Implementation of type 1 diabetes genetic risk screening in children in diverse communities: the Virginia PrIMeD project.

BACKGROUND: Population screening for risk of type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been proposed to identify those with islet autoimmunity (presence of islet autoantibodies). As islet autoantibodies can be transient, screening with a genetic risk score has been proposed as an entry into autoantibody testing. METHODS: Children were recruited from eight general pediatric and specialty clinics across Virginia with diverse community settings. Recruiters in each clinic obtained informed consent/assent, a medical history, and a saliva sample for DNA extraction in children with and without a history of T1D. A custom genotyping panel was used to define T1D genetic risk based upon associated SNPs in European- and African-genetic ancestry. Subjects at "high genetic risk" were offered a separate blood collection for screening four islet autoantibodies. A follow-up contact (email, mail, and telephone) in one half of the participants determined interest and occurrence of subsequent T1D. RESULTS: A total of 3818 children aged 2-16 years were recruited, with 14.2% (n = 542) having a "high genetic risk." Of children with "high genetic risk" and without pre-existing T1D (n = 494), 7.0% (34/494) consented for autoantibody screening; 82.4% (28/34) who consented also completed the blood collection, and 7.1% (2/28) of them tested positive for multiple autoantibodies. Among children with pre-existing T1D (n = 91), 52% (n = 48) had a "high genetic risk." In the sample of children with existing T1D, there was no relationship between genetic risk and age at T1D onset. A major factor in obtaining islet autoantibody testing was concern over SARS-CoV-2 exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive saliva sampling implemented using a genetic risk score can identify children at genetic risk of T1D. Consent for autoantibody screening, however, was limited largely due to the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and need for blood collection.

Focused ultrasound thalamotomy in Parkinson disease: Nonmotor outcomes and quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: To examine nonmotor outcomes and correlates of quality of life (QoL) 3 and 12 months after unilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy in tremor-dominant Parkinson disease (TDPD). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with TDPD in a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trial underwent comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations. These included assessment of mood, behavior, and QoL at baseline, 3 months, 3 months post crossover in the sham group, and 12 months after active treatment. We used Mann-Whitney U tests to assess differences between the active (n = 20) and sham (n = 7) groups at 3 months and Friedman tests to assess within-group changes after active treatment. We assessed correlations between disease variables and postoperative QoL using Kendall tau-b tests. RESULTS: There were no differences in cognition, mood, or behavior between the active and sham groups at 3-month blinded assessment. After active treatment, there were no differences in mood or behavior. Only declines in Stroop Color Naming and phonemic fluency were observed. Patients experienced postoperative improvements in QoL and activities of daily living (ADL). Mood and behavioral symptoms, aspects of cognitive functioning, ADL, and overall motor symptom severity, but not tremor severity specifically, were associated with QoL. CONCLUSIONS: In TDPD, unilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy appears safe from a cognitive, mood, and behavioral perspective. QoL and ADL significantly improved following surgery. Nonmotor symptoms and ADL were more closely associated with QoL than tremor severity. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with TDPD, unilateral focused ultrasound thalamotomy did not adversely change cognition, mood, or behavior at 3 months.