Burden of acute otitis media in primary care pediatrics in Italy: a secondary data analysis from the Pedianet database.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of acute otitis media (AOM) vary from country to country. Geographical variations together with differences in study designs, reporting and settings play a role. We assessed the incidence of AOM in Italian children seen by primary care paediatricians (PCPs), and described the methods used to diagnose the disease. METHODS: This secondary data analysis from the Pedianet database considered children aged 0-6 years between 01/2003 and 12/2007. The AOM episodes were identified and validated by means of patient diaries. Incidence rates/100 person-years (PY) were calculated for total AOM and for single or recurrent AOM. RESULTS: The 92,373 children (52.1% males) were followed up for a total of 227,361 PY: 23,039 (24.9%) presented 38,241 episodes of AOM (94.6% single episodes and 5.4% recurrent episodes). The total incidence rate of AOM in the 5-year period was 16.8 episodes per 100 PY (95% CI: 16.7-16.9), including single AOM (15.9 episodes per 100 PY; 95% CI: 15.7-16.1) and recurrent AOM (0.9 episodes per 100 PY; 95% CI: 0.9-0.9). There was a slight and continuously negative trend decrease over time (annual percent change -4.6%; 95%CI: -5.3, -3.9%). The AOM incidence rate varied with age, peaking in children aged 3 to 4 years (22.2 episodes per 100 PY; 95% CI 21.8-22.7). The vast majority of the AOM episodes (36,842/38,241, 96.3%) were diagnosed using a static otoscope; a pneumatic otoscope was used in only 3.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Our data fill a gap in our knowledge of the incidence of AOM in Italy, and indicate that AOM represents a considerable burden for the Italian PCP system. Educational programmes concerning the diagnosis of AOM are needed, as are further studies to monitor the incidence in relation to the introduction of wider pneumococcal conjugate vaccines.

Innovative study design for paediatric clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Despite representing a fundamental step towards the efficacious and safe utilisation of drugs in the paediatric population, the conduct of clinical trials in children poses several problems. Methodological issues and ethical concerns represent the major obstacles that have traditionally limited paediatric research. The randomised clinical trial, mainstay of clinical studies to assess the effects of any therapeutic intervention, shows some weaknesses that make it scarcely applicable to the paediatric population. Alternative and innovative approaches to clinical trial design in small populations have been developed in the last few decades with the aim of overcoming the limits related to small samples and to the acceptability of the trial. METHODS: This systematic review describes a variety of alternative designs to assess efficacy and safety in the paediatric population, including their applicability, advantages, disadvantages and real case examples. Approaches include sequential and adaptive designs, Bayesian methods and other innovative approaches. RESULTS: By limiting the sample size and increasing acceptability, these methods may rationally limit the amount of experimentation in children to what is achievable, necessary and ethical CONCLUSION: Thanks to their features, these methods represent a reliable way of ultimately improving paediatric care.