Phase II Study of Preoperative Treatment with External Radiotherapy Plus Panitumumab in Low-Risk, Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer (RaP Study/STAR-03).

BACKGROUND: Treatment with fluoropyrimidines and concomitant long-course external radiotherapy (RTE) is the standard of care in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative chemoradiation. A randomized phase II study (RaP/STAR-03) was conducted that aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of the monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor panitumumab as a single agent in combination with radiotherapy in low-risk LARC preoperative treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had adenocarcinoma of the mid-low rectum, cT3N- or cT2-T3N+, KRAS wild-type status, and negative circumferential radial margin. Panitumumab was administered concomitant to RTE. Rectal surgery was performed 6-8 weeks after the end of preoperative treatment. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was FOLFOX. The primary endpoint was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The sample size was calculated using Simon's two-stage design. A pCR of 16% was considered to qualify the experimental treatment for further testing. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients were enrolled in 13 Italian centers from October 2012 to October 2015. Three panitumumab infusions were administered in 92 (93.4%) patients. The RTE compliance was median dose 50.4 Gy; ≥28 fractions in 82 (83.7%) patients. Surgical treatment was performed in 92 (93.9%) patients, and no severe intraoperative complications were observed. A pCR was observed in 10 (10.9%) patients (95% confidence interval, 4.72%-17.07%). Pathological downstaging occurred in 45 (45.9%) patients. Grade 3 toxicities were observed in 22 (22.3%) patients, and the common adverse events were skin rash in 16 (16.3%) patients. No grade 4 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSION: The pCR rate (our primary endpoint), at only 10.9%, did not reach the specified level considered suitable for further testing. However, the analysis showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to concomitant administration of panitumumab and RTE in preoperative treatment of LARC. The pCR evaluation in all wild-type RAS is ongoing. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The aim of the RaP/STAR-03 study was to evaluate the activity and safety of monoclonal antibody anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) panitumumab as a single agent without chemotherapy in low-risk, locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) preoperative treatment. Nevertheless, the use of panitumumab in combination with radiotherapy in preoperative treatment in patients with KRAS wild type and low-risk LARC did not reach the pathologic complete response primary endpoint. This study showed a good toxicity profile and compliance to combination treatment. Further analysis of NRAS and BRAF on tissue and circulating levels of the EGFR ligands and vascular factors (soluble vascular endothelial growth factor, E-selectin) may provide insight on the potential molecular pathways involved in the anti-EGFR response.

Treatment strategy for rectal cancer with synchronous metastasis: 65 consecutive Italian cases from the Bologna Multidisciplinary Rectal Cancer Group.

BACKGROUND: Twenty percent of rectal cancer patients have synchronous distant metastasis at diagnosis. At present, the treatment strategy in this patient setting is not well defined. This study in one institution evaluates the treatment strategy of three different patient groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and July 2011, 65 patients with M1 rectal cancer were evaluated. Three different groups were defined: rectal cancer with resectable metastatic disease (group A); rectal cancer with potentially resectable metastatic disease (group B), and rectal cancer with unresectable metastatic disease (group C). RESULTS: Group A included 11 patients (16.9%), group B 28 patients (43.1%) and group C 26 patients (40%). Forty-three (66.2%) patients underwent surgery for primary rectal cancer, and 30 (46.2%) patients for metastasis resection (23 liver, 4 lung and 3 ovary). Median overall survival (OS) by group was: 51 (5-86; group A), 32 (24-40; group B) and 16 (7-26; group C) months. Patients undergoing metastasis resection have higher median OS than unresected patients (44 vs. 15 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment strategy in synchronous metastatic rectal cancer must consider the possibility of distant metastasis resection. Long-term survival can be achieved using an integrated approach.

Long-term results of a pilot study on an intensive induction regimen for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: In 1995, we designed and carried out a pilot study on the combination of cisplatin + high dose epirubicin + vinorelbine with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor support for the induction treatment of unresectable stage IIIAN2 and wet IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer. The present report concerns the long-term results. METHOD: Eligible patients received cisplatin, 75 mg/m(2), and epirubicin, 120 mg/m(2), on day 1, vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2), on days 1 and 15, and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, 300 microg s.c., from days 3 to 12. The cycle was repeated every 3 weeks for 3 times. Subsequently, all the patients were re-evaluated for surgical resection. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were enrolled: 21 males and 5 females; median age, 55 years (range, 31-64); median performance status, 90% (range, 80-100); 16 stage IIIA and 10 IIIB. After the 3 cycles, objective response was as follows: 2 complete (8%), 18 partial (69%), 5 no change (19%) and 1 progressive disease (4%). Ten patients were not operated (9 unresectable and 1 refusal) and received radiotherapy. Sixteen patients (61%) underwent surgery and 14 were completely resected (54%). After a median follow-up of 84 months (range, 12-120), the median overall progression-free survival was 17 months (range, 2-104+): 47 months for resected and 8 months for nonresected patients. The median overall survival was 40 months (range, 4-123+): 87 months for resected and 13 months for nonresected patients. One-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 73%, 42% and 37%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These intensive cytotoxic regimen enabled us to obtain favorable long-term results in a selected series of inoperable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Correlation Between Immune-related Adverse Event (IRAE) Occurrence and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Treated With Nivolumab: IRAENE Trial, an Italian Multi-institutional Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Immunotherapy has brought clinical benefits to patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC). Most patients tolerate immunotherapy but serious immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported. Some studies indicate a correlation between irAEs and clinical response in other cancer types (eg, lung cancer and melanoma). For patients with mRCC, the impact of irAE on clinical outcome is unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of 167 patients with mRCC treated with nivolumab as standard of care between March 2017 and January 2018 in 16 Italian centers was performed. irAEs were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4.0. RESULTS: Any grade and grade 3/4 irAEs occurred in 46% and 8.9% of patients, respectively. The median time to appearance of irAEs was 10 weeks; 38.8% of patients required steroid treatment. The most common irAEs were cutaneous (33.7%) and gastrointestinal (23.3%). The median overall survival and progression-free survival were 20.13 and 7.86 months, respectively. Patients with irAEs showed a greater overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.63) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29-0.66) benefit as well as better overall response rate (27.3% vs. 13.7%; odds ratio, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.03-5.44) and disease control rate (68.8% vs. 48%; odds ratio, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.23-4.67) if compared with those without irAEs. No correlation was found between steroid use and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that the appearance of irAEs was associated with better outcomes in patients treated with nivolumab. This data may be limited by sample size and the retrospective nature of the study.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (xelox) versus protracted 5-fluorouracil venous infusion plus oxaliplatin (pvifox) as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a GOAM phase II randomised study (FOCA trial).

UNLABELLED: This phase II randomised trial compares oxaliplatin plus protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (pviFOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (XELOX) in the first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC). METHODS: From December 2001 to March 2005, 118 patients were randomised to arm A (pviFOX: pvi5-FU by a central venous catheter 250 mg/m2/daily d1-21+oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 q3w) (56 pts) or arm B (XELOX: capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 po bid d1-14+oxaliplatin at the same schedule) (62 pts). RESULTS: Patient characteristics were well-balanced between the two arms. Median number of complete cycles was six. The objective responses were: CR 1 (1.7%) and 3 (4.8%), PR 26 (46.4 %) and 24 (38.7%), SD 13 (23.2%) and 20 (32.3%), P 13(23.2%) and 10 (16.1%), not evaluable 3 (5.4%) and 5 (8.1 %) in arms A and B, respectively; the CR+PR rate was 48.2% (95% confidence limits 34.6%-61.9%) versus 43.5 % (31.0%-56.7%). Median TTP was 7 versus 9 months, respectively. About 50% of the patients with symptoms or low performance status at baseline experienced improvement without major differences between the two arms. G3-4 diarrhoea was observed in 14.0% versus 8.2%, G3 stomatitis in 3.7% versus 0, and G3 neurotoxicity in 18.5% versus 24.6% in arms A and B, respectively. Eight patients in arm A (14.8%) had venous line problems that obliged the temporary suspension (six cases) or stopping (two cases) of the 5-FU infusion. CONCLUSION: Both pviFOX and XELOX are effective and safe first-line treatments for patients with ACRC. By avoiding intravenous (i.v.) administration by a central catheter, XELOX is favoured in clinical practice.

