balance of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) is commonly assessed during neurological examinations through clinical Romberg and tandem gait tests that are often not sensitive enough to unravel subtle deficits in early-stage PwMS. Inertial sensors (IMUs) could overcome this drawback. Nevertheless, IMUs are not yet fully integrated into clinical practice due to issues including the difficulty to understand/interpret the big number of parameters provided and the lack of cut-off values to identify possible abnormalities. In an attempt to overcome these limitations, an instrumented modified Romberg test (ImRomberg: standing on foam with eyes closed while wearing an IMU on the trunk) was administered to 81 early-stage PwMS and 38 healthy subjects (HS). To facilitate clinical interpretation, 21 IMU-based parameters were computed and reduced through principal component analysis into two components, sway complexity and sway intensity, descriptive of independent aspects of balance, presenting a clear clinical meaning and significant correlations with at least one clinical scale. Compared to HS, early-stage PwMS showed a 228% reduction in sway complexity and a 63% increase in sway intensity, indicating, respectively, a less automatic (more conscious) balance control and larger and faster trunk movements during upright posture. Cut-off values were derived to identify the presence of balance abnormalities and if these abnormalities are clinically meaningful. By applying these thresholds and integrating the ImRomberg test with the clinical tandem gait test, balance impairments were identified in 58% of PwMS versus the 17% detected by traditional Romberg and tandem gait tests. The higher sensitivity of the proposed approach would allow for the direct identification of early-stage PwMS who could benefit from preventive rehabilitation interventions aimed at slowing MS-related functional decline during neurological examinations and with minimal modifications to the tests commonly performed.

Instrumentally assessed gait quality is more relevant than gait endurance and velocity to explain patient-reported walking ability in early-stage multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: People with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) often report walking limitations even when the gold standard Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) indicates normal walking endurance/autonomy. The present multicenter study on early-stage PwMS aims at analyzing which aspects are associated with patient-reported walking limitations measured with the 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12). METHODS: Eighty-two PwMS (EDSS ≤ 2.5) were assessed using the Fullerton Advanced Balance Scale-short (FAB-s), the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the 6-min Walk Test (6MWT), the latter administered also to 21 healthy subjects. Participants performed the 6MWT wearing three inertial sensors on ankles and trunk. Instrumented metrics describing gait velocity (stride length and frequency) and quality (regularity, symmetry, instability) were computed from sensor data. Fatigue (FSS), balance (FAB-s), walking endurance (6MWT) and instrumented metrics were entered in a multiple regression model with MSWS-12 as dependent variable. RESULTS: Gait symmetry, gait instability, fatigue and balance were significantly associated with self-rated walking ability, whilst walking endurance and velocity were not. Fatigue, balance, gait symmetry and instability were more impaired in participants reporting mild-to-moderate (MSMM-PWL , 25 ≤ MSWS-12 < 75) compared to those reporting none-to-minimal (MSnm-PWL , 0 ≤ MSWS-12 ≤ 25) perceived walking limitations. Compared to healthy subjects, gait symmetry and stability were reduced in MSnm-PWL and MSMM-PWL , even in those participants with EDSS ≤ 1.5. CONCLUSION: Instrumentally assessed gait quality aspects (symmetry and instability) are associated with patient-reported walking ability in early-stage PwMS and seem sensitive biomarkers to detect subtle impairments even in the earliest stages of the disease (EDSS ≤ 1.5). Future studies should assess their ability to follow walking change due to MS progression or pharmacological/rehabilitation interventions.

Wearable Devices for Biofeedback Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Design Application Rules and Estimate the Effectiveness on Balance and Gait Outcomes in Neurological Diseases.

Wearable devices are used in rehabilitation to provide biofeedback about biomechanical or physiological body parameters to improve outcomes in people with neurological diseases. This is a promising approach that influences motor learning and patients' engagement. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear what the most commonly used sensor configurations are, and it is also not clear which biofeedback components are used for which pathology. To explore these aspects and estimate the effectiveness of wearable device biofeedback rehabilitation on balance and gait, we conducted a systematic review by electronic search on MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, PEDro, and the Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to January 2020. Nineteen randomized controlled trials were included (Parkinson's n = 6; stroke n = 13; mild cognitive impairment n = 1). Wearable devices mostly provided real-time biofeedback during exercise, using biomechanical sensors and a positive reinforcement feedback strategy through auditory or visual modes. Some notable points that could be improved were identified in the included studies; these were helpful in providing practical design rules to maximize the prospective of wearable device biofeedback rehabilitation. Due to the current quality of the literature, it was not possible to achieve firm conclusions about the effectiveness of wearable device biofeedback rehabilitation. However, wearable device biofeedback rehabilitation seems to provide positive effects on dynamic balance and gait for PwND, but higher-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed for stronger conclusions.

Is a Wearable Sensor-Based Characterisation of Gait Robust Enough to Overcome Differences Between Measurement Protocols? A Multi-Centric Pragmatic Study in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) allow accurate quantification of gait impairment of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Nonetheless, it is not clear how IMU-based metrics might be influenced by pragmatic aspects associated with clinical translation of this approach, such as data collection settings and gait protocols. In this study, we hypothesised that these aspects do not significantly alter those characteristics of gait that are more related to quality and energetic efficiency and are quantifiable via acceleration related metrics, such as intensity, smoothness, stability, symmetry, and regularity. To test this hypothesis, we compared 33 IMU-based metrics extracted from data, retrospectively collected by two independent centres on two matched cohorts of pwMS. As a worst-case scenario, a walking test was performed in the two centres at a different speed along corridors of different lengths, using different IMU systems, which were also positioned differently. The results showed that the majority of the temporal metrics (9 out of 12) exhibited significant between-centre differences. Conversely, the between-centre differences in the gait quality metrics were small and comparable to those associated with a test-retest analysis under equivalent conditions. Therefore, the gait quality metrics are promising candidates for reliable multi-centric studies aiming at assessing rehabilitation interventions within a routine clinical context.

Prediction of Falls in Subjects Suffering From Parkinson Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, and Stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of falls and fall predictors in patients with Parkinson disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and stroke using the same study design. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study. SETTING: Institutions for physical therapy and rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=299) with PD (n=94), MS (n=111), and stroke (n=94) seen for rehabilitation. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Functional scales were applied to investigate balance, disability, daily performance, self-confidence with balance, and social integration. Patients were followed for 6 months. Telephone interviews were organized at 2, 4, and 6 months to record falls and fall-related injuries. Incidence ratios, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used. RESULTS: Of the 299 patients enrolled, 259 had complete follow-up. One hundred and twenty-two patients (47.1%) fell at least once; 82 (31.7%) were recurrent fallers and 44 (17.0%) suffered injuries; and 16%, 32%, and 40% fell at 2, 4, and 6 months. Risk of falls was associated with disease type (PD, MS, and stroke in decreasing order) and confidence with balance (Activities-specific Balance Confidence [ABC] scale). Recurrent fallers were 7%, 15%, and 24% at 2, 4, and 6 months. The risk of recurrent falls was associated with disease type, high educational level, and ABC score. Injured fallers were 3%, 8%, and 12% at 2, 4, and 6 months. The only predictor of falls with injuries was disease type (PD). CONCLUSIONS: PD, MS, and stroke carry a high risk of falls. Other predictors include perceived balance confidence and high educational level.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Berg Balance Scale in People With Multiple Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to define clinically meaningful patient's improvement on the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) in response to rehabilitation. DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: Neurorehabilitation institute. PARTICIPANTS: PwMS (N=110). INTERVENTIONS: This study comprised inpatients and outpatients who participated in research on balance and gait rehabilitation. All received 20 rehabilitation sessions with different intensities. Inpatients received daily treatments over a period of 4 weeks, while outpatients received 2 to 3 treatments per week for 10 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: An anchor-based approach using clinical global impression of improvement in balance (Activities-specific Balance Confidence [ABC] Scale) was used to determine the MCID of the BBS. The MCID was defined as the minimum change in the BBS total score (postintervention - preintervention) that was needed to perceive at least a 10% improvement on the ABC Scale. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to define the cutoff of the optimal MCID of the BBS discriminating between improved and not improved subjects. RESULTS: The MCID for change on the BBS was 3 points for the whole sample, 3 points for the inpatients, and 2 points for the outpatients. The area under the curve was .65 for the whole sample, .64 for inpatients, and .68 for outpatients. CONCLUSIONS: The MCID for improvement in balance as measured by the BBS was 3 points, meaning that PwMS are likely to perceive that as a reproducible and clinically important change in their balance performance.

Efficacy of telerehabilitation with digital and robotic tools for the continuity of care of people with chronic neurological disorders: The TELENEURO@REHAB protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Context: Chronic Neurological Disorders (CNDs) are among the leading causes of disability worldwide, and their contribution to the overall need for rehabilitation is increasing. Therefore, the identification of new digital solutions to ensure early and continuous care is mandatory. Objective: This protocol proposes to test the usability, acceptability, safety, and efficacy of Telerehabilitation (TR) protocols with digital and robotic tools in reducing the perceived level of disability in CNDs including Parkinson's Disease (PD), Multiple Sclerosis (MS), and post-stroke patients. Design Setting and Subjects: This single-blinded, multi-site, randomized, two-treatment arms controlled clinical trial will involve PD (N = 30), MS (N = 30), and post-stroke (N = 30). Each participant will be randomized (1:1) to the experimental group (20 sessions of motor telerehabilitation with digital and robotic tools) or the active control group (20 home-based motor rehabilitation sessions according to the usual care treatment). Primary and secondary outcome measures will be obtained at the baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1, 5 weeks after baseline), and at follow-up (T2, 2 months after treatment). Main Outcome Measures: a multifaceted evaluation including quality of life, motor, and clinical/functional measures will be conducted at each time-point of assessment. The primary outcome measures will be the change in the perceived level of disability as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Conclusion: The implementation of TR protocols will enable a more targeted and effective response to the growing need for rehabilitation linked to CNDs, ensuring accessibility to rehabilitation services from the initial stages of the disease.

Validity of 2 Fall Prevention Strategy Scales for People With Stroke, Parkinson's Disease, and Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls are a common and persistent concern among people with neurological disorders (PwND), as they frequently result in mobility deficits and may lead to loss of functional independence. This study investigated the ceiling and floor effects, internal consistency, and convergent validity of 2 patient-reported fall prevention strategy scales in PwND. METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study. Two-hundred and ninety-nine PwND (111 people with multiple sclerosis, 94 people with Parkinson's disease, and 94 people with stroke) were seen for rehabilitation and assessed. The number of retrospective and prospective falls, use of walking assistive devices, scores on the Fall Prevention Strategy Survey (FPSS), Falls Behavioural Scale (FaB), and balance and mobility scales (Berg Balance Scale, Dynamic Gait Index, Timed Up and Go, 10-m walking test, and Activities-specific Balance Confidence) were analyzed. RESULTS: Total score distributions showed negligible ceiling and floor effects for both the FPSS (ceiling: 0.3%, floor: 0.3%) and the FaB (ceiling: 0%, floor: 0%). The Cronbach α (CI) was of 0.87 (0.85-0.89) for the FPSS and 0.86 (0.84-0.88) for the FaB. In terms of convergent validity, the FPSS and FaB were moderately correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.65). Moreover, the correlations between the FPSS and FaB and balance and mobility scales ranged from 0.25 to 0.49 ( P < .01). Both scales are slightly better able to distinguish between retrospective fallers/nonfallers [area under the curve, AUC (95% CI): FPSS: 0.61 (0.5-0.7); FaB: 0.60 (0.5-0.6)] compared with prospective fallers/nonfallers [AUC (95% CI): FPSS: 0.56 (0.4-0.6); FaB: 0.57 (0.4-0.6)]. Both scales accurately identified individuals who typically required the use of a walking assistive device for daily ambulation [AUC (95% CI): FPSS: 0.74 (0.7-0.8); FaB: 0.69 (0.6-0.7)]. Multiple regression analysis showed that previous falls, use of an assistive device, and balance confidence significantly predicted participants' prevention strategies (FPSS: R2 = 0.31, F(8,159) = 10.5, P < .01; FaB: R2 = 0.31, F(8,164) = 10.89, P < .01). CONCLUSION: The FPSS and the FaB appear to be valid tools to assess fall prevention strategies in people with neurological disorders. Both scales provide unique and added value in providing information on individual behavior for fall prevention.

Dynamic balance during walking in people with multiple sclerosis: A cross-sectional study.

Dynamic balance disorders are common impairments in People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) leading to gait disorders and a higher risk of falling. However, the assessment of dynamic balance is still challenging and instrumented indexes provide objective and quantitative data of CoM movement and Base of Support, which are considered that are two key factors describing dynamic balance. This study aims at validating recent instrumented indexes based on the inverted pendulum model and characterizing dynamic balance disorders in PwMS. We clinically assessed 20 PwMS and we collected instrumented gait data through an optoelectronic system. Data from 20 Healthy Subjects (HS) were also considered as normative reference. Margin of Stability by HoF (MoS_Hof) and by Terry (MoS_Terry) at midstance, and Foot Placement Estimator (DFPE) at heel strike were calculated in mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions, for both less affected and most affected sides for PwMS and for dominant and non-dominant side for HS. MoS_HOF well discriminated between PwMS and HS, followed by MoS_TERRY in ML direction (Mos_HOF: PwMS = 130.0 ± 27.2 mm, HS = 106.5 ± 18.6 mm, p < 0.001, MoS_TERRY: PwMS = 75.1 ± 24.3 mm, HS = 56.5 ± 23.4 mm, p < 0.02). MoS_HOF and MoS_TERRY discriminated between sides in both directions in PwMS. DFPE did not discriminate between groups and sides. Moderate correlations were found between all three indexes and clinical balance scales (from r = 0.02 to r = 0.66), energy recovery (from r = -0.77 to r = -0.11), single stance time (from r = -0.11 to r = 0.80) and step length (from r = -0.83 to r = -0.20). MoS_HOF resulted in the best index to describe dynamic balance disorders in PwMS: they keep CoM position far from the lateral and as close as possible to the anterior boundary of the Base of Support as preventive strategies to control balance perturbations. Furthermore, PwMS seem to use different preventive strategies in accordance with the specific lower limb impairments. This alters the physiological gait mechanisms increasing the energy expenditure and decreasing gait quality and dynamic balance.

Complementary use of statistical parametric mapping and gait profile score to describe walking alterations in multiple sclerosis: a cross-sectional study.

Gait analysis is often used to study locomotor alterations in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), but the large number of extracted variables challenges the interpretability. In this paper, we analysed gait alterations by combining the Gait Profile Score (GPS), which summarizes kinematic locomotor deviations, and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM), which compares kinematics and kinetics over the whole gait cycle. Eleven PwMS and 11 speed-matched Healthy Controls (HC) underwent overground gait analysis. GPS were compared through independent-samples t-tests; sagittal-plane kinematics and power at hip, knee, and ankle were compared through SPM Hotelling's-T2 and SPM t-tests. Spearman's correlation coefficients (r) between GPS and clinical outcomes were also calculated. PwMS had higher GPS than HC (PwMS = 8.74 ± 2.13°; HC = 5.01 ± 1.41°;p < 0.001). Multivariate SPM found statistically significant differences at 0-49%, 70-80%, and 93-99% of stride (p < 0.05) and univariate analysis showed reduced ankle dorsiflexion, and lower knee flexion during pre-swing and swing. GPS correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (r = 0.65; 95%C.I.[0.04,0.91]; p = 0.04) and 2-Minute Walking Test (r = -0.65; 95%C.I.[-0.91,-0.04]; p = 0.04). GPS in conjunction with SPM revealed multi-joint kinematic alterations on sagittal plane involving distal joint angles, ankle and knee, during the stance phase with no changes at the proximal level. Gait deviations were more pronounced in PwMS with higher disability and walking limitations.

