Are T2WI PI-RADS sub-scores of transition zone prostate lesions biased by DWI information? A multi-reader, single-center study.

PURPOSE: According to PI-RADS v2.1, T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) is the dominant sequence for transition zone (TZ) lesions. This study aimed to assess, whether diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) information influences the assignment of T2WI scores. METHOD: Out of 283 prostate MRI examinations with correlated biopsy results, fourty-four patients were selected retrospectively: first, 22 patients with a TZ lesion with T2WI and DWI scores ≥ 4, to represent lesions with unequivocal suspicion on T2WI and DWI. Second, 22 additional patients with TZ lesions of similar T2WI appearance but with corresponding DWI score ≤ 3 were added as control. Four residents and one board-certified radiologist each performed two assessments of the included patients: First, only T2WI was available (T2-only read); second, both T2WI and DWI sequences were available (biparametric read). Lesion scores were assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, inter-reader agreement using weighted kappa and Kendall's W statistics, and sensitivity/specificity using McNemar test. RESULTS: The T2WI scores were significantly different between the T2-only and biparametric read for 3 out of 4 residents (p ≤ 0.049) but not for the radiologist. The overall PI-RADS scores derived from the two reading sessions differed considerably for 35/220 cases (all readers pooled). Inter-reader agreement was fair for the T2WI and overall PI-RADS scores (mean kappa 0.27-0.30) and moderate for the DWI scores (mean kappa 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: For inexperienced readers, assessment of T2WI is variable and potentially biased by availability of DWI information, which can lead to changes of overall PI-RADS score and consequently clinical management. Assessment of T2WI should be performed before reviewing DWI to ensure non-biased interpretation of TZ lesions in the dominant sequence.

Pseudoprospective Paraclinical Interaction of Radiology Residents With a Deep Learning System for Prostate Cancer Detection: Experience, Performance, and Identification of the Need for Intermittent Recalibration.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to estimate the prospective utility of a previously retrospectively validated convolutional neural network (CNN) for prostate cancer (PC) detection on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The biparametric (T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted) portion of clinical multiparametric prostate MRI from consecutive men included between November 2019 and September 2020 was fully automatically and individually analyzed by a CNN briefly after image acquisition (pseudoprospective design). Radiology residents performed 2 research Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessments of the multiparametric dataset independent from clinical reporting (paraclinical design) before and after review of the CNN results and completed a survey. Presence of clinically significant PC was determined by the presence of an International Society of Urological Pathology grade 2 or higher PC on combined targeted and extended systematic transperineal MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy. Sensitivities and specificities on a patient and prostate sextant basis were compared using the McNemar test and compared with the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of CNN. Survey results were summarized as absolute counts and percentages. RESULTS: A total of 201 men were included. The CNN achieved an ROC area under the curve of 0.77 on a patient basis. Using PI-RADS ≥3-emulating probability threshold (c3), CNN had a patient-based sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 54.8%, not statistically different from the current clinical routine PI-RADS ≥4 assessment at 90.9% and 54.8%, respectively ( P = 0.30/ P = 1.0). In general, residents achieved similar sensitivity and specificity before and after CNN review. On a prostate sextant basis, clinical assessment possessed the highest ROC area under the curve of 0.82, higher than CNN (AUC = 0.76, P = 0.21) and significantly higher than resident performance before and after CNN review (AUC = 0.76 / 0.76, P ≤ 0.03). The resident survey indicated CNN to be helpful and clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudoprospective paraclinical integration of fully automated CNN-based detection of suspicious lesions on prostate multiparametric MRI was demonstrated and showed good acceptance among residents, whereas no significant improvement in resident performance was found. General CNN performance was preserved despite an observed shift in CNN calibration, identifying the requirement for continuous quality control and recalibration.