RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Identification of patients at high risk of surgical-site infection may allow clinicians to target interventions and monitoring to minimize associated morbidity. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and evaluate prognostic tools for the prediction of surgical-site infection in gastrointestinal surgery. METHODS: This systematic review sought to identify original studies describing the development and validation of prognostic models for 30-day SSI after gastrointestinal surgery (PROSPERO: CRD42022311019). MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, and IEEE Xplore were searched from 1 January 2000 to 24 February 2022. Studies were excluded if prognostic models included postoperative parameters or were procedure specific. A narrative synthesis was performed, with sample-size sufficiency, discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), and prognostic accuracy compared. RESULTS: Of 2249 records reviewed, 23 eligible prognostic models were identified. A total of 13 (57 per cent) reported no internal validation and only 4 (17 per cent) had undergone external validation. Most identified operative contamination (57 per cent, 13 of 23) and duration (52 per cent, 12 of 23) as important predictors; however, there remained substantial heterogeneity in other predictors identified (range 2-28). All models demonstrated a high risk of bias due to the analytic approach, with overall low applicability to an undifferentiated gastrointestinal surgical population. Model discrimination was reported in most studies (83 per cent, 19 of 23); however, calibration (22 per cent, 5 of 23) and prognostic accuracy (17 per cent, 4 of 23) were infrequently assessed. Of externally validated models (of which there were four), none displayed 'good' discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve greater than or equal to 0.7). CONCLUSION: The risk of surgical-site infection after gastrointestinal surgery is insufficiently described by existing risk-prediction tools, which are not suitable for routine use. Novel risk-stratification tools are required to target perioperative interventions and mitigate modifiable risk factors.
This study is about finding ways to predict if someone will get an infection after having surgery on their stomach and intestines. If doctors know who is at high risk of getting an infection, they can take steps to prevent it and help the patient recover faster. The researchers looked at all the recent studies that have tried to predict who might get an infection after surgery. They found 23 studies that were good enough to look at in more detail. The researchers found that the studies they looked at were not very good at predicting who might get an infection. Most of the studies did not even check if their predictions were accurate. The few studies that did check were not very good at it. This means that doctors cannot use these predictions to help their patients. This means that doctors need to find better ways to predict who might get an infection after surgery on their stomach and intestines. If they can do this, they can help their patients recover faster and avoid problems like infections.
RESUMEN
Pheochromocytoma are chromaffin cell-derived tumors that have an exceptionally high genetic predisposition. The presentation of extra-adrenal and pelvic paraganglioma (PGL) in children is uncommon. Due to the relative rarity, PGL tumors' presentation and disease behavior may vary. Genetic testing, imaging, and biochemical investigation are employed to diagnose PGL. Surgical resection with preoperative angioembolization has been practiced in alleviating the burden of torrential intraoperative bleeding.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cancellations of elective surgeries on the day of surgery (DOS) can lead to added financial burden and wastage of resources for healthcare facilities; as well as social and emotional problems to patients. These cancellations act as barriers to delivering efficient surgical services. Optimal utilisation of the available resources is necessary for resource-constrained low-and-middle-income countries (LMIC). This study investigates the rate and causes of cancellations of elective surgeries on the DOS in various surgical departments across ten hospitals in India. METHODS: A research consortium 'IndSurg' led by World Health Organisation Collaboration Centre (WHOCC) for Research in Surgical Care Delivery in LMICs, India conducted this multicentre retrospective cross-sectional study to analyse the cancellations of elective/planned surgical operations on DOS across urban secondary and tertiary level hospitals. We audited surgical records of a pre-decided period of six weeks for cancellations, documented relevant demographic information and reasons for cancellations. RESULTS: We analysed records from the participating hospitals, with an overall cancellation rate of 9.7% (508/5231) on the DOS for elective surgical operations. Of these, 74% were avoidable cancellations. A majority (30%) of these 508 cancellations were attributed to insufficient resources, 28% due to patient's refusal or failure to show-up, and 22% due to change in patient's medical status. CONCLUSION: We saw a preponderance of avoidable reasons for elective surgery cancellations. A multidisciplinary approach with adequate preoperative patient counselling, timely communication between the patients and caregivers, adequate preoperative anaesthetic assessment, and planning by the surgical team may help reduce the cancellation rate.
Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Quirófanos , Estudios Transversales , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ileal perforation occurs in about 1% of enteric fevers as a complication, with a case fatality risk (CFR) of 20%-30% in the early 1990s that decreased to 15.4% in 2011 in South East Asia. We report nontraumatic ileal perforations and its associated CFR from a 2-year prospective enteric fever surveillance across India. METHODS: The Surveillance for Enteric Fever in India (SEFI) project established a multitiered surveillance system for enteric fever between December 2017 and March 2020. Nontraumatic ileal perforations were surveilled at 8 tertiary care and 6 secondary care hospitals and classified according to etiology. RESULTS: Of the 158 nontraumatic ileal perforation cases identified,126 were consented and enrolled. Enteric fever (34.7%), tuberculosis (19.0%), malignancy (5.8%), and perforation of Meckel diverticulum (4.9%) were the common etiology. In those with enteric fever ileal perforation, the CFR was 7.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Enteric fever remains the most common cause of nontraumatic ileal perforation in India, followed by tuberculosis. Better modalities of establishing etiology are required to classify the illness, and frame management guidelines and preventive measures. CFR data are critical for comprehensive disease burden estimation and policymaking.
Asunto(s)
Perforación Intestinal , Fiebre Tifoidea , Costo de Enfermedad , Humanos , India/epidemiología , Perforación Intestinal/complicaciones , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Fiebre Tifoidea/complicaciones , Fiebre Tifoidea/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to define a globally applicable list of surgical procedures, or "basket," which could represent a health system's capacity to provide surgical care and standardize global surgical measurement. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Six indicators have been proposed to assess access to safe, affordable, timely surgical and anesthesia care, with a focus on laparotomy, cesarean section, and treatment of open fracture. However, comparability, particularly for these procedures, has been limited by a lack of definitional clarity and their overly broad scope. METHODS: We conducted a 3 round international expert Delphi exercise between April and June 2019 using REDCap to identify a set of procedures representative of surgical capacity. To be included, procedures had to be important for treating common conditions, well-defined, and impactful (ie, well-recognized clinical or functional benefit). Procedures were eliminated or prioritized in each round, and those noted as "extremely" or "very important" by ≥50% of respondents in round 3 were included in the final "basket." RESULTS: Altogether 331 respondents from 78 countries participated in the Delphi process. A final basket of 32 procedures representing disease categories in trauma, cancer, congenital anomalies, maternal/reproductive health, aging, and infection were identified for inclusion to assess surgical capacity. CONCLUSIONS: This surgical basket facilitates a more standardized assessment of a country's surgical system. Further testing and refinement will likely be needed, but this basket can be used immediately to guide ongoing monitoring and evaluation of global surgery capacities to improve and strengthen surgery and anesthesia care.
