RESUMEN
Leiomyomas are benign mesenchymal tumors which originate from smooth muscle cells. Extrauterine leiomyomas are rare and they may arise where smooth muscle cells are found. Their diagnosis is challenging due to their heterogeneous ways of presentation. Histological analysis may reveal areas of sarcomatous differentiation; therefore, complete resection of the entire tumor is the only curative treatment. There is no adjuvant therapy proved to increase overall survival. It is essential to develop a standardized protocol, detailing how to follow up these patients since it is not reported in the literature to date; however, it is advisable to follow them because the local recurrence rate is high if small implants remain. In this review, we present 3 cases of extrauterine leiomyomas diagnosed and treated in our hospital. The management was different in each case, highlighting the heterogeneity of this condition. According to the literature, there are no solid guidelines on their management. We compare our experience with the data available to date in order to support the existing knowledge and provide our expertise for future studies.
Asunto(s)
Leiomioma , Humanos , Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagen , Leiomioma/cirugía , Espacio Retroperitoneal , Miocitos del Músculo Liso/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Our purpose is to present the results of our working group, with a view to reduce the incidence and improve the management of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in a urology ward. METHODS: The study consists on an observational database designed with the view to analyse the incidence and characteristics of HAIs in Urology. Based on the results obtained, a critical evaluation was carried out and specific measures put in place to reduce HAIs. Finally, the impact and results of the implemented measures were periodically evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of HAIs in urology decreased from 6.6 to 7.3% in 2012-2014 to 5.4-5.8% in 2016-2018. In patients with immunosuppression the incidence of HAIs decreased from 12.8 to 18% in 2012-2013 to 8.1-10.2% in 2017-2018, in those with a previous urinary infection fell from 13.6 to 4.8%, in those with a urinary catheter prior to admission from 12.6 to 10.8%, and in patients with a nephrostomy tube from 16 to 10.9%. The effect of the protocol also demonstrated a reduction in the percentage of patients with suspicion of HAIs for whom no culture was taken, from 6% in 2012 to zero in 2017 and 2018. Moreover, the implementation of protocols for empirical treatment has reduced the incidence of patients experiencing inadequate empirical antimicrobial therapy from 20 to 8.1%. CONCLUSION: It is essential to monitor the incidence of HAIs, and preventive measures play a useful role in reducing the rate of infection and in optimising their management.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , España/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence of healthcare-associated infections/urinary tract infection (UTI), risk factors, microorganisms isolated and antibiotic resistances in patients who underwent lower urinary tract endoscopic surgery (LUTES) in a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out including 1,498 patients who undergo LUTES. Patients with and without UTI after surgery were compared. We analysed infection incidence, risk factors, microorganisms isolated and antibiotic resistances. RESULTS: Postoperative UTI incidence was 4.7%. Risk factors found: higher American Society of Anesthesiologists classification (OR 2.82; 95% CI 1.8-4.5; p < 0.00), immunosuppression (OR 2.89; 95% CI 1.2-7.2; p = 0.01), indwelling urinary catheter prior admission (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.6-4.2; p < 0.00) and postoperative catheterization longer than 2 days (OR 1.74; 95% CI 1.7-4.3; p < 0.00). Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) had the highest infection rates (5.5%). Microorganisms isolated were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23.5%), Escherichia coli (17.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae and Enterococcus spp (11.8%). Resistance rates for flourquinolones varied between 28 and 80%, and Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae rose up 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Low percentage of UTI after endoscopic surgery was registered. TURB was the procedure with highest infection rate. Pseudomonas aeruginosa stands out as the most frequently isolated microorganism. Patient comorbidities, previous urinary catheter and postoperative catheter were identified as risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infección Hospitalaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Carbapenémicos , Comorbilidad , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus , Escherichia coli , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Riesgo , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Sistema Urinario/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Infections related to catheters in the upper urinary tract (CUUT) are associated with specific characteristics. METHODS: A prospective observational study was carried out from 2012 to 2015 to evaluate infections in patients with CUUT. RESULTS: A total of 209 infections were included (99 with double-J, 81 with nephrostomy, and 29 with internal/external nephroureteral stents). Among nephrostomy tube carriers, the most frequently isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas and Enterococcus. In those with an internal/external nephroureteral stent, Klebsiella was the most common, and 57.1% were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella. In double-J carriers, Escherichia coli and Enterococcus were the most common microorganisms. Multiple-drug resistance (MDR) microorganisms were isolated in 28.6, 47.1, and 58.3% of patients with double-J, nephrostomy, and internal-external nephroureteral stents. A percutaneous CUUT (p = 0.005) and immunosuppression (p = 0.034) were risk factors for MDR microorganisms. CONCLUSIONS: Non-E. coli bacteria are commonly isolated in patients with CUUT. MDR microorganisms are frequent, mainly in percutaneous approach or immunosuppression.
Asunto(s)
Catéteres , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Enterococcus , Escherichia coli , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Klebsiella , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Nefrotomía , Estudios Prospectivos , Pseudomonas , Factores de Riesgo , Sistema Urinario/microbiología , beta-Lactamasas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Our aim was to describe the incidence and risk factors associated with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae and their resistance rate in a urological ward. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective observational study from November 2011 to December 2014, reviewing healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in our department. We evaluated the infections caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae. RESULTS: The incidence of HAIs in our urology ward was 6.8%. Enterobacteriaceae including Escherichia coli (24.9%), Klebsiella spp. (12.1%), Enterobacter spp. (5.9%), Morganella spp. (1.5%), Proteus spp. (1.5%), and Citrobacter spp. (1.5%) represented 47.4% of the isolated pathogens. The percentage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was 26.4. Risk factors associated with a higher incidence of ESBL-producing bacteria were prior urinary tract infection (UTI; p < 0.001), hypertension (p = 0.042), immunosuppression (p = 0.004), and urinary stone (p = 0.027). The multivariable analysis confirmed prior UTI, immunosuppression and urinary stone as risk factors. ESBL-producing strains showed resistance rates of 85.3% for fluoroquinolones and 11.8% for carbapenems. Moreover, 16.7% of ESBL-Klebsiella were resistant to carbapenems. CONCLUSIONS: ESBL-producing enterobacteria are associated with higher cross resistance to antibiotics such as quinolones. Higher resistance rates are reported in ESBL-producing Klebsiella. Among patients admitted in a urology ward, risk factors for ESBL-producing strains were previous UTI, immunosuppression, and urinary stone.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Anciano , Enterobacteriaceae/efectos de los fármacos , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , Departamentos de Hospitales , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Urología , beta-Lactamasas/biosíntesisRESUMEN
Objective: To analyze, in a urology ward, the prevalence and characteristics of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO). Methods: We carried out an observational study from 2012 to 2019, evaluating MDRO among patients with HAIs, who were hospitalized in the urology ward. MDRO include Pseudomonas spp., resistant to at least three antibiotic groups, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae or those resistant to carbapenems, and Enterococcus spp. resistant to vancomycin. Results: Among patients with HAIs, MDRO were isolated in 100 out of 438 (22.8%) positive cultures. Univariate and multivariate analyses reported that prior urinary tract infection (UTI) [OR 2.45; 95% CI 1.14-5.36; p=0.021] and immunosuppression [OR 2.13; 95% CI 1.11-4.10; p=0.023] were risk factors for MDRO. A high prevalence of MRDO was found in patients with a catheter in the upper urinary tract; 27.6% for double J stent, 29.6% in those with a nephrostomy tube, and 50% in those with a percutaneous internal/external nephroureteral (PCNU) stent. MDRO were isolated in 28.4% of cultures with Enterobacteriaceae (23.8% and 44.7% in those with E. coli and Klebsiella spp.); 7% of Enterobacteriaceae showed resistance to carbapenems (1.3% and 10% for E. coli and Klebsiella spp., respectively). Three out of 80 Enterococcus spp. were vancomycin-resistant. The rate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to at least three antibiotic groups was 36.3%. Conclusions: The isolation of MDRO, in up to 25% of positive cultures in a urology ward, constitutes a challenge for the selection of antibiotics. MDRO are more common in immunosuppressed patients, those with previous UTIs, and those with a catheter in the upper urinary tract.