Prevalence and overlap of sarcopenia, frailty, cachexia and malnutrition in older medical inpatients.

BACKGROUND: Sarcopenia, frailty, cachexia and malnutrition are widespread syndromes in older people, characterized by loss of body tissue and related to poor outcome. The aim of the present cross-sectional study was to assess the prevalence of these syndromes and their overlap in older medical inpatients. METHODS: Patients aged 70 years or older who had been admitted to the internal medical department of a German university hospital were recruited. Sarcopenia, frailty, cachexia and malnutrition were assessed in a standardized manner according to current consensus definitions. Prevalence rates of these syndromes and their constituents and the concurrent occurrence of the syndromes (overlap) were calculated. RESULTS: One hundred patients (48 female) aged 76.5 ± 4.7 years with a BMI of 27.6 ± 5.5 kg/m2 were included. The main diagnoses were gastroenterological (33%) and oncological diseases (31%). Sarcopenia was present in 42%, frailty in 33%, cachexia in 32% and malnutrition in 15% of the patients. 63% had at least one syndrome: 32% one, 11% two, 12% three and 8% all four. All four syndromes are characterized by significant weight loss during the last 12 months, which was most pronounced in malnourished patients and least pronounced in frail patients, and by significantly reduced physical performance. All syndromes were significantly pairwise related, except malnutrition and frailty. In 19% of patients sarcopenia and frailty occurred concurrently, in 20% frailty and cachexia and in 22% sarcopenia and cachexia with or without additional other syndromes. All malnourished patients except one were also cachectic (93%) and 80% of malnourished patients were also sarcopenic. 53% of malnourished patients were in addition frail, and these patients were affected by all four syndromes. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly two thirds of older medical inpatients had at least one of the tissue loss syndromes sarcopenia, frailty, cachexia and malnutrition. The syndromes overlapped partly and were interrelated. Future studies with larger patient groups and longitudinal design are required to clarify the significance of single and concurrent occurrence of these syndromes for clinical outcome and successful therapy.

Measuring eating motives in older adults with and without functional impairments with The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS).

Gaining a better understanding which motives play a role in daily eating is crucial in order to develop personalized interventions promoting adequate diet. The Eating Motivation Survey (TEMS) is a comprehensive tool to assess manifold reasons for eating but has not been specifically applied in an older sample including very old persons and persons differing in functional status. Therefore, the first step of the study was to investigate whether the basic motives of TEMS are consistent in an older sample and comparable across older adults with and without functional impairments. Second, the study aimed at describing which motives underlie eating behavior in older age most often as well as to analyze the relationship between eating motives and functional status. 376 community-dwelling older persons aged 70 years and older filled in the brief survey version (15 motives à 3 items) of TEMS. The sample comprises 149 unimpaired and 227 impaired participants in terms of physical function. Confirmatory factor analysis yielded good model fit with RMSEA 0.036 and SRMR 0.048. Furthermore, multi-group analysis revealed a generally invariant factor structure across participants with and without functional impairments. Liking was rated to underlie eating behavior most often, followed by Health and Natural Concerns. Considering gender, age and BMI, significant associations between functional status and the motive Sociability emerged. Since the results suggest that the fifteen basic eating motives are generalizable in older age and across different functional states, TEMS might be a valuable tool in nutrition-related health promotion to developing individualized approaches considering health aspects as well as hedonistic factors.

Daily and per-meal animal and plant protein intake in relation to muscle mass in healthy older adults without functional limitations: an enable study.

OBJECTIVE: Animal protein sources are considered to be of higher quality than plant protein sources in terms of stimulating muscle metabolism. Our objective was to investigate whether protein intake from animal and plant sources on a daily and per-meal basis differs between healthy older adults with normal and with low muscle mass. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study including 100 healthy, community-dwelling adults (51 women) aged 75-85 years without functional limitations dietary intake was assessed using 7-day food records. Protein intake was classified by six animal and six plant protein sources. Skeletal muscle index (SMI) was determined based on bioelectrical impedance analysis and categorized into 'normal' or 'low' (men ≤ 8.50, women ≤ 5.75 kg/m2). The absolute animal and plant protein intake and their proportion of total protein intake were compared between these groups using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Daily protein intake was 0.96 ± 0.27 g/kg body weight (BW), 61 ± 10% hereof were from animal origin with no difference between men and women. SMI was low in 39% of men and 35% of women. No differences in absolute daily animal and plant protein intake between participants with normal vs. low SMI were observed. The proportion of animal protein was not different on neither a daily nor a per-meal basis between those with normal and those with low SMI. Women with low SMI consumed less animal protein (in g) for breakfast (4.8 ± 4.1 g vs. 8.5 ± 6.9 g, p = 0.031) and fewer meals per day with at least 50% animal protein (2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 2.7 ± 1.0, p = 0.046) compared to those with normal SMI. CONCLUSION: On a daily basis, the absolute and relative animal protein intake does not differ between healthy older adults without functional limitations with normal vs. low SMI. However, our results indicate that in women animal protein intake on a per-meal basis might be of relevance for the maintenance of muscle mass.

The Relationship Between Healthy Eating Motivation and Protein Intake in Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Varying Functional Status.

In older adults, the relationship between healthy eating motivation (HEM) and protein intake as key component of a healthy diet is poorly understood. Therefore, we investigate the association of HEM with (1) total protein intake and (2) intake of different protein sources in older adults with varying functional status. In this cross-sectional study including 250 adults (≥70 years), we assessed HEM with "The Eating Motivation Survey" and protein intake by 7-day food records. In addition, gender, age, Body Mass Index (BMI), energy intake and functional status were considered. Regression analyses revealed that HEM was neither related to total (ß = -0.02; p = 0.723) nor to relative protein intake (ß = 0.04; p = 0.370). Notwithstanding this, participants with stronger HEM showed lower intake of protein from meat and meat products (ß = -0.14; p = 0.018), higher intake of overall plant-based protein (ß = 0.11; p = 0.032), protein from fruit and vegetables (ß = 0.20.; p = 0.002) and from pulses, nuts an seeds (ß = 0.16; p = 0.016). Our findings suggest HEM as a valuable indicator for intake of distinct protein sources. However, since HEM is not related to total protein intake, the importance of sufficient protein consumption should be emphasized by promoting healthy eating, regardless of self-perceived HEM.

Do Aspects of Protein Intake Vary Across the Week in Healthy Community-Dwelling Older Adults?-An enable Study.

Various aspects of protein intake are thought to be crucial for the prevention of sarcopenia in older adults. Information about the day-to-day variation in these aspects is lacking. Our objective was to examine whether daily protein intake, protein distribution across meals, number of meals providing adequate protein, and protein sources vary across the week in healthy community-dwelling older adults. In 140 persons (51% women) that were aged 75⁻85 years, protein intake was assessed by seven-day food records. On average across the week, protein intake (median [IQR]) was 0.93 [0.79⁻1.10] g/kg body weight (BW) and the coefficient of variation across the three main meals was 0.50 [0.40⁻0.61]. The number of meals per day providing ≥0.4 g protein/kg BW was 0.57 [0.43⁻1.00] and 60.0 [52.4⁻65.2]% of protein intake was animal-based. According to Friedman's test, differences throughout the week were observed in women for daily protein intake (p = 0.038; Sunday: 0.99 [0.78⁻1.31] vs. Tuesday: 0.79 [0.68⁻1.12] g/kg BW) and number of meals with adequate protein (p = 0.019; ≥1 daily meal: Sunday: 69.4% vs. Tuesday: 41.7%). On Sunday, protein intake was most in agreement with suggestions to prevent sarcopenia. In men, protein intake did not differ throughout the week.

Amount, Distribution, and Quality of Protein Intake Are Not Associated with Muscle Mass, Strength, and Power in Healthy Older Adults without Functional Limitations-An enable Study.

To maintain muscle mass in older age, several aspects regarding the amount and distribution of protein intake have been suggested. Our objective was to investigate single and combined associations of daily protein intake, evenness of protein distribution across the three main meals, number of meals providing ≥0.4 g protein/kg body weight (BW), and number of meals providing ≥2.5 g leucine, with muscle mass, strength, and power in successful agers. In this cross-sectional study in 97 healthy community-dwelling adults without functional limitations aged 75-85 years, protein intake was assessed using 7-day food records. Muscle mass, leg muscle strength, leg muscle power, and handgrip strength were measured according to standardized protocols. Mean daily protein intake was 0.97 ± 0.28 g/kg BW and the coefficient of variance between main meals was 0.53 ± 0.19. Per day, 0.72 ± 0.50 meals providing ≥0.4 g protein/kg BW and 1.11 ± 0.76 meals providing ≥2.5 g leucine were consumed. No correlations between single or combined aspects of protein intake and skeletal muscle index, leg muscle power, leg muscle strength, or handgrip strength were observed (Spearman's r of -0.280 to 0.291). In this sample of healthy older adults without functional limitations, aspects of protein intake were not associated with muscle mass, strength, or power.