Chart-confirmed guillain-barre syndrome after 2009 H1N1 influenza vaccination among the Medicare population, 2009-2010.

Given the increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) found with the 1976 swine influenza vaccine, both active surveillance and end-of-season analyses on chart-confirmed cases were performed across multiple US vaccine safety monitoring systems, including the Medicare system, to evaluate the association of GBS after 2009 monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccination. Medically reviewed cases consisted of H1N1-vaccinated Medicare beneficiaries who were hospitalized for GBS. These cases were then classified by using Brighton Collaboration diagnostic criteria. Thirty-one persons had Brighton level 1, 2, or 3 GBS or Fisher Syndrome, with symptom onset 1-119 days after vaccination. Self-controlled risk interval analyses estimated GBS risk within the 6-week period immediately following H1N1 vaccination compared with a later control period, with additional adjustment for seasonality. Our results showed an elevated risk of GBS with 2009 monovalent H1N1 vaccination (incidence rate ratio = 2.41, 95% confidence interval: 1.14, 5.11; attributable risk = 2.84 per million doses administered, 95% confidence interval: 0.21, 5.48). This observed risk was slightly higher than that seen with previous seasonal influenza vaccines; however, additional results that used a stricter case definition (Brighton level 1 or 2) were not statistically significant, and our ability to account for preceding respiratory/gastrointestinal illness was limited. Furthermore, the observed risk was substantially lower than that seen with the 1976 swine influenza vaccine.

Surveillance for Guillain-Barré syndrome after influenza vaccination among the Medicare population, 2009-2010.

OBJECTIVES: We implemented active surveillance for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following seasonal or H1N1 influenza vaccination among the Medicare population during the 2009-2010 influenza season. METHODS: We used weekly Medicare claims data to monitor vaccinations and subsequent hospitalizations with principal diagnosis code for GBS within 42 days. Group sequential testing assessed whether the observed GBS rate exceeded a critical limit based on the expected rate from 5 previous years adjusted for claims delay. We evaluated the lag between date of service and date of claims availability and used it for adjustment. RESULTS: By July 30, 2010 (after 26 interim surveillance tests), 14.0 million seasonal and 3.3 million H1N1 vaccinations had accrued. Taking into account claims delay appropriately lowered the critical limit during early monitoring. The observed GBS rate was below the critical limit throughout the surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: Medicare data contributed rapid safety monitoring among millions of 2009-2010 influenza vaccine recipients. Adjustment for claims delay facilitates early detection of potential safety issues. Although limited by lack of medical record review to confirm cases, this claims-based surveillance did not indicate a statistically significant elevated GBS rate following seasonal or H1N1 influenza vaccination.

Utilizing Medicare claims data for real­time drug safety evaluations:is it feasible?

PURPOSE: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims comprise an administrative database of beneficiary-specific clinical information. This study evaluates the impacts of (i) claim information updates (claims adjudication) and (ii) delay in claim processing (claims delay) on real-time evaluation of health service and drug safety signals using the Medicare database. METHODS: Using Medicare claims data accumulated through May 2009 on health services rendered in 2006 and drugs dispensed in 2007, this study measures the frequency with which clinical information changes in the database as a result of (i) claims adjudication and (ii) claims delay. RESULTS: Over 85% of health services claims were processed within 8 weeks after the date of service, and 72% of drug claims were processed within 3 months after the dispense date. Clinical information changed for no more than 3% of unique claim groups in inpatient hospital, outpatient institutional, physician's office, and prescription drug Medicare claim settings. CONCLUSIONS: Claims delay is consistent across time and is minimal. Claims adjudication does not substantially impact the content of clinical information in the Medicare claims database. Therefore, the Medicare claims database provides consistent information regarding health services and prescription drugs in a manner that is prompt enough to facilitate medical product safety evaluations in real time.