Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
J Cyst Fibros ; 19(3): 344-354, 2020 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32115388

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Advanced cystic fibrosis lung disease (ACFLD) is common, is associated with reduced quality of life, and remains the most frequent cause of death in individuals with cystic fibrosis (CF). These consensus guidelines provide recommendations to the CF community on management of both common and unique issues that arise when individuals reach a state of ACFLD. METHODS: The CF Foundation assembled a multidisciplinary expert panel consisting of three workgroups: Pulmonary management; Management of comorbid conditions; Symptom management and psychosocial issues. Topics were excluded if the management considerations did not differ in ACFLD from in the overall CF population or if already addressed in other published guidelines. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review combined with expert opinion when appropriate. RESULTS: The committee formulated twenty-three recommendation statements specific to ACFLD that address the definition of ACFLD, pulmonary and intensive care unit management, management of selected comorbidities, symptom control, and psychosocial issues. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are intended to be paired with previously published management guidelines for the overall CF population, with the objective of reducing practice variability and improving overall care, quality of life, and survival in those with ACFLD.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Vía Aérea/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Fibrosis Quística , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Manejo de Atención al Paciente/métodos , Intervención Psicosocial/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Comorbilidad , Fibrosis Quística/fisiopatología , Fibrosis Quística/psicología , Fibrosis Quística/terapia , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Gravedad del Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad
2.
Respir Care ; 64(10): 1181-1192, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31113857

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung expansion therapy is often ordered after surgery to improve alveolar ventilation and reduce risks of postoperative pulmonary complications. The impact of lung expansion therapy at altering ventilation in patients who are not intubated has not been described. The primary purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in dorsal redistribution of ventilation and incidences of postoperative pulmonary complications when comparing incentive spirometry (IS) with EzPAP lung expansion therapy after upper abdominal surgery. Our a priori null hypothesis was that there are no differences. METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled adult human subjects after upper- abdominal surgery from January 2017 to November 2018. The subjects were allocated to receive IS or EzPAP 3 times a day on postoperative days 1-5. An electrical impedance tomography device was connected to the subjects for a single lung expansion therapy session on postoperative days 1, 3, and 5 to measure the change in post-lung expansion therapy dorsal end-expiratory lung impedance (ΔEELI%). Lung expansion therapy sessions with electrical impedance tomography included 2 min of normal breathing, 3 cycles of 10 breaths, and 2 min of normal breathing after cycle 3. Postoperative pulmonary complications were screened until hospital discharge. Mann-Whitney, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were applied. Data were reported as count (n), percentage, and median (interquartile range) for primary and secondary outcomes. Alpha (2-tailed) was < 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 112 subjects were enrolled to receive IS (n = 56) or EzPAP (n = 56). Baseline characteristics were equal. Post-lung expansion therapy dorsal ΔEELI% increased for both groups, but the dorsal ΔEELI% for IS versus EzPAP on postoperative day 1 (16% versus 12%, P = .39), postoperative day 3 (6% versus 6%, P = .68), and postoperative day 5 (9% versus 6%, P = .46) was not significantly different. Hospital length of stay (4 d; P = .30) and incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (3.6% versus 7.1%, P = .19) were similar. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant post-lung expansion therapy dorsal ΔEELI% or postoperative pulmonary complications among the adults who received IS or EzPAP 3 times a day after upper abdominal surgery. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02892773.).


Asunto(s)
Abdomen/cirugía , Enfermedades Pulmonares/prevención & control , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Espirometría , Anciano , Impedancia Eléctrica , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoxia/etiología , Hipoxia/prevención & control , Capacidad Inspiratoria , Tiempo de Internación , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Pulmonares/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía/etiología , Neumonía/prevención & control , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Atelectasia Pulmonar/etiología , Atelectasia Pulmonar/prevención & control , Ventilación Pulmonar , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , Tomografía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA