Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gut ; 73(7): 1052-1075, 2024 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609165

RESUMEN

The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Gastroenterología , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Gastroenterología/normas , COVID-19/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Recurrencia , Clostridioides difficile , Reino Unido , Sociedades Médicas
2.
BMC Infect Dis ; 20(1): 783, 2020 Oct 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33081710

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A cost effective and efficient diagnostic tool for COVID-19 as near to the point of care (PoC) as possible would be a game changer in the current pandemic. We tested reverse transcription loop mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP), a method which can produce results in under 30 min, alongside standard methods in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS: This prospective service improvement project piloted an RT-LAMP method on nasal and pharyngeal swabs on 21 residents of a high dependency care home, with two index COVID-19 cases, and compared it to multiplex tandem reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We recorded vital signs of patients to correlate clinical and laboratory information and calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of a single swab using RT-LAMP compared with the current standard, RT-PCR, as per Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) guidelines. RESULTS: The novel method accurately detected 8/10 RT-PCR positive cases and identified a further 3 positive cases. Eight further cases were negative using both methods. Using repeated RT-PCR as a "gold standard", the sensitivity and specificity of a single novel test were 80 and 73% respectively. PPV was 73% and NPV was 83%. Incorporating retesting of low signal RT-LAMP positives improved the specificity to 100%. We also speculate that hypothermia may be a significant early clinical sign of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: RT-LAMP testing for SARS-CoV-2 was found to be promising, fast and to work equivalently to RT-PCR methods. RT-LAMP has the potential to transform COVID-19 detection, bringing rapid and accurate testing to the PoC. RT-LAMP could be deployed in mobile community testing units, care homes and hospitals to detect disease early and prevent spread.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/genética , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/métodos , Datos Preliminares , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Exactitud de los Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/economía , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/economía , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/virología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa/economía , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 38(1): 199, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30406879

RESUMEN

The article "Fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in at-risk patients with inflammatory bowel disease, fulminant CDI, renal impairment or hepatic impairment: a retrospective study of routine clinical use (ANEMONE)", written by M.J.G.T. Vehreschild et al., was originally published at Springerlink on 11 August 2018 without open access.

4.
Gut ; 67(11): 1920-1941, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30154172

RESUMEN

Interest in the therapeutic potential of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) has been increasing globally in recent years, particularly as a result of randomised studies in which it has been used as an intervention. The main focus of these studies has been the treatment of recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), but there is also an emerging evidence base regarding potential applications in non-CDI settings. The key clinical stakeholders for the provision and governance of FMT services in the UK have tended to be in two major specialty areas: gastroenterology and microbiology/infectious diseases. While the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance (2014) for use of FMT for recurrent or refractory CDI has become accepted in the UK, clear evidence-based UK guidelines for FMT have been lacking. This resulted in discussions between the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS), and a joint BSG/HIS FMT working group was established. This guideline document is the culmination of that joint dialogue.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/microbiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Gastroenterología/organización & administración , Humanos , Recurrencia , Sociedades Médicas , Donantes de Tejidos , Reino Unido
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(10): 2851-2855, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29982502

RESUMEN

Objectives: Accurate and sufficiently detailed data on the economic burden of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are lacking. We performed a micro-costing study to determine the health resource utilization of patients with a first episode of CDI (fCDI) and those with a recurrent episode of CDI (rCDI). Patients and methods: Forty-five adult and paediatric inpatients with rCDI were matched by age, sex and date of diagnosis with control patients with fCDI. Total length of hospital stay, length of stay in the ICU and several cost parameters differentiated into fixed and variable components were measured and compared across both groups. Results: The mean total length of stay for rCDI patients was 33 days (95% CI 19-46) compared with 17 days (95% CI 12-21) for fCDI patients; P = 0.0259. ICU length of stay was also longer for rCDI patients than for fCDI patients (mean 2.5 versus 0.7 days). Mean total variable costs for fCDI and rCDI were £2382 (95% CI 1750-3014) and £4683 (95% CI 3051-6311), respectively; P = 0.009. Mean fixed costs for fCDI and rCDI were £10 328 (95% CI 7555-13 101) and £26 438 (95% CI 16 135-36 742), respectively; P = 0.003. Mean total costs for fCDI and rCDI were £12 710 (95% CI 9652-15 769) and £31 121 (95% CI 19 792-42 447), respectively; P < 0.002. Conclusions: The healthcare resource use and financial burden attributable to CDI is significant. Most excess cost is driven by additional length of hospital stay. These costs may have been underestimated in previous studies that have not accounted for several difficult-to-measure parameters or have used averaged tariff-based estimates.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium/economía , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Cuidados Críticos/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Recurrencia
6.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 73(9): 2529-2539, 2018 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29800295

RESUMEN

Objectives: The randomized Phase IIIb/IV EXTEND trial showed that extended-pulsed fidaxomicin significantly improved sustained clinical cure and reduced recurrence versus vancomycin in patients ≥60 years old with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Cost-effectiveness of extended-pulsed fidaxomicin versus vancomycin as first-line therapy for CDI was evaluated in this patient population. Methods: Clinical results from EXTEND and inputs from published sources were used in a semi-Markov treatment-sequence model with nine health states and a 1 year time horizon to assess costs and QALYs. The model was based on a healthcare system perspective (NHS and Personal Social Services) in England. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Patients receiving first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin treatment had a 0.02 QALY gain compared with first-line vancomycin (0.6267 versus 0.6038 QALYs/patient). While total drug acquisition costs were higher for extended-pulsed fidaxomicin than for vancomycin when used first-line (£1356 versus £260/patient), these were offset by lower total hospitalization costs (which also included treatment monitoring and community care costs; £10 815 versus £11 459/patient) and lower costs of managing adverse events (£694 versus £1199/patient), reflecting the lower incidence of CDI recurrence and adverse events with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin. Extended-pulsed fidaxomicin cost £53 less per patient than vancomycin over 1 year. The probability that first-line extended-pulsed fidaxomicin was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30 000/QALY was 76% in these patients. Conclusions: While fidaxomicin acquisition costs are higher than those of vancomycin, the observed reduced recurrence rate with extended-pulsed fidaxomicin makes it a more effective and less costly treatment strategy than vancomycin for first-line treatment of CDI in older patients.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fidaxomicina/administración & dosificación , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antibacterianos/economía , Infecciones por Clostridium/economía , Inglaterra , Femenino , Fidaxomicina/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/economía
7.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis ; 37(11): 2097-2106, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30099637

RESUMEN

Information is limited or lacking on fidaxomicin treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, fulminant or life-threatening CDI, severe renal impairment, moderate-to-severe hepatic impairment and pregnancy. The ANEMONE study investigated fidaxomicin use in a routine clinical setting, focusing on these medical conditions of specific interest (MCSIs). This retrospective, post-authorisation study reviewed hospital records from Austria, Germany, Spain and the UK (June 2012-June 2015), collecting data from hospital admission to 30 days after last fidaxomicin dose. The primary objective was to identify the proportion of fidaxomicin-treated patients with MCSIs. Secondary objectives were to describe 30-day mortality, changes in ECG and laboratory parameters, fidaxomicin exposure and CDI response (resolution of diarrhoea; 30-day recurrence). 45.3% (261/576) of patients had ≥ 1 MCSI. Thirty-day mortality (post-first dose) was 17.0% (98/576) in the total population and slightly higher (24.6-27.6%) in patients with fulminant CDI or severe renal impairment. 29.6% (24/81) deaths of known cause were attributable to CDI. Of changes in laboratory parameters or ECG findings, only a decrease in leucocyte counts appeared associated with fidaxomicin, consistent with a positive treatment response. Diarrhoea resolved in 78.0% (404/518) of treatment episodes; diarrhoea resolution was lowest in patients with fulminant CDI (investigator-defined, 67.5%, 56/88) and severe renal impairment (68.0%, 68/100). Thirty-day recurrence (18.8%, 79/420) was similar across MCSI subgroups. Although almost half of fidaxomicin-treated patients had ≥ 1 MCSI, the majority of patients in all subgroups had positive responses to treatment, and no particular safety concerns were identified.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Clostridioides difficile/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Fidaxomicina/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/etiología , Hepatopatías/etiología , Insuficiencia Renal/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Infecciones por Clostridium/complicaciones , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Electrocardiografía , Fidaxomicina/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/diagnóstico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Renal/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 65(3): 433-441, 2017 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28575285

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Variation in Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) rates between healthcare institutions suggests overall incidence could be reduced if the lowest rates could be achieved more widely. METHODS: We used whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of consecutive C. difficile isolates from 6 English hospitals over 1 year (2013-14) to compare infection control performance. Fecal samples with a positive initial screen for C. difficile were sequenced. Within each hospital, we estimated the proportion of cases plausibly acquired from previous cases. RESULTS: Overall, 851/971 (87.6%) sequenced samples contained toxin genes, and 451 (46.4%) were fecal-toxin-positive. Of 652 potentially toxigenic isolates >90-days after the study started, 128 (20%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 17-23%) were genetically linked (within ≤2 single nucleotide polymorphisms) to a prior patient's isolate from the previous 90 days. Hospital 2 had the fewest linked isolates, 7/105 (7%, 3-13%), hospital 1, 9/70 (13%, 6-23%), and hospitals 3-6 had similar proportions of linked isolates (22-26%) (P ≤ .002 comparing hospital-2 vs 3-6). Results were similar adjusting for locally circulating ribotypes. Adjusting for hospital, ribotype-027 had the highest proportion of linked isolates (57%, 95% CI 29-81%). Fecal-toxin-positive and toxin-negative patients were similarly likely to be a potential transmission donor, OR = 1.01 (0.68-1.49). There was no association between the estimated proportion of linked cases and testing rates. CONCLUSIONS: WGS can be used as a novel surveillance tool to identify varying rates of C. difficile transmission between institutions and therefore to allow targeted efforts to reduce CDI incidence.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/genética , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/prevención & control , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Infecciones por Clostridium/microbiología , Infecciones por Clostridium/transmisión , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Heces/microbiología , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Factores de Riesgo
10.
PLoS Med ; 13(1): e1001944, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26812054

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Identifying and tackling the social determinants of infectious diseases has become a public health priority following the recognition that individuals with lower socioeconomic status are disproportionately affected by infectious diseases. In many parts of the world, epidemiologically and genotypically defined community-associated (CA) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains have emerged to become frequent causes of hospital infection. The aim of this study was to use spatial models with adjustment for area-level hospital attendance to determine the transmission niche of genotypically defined CA- and health-care-associated (HA)-MRSA strains across a diverse region of South East London and to explore a potential link between MRSA carriage and markers of social and material deprivation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This study involved spatial analysis of cross-sectional data linked with all MRSA isolates identified by three National Health Service (NHS) microbiology laboratories between 1 November 2011 and 29 February 2012. The cohort of hospital-based NHS microbiology diagnostic services serves 867,254 usual residents in the Lambeth, Southwark, and Lewisham boroughs in South East London, United Kingdom (UK). Isolates were classified as HA- or CA-MRSA based on whole genome sequencing. All MRSA cases identified over 4 mo within the three-borough catchment area (n = 471) were mapped to small geographies and linked to area-level aggregated socioeconomic and demographic data. Disease mapping and ecological regression models were used to infer the most likely transmission niches for each MRSA genetic classification and to describe the spatial epidemiology of MRSA in relation to social determinants. Specifically, we aimed to identify demographic and socioeconomic population traits that explain cross-area extra variation in HA- and CA-MRSA relative risks following adjustment for hospital attendance data. We explored the potential for associations with the English Indices of Deprivation 2010 (including the Index of Multiple Deprivation and several deprivation domains and subdomains) and the 2011 England and Wales census demographic and socioeconomic indicators (including numbers of households by deprivation dimension) and indicators of population health. Both CA-and HA-MRSA were associated with household deprivation (CA-MRSA relative risk [RR]: 1.72 [1.03-2.94]; HA-MRSA RR: 1.57 [1.06-2.33]), which was correlated with hospital attendance (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.76). HA-MRSA was also associated with poor health (RR: 1.10 [1.01-1.19]) and residence in communal care homes (RR: 1.24 [1.12-1.37]), whereas CA-MRSA was linked with household overcrowding (RR: 1.58 [1.04-2.41]) and wider barriers, which represent a combined score for household overcrowding, low income, and homelessness (RR: 1.76 [1.16-2.70]). CA-MRSA was also associated with recent immigration to the UK (RR: 1.77 [1.19-2.66]). For the area-level variation in RR for CA-MRSA, 28.67% was attributable to the spatial arrangement of target geographies, compared with only 0.09% for HA-MRSA. An advantage to our study is that it provided a representative sample of usual residents receiving care in the catchment areas. A limitation is that relationships apparent in aggregated data analyses cannot be assumed to operate at the individual level. CONCLUSIONS: There was no evidence of community transmission of HA-MRSA strains, implying that HA-MRSA cases identified in the community originate from the hospital reservoir and are maintained by frequent attendance at health care facilities. In contrast, there was a high risk of CA-MRSA in deprived areas linked with overcrowding, homelessness, low income, and recent immigration to the UK, which was not explainable by health care exposure. Furthermore, areas adjacent to these deprived areas were themselves at greater risk of CA-MRSA, indicating community transmission of CA-MRSA. This ongoing community transmission could lead to CA-MRSA becoming the dominant strain types carried by patients admitted to hospital, particularly if successful hospital-based MRSA infection control programmes are maintained. These results suggest that community infection control programmes targeting transmission of CA-MRSA will be required to control MRSA in both the community and hospital. These epidemiological changes will also have implications for effectiveness of risk-factor-based hospital admission MRSA screening programmes.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria , Privación Materna , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Aislamiento Social , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Londres/epidemiología , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aislamiento Social/psicología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/diagnóstico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/psicología , Adulto Joven
11.
J Clin Microbiol ; 54(1): 212-5, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26560540

RESUMEN

The performance of the Enigma MiniLab assay for influenza A and B viruses and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was compared to a centralized laboratory respiratory virus panel. The positive and negative percent agreement for influenza A virus, influenza B virus, and RSV were 79.2% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 57.8 to 92.9%) and 99.4% (95% CI, 98.4 to 99.9), 100% (95% CI, 47.8 to 100%) and 100% (95% CI, 99.3 to 100%), 98.5% (95% CI, 94.6 to 99.8%) and 94.5% (95% CI, 91.9 to 96.4%), respectively.


Asunto(s)
Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Influenza B/aislamiento & purificación , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino
12.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 71(12): 3556-3561, 2016 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27516471

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) are an emerging threat for healthcare providers worldwide. OBJECTIVES: To determine CPE carriage rates and risk factors in an unselected hospital cohort at the time of admission. METHODS: We approached 4567 patients within 72 h of admission to provide a rectal swab and answer a questionnaire on risk factors for carriage. Rectal swabs were cultured for carbapenem-resistant organisms on chromogenic and non-chromogenic agar, and tested for carbapenemase production by PCR (Check-Direct CPE). The study was approved by the NHS Research Ethics Committee. RESULTS: Only 6 CPE were cultured from 5 (0.1%) of 4006 patients who provided a rectal swab; only 1 was cultured using non-chromogenic media. An additional 76 culture-negative rectal swabs were initially PCR positive, but none grew a carbapenem-resistant organism despite enrichment culture and only two were positive when retested several months later by Check-Direct and a second PCR assay (Cepheid GeneXpert® Carba-R). A modified Ct cut-off of <35 would have resolved these apparent false-positives. 40% of patients had a risk factor that should prompt screening and pre-emptive isolation as defined by UK CPE guidelines but only 8.1% and 20.2% of these patients had been screened and pre-emptively isolated by clinical teams, respectively. Overseas hospitalization was the only significant risk factor for CPE carriage (P < 0.001, OR 64.3, 95% CI 7.3-488.5). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a very low carriage rate of CPE. Hospitalization abroad is the most important risk factor to guide admission screening in this low-prevalence setting.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Bacterianas/análisis , Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina/métodos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/enzimología , beta-Lactamasas/análisis , Adulto , Técnicas Bacteriológicas , Portador Sano/diagnóstico , Portador Sano/epidemiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Enterobacteriaceae/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Femenino , Técnicas de Genotipaje , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Prevalencia , Recto/microbiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reino Unido
14.
Infect Dis Rep ; 15(3): 238-254, 2023 May 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37218816

RESUMEN

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is one of the greatest challenges facing humanity, causing a substantial burden to the global healthcare system. AMR in Gram-negative organisms is particularly concerning due to a dramatic rise in infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL and CPE). These pathogens have limited treatment options and are associated with poor clinical outcomes, including high mortality rates. The microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract acts as a major reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes (the resistome), and the environment facilitates intra and inter-species transfer of mobile genetic elements carrying these resistance genes. As colonisation often precedes infection, strategies to manipulate the resistome to limit endogenous infections with AMR organisms, as well as prevent transmission to others, is a worthwhile pursuit. This narrative review presents existing evidence on how manipulation of the gut microbiota can be exploited to therapeutically restore colonisation resistance using a number of methods, including diet, probiotics, bacteriophages and faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT).

15.
Infect Dis Rep ; 14(1): 56-62, 2022 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35076517

RESUMEN

There is limited evidence to guide successful treatment of recurrent Campylobacter infection in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) already managed on regular immunoglobulin therapy. The role of faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is uncertain. We report a case of recurrent Campylobacter jejuni infection in a patient with CVID treated with repeated FMT with 18 months of symptom resolution prior to relapse.

16.
Skin Appendage Disord ; 8(3): 211-220, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35707293

RESUMEN

Introduction: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by recurrent nodules, abscesses, and sinus tracts, resulting in scarring. Patients suffer significantly impacted quality of life (QoL), manifested by anxiety and depression. We describe microbial isolates identified from active sites in adults with HS, and explore associations between organisms isolated, disease severity, and QoL. Methods: Observational study over 2 years. Assessment was made of disease severity using the Hurley staging score and of QoL scores, and subjective assessment. Wound swab samples were obtained from sites of active disease. Descriptive summary statistics and tests of significance were used to analyse the data. Results: Two hundred and twelve patients participated, resulting in 352 episodes, and 501 lesion swab samples. 54% were female and 59% were obese, median age of 37 years. A lower proportion of Gram-negative organisms and more staphylococcal and streptococcal organisms were isolated from sites of disease in individuals with stage 3 disease compared to those with stage 1-2 disease (p = 0.001). We found no association between microbial isolation and QoL. Discussion/Conclusions: Hurley stage 3 disease is associated with more infected lesions than Hurley stage 1-2 disease, but the QoL experienced by patients with HS is determined by factors other than infection.

17.
Adv Ther ; 39(8): 3602-3615, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35701725

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Antimicrobial resistance is an urgent medical challenge. In this two-part study, we investigated the epidemiology and management of carbapenem non-susceptible (Carb-NS) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in the UK. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of data from UK hospitals (ten in part 1, nine in part 2). In part 1, epidemiological data were collected from patients hospitalised between April 2017 and March 2018 with any laboratory detection of Carb-NS GNB, encompassing both colonisation and infection. In part 2, diagnosis and management pathways in a randomly selected population of adults from part 1 with confirmed Carb-NS GNB infection were assessed. Data were obtained from a detailed medical chart review for ≥ 3 months from index (collection date of first positive Carb-NS GNB sample). RESULTS: Of 42,340 GNB isolates from 36,098 patients colonised/infected with GNB in part 1, 7% were Carb-NS. In 157 patients included in part 2, 234 GNB index samples were collected, of which 197 (82%) were Carb-NS (median number of Carb-NS pathogens per patient, 1; range 1-3). The most frequent Carb-NS isolates were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (36%), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (29%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10%). Median length of hospitalisation was 34 days. Median time from index to appropriate therapy was 3 days, with empirical therapy initiated a median of 1 day before index. Carb-NS infection was believed to contribute to 21 (28%) of 76 deaths during the study. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high incidence of Carb-NS GNB colonisation and infection in the UK and the need for improved management of patients with Carb-NS GNB infection.


Asunto(s)
Carbapenémicos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Carbapenémicos/uso terapéutico , Bacterias Gramnegativas , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/epidemiología , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
18.
J Control Release ; 350: 324-331, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35963468

RESUMEN

Faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) is an established and effective treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and has many other potential clinical applications. However, preparation and quality of FMT is poorly standardised and clinical studies are hampered by a lack of well-defined FMT formulations that meet regulatory standards for medicines. As an alternative to FMT suspensions for administration by nasojejunal tube or colonoscopy, which is invasive and disliked by many patients, this study aimed to develop a well-controlled, standardised method for manufacture of lyophilised FMT capsules and to provide stability data allowing storage for extended time periods. Faecal donations were collected from healthy, pre-screened individuals, homogenised, filtered and centrifuged to remove dietary matter. The suspension was centrifuged to pellet bacteria, which were resuspended with trehalose and lyophilised to produce a powder which was filled into 5 enteric-coated capsules (size 0). Live-dead bacterial cell quantitative PCR assay showed <10 fold viable bacterial load reduction through the manufacturing process. No significant loss of viable bacterial load was observed after storage at -80 °C for 36 weeks (p = 0.24, n = 5). Initial clinical experience demonstrated that the capsules produced clinical cure in patients with CDI with no adverse events reported (n = 7). We provide the first report of a detailed manufacturing protocol and specification for an encapsulated lyophilised formulation of FMT. As clinical trials into intestinal microbiota interventions proceed, it is important to use a well-controlled investigational medicinal product in the studies so that any beneficial results can be replicated in clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Microbiota , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Heces , Humanos , Polvos , Recurrencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Trehalosa
19.
Lancet Reg Health Eur ; 9: 100181, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34693388

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging treatment modality, but its current clinical use and organisation are unknown. We aimed to describe the clinical use, conduct, and potential for FMT in Europe. METHODS: We invited all hospital-based FMT centres within the European Council member states to answer a web-based questionnaire covering their clinical activities, organisation, and regulation of FMT in 2019. Responders were identified from trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov and from the United European Gastroenterology (UEG) working group for stool banking and FMT. FINDINGS: In 2019, 31 FMT centres from 17 countries reported a total of 1,874 (median 25, quartile 10-64) FMT procedures; 1,077 (57%) with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) as indication, 791 (42%) with experimental indications, and 6 (0•3%) unaccounted for. Adjusted to population size, 0•257 per 100,000 population received FMT for CDI and 0•189 per 100,000 population for experimental indications. With estimated 12,400 (6,100-28,500) annual cases of multiple, recurrent CDI and indication for FMT in Europe, the current European FMT activity covers approximately 10% of the patients with indication. The participating centres demonstrated high safety standards and adherence to international consensus guidelines. Formal or informal regulation from health authorities was present at 21 (68%) centres. INTERPRETATION: FMT is a widespread routine treatment for multiple, recurrent CDI and an experimental treatment. Embedded within hospital settings, FMT centres operate with high standards across Europe to provide safe FMT. A significant gap in FMT coverage suggests the need to raise clinical awareness and increase the FMT activity in Europe by at least 10-fold to meet the true, indicated need. FUNDING: NordForsk under the Nordic Council and Innovation Fund Denmark (j.no. 8056-00006B).

20.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 9(2): 229-247, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33151137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation is an emerging therapeutic option, particularly for the treatment of recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection. Stool banks that organise recruitment and screening of faeces donors are being embedded within the regulatory frameworks described in the European Union Tissue and Cells Directive and the technical guide to the quality and safety of tissue and cells for human application, published by the European Council. OBJECTIVE: Several European and international consensus statements concerning faecal microbiota transplantation have been issued. While these documents provide overall guidance, we aim to provide a detailed description of all processes that relate to the collection, handling and clinical application of human donor stool in this document. METHODS: Collaborative subgroups of experts on stool banking drafted concepts for all domains pertaining to stool banking. During a working group meeting in the United European Gastroenterology Week 2019 in Barcelona, these concepts were discussed and finalised to be included in our overall guidance document about faecal microbiota transplantation. RESULTS: A guidance document for all domains pertaining to stool banking was created. This document includes standard operating manuals for several processes involved with stool banking, such as handling of donor material, storage and donor screening. CONCLUSION: The implementation of faecal microbiota transplantation by stool banks in concordance with our guidance document will enable quality assurance and guarantee the availability of donor faeces preparations for patients.


Asunto(s)
Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/organización & administración , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Heces , Factores de Edad , Bancos de Muestras Biológicas/normas , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium/inmunología , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Contraindicaciones de los Procedimientos , Selección de Donante , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Consentimiento Informado , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Recurrencia , Manejo de Especímenes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA