Patient-related risk factors for in-hospital functional decline in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Functional decline (FD) is a common and serious problem among hospitalised older adults. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to identify patient-related risk factors for in-hospital FD in older adults. METHODS: Previous reviews on this topic (1970-2007) and the databases PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL (January 2007-December 2020) were searched. Reference lists of included articles were screened. Studies investigating patient-related risk factors for FD from (pre)admission to discharge in older adults admitted to an acute geriatric or internal medical unit were included. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using random-effects models. The quality of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies met the inclusion criteria. Statistically significant risk factors were living in a nursing home (OR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.29-4.52), impairment in instrumental activities of daily living (OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.51-2.86), history of falls (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.00-2.92), cognitive impairment (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.56-2.14), dementia (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.23-2.38), delirium (OR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.88-2.93), (risk of) malnutrition (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.03-3.03), hypoalbuminemia (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.36-2.36), comorbidity (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.03-1.16), and the presence of pressure ulcers (OR, 3.33; 95% CI, 1.82-6.09). The narrative synthesis suggested prehospital FD, needing assistance with walking, and low body mass index as additional risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Several patient-related risk factors for in-hospital FD were identified that can be used at hospital admission to identify older patients at risk of FD.

Flanders Nursing Home (FLANH) project: Protocol of a multicenter longitudinal observational study on staffing, work environment, rationing of care, and resident and care worker outcomes.

BACKGROUND: While the demand for high quality of care in nursing homes is rising, it is becoming increasingly difficult to recruit and retain qualified care workers. To date, evidence regarding key organizational factors such as staffing, work environment, and rationing of care, and their relationship with resident and care worker outcomes in nursing homes is still scarce. Therefore, the Flanders Nursing Home (FLANH) project aims to comprehensively examine these relationships in order to contribute to the scientific knowledge base needed for optimal quality of care and workforce planning in nursing homes. METHODS: FLANH is a multicenter longitudinal observational study in Flemish nursing homes based on survey and registry data that will be collected in 2023 and 2025. Nursing home characteristics and staffing variables will be collected through a management survey, while work environment variables, rationing of care, and care worker characteristics and outcomes will be collected through a care worker survey. Resident characteristics and outcomes will be retrieved from the Belgian Resident Assessment Instrument for long-Term Care Facilities (BelRAI LTCF) database. Multilevel regression analyses will be applied to examine the relationships between staffing variables, work environment variables, and rationing of care and resident and care worker outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study will contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the nursing home context and the interrelated factors influencing residents and care workers. The findings will inform the decision-making of nursing home managers and policymakers, and evidence-based strategies to optimize quality of care and workforce planning in nursing homes.

Identifying vulnerable older adults at risk for functional decline in cardiac care wards: time to shift the paradigm.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether routine screening with the Flemish version of the Triage Risk Screening Tool (fTRST) is a valid approach to determine which patients on cardiac care wards are at risk for inhospital functional decline and would benefit from geriatric expertise consultation. METHODS: A secondary data-analysis of the G-COACH before-cohort, describing patient profiles and routine care processes, in 189 older adults on two cardiac care wards in the University Hospitals Leuven between September 2016 and June 2017. Inhospital functional decline was defined as an increase of at least one point on the Katz Index of Activities of Daily Living or death between hospital admission and discharge. RESULTS: Nine in 10 patients had at least one geriatric syndrome and one-third developed functional decline. Based on the fTRST proposed cut-off of ≥2, 156 (82.5%) patients were at risk for functional decline (sensitivity of 95.2%, specificity of 23.8%, negative predictive value of 90.9% and Area Under the Curve of 0.60). Of the 156 'at risk' patients, 43 (27.6%) received a consultation by the geriatric consultation team after a median of four hospitalization days. A positive fTRST was not significantly related to geriatric consultations (x2 = 0.57; p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: The fTRST has a low discriminative value in identifying older cardiology patients at risk for functional decline. Given the high prevalence of geriatric syndromes, we propose a new paradigm were all older adults on cardiac care wards undergo a needs assessment upon hospital admission.

Geriatric care for surgical patients: results and reflections from a cross-sectional survey in acute Belgian hospitals.

PURPOSE: To explore geriatric care for surgical patients in Belgian hospitals and geriatricians' reflections on current practice. METHODS: A web-based survey was developed based on literature review and local expertise, and was pretested with 4 participants. In June 2021, the 27-question survey was sent to 91 heads of geriatrics departments. Descriptive statistics and thematic analysis were performed. RESULTS: Fifty-four surveys were completed, corresponding to a response rate of 59%. Preoperative geriatric risk screening is performed in 25 hospitals and systematically followed by geriatric assessment in 17 hospitals. During the perioperative hospitalisation, 91% of geriatric teams provide non-medical and 82% provide medical advice. To a lesser extent, they provide geriatric protocols, geriatric education and training, and attend multidisciplinary team meetings. Overall, time allocation of geriatric teams goes mainly to postoperative evaluations and interventions, rather than to preoperative assessment and care planning. Most surgical patients are hospitalised on surgical wards, with reactive (73%) or proactive (46%) geriatric consultation. In 36 hospitals, surgical patients are also admitted on geriatric wards, predominantly orthopaedic/trauma, abdominal and vascular surgery. Ninety-eight per cent of geriatricians feel that more geriatric input for surgical patients is needed. The most common reported barriers to further implement geriatric-surgical services are shortage of geriatricians and geriatric nurses, and unadjusted legislation and financing. CONCLUSION: Geriatric care for surgical patients in Belgian hospitals is mainly reactive, although geriatricians favour more proactive services. The main opportunities and challenges for improvement are to resolve staff shortages in the geriatric work field and to update legislation and financing.