Sequential chemotherapy with cisplatin/gemcitabine (CG) followed by mitoxantrone/methotrexate/mitomycin (MMM) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. A multicenter Italian Phase II Study (SITMP1).

PURPOSE: We performed a multicenter phase II trial to evaluate the impact on the activity, efficacy, symptom control and safety of using two active regimens in a sequential schedule (cisplatin/gemcitabine followed by mitoxantrone/methotrexate/mitomycin) as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 54 patients received cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks for four courses (CG regimen) followed by mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2) on day 1, methotrexate 35 mg/m(2) on day 1 and mitomycin 7 mg/m(2) on day 1, every 3 weeks with mitomycin in alternate cycles for four courses (MMM regimen). RESULTS: We observed 3 complete responses (CRs) (5.6%) and 13 partial responses (PRs) (24.0%), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 29.6% (95% confidence interval, 17-42%), 33 stable disease (SD) (61.1%) and 5 progressive disease (PD) (9.2%). Median time to progression (TTP) was 9.5 months (range, 2-23). Median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range, 3-33); 1-year survival rate was 63%. The treatment produced a good symptom control, with an improvement during chemotherapy in dyspnea and pain in 52.9 and 48.3% of patients, respectively. The major toxicity observed was hematological. Grades 3-4 NCI-CTC v 2.0 toxicity with the CG regimen included: neutropenia (11.1%), anemia (1.9%), thrombocytopenia (7.4%), vomiting (11.1%) and with the MMM regimen: neutropenia (35.2%), anemia (5.5%), thrombocytopenia (7.4%) and stomatitis (1.9%). CONCLUSION: This phase II study with the sequential approach of two active regimens showed a good disease control in MPM, with symptom improvement and only mild toxicity.

Planned sequence of gemcitabine followed by vinorelbine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The rationale for planned sequential chemotherapy is based on the principle that sequential administration of non-cross-resistant cytotoxic agents has the advantage of eliminating additive toxicity and permitting the delivery of full doses of each drug. At present, there is a lack of data on the results of planned sequential single agent administration in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to explore the possibility of increasing the time-to-progression (TTP) by a 1.5 factor in comparison with the historical results of monochemotherapy with a first-line planned sequential administration of gemcitabine (GEM) and vinorelbine (VNR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: GEM 1000 mg/m2 was administered intravenously (i.v.) for 30 min on days 1, 8 and 15 and recycled on day 28 for a total of 3 cycles. Independently of response, VNR was administered i.v. as a bolus at a dose of 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. VNR treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerance. RESULTS: Fifty-two consecutive patients, with a median age of 76 years (70-85), affected by locally advanced (35%), metastatic (54%) or recurrent (11%) NSCLC were enrolled. The overall best objective response was 3.8% CR, 19.2% PR, 32.7% SD, 23.1% disease progression and 21.2% not evaluable. Both drugs were well tolerated. The median TTP was 6 months (95% confidence limits 4-8), the median overall survival was 10 months (95% confidence limits 6-14) and the one-year survival rate was 42%. CONCLUSION: The planned sequential administration of GEM and VNR suggests that the TTP can be increased with the use of the 2 single agents in elderly patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC.

The predictive value of 18F-FDG-PET early evaluation in patients with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the therapy-induced reduction of the (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG-PET) maximum standardized uptake value in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab could predict the objective response and outcome early during the treatment. METHODS: The study was performed as a part of a phase II trial evaluating cetuximab plus the leucovorin/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen. The objective response was evaluated according to the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) every 6 weeks. The early metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET was assessed according to our own evaluated cutoff value (<35%) after receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Twenty of 22 patients had positive baseline 18F-FDG-PET. The best RECIST response was: complete response (CR), 3; partial response (PR), 9; stable disease (SD), 8. Twelve patients (60%) were classified as metabolic responders and 8 (40%) as nonresponders. At the median follow-up time of 11 months, median time to disease progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) for early metabolic responders versus nonresponders were 11 versus 5 months (P = 0.0016) and 16 versus 6 months (P = 0.1493), respectively. CONCLUSION: The early metabolic response evaluated by 18F-FDG-PET predicted the clinical outcome in this series of patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy plus cetuximab.