Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 46(6): 348-353, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260367

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess U-score individual values as urethral complex surgery predictors. METHODS: Cross-sectional study including patients who received anterior urethroplasty from 2011 to 2019. U-score (etiology (1-2 points), number of strictures (1-2 points), anatomic location (1-2 points) and length (1-3 points)) was measured individually and globally. Surgical complexity was defined as low (anastomotic, buccal mucosal graft, and augmented anterior urethroplasty), and high complexity (double buccal mucosal graft, flap, and graft/flap combination). U-score components were included as complex surgery predictor and as main variable with individual probability values estimations and comparisons. Risk complex surgery probability groups were established. RESULTS: 654 patients were included. Mean age was 57.2 years. Low complexity surgery was performed in 464 patients (259 anastomotic, 144 graft, 61 augmented anterior urethroplasty) and high complexity was done in 190 (53 double buccal mucosa graft, 27 flap, 110 graft/flap comb.). In multivariate analysis length, number of strictures and location were predictors of complexity. Introducing U-Score as only variable in univariate model predicted an OR 8.52 (95%CI 6.1-11). Simplified U-score grouping set obtained by complex probability was: low risk (4-5 points), medium risk (6 points) and high risk of complexity (7-9 points) Predicted risk of complex surgery probability (95%CI) for low, median and high risk group were 1.6 (0-2.9), 19.1 (13.8-25.9) and 77.9 (61.6-88.7), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: U-score can be used as a tool to predict complex urethral surgery. We present a simplified U-score risk tool to assess individual complex anterior urethroplasty probability.


Asunto(s)
Estrechez Uretral , Constricción Patológica , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos
2.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 45(8): 557-563, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34526253

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and complications after urethroplasty based on patient age groups. As secondary objective, we analyzed the impact of operative complexity on each age group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that include male patients who underwent urethroplasty between January 2011 and December 2018. Data was obtained from the patients' electronic health records. Patients were grouped as follows: <60 years, 60-79 years and >80 years. Variables evaluated were history, comorbidities, previous surgeries and operative complexity. Restenosis-free survival and complications presented in each group were determined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The SPSS® program was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included, and the mean follow-up was 19 months. The estimated 2-year restenosis-free survival in the population under 60, 60-79 and over 80 years was 87, 87 and 93.9% (IC 95%), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the age group was not a predictor of restenosis. Complex surgery is the only predictor of recurrence, increasing the risk by 60% (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.05-2.56, p = 0.029). There was an overall complication rate of 30.8%, and 62% of these were Clavien ≤ II. We found no association between the frequency of complications and age. CONCLUSIONS: Urethroplasty is safe and effective regardless of age group. There are no statistically significant differences in outcomes and complications shown by the age group comparison. There were no significant differences when analyzing the impact of complex surgeries among the different age groups. The data indicate that age alone should not be taken as an absolute exclusion criterion for patients needing urethral reconstruction.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Estrechez Uretral , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos
3.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682509

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the results and complications after urethroplasty based on patient age groups. As secondary objective, we analyzed the impact of operative complexity on each age group. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study that include male patients who underwent urethroplasty between January 2011 and December 2018. Data was obtained from the patients' electronic health records. Patients were grouped as follows: < 60 years, 60-79 years and > 80 years. Variables evaluated were history, comorbidities, previous surgeries and operative complexity. Restenosis-free survival and complications presented in each group were determined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The SPSS® program was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 783 patients were included, and the mean follow-up was 19 months. The estimated 2-year restenosis-free survival in the population under 60, 60-79 and over 80 years was 87, 87 and 93.9% (IC 95%), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the age group was not a predictor of restenosis. Complex surgery is the only predictor of recurrence, increasing the risk by 60% (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.05-2.56, p = 0.029). There was an overall complication rate of 30.8%, and 62% of these were Clavien ≤ II. We found no association between the frequency of complications and age. CONCLUSIONS: Urethroplasty is safe and effective regardless of age group. There are no statistically significant differences in outcomes and complications shown by the age group comparison. There were no significant differences when analyzing the impact of complex surgeries among the different age groups. The data indicate that age alone should not be taken as an absolute exclusion criterion for patients needing urethral reconstruction.

4.
Int Urol Nephrol ; 52(10): 1899-1905, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440837

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of postoperative urinary extravasation (POUE) following anterior urethroplasty, to analyze factors associated with its occurrence, and to study the impact of POUE on surgical success. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all male patients who have undergone a urethroplasty at our center between 2011 and 2018. Subjects with posterior location stricture, those who did not undergo routine radiographic follow-up, or patients with inadequate follow-up were excluded. Urinary extravasation was defined as presence of evident contrast extravasation on the postoperative voiding cystourethrogram (VCUG). Impact was determined as "need-for-reoperation". Uni- and multivariate analysis were performed to determine clinical and demographic variables associated with occurrence of extravasation and postoperative stricture. RESULTS: A total of 783 men underwent a urethroplasty and 630 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Urinary extravasation prevalence was 12.2%, and there was a "need-for-reoperation" in 1.1% of cases. On uni- and multivariate analysis, greatest stricture length (HR: 1.07 (1-1.2), p = 0.05) and penile urethral location (HR: 2.29 (1.1-4.6), p = 0.021) showed to be POUE predictors. POUE did not show to be a risk factor for postoperative stricture (HR: 1.57, 95% CI (0.8-3), p = 0.173). However, reoperation group  showed to be a risk factor (HR: 6.6, 95% CI 1.4-31, p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of POUE was 12.2%. Stricture length and penile urethral strictures were POUE predictors. POUE occurrence with successful conservative management did not appear to have impact on urethroplasty outcomes as it did not predict re-stricture. POUE was reoperation cause in 1.1% of total cases.


Asunto(s)
Extravasación de Materiales Terapéuticos y Diagnósticos/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Uretra/cirugía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Orina , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos/métodos
5.
Actas Urol Esp ; 40(6): 353-60, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26794623

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: The treatment of high-risk prostate cancer requires a multimodal approach to improve control of the disease. There is still no consensus as to the initial strategy of choice. The aim of this study is to review the results of radical prostatectomy as first step in management of patients with high-risk disease. ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE: A search was conducted on PubMed of English and Spanish texts. We included those studies that reported the results of radical prostatectomy in patients with high-risk prostate cancer, as well as those that compared radical prostatectomy with other treatment alternatives. The last search was conducted in November 2015. SYNTHESIS OF THE EVIDENCE: The advantages of radical prostatectomy include a better pathological analysis, more accurate staging, better local control of the disease and better follow-up and adjuvant therapy strategies. When compared with external radiation therapy plus hormonal blockade, the patients who underwent prostatectomy had greater chances of healing and longer cancer-specific survival. The patients who most benefit from this approach are younger, have fewer comorbidities and no evidence of organ metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The available scientific evidence to date is not without bias and confounders; however, they appear to favour radical prostatectomy as the initial approach of choice for high-risk prostate cancer.


Asunto(s)
Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Actas Urol Esp ; 40(2): 124-30, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26515118

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following prostatectomy is uncommon but represents a challenge for reconstructive surgery and has a significant impact on quality of life. The aim of this study was to relate our experience in managing vesicourethral anastomotic strictures and present the treatment algorithm used in our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a descriptive, retrospective study in which we assessed the medical records of 45 patients with a diagnosis of vesicourethral anastomotic stricture following radical prostatectomy. The patients were treated in the same healthcare centre between January 2002 and March 2015. Six patients were excluded for meeting the exclusion criteria. The stricture was assessed using cystoscopy and urethrocystography. The patients with patent urethral lumens were initially treated with minimally invasive procedures. Open surgery was indicated for the presence of urethral lumen obliteration or when faced with failure of endoscopic treatment. Urinary continence following the prostatectomy was determinant in selecting the surgical approach (abdominal or perineal). RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients treated for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture were recorded. The mean age was 64.4 years, and the mean follow-up was 40.3 months. Thirty-three patients were initially treated endoscopically. Seventy-five percent progressed free of restenosis following 1 to 4 procedures. Twelve patients underwent open surgery, 6 initially due to obliterative stricture and 6 after endoscopic failure. All patients progressed favourable after a mean follow-up of 29.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic surgery is the initial treatment option for patients with vesicourethral anastomotic strictures with patent urethral lumens. Open reanastomosis is warranted when faced with recalcitrant or initially obliterative strictures and provides good results.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Prostatectomía , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prostatectomía/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estrechez Uretral/complicaciones , Obstrucción del Cuello de la Vejiga Urinaria/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
7.
Actas Urol Esp ; 38(2): 84-9, 2014 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24119633

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to analyze the clinical and surgical features of patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) at our institution, and the impact of the surgeon's experience in the oncological results related to pathological stage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An analysis of 300 RARP consecutively performed by the same urologist was conducted. Patients were divided into 3 groups of 100 patients in chronological order, according to surgery date. All patients had organ-confined clinical stage. Variables which could impact in positive margins rates were analyzed. Finally, positive surgical margins (PSM) in regard to pathological stage and surgeon's experience were compared and analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in variables which could impact in PSM rates. The overall PSM rate was 21%, with 28% in the first group, 20% in the second, and 16% in the third (P = .108). Significant lineal decreasing tendency was observed (P = .024). In pT2 patients, the overall PSM rate was 16.6%, with 27%, 13.8%, and 7.3% in each group respectively (P = .009). A significant difference was found between group 1 and group 3 (P = .004). In pT3 patients, the surgeon's experience was not significantly associated with margin reductions with an overall PSM rate of 27.7% (28.2%, 28.6%, and 26.7% in each group respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and surgical features in our patients did not vary over time. We found a significant reduction of PSM related to surgeon's experience in pT2 patients. Contrariwise, the margin status remained stable despite increasing experience in pT3 patients.


Asunto(s)
Próstata/patología , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias
8.
Actas urol. esp ; 46(6): 348-353, jul. - ago. 2022. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-208684

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Evaluar los valores individuales del U-score como factores predictores de la cirugía uretral compleja.Métodos: Estudio transversal que incluye a los pacientes que recibieron una uretroplastia anterior entre 2011 y 2019. Se midieron las variables del U-score (etiología [1-2 puntos], número de estenosis [1-2 puntos], localización anatómica (1-2 puntos) y longitud [1-3 puntos]) de manera individual y total. La complejidad quirúrgica se definió como baja (anastomosis, injerto de mucosa oral y uretroplastia anterior ampliada) y alta (injerto doble de mucosa oral, colgajo y combinación de injerto y colgajo). Los componentes del U-score se incluyeron como predictores de cirugía compleja y como variables principales con estimaciones y comparaciones de los valores de probabilidad individuales. Se establecieron grupos según la probabilidad de riesgo de cirugía compleja.Resultados: Se incluyeron 654 pacientes. La edad media fue de 57,2 años. Se realizó cirugía de baja complejidad en 464 pacientes (259 anastomosis, 144 injertos, 61 uretroplastia anterior aumentada) y de alta complejidad en 190 (53 injerto doble de mucosa oral, 27 colgajo, 110 combinación injerto/colgajo). En el análisis multivariante, la longitud, el número de estenosis y la localización fueron predictores de complejidad. La introducción del U-score como única variable en el modelo univariante predijo una OR de 8,52 (IC 95%: 6,1-11). Los grupos del U-score simplificado obtenidos por probabilidad de complejidad fueron: riesgo bajo (4-5 puntos), riesgo intermedio (6 puntos) y riesgo alto de complejidad (7-9 puntos) La predicción del riesgo de probabilidad de cirugía compleja (IC 95%) para el grupo de riesgo bajo, medio y alto fue de 1,6 (0-2,9), 19,1 (13,8-25,9) y 77,9 (61,6-88,7), respectivamente.Conclusiones: El U-score puede utilizarse como una herramienta predictiva de la cirugía uretral compleja. Presentamos la herramienta de riesgo U-score simplificado para evaluar


Objective: To assess U-score individual values as urethral complex surgery predictors.Methods: Cross-sectional study including patients who received anterior urethroplasty from 2011 to 2019. U-score (etiology (1-2 points), number of strictures (1-2 points), anatomic location (1-2 points) and length (1-3 points)) was measured individually and globally. Surgical complexity was defined as low (anastomotic, buccal mucosal graft, and augmented anterior urethroplasty), and high complexity (double buccal mucosal graft, flap, and graft/flap combination). U-score components were included as complex surgery predictor and as main variable with individual probability values estimations and comparisons. Risk complex surgery probability groups were established.Results: 654 patients were included. Mean age was 57.2 years. Low complexity surgery was performed in 464 patients (259 anastomotic, 144 graft, 61 augmented anterior urethroplasty) and high complexity was done in 190 (53 double buccal mucosa graft, 27 flap, 110 graft/flap comb.). In multivariate analysis length, number of strictures and location were predictors of complexity. Introducing U-Score as only variable in univariate model predicted an OR 8.52 (95%CI 6.1-11). Simplified U-score grouping set obtained by complex probability was: low risk (4-5 points), medium risk (6 points) and high risk of complexity (7-9 points) Predicted risk of complex surgery probability (95%CI) for low, median and high risk group were 1.6 (0-2.9), 19.1 (13.8-25.9) and 77.9 (61.6-88.7), respectively.Conclusions: U-score can be used as a tool to predict complex urethral surgery. We present a simplified U-score risk tool to assess individual complex anterior urethroplasty probability (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estrechez Uretral/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos Masculinos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Transversales
9.
Actas urol. esp ; 45(8): 557-563, octubre 2021. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS (España) | ID: ibc-217015

RESUMEN

Objetivo: Analizar los resultados y las complicaciones posturetroplastia estratificando a los pacientes por edades. Como objetivo secundario, analizamos el impacto de la complejidad de la cirugía en cada grupo etario.Material y métodosSe trata de un estudio de cohortes, retrospectivo, donde se incluyó a todos los pacientes masculinos a quienes se les practicó uretroplastia entre enero de 2011 y diciembre de 2018. La información se obtuvo de la historia clínica electrónica. Los pacientes se agruparon en menores de 60 años, de 60 a 79 años y mayores de 80 años. Se evaluaron diferentes variables como antecedentes, comorbilidades, cirugías previas, complejidad de la cirugía. Se determinó la supervivencia libre de reestenosis y las complicaciones presentadas en cada grupo, según la clasificación de Clavien Dindo. Se utilizó el programa SPSS® para el análisis estadístico.ResultadosSe incluyeron un total de 783 pacientes. El seguimiento promedio fue de 19 meses. La sobrevida estimada a dos años libre de reestenosis en la población menor a 60, de 60 a 79 y mayor de 80 años fue de 87, 87 y 93,9% (IC 95%), respectivamente. En el análisis univariado, el grupo etario no fue una variable predictora de reestenosis. La realización de cirugía compleja es el único factor predictor de recidiva, aumentando el riesgo en un 60% (HR 1,64 IC 95% 1,05-2,56 p = 0,029). Se presentó una tasa general de complicaciones del 30,8%, siendo el 62% Clavien menor a dos. No encontramos asociación entre la frecuencia de las mismas y la edad. (AU)


Objective: To analyze the results and complications after urethroplasty based on patient age groups. As secondary objective, we analyzed the impact of operative complexity on each age group.Material and methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that include male patients who underwent urethroplasty between January 2011 and December 2018. Data was obtained from the patients’ electronic health records. Patients were grouped as follows: < 60 years, 60-79 years and > 80 years. Variables evaluated were history, comorbidities, previous surgeries and operative complexity. Restenosis-free survival and complications presented in each group were determined according to the Clavien-Dindo classification system. The SPSS® program was used for statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 783 patients were included, and the mean follow-up was 19 months. The estimated 2-year restenosis-free survival in the population under 60, 60-79 and over 80 years was 87, 87 and 93.9% (IC 95%), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that the age group was not a predictor of restenosis. Complex surgery is the only predictor of recurrence, increasing the risk by 60% (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.05-2.56, p = 0.029). There was an overall complication rate of 30.8%, and 62% of these were Clavien ≤ II. We found no association between the frequency of complications and age. (AU)


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Estrechez Uretral , Registros Médicos , Pacientes , Comorbilidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA