Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Future Oncol ; 11(15 Suppl): 31-6, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26235263

RESUMEN

AIM: EMA licensed eribulin mesylate in 2011 for women with advanced breast cancer already treated with at least two lines of chemotherapy, including anthracyclines and taxanes. Azienda Sanitaria Firenze experience is reported to assess the efficacy and safety of eribulin in the real-life setting. PATIENTS & METHODS: Eribulin was infused as per indication. All women treated in the last 2 years were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 27 women received eribulin. All but one was pretreated with anthracyclines, 97% with taxanes and 87% with capecitabine. Median age was 63 years (range: 27-80). A median of four cycles of eribulin were infused (range: 2-10). Overall response rate was 30% with a 45% of clinical benefit (response plus stable disease for at least 24 weeks). Toxicities have been as expected. Severe toxicities were rare, with one patient experiencing sepsis and 18% developing grade 3 asthenia. CONCLUSION: Eribulin maintains its activity out of clinical trials, without unexpected toxicities.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Furanos/uso terapéutico , Cetonas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Femenino , Furanos/administración & dosificación , Furanos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Cetonas/administración & dosificación , Cetonas/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Clin Neuropsychiatry ; 19(6): 355-364, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627943

RESUMEN

Objective: This mixed-methods study aimed to explore the role of externalizing traits in moderating the relationship between COVID-19 risk perception and vaccine hesitancy in patients diagnosed with cancer. A community-based participatory approach - comprising a preliminary qualitative inquiry and a subsequent cross-sectional research - was used to promote effective vaccination campaigns. Method: 12 people diagnosed with cancer and 7 cancer professionals were recruited for the qualitative inquiry, 356 people either under cancer treatment or in follow-up care for the cross-sectional research.A phenomenological analysis explored the transcripts of two focus groups. The cross-sectional research tested the hypothesis emerged during the previous qualitative inquiry through self-reported questionnaires and moderated regression. Results: Phenomenological analysis suggested a pivotal role of externalizing traits in vaccine hesitancy. Moderated regression revealed how the association between risk perception and vaccine hesitancy is moderated by externalizing traits, even when controlled for treatment adherence. Conclusions: In the present study we found a stronger relationship between risk perception and vaccine hesitancy for patients with higher levels of externalizing traits. We suggest that vaccination campaigns should be personality-informed to offer individualized and effective solutions. Patients with externalizing traits may cope dysfunctionally with vaccination campaigns.

3.
Eur J Cancer ; 170: 149-157, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35635936

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International and national oncology societies had released recommendations in favor of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. In the context of the national vaccination campaign targeting the so called extremely vulnerable, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines in a cohort of 623 patients. METHODS: Between March 26 and April 04, 2021, the Pfizer and BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA and the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines were given as a two-dose prime-boost regimen. Starting on September 25th 2021 a third dose was offered to patients in whom a suboptimal immunogenicity with COVID-19 vaccination could be expected. Safety assessments were performed by phone call 7 days after each dose. Electronic health records were accessed to review demographic information, disease history, treatment detail, and outcome events of participants patients'. FINDINGS: No toxicities were reported in 63.7%, 54%, and in 48.7% patients with cancer after each dose. Mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site was the most commonly adverse event. After the second dose, 46% of the 610 patients reported toxicity, with more systemic side-effects observed. Fever was reported in 45% of patients, with a temperature ≥ 38 °C in 21.4% of them. Of the 335 patients receiving a third vaccine dose, 51% reported toxicity, with 13% of patients reporting more than one effect. Logistic regression analysis reported mixed results, with limited variables or categories reporting a significant odd ratio. The type of vaccine reported a significant value at first dose (OR = 0.12; CI 0.52, 0.26; p = 0.00). Thirty-four cases of COVID-19 infection were reported with only one patient requiring a short-term hospitalization for monitoring. INTERPRETATION: The safety profile of the mRNA vaccines does not raise any specific concerns and support prioritization of vaccination for cancer patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Vacunas , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Humanos , Programas de Inmunización , Oncología Médica , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/terapia , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunas/efectos adversos
4.
Can J Gastroenterol ; 18(10): 611-8, 2004 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15497001

RESUMEN

The treatment of early and intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is still debated. Surgical treatments are considered to be the only curative procedures available, and only for a minority of patients. Percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) is an established technique for the ablation of HCC nodules, and shows survival rates similar to those of resection. The efficacy of PEI in patients with biopsy-proven viral cirrhosis and small to intermediate inoperable HCC was evaluated. One hundred twenty-seven patients (85 men, 42 women, mean age 63 years, range 51 to 92 years, 115 hepatitis C virus-positive, 12 hepatitis B virus-positive) were enrolled between January 1993 and December 2002. They all underwent a standard PEI procedure and were prospectively followed-up. Overall median survival rate was 28 months (range six to 112 months). The following parameters were associated with a significantly longer survival: nodule diameter smaller than 30 mm (P=0.0480), the presence of a perinodular boundary (P=0.0008), serum alpha-fetoprotein less than 20 ng/mL (P=0.0104), a Child-Pugh A class score (P<0.0001) or a Cancer of the Liver Italian Program score of 0 (P<0.0001) and the presence or absence of small esophageal varices (P=0.013). The 19 patients with all these favourable characteristics showed an overall median survival of 61 months. An alpha-fetoprotein below 20 ng/mL was associated with significantly longer disease-free survival (P=0.0009). The Child-Pugh and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program scores were effective in predicting prognosis of these patients. In conclusion, PEI still represents a safe and economically sound treatment for HCC.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Etanol/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia con Aguja , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Inyecciones Intralesiones , Italia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Probabilidad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Anticancer Drugs ; 18(10): 1207-11, 2007 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17893522

RESUMEN

The purpose of the study was to evaluate objective response rate, survival and toxicity of the combination of gemcitabine-docetaxel administered on a biweekly schedule as first-line treatment in advanced/relapsed or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Treatment consisted of the sequenced administration of gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) (2 h intravenous infusion) on days 1, 14 of a 28-day cycle for 6 months. A total of 33 patients, 22 men and 11 women, were enrolled, aged 41-75 years (median 64 years). The majority of patients had a good performance status (94%; status<2). Thirteen patients had locally advanced disease (39%) and 20 metastasic disease (41%). A total of 178 treatment cycles were administered with a median number of 5.4 cycles for a patients (range 2-8). Toxicity was primarily hematologic with the most frequent grade >2 being neutropenia (11%), with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Anemia and thrombocytopenia were milder and had a lower incidence. The most frequent nonhematological toxicities were alopecia, followed by asthenia. Cardiac and pulmonary toxicity was minimal. No toxic deaths were recorded during study and follow-up. Overall response rate was 53.1%, including four complete responses (12.5%) and 13 partial responses (40.6%), whereas six patients (18.8%) had disease stabilization. Median time to progression was 10.2 months (95% confidence interval: 5.1-13.7), with a median survival of 14.8 months (95% confidence interval: 9.4-20.2) after an observation of 30 months (range 4-30+). The results of this study suggested that combination therapy with gemcitabine and docetaxel administered twice a week is particularly active and well tolerated as first-line treatment in advanced and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Once data are confirmed in a larger study and longer follow-up, the favorable toxicity profile of this regimen may offer an interesting alternative to the cisplatin-based regimen.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Urológicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma de Células Transicionales/patología , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Docetaxel , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Taxoides/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Urotelio/patología , Gemcitabina
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA