The impact of body mass index and height on risk for primary tumours of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves in 1.7 million norwegian women and men: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Primary tumours of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves comprise a heterogenous group of pathology, dominantly represented by meningioma, nerve sheath tumours (NST) and glioma. Body height and body mass index (BMI) are risk factors for certain brain tumour subgroups, but no other study has specifically assessed height and BMI in relation to primary tumours of the spine and peripheral nerves in women and men. METHODS: In this prospective population-based cohort study height and weight were measured in 1.7 million adult Norwegian women and men at baseline. Incident cases of primary tumours arising from the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves during follow-up were identified by linkage to the National Cancer Registry. Tumour risk was assessed by Cox regression analyses in relation to height and BMI. RESULTS: During 49 million person-years of follow-up, 857 primary tumours of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves were identified. Overweight and obesity were not associated with risk for all tumours or any tumour subgroup. Height was positively associated with risk for all tumours (HR per 10 cm increase: 1.30, 95% CI 1.16-1.46). The association between height and tumour risk varied between tumour subgroups: while height was not significantly associated with NST, height increased the risk for meningioma (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.13-1.78) and glioma (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.06-2.28). The strongest association between height and tumour risk was found for the glioma subgroup of ependymoma in women (HR 3.38, 95% CI 1.64-6.94). CONCLUSION: This study could not identify overweight and obesity as risk factors for primary tumours of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves in women or men. Increasing body height was associated with increased tumour risk overall, but not universal for all tumour subgroups.Importance of the studyPrimary tumours of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves have received little focus in epidemiologic studies, although the incidence and histo-pathological tumour subgroups differ significantly from primary brain tumours. Risk factors for these tumours have hardly been assessed in previous studies. Height, overweight and obesity are known risk factors for several cancers, including certain brain tumour subgroups, such as meningioma.This is the first study to report the association between height, overweight and obesity and primary tumours of the spinal cord, spinal meninges, spinal and peripheral nerves. This includes tumour subgroups of meningioma, nerve sheath tumour, glioma and the most common spinal glioma subgroup of ependymoma. While overweight and obesity were not associated with either of the tumour subgroups, an association between increasing body height and risk for spinal meningioma and glioma, including ependymoma, was found. Nerve sheath tumour risk was not associated with increasing body height.

Myelomeningocele Surgery over the 10 Years Following the MOMS Trial: A Systematic Review of Outcomes in Prenatal versus Postnatal Surgical Repair.

Background and Objectives: Myelomeningocele is the most severe form of spina bifida, a congenital neural tube defect arising from an incomplete neural tube closure during early development with damage worsening with advancing gestational age. The Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) Trial proved that surgery performed before 26 weeks of gestation significantly improved the prognosis, significantly changing treatment paradigms. This article aims to provide a review of the changes and updates in spina bifida repair over the 10-year period following the MOMS Trial. Material and methods: We performed a systematic review in the PubMed and Cochrane databases as well as a hand-search of high-impact journals using the reference list of all identified articles, searching for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Results: We identified 27 articles published between 2011 and 2021 that fulfilled the inclusion criteria and review them in the present study. Conclusions: With growing experience and with the improvement of prenatal open and fetoscopic techniques, the outcome of SB-associated conditions could be improved and the risks to both the mother and the fetus reduced. A continuous follow-up of the treated infants and further randomized trials are essential to study the complications and advantages or disadvantages of any given treatment strategy.

Effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab in patients with systemic sclerosis: a propensity score matched controlled observational study of the EUSTAR cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Tocilizumab showed trends for improving skin fibrosis and prevented progression of lung fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc) in randomised controlled clinical trials. We aimed to assess safety and effectiveness of tocilizumab in a real-life setting using the European Scleroderma Trial and Research (EUSTAR) database. METHODS: Patients with SSc fulfilling the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/EULAR 2013 classification criteria, with baseline and follow-up visits at 12±3 months, receiving tocilizumab or standard of care as the control group, were selected. Propensity score matching was applied. Primary endpoints were the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) and FVC at 12±3 months compared between the groups. Secondary endpoints were the percentage of progressive/regressive patients for skin and lung at 12±3 months. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients with SSc treated with tocilizumab and 3180 patients with SSc with standard of care fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Comparison between groups did not show significant differences, but favoured tocilizumab across all predefined primary and secondary endpoints: mRSS was lower in the tocilizumab group (difference -1.0, 95% CI -3.7 to 1.8, p=0.48). Similarly, FVC % predicted was higher in the tocilizumab group (difference 1.5 (-6.1 to 9.1), p=0.70). The percentage of progressive/regressive patients favoured tocilizumab over controls. These results were robust regarding the sensitivity analyses. Safety analysis confirmed previously reported adverse event profiles. CONCLUSION: Although this large, observational, controlled, real-life EUSTAR study did not show significant effectiveness of tocilizumab on skin and lung fibrosis, the consistency of direction of all predefined endpoints generates hypothesis for potential effectiveness in a broader SSc population.