Mobility and balance rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits of neurological rehabilitation and the dose-response relationship for the treatment of mobility and balance in multiple sclerosis. METHODS: We included studies investigating the effects of neurological rehabilitation on mobility and balance with the following eligibility criteria for inclusion: Population, People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS); Intervention, method of rehabilitation interventions; Comparison, experimental (specific balance intervention) vs control (no intervention/no specific balance intervention); Outcome, balance clinical scales; Study Design, randomised controlled trials. We conducted a random effects dose-response meta-analysis to assess linear trend estimations and a one stage linear mixed effects meta-regression for estimating dose-response curves. RESULTS: We retrieved 196 studies from a list of 5020 for full text review and 71 studies (n subjects=3306) were included. One study was a cross-over and 70 studies were randomized controlled trials and the mean sample size per study was 46.5 ± 28.6 (mean±SD) with a mean age of 48.3 ± 7.8years, disease duration of 11.6 ± 6.1years, and EDSS of 4.4 ± 1.4points. Twenty-nine studies (40.8%) had the balance outcome as the primary outcome, while 42 studies (59.1%) had balance as secondary outcome or did not specify primary and secondary outcomes. Thirty-three trials (46.5%) had no active intervention as comparator and 38 trials (53.5%) had an active control group. Individual level data from 20 studies (n subjects=1016) were analyzed showing a medium pooled effect size for balance interventions (SMD=0.41; 95% CIs 0.22 to 0.59). Moreover, we analyzed 14 studies (n subjects=696) having balance as primary outcome and BBS as primary endpoint yielding a mean difference of 3.58 points (95% CIs 1.79 to 5.38, p<0.0001). Finally, we performed meta regression of the 20 studies showing an association between better outcome, log of intensity defined as minutes per session (ß=1.26; SEß=0.51; p = 0.02) and task-oriented intervention (ß=0.38; SEß=0.17; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our analyses provide level 1 evidence on the effect of balance intervention to improve mobility. Furthermore, according to principles of neurological rehabilitation, high intensity and task-specific interventions are associated with better treatment outcomes.

Machine learning based estimation of dynamic balance and gait adaptability in persons with neurological diseases using inertial sensors.

Poor dynamic balance and impaired gait adaptation to different contexts are hallmarks of people with neurological disorders (PwND), leading to difficulties in daily life and increased fall risk. Frequent assessment of dynamic balance and gait adaptability is therefore essential for monitoring the evolution of these impairments and/or the long-term effects of rehabilitation. The modified dynamic gait index (mDGI) is a validated clinical test specifically devoted to evaluating gait facets in clinical settings under a physiotherapist's supervision. The need of a clinical environment, consequently, limits the number of assessments. Wearable sensors are increasingly used to measure balance and locomotion in real-world contexts and may permit an increase in monitoring frequency. This study aims to provide a preliminary test of this opportunity by using nested cross-validated machine learning regressors to predict the mDGI scores of 95 PwND via inertial signals collected from short steady-state walking bouts derived from the 6-minute walk test. Four different models were compared, one for each pathology (multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, and stroke) and one for the pooled multipathological cohort. Model explanations were computed on the best-performing solution; the model trained on the multipathological cohort yielded a median (interquartile range) absolute test error of 3.58 (5.38) points. In total, 76% of the predictions were within the mDGI's minimal detectable change of 5 points. These results confirm that steady-state walking measurements provide information about dynamic balance and gait adaptability and can help clinicians identify important features to improve upon during rehabilitation. Future developments will include training of the method using short steady-state walking bouts in real-world settings, analysing the feasibility of this solution to intensify performance monitoring, providing prompt detection of worsening/improvements, and complementing clinical assessments.

Physical activity in non-disabled people with early multiple sclerosis: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: People with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS) show low levels of physical activity (PA), however there has been limited research on PA in early diagnosed and no/minimally impaired (<5 years, EDSS≤ 2.5) PwMS. The aims of the study were to objectively quantify PA levels in non-disabled PwMS, to compare the time spent daily at different PA levels (No activity (NPA), Light PA (LPA), Moderate PA (MPA), and Vigorous PA (VPA)) with healthy subjects (HS), and to examine the association of PA with disability, and clinical measures in PwMS. METHODS: We assessed 58 PwMS (mean age±standard deviation, SD 39.1 ± 10.6years) and 20 HS (mean age±SD 39.3 ± 8.9 years). Demographic and clinical data were recorded at the hospital during the baseline assessment. Subjects wore the wrist GENEActiv accelerometer for 7-days. Data were collected at 100 Hz and summarized into a motor activity (MA) index using 60 s epochs with the following thresholds: MANPA-LPA: 10mG, MALPA-MPA: 100mG, MAMPA-VPA: 350mG. RESULTS: PwMS show higher NPA and lower VPA compared to matched healthy subjects (NPA: Mean±SD, HS: 7.2 ± 0.9 h/day; PwMS: 8.1 ± 1.2 h/day, p<0.01; VPA: HS: 0.78± 0.42 h/day; PwMS: 0.50± 0.40 h/day, p = 0.01), while no between group differences were observed for LPA and MPA (p>0.05). Bivariate analysis showed that higher NPA was associated with fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale, FSS score) in PwMS with EDSS 0-1.5 (r = 0.34, p = 0.05). In PwMS with EDSS 2-2.5, NPA was correlated with Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT, r=-0.45, p = 0.02) and CIQ (r=-0.41, p = 0.04), while VPA was more associated with FSS (R= -0.38, p = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The PA level of PwMS differs from that of healthy subjects even in early diagnosed subjects. In PwMS with EDSS 0-1.5 only, fatigue is associated to prolonged inactive behavior. Conversely, in PwMS with EDSS 2-2.5 both inactivity and vigorous activities are modulated by fatigue, endurance and associated with different level of social participation.

Acute Thermoregulatory and Cardiovascular Response to Submaximal Exercise in People With Multiple Sclerosis.

Background: Heat sensitivity occurs in a high percentage of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), in response to environmental or exercise-induced increase in body temperature. However, the kinetic and magnitude of adaptation of the internal load and of the core body temperature (CBT) to a submaximal continuous exercise has been poorly addressed in PwMS; this may be relevant for the brief exercise bouts usually occurring in normal daily life. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether multiple sclerosis influences the acute adaptation of the internal load, the CBT and the perceptual load in response to a constant submaximal work step. Methods: CBT has been continuously monitored (0.5 Hz) by a validated wearable heat-flux sensor and electrocardiography was recorded (250 Hz) by a wearable device during a standard 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in 14 PwMS (EDSS, 4.7 ± 1.2; disease duration: 13.0 ± 10.2 years; m ± SD) and 14 age, sex and BMI-matched healthy subjects (HS). The rate of perceived exertion (RPE) of the lower limbs was assessed during the 6MWT by the Borg scale (6-20). Results: As expected, PwMS walked a significantly shorter distance (361 ± 98 m) than the HS group (613 ± 62 m, p<0.001 vs PwMS). However, the kinetics of adaptation of CBT and the magnitude of CBT change from baseline did not differ between groups. Similarly, heart rate (HR) kinetics and HR change from baseline were comparable between groups during the 6MWT. Finally, lower limbs RPE gradually increased during the exercise test, but without significant differences between groups. Conclusion: The internal load, the metabolic heat production, and the perceptive load due to a standard submaximal walking exercise seems to be preserved in PwMS, suggesting a comparable acute heat production and dissipation during exercise. Therefore, it is unlikely that the different distance achieved during the 6MWT may be caused by altered thermoregulatory responses to exercise. Rather, this appears to be a consequence of the known increased energy cost of locomotion in PwMS.

Identification of modified dynamic gait index cutoff scores for assessing fall risk in people with Parkinson disease, stroke and multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Balance and gait impairments increase fall rate and injury in people with neurological disorders(PwND). The modified Dynamic Gait Index(mDGI) is a scale assessing dynamic balance during walking, however its ability in identifying Fallers and Recurrent Fallers has not been studied. RESEARCH QUESTION: To evaluate mDGI's ability in identifying retrospective Fallers and Recurrent Fallers establishing cut-off scores for its use in clinical practice. METHOD: In this cross-sectional study, the number of retrospective falls and mDGI scores were collected. PwND were categorised as Non-Fallers or Fallers (falls≥1) and as Recurrent Fallers(falls≥2) or Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers(falls<2) according to their number of retrospective falls over two months. Two generalised linear logistic models were developed using a machine learning method to detect Fallers (Model 1) and Recurrent Fallers (Model 2) based on mDGI scores. ROC curves were used to identify mDGI cut-off scores to distinguish between different fall categories. RESULTS: 58 PwND (mean ± standard deviation age: 63.4 ± 12 years) including 28 people with Multiple Sclerosis, 15 people with Parkinson's disease and 15 people with Stroke were analysed. The mDGI score(median (IQR)) for Non-Fallers, Fallers, Recurrent Fallers and Non-Recurrent/Non-Fallers was respectively 50(22), 37(22), 26.5(20.25) and 46.5(20.5)points. The cut-off to identify Fallers from Non-Fallers was 49 points(sensitivity:100 %, specificity:50 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off: 53.2 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off: 0%, AUC:0.68), while 29 points(sensitivity:60 %, specificity:79 %, post-test probability with mDGI ≤ cut-off:52.1 %, post-test probability with mDGI > cut-off:16.1 %, AUC:0.70) was the best cut-off to identify Recurrent Fallers. SIGNIFICANCE: People with mDGI score>49 points have low or minimal fall risk, while people with mDGI score≤49 points should be further investigated with other scales before starting a balance-focused rehabilitation intervention. People scoring ≤29 points on the mDGI scale may need a fall prevention intervention, regardless of the results of other balance clinical measures.

Prevalence and patterns of subclinical motor and cognitive impairments in non-disabled individuals with early multiple sclerosis: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Motor and cognitive disorders appear early in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS) and develop gradually over time. OBJECTIVE: To study the frequency and pattern of subtle functional disorders in people with MS (PwMS) with no overt signs of disability in an early phase of the disease and their association with walking impairments in daily activities. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we recruited PwMS with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score≤2.5 and disease duration≤5years. Participants were assessed with functional scales rating walking endurance (6-Min Walk Test), perceived walking ability (Twelve-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale), balance (Fullerton Advanced Balance scale_short), manual dexterity (Nine Hole Peg Test), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale), and cognitive impairments (Brief International Cognitive Assessment). RESULTS: About 90% of the 82 PwMS (mean [SD] EDSS score 1.5 [0.7] and disease duration 2.2 [1.7] years) showed endurance values below the expected score; almost 30% showed impairment, and for 57%, perceived walking ability score was abnormal. Balance was impaired in 48% of participants, as was manual dexterity (29%) and fatigue (24%), but only a few showed cognitive impairments. Only 11% of PwMS had no abnormal score on the scales used in the assessment. As compared with EDSS score 0 to 1.5, with EDSS score 2 to 2.5, performance was worse for endurance (difference±61.0m, P=0.016), perceived walking ability (-11 points, P=0.002), balance (+1.9 points, P=0.005), manual dexterity (-2.8 s, P=0.004), and fatigue (-1.3 points, P=0.013). Factors that predicted perceived walking ability were balance (B=-1.37, P<0.001) and fatigue (B=5.11, P<0.001) rather than endurance (B=-0.01, P=048). CONCLUSION: Even PwMS with no clinical disability and classified as having "no problem walking" present walking and other functional deficits when assessed with specific functional tests. The addition of specific tools could better identify subtle motor and cognitive deficits. Finally, the assessment of balance disorders and fatigue is important to understand individuals' perceived walking impairments in daily activities.

Strategies for maintaining dynamic balance in persons with neurological disorders during overground walking.

Maintaining a stable gait requires a dynamic balance control, that can be altered in persons with Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Stroke (ST), and Parkinson's disease (PD). The understanding of the strategy for Center of Mass (CoM) positioning adopted by patients during walking is important to be able to program treatments aimed at improving gait control and preventing falls. Forty-four persons with a mild-to-moderate neurological disorder (20 with MS, 14 with ST, 10 with PD) underwent clinical examination and gait analysis. Ten Healthy Subjects (HS) walking at matched speed provided the normative data. Dynamic balance was assessed using the margin of stability (MoS). It was calculated as the distance between the extrapolated Center of Pressure and the extrapolated CoM at mid-stance. The MoS values for lower limbs were calculated in patients and compared with speed-matched values of HS. Persons with neurological disorder showed increased MoS in the medio-lateral direction with respect to HS. Within-group comparison analysis showed a symmetry between lower limbs in HS (Mean (95%CI) [mm], dominant vs non-dominant limb, 43.3 (31.9-54.6) vs 42.9 (28.8-56.9)) and PD (less affected vs more affected limb, 71.1 (59.8-82.5) vs 72.5 (58.5-86.6)), while a significant asymmetry was found in MS (54.4 (46.4-62.4) vs 81.1 (71.2-91.1)) and ST (52.1 (42.6-61.7) vs 74.7 (62.8-86.6)) participants. The history of falls was comparable among PD, MS, and ST groups, and the MoS in the frontal plane showed a strong correlation with these records. Objective assessment of MoS revealed pathology-specific strategies showing different impacts in MS, ST, and PD on the ability to control CoM information to manage the balance between limbs during gait. MoS evaluation will provide useful information to address a tailored rehabilitation program and to monitor disease progression.