Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 78: 112-119, 2024 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38244244

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: In the Emergency Department (ED), ultrasound-guided nerve blocks (UGNBs) have become a cornerstone of multimodal pain regimens. We investigated current national practices of UGNBs across academic medical center EDs, and how these trends have changed over time. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional electronic survey of academic EDs with ultrasound fellowships across the United States. Twenty-item questionnaires exploring UGNB practice patterns, training, and complications were distributed between November 2021-June 2022. Data was manually curated, and descriptive statistics were performed. The survey results were then compared to results from Amini et al. 2016 UGNB survey to identify trends. RESULTS: The response rate was 80.5% (87 of 108 programs). One hundred percent of responding programs perform UGNB at their institutions, with 29% (95% confidence interval (CI), 20%-39%) performing at least 5 blocks monthly. Forearm UGNB are most commonly performed (96% of programs (95% CI, 93%-100%)). Pain control for fractures is the most common indication (84%; 95% CI, 76%-91%). Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 77%-92%) of programs report at least 80% of UGNB performed are effective. Eighty-five percent (95% CI, 66%-85%) of programs have had no reported complications from UGNB performed by emergency providers at their institution. The remaining 15% (95% CI, 8%-23%) report an average of 1 complication annually. CONCLUSIONS: All programs participating in our study report performing UGNB in their ED, which is a 16% increase over the last 5 years. UGNB's are currently performed safely and effectively in the ED, however practice improvements can still be made. Creating multi-disciplinary committees at local and national levels can standardize guidelines and practice policies to optimize patient safety and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Bloqueo Nervioso , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Dolor , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos
2.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e51397, 2024 Jul 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38963923

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) models can yield faster and more accurate medical diagnoses; however, developing ML models is limited by a lack of high-quality labeled training data. Crowdsourced labeling is a potential solution but can be constrained by concerns about label quality. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine whether a gamified crowdsourcing platform with continuous performance assessment, user feedback, and performance-based incentives could produce expert-quality labels on medical imaging data. METHODS: In this diagnostic comparison study, 2384 lung ultrasound clips were retrospectively collected from 203 emergency department patients. A total of 6 lung ultrasound experts classified 393 of these clips as having no B-lines, one or more discrete B-lines, or confluent B-lines to create 2 sets of reference standard data sets (195 training clips and 198 test clips). Sets were respectively used to (1) train users on a gamified crowdsourcing platform and (2) compare the concordance of the resulting crowd labels to the concordance of individual experts to reference standards. Crowd opinions were sourced from DiagnosUs (Centaur Labs) iOS app users over 8 days, filtered based on past performance, aggregated using majority rule, and analyzed for label concordance compared with a hold-out test set of expert-labeled clips. The primary outcome was comparing the labeling concordance of collated crowd opinions to trained experts in classifying B-lines on lung ultrasound clips. RESULTS: Our clinical data set included patients with a mean age of 60.0 (SD 19.0) years; 105 (51.7%) patients were female and 114 (56.1%) patients were White. Over the 195 training clips, the expert-consensus label distribution was 114 (58%) no B-lines, 56 (29%) discrete B-lines, and 25 (13%) confluent B-lines. Over the 198 test clips, expert-consensus label distribution was 138 (70%) no B-lines, 36 (18%) discrete B-lines, and 24 (12%) confluent B-lines. In total, 99,238 opinions were collected from 426 unique users. On a test set of 198 clips, the mean labeling concordance of individual experts relative to the reference standard was 85.0% (SE 2.0), compared with 87.9% crowdsourced label concordance (P=.15). When individual experts' opinions were compared with reference standard labels created by majority vote excluding their own opinion, crowd concordance was higher than the mean concordance of individual experts to reference standards (87.4% vs 80.8%, SE 1.6 for expert concordance; P<.001). Clips with discrete B-lines had the most disagreement from both the crowd consensus and individual experts with the expert consensus. Using randomly sampled subsets of crowd opinions, 7 quality-filtered opinions were sufficient to achieve near the maximum crowd concordance. CONCLUSIONS: Crowdsourced labels for B-line classification on lung ultrasound clips via a gamified approach achieved expert-level accuracy. This suggests a strategic role for gamified crowdsourcing in efficiently generating labeled image data sets for training ML systems.


Asunto(s)
Colaboración de las Masas , Pulmón , Ultrasonografía , Colaboración de las Masas/métodos , Humanos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Ultrasonografía/normas , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Femenino , Masculino , Aprendizaje Automático , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 74: 41-48, 2023 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37769445

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) is the gold standard for nephrolithiasis evaluation in the emergency department (ED). However, Choosing Wisely guidelines recommend against ordering NCCT for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis who are <50 years old with a history of kidney stones. Our primary objective was to estimate the national annual cost savings from using a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS)-first approach for patients with suspected nephrolithiasis meeting Choosing Wisely criteria. Our secondary objectives were to estimate reductions in ED length of stay (LOS) and preventable radiation exposure. METHODS: We created a Monte Carlo simulation using available estimates for the frequency of ED visits for nephrolithiasis and eligibility for a POCUS-first approach. The study population included all ED patients diagnosed with nephrolithiasis. Based on 1000 trials of our simulation, we estimated national cost savings in averted advanced imaging from this strategy. We applied the same model to estimate the reduction in ED LOS and preventable radiation exposure. RESULTS: Using this model, we estimate a POCUS-first approach for evaluating nephrolithiasis meeting Choosing Wisely guidelines to save a mean (±SD) of $16.5 million (±$2.1 million) by avoiding 159,000 (±18,000) NCCT scans annually. This resulted in a national cumulative decrease of 166,000 (±165,000) annual bed-hours in ED LOS. Additionally, this resulted in a national cumulative reduction in radiation exposure of 1.9 million person-mSv, which could potentially prevent 232 (±81) excess cancer cases and 118 (±43) excess cancer deaths annually. CONCLUSION: If adopted widely, a POCUS-first approach for suspected nephrolithiasis in patients meeting Choosing Wisely criteria could yield significant national cost savings and a reduction in ED LOS and preventable radiation exposure. Further research is needed to explore the barriers to widespread adoption of this clinical workflow as well as the benefits of a POCUS-first approach in other patient populations.


Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Neoplasias , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tiempo de Internación , Ahorro de Costo , Método de Montecarlo , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ultrasonografía/métodos
4.
J Emerg Med ; 60(4): 512-516, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33339647

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Adequate analgesia is difficult to achieve in patients with an abscess requiring incision and drainage (I&D). There has been a recent increase in regional anesthesia use in the emergency department (ED) to aid in acute musculoskeletal pain relief. Specifically, transgluteal sciatic nerve (TGSN) block has been used as an adjunct treatment for certain chronic lumbar and lower extremity pain syndromes in the ED. CASE REPORT: A 21-year-old woman presented to the ED with a painful gluteal abscess. The pain was so severe that the patient barely tolerated light palpation to the abscess area. Using dynamic ultrasound guidance, a TGSN block was performed with significant pain reduction. Ultrasonographic confirmation of abscess was obtained followed by definitive I&D. She was discharged from the ED and her incision site was healing well at the time of follow-up. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: Abscess I&D is a common procedure in the ED. Procedural analgesia for I&D can be difficult to obtain. We describe the TGSN block as an additional analgesic option to be used for procedural analgesia. The use of regional anesthesia has the potential to decrease unwanted and at times dangerous side effects of opiate use and resource utilization of procedural sedation while optimizing patient comfort.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia , Anestesia de Conducción , Bloqueo Nervioso , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor , Nervio Ciático/diagnóstico por imagen , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto Joven
5.
J Emerg Med ; 61(5): 574-580, 2021 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34916056

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Acute pain is one of the most common complaints encountered in the emergency department (ED). Single-injection peripheral nerve blocks are a safe and effective pain management tool when performed in the ED. Dexamethasone has been explored as an adjuvant to prolong duration of analgesia from peripheral nerve blocks in peri- and postoperative settings; however, data surrounding the use of dexamethasone for ED-performed nerve blocks are lacking. CASE SERIES: In this case series we discuss our experience with adjunctive perineural dexamethasone in ED-performed regional anesthesia. Why Should an Emergency Physician be Aware of This?: Nerve blocks performed with adjuvant perineural dexamethasone may be a safe additive to provide analgesia beyond the expected half-life of local anesthetic alone. Prospective studies exploring the role of adjuvant perineural dexamethasone in ED-performed nerve blocks are needed. © 2021 Elsevier Inc.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia de Conducción , Dexametasona , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Nervios Periféricos , Estudios Prospectivos
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(10): 2245.e3-2245.e5, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513452

RESUMEN

The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has created diagnostic uncertainty with regards to distinguishing this infection from pulmonary embolism (PE). Although there appears to be an increased incidence of thromboembolic disease in patients with COVID-19 infection, recommendations regarding anticoagulation are lacking. We present the case of a 61-year-old woman with clinically significant venous and arterial thromboemboli in the setting of COVID-19 infection requiring tissue plasminogen activator (tPA).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno/metabolismo , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico , Dolor Abdominal/etiología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Tromboembolia/etiología
7.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(7): 1542.e1-1542.e3, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32273141

RESUMEN

The outbreak of a novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been of concern to health care workers (HCW's) in the emergency department (ED) due to potential exposure and transmission. This case report describes a man who was referred to the ED for abdominal and testicular pain who was subsequently found to test positive for COVID-19. Due to the lack of respiratory symptoms, proper protective equipment (PPE) was not donned, and it led to several patients and health care workers being exposed. Given recent new descriptions of patients who present atypically, full PPE for all patients may be considered as community spread increases.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Abdominal/etiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Personal de Salud , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Enfermedades Testiculares/etiología , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infección Hospitalaria/virología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Control de Infecciones , Masculino , Pandemias , Equipo de Protección Personal , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(9): 1792-1795, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738473

RESUMEN

Sciatic radicular back pain is a painful condition resulting in approximately 2% of emergency department (ED) visits a year. Typically, the ED treatment has been limited to various analgesic regimens with limited success sometimes resulting in hospital admissions for pain control. Regional anesthesia has become increasing popular for lower-limb analgesia, but has not universally permeated the ED setting. The transgluteal sciatic nerve block (TGSNB) is a procedure that can provide effective analgesia for lower extremity pain. Herein, we present the first technical description and clinical response to ultrasound-guided TGSNB performed by emergency physicians for acute pain control of sciatic back pain through a series of cases.


Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Dolor de Espalda/tratamiento farmacológico , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Radiculopatía/tratamiento farmacológico , Nervio Ciático , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Adulto , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor
9.
J Emerg Med ; 59(3): 409-412, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32534859

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster (HZV) is a painful vesicular rash that occurs after reactivation in immunosuppressed patients. Analgesia in this patient population has been notoriously difficult. The serratus anterior and erector spinae plane block have both been described as effective thoracic analgesic techniques, but data are limited on their use in HZV. CASE REPORT: A middle-aged man with a history of hypertension and hyperlipidemia presented to the emergency department (ED) with chest and back pain associated with cutaneous rash. Traditional pain regimens were not effective; therefore, a serratus anterior plane block was performed using 25 mL of 0.25% of bupivacaine. The patient's pain decreased from 10 to 2 in 20 min and the patient was discharged without further analgesia. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: As opiate use decreases in prevalence and utility in the ED, alternatives to analgesia are sought. We describe the technique of regional anesthesia using a serratus anterior plane block as another modality that physicians can use to address HZV-related pain.


Asunto(s)
Herpes Zóster , Bloqueo Nervioso , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Herpes Zóster/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrasonografía Intervencional
10.
J Emerg Med ; 59(4): 515-520, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32713618

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lung point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a critical tool for evaluating patients with dyspnea in the emergency department (ED), including patients with suspected coronavirus disease (COVID)-19. However, given the threat of nosocomial disease spread, the use of ultrasound is no longer risk free. OBJECTIVE: Here, we review the lung POCUS findings in patients with COVID-19. In doing so we present a scanning protocol for lung POCUS in COVID-19 that maximizes clinical utility and provider safety. DISCUSSION: In COVID-19 lung, POCUS findings are predominantly located in the posterior and lateral lung zones bilaterally. A six-zone scanning protocol that prioritizes obtaining images in these locations optimizes provider positioning, and minimizes time spent scanning, which can reduce risk to health care workers performing POCUS. CONCLUSIONS: Lung POCUS can offer valuable clinical data when evaluating patients with COVID-19. Scanning protocols such as that presented here, which target clinical utility and decreased nosocomial disease spread, must be prioritized.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagen , Protocolos Clínicos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Control de Infecciones/normas , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Ultrasonografía/normas , Humanos , Posicionamiento del Paciente , SARS-CoV-2 , Administración de la Seguridad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA