Quantitative Ultrasound of Proximal Phalanxes in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors.

Reduced bone mineral density (BMD) is a well-known complication in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) survivors; the optimal method to assess BMD is still debated. We studied BMD by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in 72 ALL survivors, and evaluated any correlation with cumulative doses of steroids and cytotoxic agents. Mean age at diagnosis was 61±45 months, while mean age at QUS was 318.3±129.6 months; mean period of follow-up was 41.2±37.8 months. Mean amplitude-dependent speed of sound z-score was -1.22±1.19. Ten survivors (13.8%) presented a z-score below -2 SD. A negative correlation was found between amplitude-dependent speed of sound z-score and age at diagnosis (P=0.01). A positive correlation was observed with length of follow-up (P=0.01). No correlation was found with cytotoxic drugs. This study represents the largest cohort of childhood ALL survivors studied by QUS. Our results suggest that QUS for its characteristics of being radiation free may be an effective option to assess BMD in pediatric age. In addition, our data outline the importance to improve the awareness about the specific expression of this complication in the pediatric age, concerning the major determinants of bone impairment, which are the disease itself and the phase of bone growth when the disease occurs.

Bendamustine in multiple myeloma.

The advent of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT), the availability of novel agents such as thalidomide, lenalidomide (immunomodulatory drugs or IMiDs) and bortezomib (proteasome inhibitor) and improvements in supportive care have allowed to increase overall survival in multiple myeloma (MM) patients; nevertheless, MM remains an incurable pathology. For this reason, newer agents are required for continued disease control. Bendamustine is an old drug rediscovered in the last decade. In fact, its unique mechanism of action with structural similarities to both alkylating agents and antimetabolities, but which is not cross-resistant to alkylating agents, has reawakened interest in the use of this drug in the treatment of MM. Studies have proven the safety and efficacy of bendamustine administered alone or in combination with new drugs in both upfront and relapse/refractory settings of MM patients, including those with renal impairment. Moreover, bendamustine has been successfully used as conditioning for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Finally, the use of bendamustine does not compromise peripheral blood stem-cell collection. This drug is generally well tolerated, with the majority of adverse events being due to myelosuppression. Non-haematological adverse events are infrequent and usually mild.

Single center experience on efficacy and safety of Aprepitant for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a distressing treatment side-effect that could negatively affect children's quality of life (QoL). Different scoring systems for CINV were applied and different antiemetic drugs were used; however, few studies have been performed in children undergoing chemotherapy with Aprepitant. Herein, we report a pediatric experience on efficacy and safety of Aprepitant as part of triple antiemetic prophylaxis, in a cohort of thirty-two children and adolescents with Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL), treated with moderate/highly emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC/HEC) regimens in a single Hemato-Oncology Institution. The triple therapy was compared to standard antiemetic therapy in a cohort of twenty-three HL patients (control group). Aprepitant therapy was associated to a significant decrease of chemotherapy-induced vomiting (p = 0.0001), while no impact on the reduction of nausea was observed; these observations were also confirmed by multivariate analysis (p = 0.0040). Aprepitant was well tolerated and the most commonly reported adverse events were neutropenia and hypertransaminasemia. No significant differences on the toxicity were observed between the two compared groups. Our experience on Aprepitant efficacy and safety, associated with feasibility of orally administration, suggests a possible widespread use of the drug to prevent pediatric CINV.