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To assess the influence of holmium laser cystolitholapaxy (HLC) concomitantly with holmium laser prostate enucleation (HoLEP) on patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) presenting bladder calculi. Materials and Methods: We present a retrospective analysis of patients with BPH (with or without concomitant HLC) at three Spanish centers. Intraoperative variables (e.g., time and resected tissue), changes in functional parameters of the prostate, and frequency of complications (intraoperative, early postoperative, and at 12 months) in patients with and without HLC were compared. Results: The analysis included 963 patients aged 48 to 91 years, of which 54 (5.6%) underwent HLC to treat vesical lithiasis. Mean (range) prostate size (measured by transrectal ultrasound) was 79 (43-173) g and 91 (35-247) g for patients with and without concomitant HLC, respectively (p = 0.080). All bladder calculi were effectively removed. No significant differences were found regarding enucleation and morcellation times, but total operation time was significantly higher in patients with HLC: mean (standard deviation [SD]) of 78 (27) minutes vs 95 (41) minutes (p < 0.001). Three patients underwent conversion to open surgery because of bladder perforation, all of them from the group without HLC. Rates of intraoperative, early, and 12-month complications were similar in both groups. No significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Scale, maximum flow rate (Qmax), and mean flow were observed between groups 12 months after surgery. Conclusions: Simultaneous HoLEP and HLC increases the total operation time, but does not influence the risk of clinically relevant perioperative and postoperative complications.
Asunto(s)
Láseres de Estado Sólido/uso terapéutico , Litotripsia por Láser/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Cálculos de la Vejiga Urinaria/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Holmio , Hospitales de Alto Volumen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cálculos de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga UrinariaRESUMEN
Urology is defined as the medical-surgical specialty that includes the study, diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions of the urinary system. It is well specified by the National Commission of Specialties that we must know the medical pathology that concerns us. However, on occasions, resident training focuses on the surgical field and oncological pathology, which, although one of the main pillars of the specialty, is usually to the detriment of training in medical and functional pathology. We conducted a survey of residents in the fourth year of Urology in Spain, where we asked about the quality of training in Andrology and Functional Urology. The average rotation time is 3.5 months in each unit. Only 20% consider that their training is satisfactory and sufficient in Andrology. Seventy-five percent of residents surveyed believe that their training in Functional Urology is acceptable or sufficient, both medical and surgical. There are numerous fields of action to improve the training of residents and young urologists in this country in the management of urological medical pathology. The future is open, and it is in our hand to set up a training for urology residents within excellence and to be recognized both nationally and internationally as one of the great pillars of Spanish Urology. In this chapter we will analyze the current situation in the training of Spanish Urology Residents in urological medical pathology, and we will focus on training in functional urology and andrology.
Asunto(s)
Urología/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/tendencias , PredicciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in urological patients have special features due to specific risk factors. Our objective was to evaluate the characteristics and risk factors for HAIs in patients hospitalized in a Urology ward. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated prospectively, from 2012 to 2015, the incidence, types and risk factor for HAIs, microbiological and resistance patterns. RESULTS: The incidence of HAIs was 6.3%. The most common types were urinary infections (70.5%) and surgical site infections (22.1%). Univariate analysis showed an increased risk of HAIs among patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system III-IV (odds ratio [OR], 1.39; p<0.001), immunosuppression (OR, 1.80; p=0.013), previous urinary infection (OR, 4.46; p<0,001), and urinary catheter before admission (OR, 1.74; p<0.001). The surgical procedures with the highest incidence of HAIs were radical cystectomy (54.2%) and renal surgery (8.7%). The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Escherichia coli (25.1%), Enterococcus spp. (17.5%), Klebsiella spp. (13.5%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (12.3%). Enterococcus sp was the most common microorganism after radical cystectomy and in surgical site infections, E. coli showed resistance rates of 53.5% for fluoroquinolones, 9.3% for amikacin. The percentage of extended-spectrum betalactamase producing E. coli was 24.7%. Klebsiella spp. showed resistance rates of 47.8% for fluoroquinolones, 7.1% for amikacin and 4.3% for carbapenems. Enterococcus spp showed resistance rates of 1.7% for vancomycin and; P. aeruginosa of 33.3% for carbapenems and 26.2% for amikacin. CONCLUSIONS: Comorbidities, previous urinary infections, and urinary catheter are risk factors for HAIs. The microorganisms most commonly isolated were E. coli, Enterococcus and P. aeruginosa. Prospective monitoring may decrease the incidence of infections.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Unidades Hospitalarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Urología/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amicacina/farmacología , Carbapenémicos/farmacología , Catéteres de Permanencia/efectos adversos , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Cistectomía/efectos adversos , Farmacorresistencia Microbiana , Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/efectos de los fármacos , Escherichia coli/enzimología , Infecciones por Escherichia coli/epidemiología , Femenino , Fluoroquinolonas/farmacología , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Klebsiella/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Klebsiella/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/epidemiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/microbiología , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/microbiología , Vancomicina/farmacología , beta-Lactamasas/metabolismoRESUMEN
La Urología está definida como la especialidad médico-quirúrgica que engloba el estudio, diagnóstico y tratamiento de las afecciones médicas del aparato urinario. Queda bien especificado por la Comisión Nacional de Especialidades que debemos conocer la patología médica que nos compete. Sin embargo, en ocasiones, la formación de los residentes se centra en el ámbito quirúrgico y la patología oncológica, que, si bien es uno de los grandes pilares de la especialidad, suele ser en detrimento de la formación en patología médica y funcional. Hemos realizado una encuesta a residentes de cuarto año de Urología de España, en la que preguntamos sobre la calidad de la formación en Andrología y Urología Funcional. La media de tiempo de rotación es de 3,5 meses en cada unidad. Solo un 20% considera que su formación es satisfactoria y suficiente en Andrología. El 75% de los residentes encuestados considera que su formación en Urología Funcional es aceptable o suficiente, tanto a nivel médico como quirúrgico. Existen numerosos campos de actuación para la mejora de la formación de los residentes y jóvenes urólogos de este país en el manejo de la patología médica urológica. El futuro está abierto, y está en nuestra mano configurar una formación para los residentes de urología dentro de la excelencia y que sea reconocida tanto a nivel nacional como internacional como uno de los grandes pilares de la Urología española. En este capítulo analizaremos la situación actual en la formación de los Residentes de Urología españoles en la patología médica urológica, y nos vamos a centrar en la formación en urología funcional y andrología (AU)
Urology is defined as the medical-surgical specialty that includes the study, diagnosis and treatment of medical conditions of the urinary system. It is well specified by the National Commission of Specialties that we must know the medical pathology that concerns us. However, on occasions, resident training focuses on the surgical field and oncological pathology, which, although one of the main pillars of the specialty, is usually to the detriment of training in medical and functional pathology. We conducted a survey of residents in the fourth year of Urology in Spain, where we asked about the quality of training in Andrology and Functional Urology. The average rotation time is 3.5 months in each unit. Only 20% consider that their training is satisfactory and sufficient in Andrology. Seventy-five percent of residents surveyed believe that their training in Functional Urology is acceptable or sufficient, both medical and surgical. There are numerous fields of action to improve the training of residents and young urologists in this country in the management of urological medical pathology. The future is open, and it is in our hand to set up a training for urology residents within excellence and to be recognized both nationally and internationally as one of the great pillars of Spanish Urology. In this chapter we will analyze the current situation in the training of Spanish Urology Residents in urological medical pathology, and we will focus on training in functional urology and andrology (AU)