Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Epidemiol Prev ; 33(4-5): 147-53, 2009.
Artículo en Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20124629

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: the study evaluates the accuracy of an algorithm based on hospital discharge data (HDD) in order to estimate breast cancer incidence in three italian regions (Emilia-Romagna, Toscana and Veneto) covered by cancer registries (CR). The evolution of computer-based information systems in health organization suggests automatic processing of HDD as a possible alternative to the time-consuming methods of CR. The study intends to verify whether HDD quickly provides reliable cancer incidence estimates for diagnosis and therapy evaluations. DESIGN AND SETTING: an algorithm based on discharge diagnosis and surgical therapy of hospitalized breast cancer patients was developed in order to provide breast cancer incidence. Results were compared with the corresponding incidence data of cancer registries. The accuracy of the automatic method was also verified by a direct record-linkage between HDD output and registries' files. The overall survival of cases lost to "HDD method" was analyzed. RESULTS: in the period covered by the study (3,125,425 person/year) CR enrolled 6,079 incident cases, compared to 6,000 cases recorded through the HDD flow. Incidence rates of the two methods (CR 194.5; HDD 192.0 x 100.000) showed no statistical differences. However, matched cases by the two methods were only 5,038. The sensitivity of the HDD algorithm was 82.9% and its predictive positive value (PPV) was 84.0%. False positive cases were 9.9%. On the other hand, 12.3% CR incident cases were not identified by the algorithm: these were mainly made up of older women, not eligible for surgical therapy. Their three-years survival was 62.0% vs 88.8% of the whole incidence group. CONCLUSION: HDD flow performance was similar to observations reported in the literature. The agreement between HDD and CR incidence rates is a result of a cross effect of both sensitivity and specificity limitations of the HDD algorithm. This can seriously impair the reliability of the latter method with regard to the evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in cohort studies (i.e. the most effective approach to health setting in oncology).s.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Sistemas de Registros Médicos Computarizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Mastectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis por Apareamiento , Registro Médico Coordinado , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
2.
Dig Liver Dis ; 47(12): 1076-81, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26476476

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The worldwide decrease in gastric cancer incidence is due to a birth-cohort-dependent decrease in exposure to major risk factors. METHODS: In an area of northern Italy with a historically strong internal geographical gradient in gastric cancer incidence, variations in rates by municipality and age group between 1987 and 2008 were evaluated. The study period was divided into three nonadjacent periods. End points included: age- and sex-standardised incidence rates; incidence rate ratio between age- and sex-standardised incidence rates; smoothed relative risks of gastric cancer incidence, and posterior probabilities of the relative risk being >1. RESULTS: In 1987-1990, the estimate of posterior probabilities of relative risk being >1 showed a higher incidence in hilly/mountainous areas. Between 1987-1990 and 2005-2008, a uniform decrease of more than 50% was observed (incidence rate ratio: plain, 0.45 (95% confidence interval 0.40-0.51); hill, 0.44 (0.34-0.58); mountain, 0.48 (0.22-1.02)). The decrease in the mountainous area was weak in the middle time period, with an incidence rate ratio of 0.92 (0.46-1.84), and intensified afterwards. The decrease occurred earlier and was more pronounced among younger people. In 2005-2008, gastric cancer risk was uniform across ages and municipalities. CONCLUSIONS: The observed changes in gastric cancer incidence is the epilogue of a birth-cohort-dependent decrease in exposure to major risk factors.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis Espacio-Temporal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA