Clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetic properties of topically applied corticosteroids. A review.

The development of topical corticosteroids since the 1950s has opened new doors for dermatologists previously faced with treating intractable dermatoses, so that the pharmacology of topically applied corticosteroids is now reasonably well described. Manipulation of the steroid molecule has produced compounds with greater lipophilicity, fewer mineralocorticoid properties and high potency. Potency is determined through various techniques, notably the vasoconstrictor assay as well as the mitotic index suppression method and atrophogenic potential assay. The mechanism of activity of corticosteroids is thought to result, at least in part, from binding of the drug to steroid receptors, with resultant effects on the synthesis of proteins responsible for specific effects. Corticosteroids are proposed to alter the inflammatory response, and thus provide therapeutic benefits, via actions on mediator release and function, inflammatory cell function and release of lysosomal enzymes. Disadvantages of corticosteroid activity include the possibility of adrenal suppression, epidermal and dermal thinning, and local effects such as purpura, striae, and steroid-induced rosacea and perioral dermatitis. The cutaneous pharmacokinetics, particularly of absorption of topical corticosteroids, must be examined in parallel with their pharmacodynamic effects to gain a more complete understanding of activity. Many factors can affect percutaneous steroid absorption: drug lipophilicity and solubility, drug concentration, anatomical site, age of the patient, presence of skin disease and use of occlusive dressings will each influence the degree to which topically applied corticosteroids achieve their intended therapeutic results. Cutaneous metabolism is a poorly understood process at present, but one which is acknowledged to have some impact on the biotransformation of corticosteroids applied topically. Thus, although some gaps still persist in present knowledge of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of this important class of drugs, there can be no denying the contribution of topical corticosteroids to the therapy of dermatoses.

Nitrendipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of hypertension.

Nitrendipine is a calcium entry blocker shown to inhibit the movement of calcium through the 'slow channel' of cardiac and vascular smooth muscle, thus inducing peripheral vasodilation with consequent reductions in elevated blood pressure. As evidenced by clinical trials, nitrendipine promptly lowers blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate hypertension, and sustains this effect during long term administration. Combining nitrendipine with other antihypertensive agents such as diuretics or beta-blockers often results in successful treatment in patients unresponsive to nitrendipine monotherapy. Headache, oedema, flushing and palpitations commonly occurring during treatment with nitrendipine are generally mild, usually subsiding with continued therapy. Thus, although additional long term studies are required to properly assess the relative merits of the drug compared with other antihypertensives, by providing the clinician with an effective and safe alternative to traditional therapies, nitrendipine represents a step forward in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

Flumazenil. A preliminary review of its benzodiazepine antagonist properties, intrinsic activity and therapeutic use.

Flumazenil, a 1,4-imidazobenzodiazepine, is a specific benzodiazepine antagonist which is indicated for use when the effect of a benzodiazepine must be quickly attenuated or terminated. Following intravenous administration, the onset of clinically apparent benzodiazepine antagonism usually occurs within 1 to 5 minutes. Although flumazenil has a short elimination half-life of about 1 hour, a single intravenous dose of up to 1 mg is usually sufficient to attain and maintain for about 2 hours the desired level of consciousness after general anaesthesia or conscious to moderate sedation induced by benzodiazepines. After intoxication with high doses of benzodiazepines the initial single dose of flumazenil will require supplementing with repeated low intravenous doses or an infusion (0.1 mg/h) to maintain a state of wakefulness. Flumazenil is well tolerated, and since it reliably attenuates or reverses the central effects of benzodiazepines and is specific for these drugs, it facilitates diagnosis by eliminating benzodiazepine intoxication in patients in whom the cause of unconsciousness is unknown. While results of some studies suggested that flumazanil may have intrinsic benzodiazepine partial agonist or inverse agonist activity, this is unlikely to be clinically important with usual doses. Thus, flumazenil is a very promising, effective, short acting benzodiazepine antagonist which is well tolerated by most patients. Undoubtedly, its full clinical potential has yet to be realised.

Enalapril. An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in congestive heart failure.

Enalapril provides significant haemodynamic, symptomatic and clinical improvement when added to maintenance therapy with digitalis and diuretics in patients with congestive heart failure [NYHA (New York Heart Association) classes II to IV]. These effects are not attenuated during long term therapy. More significantly, a clinical study demonstrated that enalapril reduces mortality when added to established therapy in patients with severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class IV) refractory to digitalis, diuretics and other vasodilators. Thus, ACE inhibitors such as enalapril offer a significant advance in the treatment of congestive heart failure. Because these drugs improve symptoms in patients with classes II to IV failure, and reduce mortality in patients with severe heart failure, they should be considered as first choice adjuvant therapy when a vasodilator is needed in addition to conventional treatment with digitalis and diuretics.

Midodrine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in orthostatic hypotension and secondary hypotensive disorders.

Midodrine, a peripheral alpha-adrenergic agonist, finds use in the clinical management of patients with orthostatic hypotension or hypotension secondary to other clinical conditions or drug therapies. Midodrine is almost completely absorbed after oral administration and undergoes enzymatic hydrolysis to form its pharmacologically active metabolite, de-glymidodrine. In patients with refractory orthostatic hypotension oral midodrine increases standing blood pressure and improves symptoms of orthostatism, such as weakness, syncope, blurred vision and fatigue, without any associated cardiac stimulation. Comparative studies have shown midodrine to be clinically at least as effective as other sympathomimetic agents (norfenefrine, etilefrine, dimetofrine and ephedrine) and dihydroergotamine in this regard. Additionally, midodrine appears to cause less frequent and severe adverse effects associated with alpha-receptor agonism such as piloerection and urinary hesitancy. The most commonly experienced adverse effects--piloerector reactions, gastrointestinal disorders, and cardiovascular complaints--are generally mild and can be controlled by reducing the dosage of midodrine. Thus, midodrine is at least as useful as other currently available options in the management of orthostatic or secondary hypotension, and represents a stepping stone towards optimal therapy.

Amprenavir: a review of its clinical potential in patients with HIV infection.

UNLABELLED: The virological/immunological efficacy of amprenavir-containing combination regimens has been evaluated in a small number of clinical trials in patients with HIV infection. Amprenavir plus 2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) was more effective than 2 NRTIs (in treatment-naive patients) or amprenavir monotherapy (in treatment-naive or -experienced patients) in double-blind trials. In the only direct comparison with another protease inhibitor as part of triple therapy, amprenavir was less effective than indinavir in treatment-experienced (protease inhibitor-naive) patients. Amprenavir was as effective as other protease inhibitors when given with abacavir in a small nonblind trial. Amprenavir is generally well tolerated (most events are mild or moderate). GI disturbance and rash are the principal treatment-limiting effects. Preclinical data suggest that amprenavir may have a low potential for metabolic disturbances (e.g. lipodystrophy, fat redistribution); such effects have been infrequent in patients treated to date, but longer term experience is needed. 150V is the major HIV protease substitution associated with amprenavir resistance; this mutation is not seen in isolates from patients receiving other available protease inhibitors. Amprenavir-resistant isolates evaluated to date showed no significant cross-resistance to most other protease inhibitors, although some cross-resistance to ritonavir was noted. Many isolates from patients previously treated with other protease inhibitors are susceptible to amprenavir. Amprenavir offers the convenience of twice-daily administration with no food-timing or fluid restrictions, but this may be offset by the large number and size of the capsules. However, pharmacokinetic data support the use of co-administration of amprenavir and ritonavir at reduced dosages, thereby allowing a reduction in the number of amprenavir capsules. CONCLUSIONS: Amprenavir-containing combination regimens have shown virological efficacy, and have generally been well tolerated, in patients with HIV infection (primarily treatment-naive or protease inhibitor-naive). The limited number of studies available and the absence of well controlled comparisons with other triple therapies limits the conclusions that can be drawn at present. The clinical value of amprenavir for patients with isolates which are resistant to other protease inhibitors but sensitive to amprenavir, and in treatment-experienced patients in general, requires further investigation. Further evaluation of the amprenavir/ritonavir combination is awaited with interest. Like other members of its class, amprenavir has a particular profile of tolerability, resistance and administration characteristics which should be carefully considered in relation to the needs of individual patients.

Galantamine: a review of its use in Alzheimer's disease.

UNLABELLED: Currently, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitors are the most promising class of drugs for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Galantamine is a reversible, competitive, tertiary alkaloid AChE inhibitor. The drug is selective for AChE rather than butyrylcholinesterase. In addition to inhibition of AChE galantamine interacts allosterically with nicotinic acetylcholine receptors to potentiate the action of agonists at these receptors. Recipients of galantamine 16 or 24 mg/day achieved significant improvements in cognitive and global symptoms relative to placebo recipients in large (n = 285 to 978 patients with mild to moderate AD) well-designed trials of 3 to 6 months' duration. Galantamine also improved activities of daily living in these patients and significantly reduced the requirement for caregiver assistance with activities of daily living. Moreover, galantamine recipients achieved significantly better outcomes on behavioural symptoms than placebo recipients. In a long term study (12 months), galantamine 24 mg/day slowed the progression of symptoms of the disease and maintained cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with mild to moderate AD. Galantamine was generally well tolerated with the majority of adverse events being mild to moderate in intensity and transient. Predictably, adverse events were cholinergic in nature and generally related to the gastrointestinal system. These effects were reduced in patients receiving the recommended dose escalation regimen. Galantamine had no clinically relevant effects on vital signs, haematological or biochemical laboratory parameters and, importantly, there were no reports of hepatotoxicity. The incidence of serious adverse events was similar between galantamine (8 to 32 mg/day) and placebo groups (6 to 16% of patients across all treatment groups). CONCLUSIONS: Galantamine is an effective well tolerated symptomatic treatment for AD which improves cognition, function and activities of daily living in the short term (up to 6 months) in patients with mild to moderate AD. In addition, it delays the development of behavioural disturbances and psychiatric symptoms, and reduces caregiver burden (as measured by caregiver time). In the long term (up to 1 year), galantamine maintains cognition and activities of daily living. Adverse events associated with galantamine are mainly cholinergic, usually mild to moderate in intensity and transient. Galantamine has been evaluated in several large well-designed studies and, given the relative lack of established treatment options, it may be considered as one of the first-line pharmacological treatments in patients with mild to moderate AD.

Toremifene. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of advanced breast cancer.

The triphenylethylene antiestrogen toremifene is a chlorinated derivative of the antiestrogen tamoxifen, an agent which has been widely and successfully used in the treatment of breast cancer. Clinical trials investigating the efficacy of toremifene as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer (estrogen receptor status positive or unknown) have shown this drug to have similar antitumour activity to that of tamoxifen. In multicentre comparative trials, objective responses (complete and partial) occurred in 20 to 29% of patients treated with toremifene (60 to 240 mg/day) and in 19 to 37.5% of tamoxifen (20 or 40 mg/day) recipients. The duration of response, time to disease progression and median overall survival time were generally similar in both treatment groups. Toremifene is well tolerated. Most drug-related adverse effects are mild or moderate in severity and rarely necessitate discontinuation of therapy. The tolerability profile of toremifene is similar to that reported for tamoxifen, the most common adverse effects being hot flushes, sweating, nausea and/or vomiting, dizziness, oedema, and vaginal discharge and/or bleeding. Thus, toremifene provides an equally effective and well tolerated alternative to tamoxifen for the first-line endocrine therapy of postmenopausal advanced breast cancer. Preclinical studies showing toremifene to have a lower carcinogenic potential than tamoxifen indicate that toremifene may be a preferable agent for long term treatment regimens; however, these findings require confirmation in the clinical setting.

Dilevalol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in hypertension.

Dilevalol, the RR-stereoisomer of labetalol, is a non-cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist with substantial partial beta 2-agonist and negligible alpha 1-blocking activity. Reduction in blood pressure during dilevalol administration is associated with peripheral vasodilatation, and heart rate remains essentially unchanged. Following oral administration, dilevalol is completely absorbed. Once-daily administration is possible, due to a long elimination half-life. Large well-controlled trials reveal that dilevalol is equivalent in antihypertensive efficacy to metoprolol, the ACE inhibitors captopril and enalapril, and the calcium antagonist nifedipine. Smaller noncomparative and comparative trials demonstrate the blood pressure-lowering effects of dilevalol and suggest an efficacy at least equivalent to that of the 'pure' beta-blockers atenolol and propranolol and the alpha 1-blockers urapidil and doxazosin. Dilevalol appears to be well tolerated, the most frequent adverse effects being dizziness, headache and diarrhoea in only about 7% of patients each. Unlike alpha 1-blockers and labetalol, dilevalol is not commonly associated with orthostatic hypotension. Thus, data suggest that dilevalol, with its distinctive pharmacological profile, is likely to be a useful addition to the options currently available for treating patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Nafarelin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and clinical potential in sex hormone-related conditions.

Nafarelin, a synthetic agonist of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) [luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH); gonadorelin] appears likely to join the other GnRH analogues currently used in a range of conditions reliant on gonadotrophins or sex hormones. With repeated administration, the pituitary becomes desensitised, and gonadotrophin release, and therefore sex hormone synthesis, are inhibited. Nafarelin has proved to be comparable to danazol in the management of women with endometriosis, with fewer potentially harmful adverse effects. Nafarelin has also been used effectively in in vitro fertilisation programmes, and in hirsute women and those with uterine leiomyoma, particularly to induce preoperative fibroid shrinkage. The drug shrinks hypertrophic tissue in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia, although treatment would need to be maintained indefinitely and therefore should probably be reserved for those unsuitable for prostatectomy. Preliminary data suggest that nafarelin is equivalent to diethylstilbestrol (stilboestrol) in terms of disease-free survival in men with prostate cancer. As a reliable method of contraception, nafarelin gives unpredictable results in men and the promising results in women may be offset by hypoestrogenic side effects. Nafarelin may join other GnRH agonists which are now routinely used in the management of children with central or combined precocious puberty. Nafarelin is readily and rapidly absorbed following intranasal delivery, and is protected to some extent from enzymatic degradation. The resultant relatively long elimination half-life allows once- or twice-daily administration. Estrogen depletion accounts for the most common side effects associated with nafarelin, including hot flushes and vaginal dryness, which are mild and tolerable in most patients. Reversible resorption of trabecular bone can occur during nafarelin therapy, perhaps necessitating cyclical treatment to enable bone mass to recover. Nafarelin, therefore, looks likely to find a role in the treatment of women with endometriosis, and results achieved in other conditions dependent on the pituitary-gonadal axis are promising.

Alglucerase. A review of its therapeutic use in Gaucher's disease.

Alglucerase is a mannose-terminated form of human placental glucocerebrosidase, developed to treat patients with Gaucher's disease. Functional glucocerebrosidase is deficient in Gaucher's disease, an autosomal recessive lipid storage disorder that affects people of all ethnic backgrounds, but has a higher incidence among East European Jews (Ashkenazim). Gaucher's disease manifests with hepatosplenomegaly, bleeding disorders and bone disease, with the more rare subtypes (types 2 and 3) featuring neurological dysfunction. Prior to the development of enzyme replacement therapy, treatment for Gaucher's disease was mainly symptomatic relief. Primary treatment with glucocerebrosidase focuses on removal of the lipid metabolite that causes the pathology. Because of the rarity of Gaucher's disease clinical trials are small, and much of the data investigating alglucerase therapy have been obtained from studies of patients with type 1 disease, the prevalent subtype. Nonetheless, after intravenous administration of alglucerase, improvements are evident within 6 months of therapy. Patients have increased haemoglobin levels and platelet counts, and decreased incidences of epistaxis and bruising. Spleen and liver size are reduced, and skeletal parameters improve. Children gain height and most patients receiving alglucerase therapy are able to resume work and daily activities. Alglucerase is well tolerated, with few mild adverse reactions reported. Although the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic information for alglucerase is limited, its unequivocal efficacy justifies enzyme replacement therapy with this compound as first-line treatment for patients with Gaucher's disease, for whom treatment options are limited.

Atovaquone. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in opportunistic infections.

Atovaquone has been investigated as an alternative agent for oral use in the treatment of both mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) and toxoplasmosis, opportunistic infections commonly experienced by patients with AIDS. In patients with mild to moderate PCP, a dosage of 750mg 3 times daily (administered in tablet form) has similar overall therapeutic efficacy (defined as clinical response without a treatment-limiting adverse event) to the conventional therapies oral cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) and intravenous pentamidine, respectively. Response rates to atovaquone are lower than those achieved with cotrimoxazole, but atovaquone has superior tolerability. Atovaquone recipients experienced significantly fewer treatment-limiting adverse effects than patients treated with cotrimoxazole (7 vs 20%) or pentamidine (4 vs 36%). Mortality rates were higher among atovaquone-treated patients than in cotrimoxazole recipients (7 vs 0.6%) 4 weeks after completion of therapy in a large comparative trial, although most deaths were caused by bacterial infections. However, a similar rate of mortality was reported for atovaquone- and pentamidine-treated patients (16 vs 17% 8 weeks after discontinuation of therapy) in another study. In predominantly small numbers of patients with toxoplasmosis, of whom most were unresponsive to conventional agents, atovaquone 750mg 4 times daily (administered as tablets) produced a complete or partial radiological response rate of 37 to 87.5% 52% of patients achieved a complete or partial clinical response after 6 weeks of treatment in the largest trial (n = 87), although the incidence of toxoplasmosis-related death was 24% 18 weeks after therapy was initiated. Thus, atovaquone will be a useful option for the treatment of patients with mild to moderate PCP who are intolerant or unresponsive to cotrimoxazole, especially if the increased plasma drug concentrations observed with the suspension further improve response rates. Atovaquone should also be considered a promising agent for the treatment of toxoplasmosis.

Quazepam. A preliminary review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in insomnia.

Quazepam is a trifluoroethyl benzodiazepine hypnotic with a half-life of 27 to 41 hours, which has been shown to induce and maintain sleep in the short to long term (up to 4 weeks) treatment of patients with chronic or transient insomnia. Although its hypnotic efficacy has been well characterised against placebo, there are few clinical studies in comparison with established hypnotics, particularly over long term administration. However, preliminary evidence suggests that quazepam 15 to 30 mg is as effective as flurazepam and triazolam in usual therapeutic doses, and causes minimal rebound insomnia following its withdrawal, unlike rapidly eliminated benzodiazepines such as triazolam. The lack of rebound phenomena is likely to be attributable to the 'carryover' effects occurring after discontinuation of quazepam, which has pharmacologically active metabolites with half-lives of elimination similar to or longer than that of the parent drug. Probably because of the long half-lives of quazepam's metabolites, daytime sedation, fatigue and lethargy are the most frequently reported side effects. These side effects are most intense with the 30 mg dose and least with the 7.5mg dose, which has not been studied extensively. Hence, quazepam is an effective hypnotic which may be particularly suitable for short or medium term use in patients in whom withdrawal effects or rebound insomnia may be especially bothersome. Further definition of certain characteristics of its profile--such as its long term use and potential for development of tolerance or dependence, effects on psychomotor skills, efficacy of the 7.5mg dose, and suitability in elderly patients and patients with chronic organic diseases--will assist in more clearly defining its ultimate place in therapy.

Defibrotide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in vascular disorders.

Defibrotide is a deoxyribonucleic acid derivative extracted from mammalian organs, which has been developed for the treatment of a number of vascular disorders. It appears to increase fibrinolysis and may possess antithrombotic, antiatherosclerotic and anti-ischaemic actions, probably due to its ability to selectively increase prostaglandin I2 and E2 levels and to increase tissue plasminogen activator and decrease plasminogen activator inhibitor function. Defibrotide is available as an intravenous and intramuscular preparation, and also as an oral formulation for long term use. Trials performed to date have provided initial evidence that defibrotide is effective in the treatment of peripheral obliterative arterial disease and acute thrombophlebitis, while preliminary data suggest possible use in preventing fibrin deposition in the circuitry of renal haemodialysis equipment. Efficacy in preventing deep vein thrombosis after surgery has been demonstrated but defibrotide does not appear to offer any therapeutic advantage over heparin. Further clinical experience is required in other disorders, including acute myocardial infarction, Raynaud's phenomenon, renal thrombotic microangiopathy and renal transplant rejection, before adequate assessment of efficacy in these areas can be made. Defibrotide is well tolerated, as assessed in trials of up to 6 months duration, with a low global incidence of adverse events (< 1 to 9%). Mild allergic reactions and gastrointestinal disturbances have occasionally been described, and a hypotensive effect has also infrequently been observed. Thus, available data suggest that defibrotide is a well tolerated agent with little or no anticoagulant activity, which is conveniently available in both parenteral and oral formulations. Initial data indicate that the drug may be a useful alternative in the treatment of peripheral obliterative arterial disease and thrombophlebitis, while its therapeutic potential in other vascular disorders and efficacy relative to established agents remains to be fully determined.

Iodixanol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and diagnostic use as an x-ray contrast medium.

Iodixanol is an iso-osmolal nonionic dimeric hydrophilic contrast agent. It has similar diagnostic efficacy to that of other iodinated contrast media. Because of its physical properties, iodixanol would be expected to produce a lower incidence of adverse events than other nondimeric contrast media. Indeed, pharmacodynamic studies indicate that iodixanol has fewer cardiovascular effects, causes less renal damage and is associated with similar or smaller changes to the blood-brain barrier and neurological function when compared with nondimeric nonionic contrast media. In clinical trials, iodixanol had a similar tolerability profile to other nonionic contrast media but induced fewer adverse events than ioxaglate. Iodixanol appears to have an advantage over other contrast media in that it generally causes less frequent and less intense discomfort on injection. However, in common with other newer, and usually nonionic, contrast media, iodixanol is expensive. Studies investigating other nonionic contrast media (but not iodixanol) have shown that it is not cost-effective in all patients to replace older, usually ionic, contrast media with the more costly newer alternatives. Nonetheless, in selected patients who are considered at increased risk of contrast medium-associated adverse events, nonionic agents should be used. Iodixanol, with its lower intensity (and possibly frequency) of discomfort, may be a preferred option in these patients.

Olanzapine. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of schizophrenia and related psychoses.

Olanzapine is a thienobenzodiazepine derivative which displays efficacy in patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses. It has structural and pharmacological properties resembling those of the atypical antipsychotic clozapine and an improved tolerability profile compared with the classical antipsychotic haloperidol. In several large, well controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia or related psychoses, olanzapine generally 5 to 20 mg/day was at least as effective as haloperidol (5 to 20mg) and more so than placebo, as assessed by overall rating scales for psychoses. Olanzapine improved negative symptoms to a greater extent than haloperidol in 2 of 3 comparative trials, including the largest trial. Efficacy of olanzapine has a rapid onset (within 1 to 2 weeks). Its clinical benefits appear to be maintained for treatment periods of up to 1 year, as shown by analysis of the extension phase of several trials demonstrating decreased probability of hospitalisation over this period compared with haloperidol. Preliminary data suggest the drug may also improve quality of life. Olanzapine was associated with significantly fewer adverse movement disorders (e.g. akathisia, dystonia, hypertonia, extrapyramidal symptoms) than haloperidol. There have been no reports of agranulocytosis (as occurs with clozapine) or any other haemotoxicity attributed to olanzapine, and the drug has shown minimal effect on prolactin levels. Transient increases in levels of hepatic transaminases seem to be clinically important. The only events recorded more frequently during olanzapine than during haloperidol therapy were weight gain, dry mouth and increased appetite. Although the antipsychotic activity of olanzapine has been well demonstrated. Its efficacy in refractory schizophrenia and its place relative to other atypical antipsychotics remain to be determined. Nevertheless, if the long term tolerability profile of olanzapine is confirmed, the drug should provide a valuable therapeutic alternative in the management of schizophrenia and related psychoses.

Triflusal.

Triflusal is an antiplatelet agent structurally related to the salicylate group of compounds, but it is not derived from aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Platelet antiaggregant properties of triflusal and its active 3-hydroxy-4-trifluoro-methylbenzoic acid metabolite are primarily mediated by specific inhibition of platelet arachidonic acid metabolism. Triflusal, compared with placebo for 6 months, significantly reduced the incidence of nonfatal myocardial infarction in patients with unstable angina. In patients with peripheral arteriopathy, total and pain free walking distances were markedly improved in triflusal compared with placebo recipients. The cumulative event rate for stroke, ischemic cardiopathy and vascular death was lower, but not significantly different, in patients with atherothrombotic stroke who received triflusal than in aspirin recipients. Differences were significant, and favoured triflusal, in a subgroup of patients with > 70% carotid stenosis. Prophylaxis with triflusal for 6 months after aortocoronary vein grafting reduced the number of new distal anastomosis occlusions and the graft attrition rate more than aspirin or placebo. The incidence of deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism in more than 500 patients undergoing hip surgery was similar for these 3 treatments. The amount of blood transfused was significantly reduced in triflusal compared with aspirin recipients who underwent hip surgery. Risk of haemorrhage was also reduced in ischemic stroke patients receiving triflusal versus aspirin.

Fixed combination verapamil SR/trandolapril.

Verapamil sustained-release (SR)/trandolapril is a combination of a phenylalkylamine calcium antagonist and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor for the management of essential hypertension. Verapamil SR/trandolapril does not adversely influence glucose, insulin or lipid parameters in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus with or without elevated cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels. Verapamil SR/trandolapril reduces proteinuria to a greater extent than the individual components in patients with diabetic or non-diabetic proteinuria. The antihypertensive efficacy of once daily verapamil SR/trandolapril (180/1 or 180/2 mg) for 8 weeks or 6 months is similar to that of atenolol/chlorthalidone (100/25 mg) and lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide (20/12.5 mg), and was at least as good as that of metoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide (100/12.5 mg) in a small trial. The reduction in sitting or supine diastolic and systolic blood pressure is greater after verapamil SR/trandolapril (180/2 to 240/4 mg) than after monotherapy with verapamil SR (180 and 240 mg/day) or trandolapril (2 to 8 mg/day). Fewer cardiac events occurred after verapamil SR/trandolapril (240/1 to 360/2 mg/day) than after trandolapril (1 to 2 mg/day) in postmyocardial infarction patients with congestive heart failure. The incidence of adverse events after verapamil SR/trandolapril is similar to that of comparator drugs and the individual components of the combination.

Candesartan cilexetil. A review of its use in essential hypertension.

UNLABELLED: Candesartan cilexetil is completely converted to the nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor blocker candesartan during absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Candesartan selectively blocks and dissociates slowly from the angiotensin II subtype 1 (AT1) receptor which mediates most of the known activities of angiotensin II. When administered once daily, oral candesartan cilexetil 8 to 32 mg dose-dependently and effectively reduces blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In comparative studies, candesartan cilexetil 8 mg/day was as effective as usual therapeutic dosages of enalapril, losartan potassium, hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine. One study showed candesartan cilexetil 16 mg/day to be more effective than losartan potassium 50 mg/day. Furthermore, the combination of candesartan cilexetil with either hydrochlorothiazide or amlodipine resulted in additive antihypertensive effects. Preliminary evidence suggests that the blood pressure-lowering effects of candesartan cilexetil are associated with the prevention or improvement of end-organ damage in patients with hypertension. However, this requires further confirmation in clinical studies. Candesartan cilexetil improves insulin sensitivity in patients with hypertension and does not affect glucose homeostasis or the serum lipid profile in those with coexisting type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Candesartan cilexetil is well tolerated in patients with hypertension. Pooled data indicate that the tolerability profile of the drug is not significantly different from that of placebo, with headache being the most commonly reported event. Adverse events are not dose related and are mostly mild to moderate in severity. Candesartan cilexetil is better tolerated than enalapril, primarily because of a reduced incidence of cough, and was not associated with the hypokalaemia or hyperuricaemia seen with hydrochlorothiazide in a study in patients aged > or = 75 years. The drug has an adverse events profile similar to that of losartan potassium in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: once daily candesartan cilexetil is effective and well tolerated when used once daily (as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents) in patients with mild, moderate or severe hypertension. Initially, however, the drug is likely to be used as an alternative to other agents in patients not responding to or intolerant of their current drug therapy.

Urapidil. A reappraisal of its use in the management of hypertension.

UNLABELLED: Urapidil is a peripheral postsynaptic alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with central agonistic action at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors. It reduces blood pressure by decreasing peripheral vascular resistance. Oral urapidil decreases blood pressure in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and associated risk factors such as hyperlipidaemia or type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus with no effect on heart rate. The antihypertensive efficacy of urapidil is similar to that of most comparators in patients with mild to moderate essential or secondary hypertension and no concomitant risk factors. However, the antihypertensive efficacy of urapidil was lower than that of hydrochlorothiazide in a well designed trial. Lipid levels and glucose metabolism are not adversely affected and may improve with urapidil in patients with lipid or glucose abnormalities. Urapidil can be safely combined with other antihypertensive agents such as hydrochlorothiazide and nifedipine and improves blood pressure control in previous nonresponders to monotherapy. Intravenous urapidil reduces blood pressure in patients with pre-eclampsia or hypertension in pregnancy and in patients with hypertensive crises or peri- or postoperative hypertension. The decrease in blood pressure is similar to that observed after nifedipine, enalaprilat, sodium nitroprusside and dihydralazine, greater than that of ketanserin according to 1 larger study, and greater than that of sublingual nitroglycerin in 1 trial in patients with nonsurgical hypertensive crises and pulmonary oedema. However, more patients responded to treatment with urapidil than with enalaprilat or nifedipine. Heart rate is less likely to be altered by urapidil than with some comparator drugs. Urapidil appears to be well tolerated, with most adverse events being mild and transient. The incidence of adverse events with urapidil is similar to that with prazosin, metoprolol, atenolol, sodium nitroprusside and hydrochlorothiazide and less than that with nifedipine and clonidine. Urapidil may not be as well tolerated as captopril and, in 1 study, more urapidil than nitrendipine recipients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: urapidil reduces blood pressure without altering heart rate. The oral formulation is an effective choice in patients with hypertension and concomitant dyslipidaemia or type 2 diabetes mellitus, in whom the drug does not adversely affect and may improve lipid profiles and glucose metabolism. The intravenous formulation is effective in controlling various hypertensive crises and hypertension associated with pregnancy or surgery and is similar to or better than other first-line agents used in these conditions. Thus, urapidil may be a useful alternative to currently available antihypertensive agents.