Asunto(s)
Salud Global , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/normas , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
Wandering spleen is a rare pathology. A 2-year-old child with abdominal pain was diagnosed to have a torted, avascular wandering spleen. On conservative management, she remains well with no radiological evidence of the spleen. Splenic torsion usually warrants surgery. Nonoperative management in selected cases allows the natural process of autosplenectomy.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Bladder augmentation is an important part of pediatric reconstructive urology. This study was conducted to assess the feasibility and results of our technique of preperitoneal bladder augmentation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three children underwent preperitoneal bladder augmentation for small inelastic bladders who had failed medical management or needed undiversion. The underlying diagnosis included neurogenic bladder, valve bladder, bladder exstrophy, non-neurogenic neurogenic, ectopic ureters, and urogenital sinus. The operative procedure involved placing the entire augmentation in the preperitoneal or subcutaneous space after bivalving the native bladder. The augment segment of the bowel with its pedicle was brought into the preperitoneal space through a small opening in the parietal peritoneum. A Mitrofanoff port was also provided where needed. RESULTS: Preperitoneal augmentation provided an adequately compliant, good volume bladder except in children with bladder exstrophy or previous abdominal surgery. There was a good cystometric recovery, with resolution of hydronephrosis and incontinence. Vesicoureteral reflux resolved in 24 of 26 units. In the 13 children who were uremic preoperatively, there was a significant decrease in serum creatinine levels, although 9 children continued to have supra-normal serum creatinine. Surgical complications seen were within expectations. There was no incidence of intraperitoneal leak, which is the main projected benefit of this procedure over the traditional "intraperitoneal" method of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The preperitoneal augmentation provides an adequate, safe, and low-pressure reservoir of urine except in cases of bladder exstrophy and previous abdominal surgery.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Abdominal tuberculosis presents in a variety of ways. Different testing modalities must be applied in addition to having a high clinical suspicion to diagnose and initiate therapy. Medications have a good response; however, morbidity has been seen following surgical management of complicated presentations like intestinal obstruction and perforation. There is a paucity of studies in the pediatric age group which evaluate response to the different treatment regimen and identify factors associated with poorer outcomes in children with abdominal tuberculosis. METHODS: Patient records of 75 children with abdominal tuberculosis at a single center were evaluated using a questionnaire, covering a 14-year period from 2007 to 2021. Demographic features, presenting signs and symptoms, investigations and treatment details were studied. In- person or telephonic follow-up was conducted to identify treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Incidence of abdominal TB was 7%, of all TB children with a mean age of 10.1 years. Mesenteric lymph nodes were involved in 67% and small intestine in 33% cases. Surgery was required in 22 children. 85% children completed treatment. Small intestine involvement had higher probability of undergoing surgery. Of the 70 children with complete follow up, 64 were well and 6 children succumbed to the disease. Older age, small intestine involvement and surgery were independently associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSION: Intestinal involvement is associated with greater need for surgical intervention and greater mortality. Adolescents have poorer outcomes. Further studies are required focusing on these individual subgroups to understand the patterns of presentation, causes for mortality and prevention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 5.
Asunto(s)
Antituberculosos , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Tuberculosis Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Preescolar , Antituberculosos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incidencia , Estudios de Cohortes , Lactante , Estudios de Seguimiento , India/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100207.].
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100207.].
RESUMEN
South Asia is a demographically crucial, economically aspiring, and socio-culturally diverse region in the world. The region contributes to a large burden of surgically-treatable disease conditions. A large number of people in South Asia cannot access safe and affordable surgical, obstetric, trauma, and anesthesia (SOTA) care when in need. Yet, attention to the region in Global Surgery and Global Health is limited. Here, we assess the status of SOTA care in South Asia. We summarize the evidence on SOTA care indicators and planning. Region-wide, as well as country-specific challenges are highlighted. We also discuss potential directions-initiatives and innovations-toward addressing these challenges. Local partnerships, sustained research and advocacy efforts, and politics can be aligned with evidence-based policymaking and health planning to achieve equitable SOTA care access in the South Asian region under the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC).
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Sur de Asia , Pueblo Asiatico , Planificación en SaludRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002102.].
RESUMEN
Academic global surgery is a rapidly growing field that aims to improve access to safe surgical care worldwide. However, no universally accepted competencies exist to inform this developing field. A consensus-based approach, with input from a diverse group of experts, is needed to identify essential competencies that will lead to standardization in this field. A task force was set up using snowball sampling to recruit a broad group of content and context experts in global surgical and perioperative care. A draft set of competencies was revised through the modified Delphi process with two rounds of anonymous input. A threshold of 80% consensus was used to determine whether a competency or sub-competency learning objective was relevant to the skillset needed within academic global surgery and perioperative care. A diverse task force recruited experts from 22 countries to participate in both rounds of the Delphi process. Of the n = 59 respondents completing both rounds of iterative polling, 63% were from low- or middle-income countries. After two rounds of anonymous feedback, participants reached consensus on nine core competencies and 31 sub-competency objectives. The greatest consensus pertained to competency in ethics and professionalism in global surgery (100%) with emphasis on justice, equity, and decolonization across multiple competencies. This Delphi process, with input from experts worldwide, identified nine competencies which can be used to develop standardized academic global surgery and perioperative care curricula worldwide. Further work needs to be done to validate these competencies and establish assessments to ensure that they are taught effectively.
RESUMEN
Preoperative undernutrition is a prognostic indicator for postoperative mortality and morbidity. Evidence suggests that treating undernutrition can improve surgical outcomes. This study explored the provision of nutritional screening, assessment and support on surgical cancer wards in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This was a qualitative study and participants took part in one focus group or one individual interview. Data were analysed thematically. There were 34 participants from Ghana, India, the Philippines and Zambia: 24 healthcare professionals (HCPs) and 10 patients. Results showed that knowledge levels and enthusiasm were high in HCPs. Barriers to adequate nutritional support were a lack of provision of ward and kitchen equipment, food and sustainable nutritional supplements. There was variation across countries towards nutritional screening and assessment which seemed to be driven by resources. Many hospitals where resources were scarce focused on the care of individual patients in favour of an integrated systems approach to identify and manage undernutrition. In conclusion, there is scope to improve the efficiency of nutritional management of surgical cancer patients in LMICs through the integration of nutrition assessment and support into routine hospital policies and procedures, moving from case management undertaken by interested personnel to a system-based approach including the whole multidisciplinary team.
Asunto(s)
Países en Desarrollo , Neoplasias , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Humanos , Renta , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/cirugía , Evaluación Nutricional , Estado NutricionalRESUMEN
Malnutrition is an independent predictor for postoperative complications in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We systematically reviewed evidence on the impact of preoperative oral nutrition supplementation (ONS) on patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery in LMICs. We searched EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, WHO Global Index Medicus, SciELO, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) databases from inception to March 21, 2022 for randomised controlled trials evaluating preoperative ONS in gastrointestinal cancer within LMICs. We evaluated the impact of ONS on all postoperative outcomes using random-effects meta-analysis. Seven studies reported on 891 patients (446 ONS group, 445 control group) undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal cancer. Preoperative ONS reduced all cause postoperative surgical complications (risk ratio (RR) 0.53, 95% CI 0.46-0.60, P < 0.001, I2 = 0%, n = 891), infection (0.52, 0.40-0.67, P = 0.008, I2 = 0%, n = 570) and all-cause mortality (0.35, 0.26-0.47, P = 0.014, I2 = 0%, n = 588). Despite heterogeneous populations and baseline rates, absolute risk ratio (ARR) was reduced for all cause (pooled effect -0.14, -0.22 to -0.06, P = 0.006; number needed to treat (NNT) 7) and infectious complications (-0.13, -0.22 to -0.06, P < 0.001; NNT 8). Preoperative nutrition in patients undergoing gastrointestinal cancer surgery in LMICs demonstrated consistently strong and robust treatment effects across measured outcomes. However additional higher quality research, with particular focus within African populations, are urgently required.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Desnutrición , Países en Desarrollo , Suplementos Dietéticos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pneumonia is a common and severe complication of abdominal surgery, it is associated with increased length of hospital stay, healthcare costs, and mortality. Further, pulmonary complication rates have risen during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. This study explored the potential cost-effectiveness of administering preoperative chlorhexidine mouthwash versus no-mouthwash at reducing postoperative pneumonia among abdominal surgery patients. METHODS: A decision analytic model taking the South African healthcare provider perspective was constructed to compare costs and benefits of mouthwash versus no-mouthwash-surgery at 30 days after abdominal surgery. We assumed two scenarios: (i) the absence of COVID-19; (ii) the presence of COVID-19. Input parameters were collected from published literature including prospective cohort studies and expert opinion. Effectiveness was measured as proportion of pneumonia patients. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the impact of parameter uncertainties. The results of the probabilistic sensitivity analysis were presented using cost-effectiveness planes and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. RESULTS: In the absence of COVID-19, mouthwash had lower average costs compared to no-mouthwash-surgery, $3,675 (R 63,770) versus $3,958 (R 68,683), and lower proportion of pneumonia patients, 0.029 versus 0.042 (dominance of mouthwash intervention). In the presence of COVID-19, the increase in pneumonia rate due to COVID-19, made mouthwash more dominant as it was more beneficial to reduce pneumonia patients through administering mouthwash. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curves shown that mouthwash surgery is likely to be cost-effective between $0 (R0) and $15,000 (R 260,220) willingness to pay thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Both the absence and presence of SARS-CoV-2, mouthwash is likely to be cost saving intervention for reducing pneumonia after abdominal surgery. However, the available evidence for the effectiveness of mouthwash was extrapolated from cardiac surgery; there is now an urgent need for a robust clinical trial on the intervention on non-cardiac surgery.
Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Modelos Teóricos , Neumonía/prevención & control , COVID-19 , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Antisépticos Bucales , Pandemias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , SudáfricaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pull-through of ganglionic bowel is essential for successful treatment of Hirschsprung's disease. We studied the incidence of transition zone pull-through in our institution and compared its outcome with ganglionic bowel pull-through. METHODS: Children who underwent Soave's pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease from January 2005 to November 2012 were studied. Patients were divided into two groups: ganglionic bowel pull-throughs (Group 1) and transition zone pull-throughs (Group 2). Demographics, presentations, surgical procedure, post-operative results and complications including redo procedures were recorded and reviewed along with histopathology reports. RESULTS: Fifty patients underwent Soave's pull-through for Hirschsprung's disease in our group. The median age at surgery was 13.5 days in Group 1 and 22.5 days in Group 2. Transition zone pull-through occurred in eight children (16%). Transition zone pull-through was attributed to errors in histologic interpretation (n = 5), sampling (n = 2) and surgical technique (n = 1). The transition zone was significantly longer in Group 2 (P = 0.002). Constipation and enterocolitis were the main complications needing therapy. One child in Group 2 required surgery for adhesive intestinal obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The length of the transition zone in children with transition zone pull-through was significantly longer. Though our children with transition zone pull-through did not require redo surgery the possibility of redo surgery remains. Transition zone pull-through should still be considered an error and should be prevented.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/patología , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/cirugía , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Recto/cirugía , Estreñimiento/epidemiología , Estreñimiento/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Enterocolitis/epidemiología , Enterocolitis/etiología , Femenino , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Hirschsprung/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Recién Nacido , Obstrucción Intestinal/epidemiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Recto/inervación , Recto/patología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Colon Sigmoide/patología , Mesocolon/patología , Neoplasias de Tejido Muscular/patología , Receptores de Activinas Tipo II/metabolismo , Cuidados Posteriores , Preescolar , Colon Sigmoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Queratinas/metabolismo , Mesocolon/cirugía , Neoplasias de Tejido Muscular/metabolismo , Neoplasias de Tejido Muscular/cirugía , Enfermedades Peritoneales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Peritoneales/patología , Enfermedades Peritoneales/cirugía , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Vimentina/metabolismoRESUMEN
The leaking pancreatic duct in childhood chronic pancreatitis presents with ascites and pleural effusion and is a potentially lethal condition. Seven children with this condition were seen in the period 2003-2006. The correct diagnosis was not entertained till a raised serum amylase was discovered. The diagnosis was confirmed by very high levels of amylase in the aspirated abdominal or pleural fluid. Computerized tomogram was the most useful imaging study and demonstrated a dilated pancreatic duct. All children were operated within 6 days of diagnosis by a Puestow's procedure in six and peripancreatic drainage in one. Six children made a prompt and lasting recovery after a Puestow's procedure while one child, also suffering from metastatic neuroblastoma, died in the immediate post operative period after peripancreatic drainage. We recommend prompt and definitive surgical management of this potentially lethal condition.